By bye Phorm, we all hate you ayway.
Phorm shares continue to fall today, dropping another 11.5 per cent on top of the 25 per cent they fell yesterday, as another partner distanced itself from the technology. CarphoneWarehouse's ISP TalkTalk played down its links to the ad tech developer a day after BT's announcement that it was abandoning trials. Charles …
Won't put up with this; unless it's done by their government to protect them from North Korea.
Never underestimate the investors in Phorm or the directors ingenuity. I would have terminated my contract with BT had they gone live with it but they might have been able to persuade some government that ISPs could offer lower cost broadband in exchange for forced tailored advertising.
Which to die totally first... SCO or Phorm?
Fun watching them squirm around anyway... I love hearing PR people try and dig themselves out of a hole, hilarious for those of us living in the real world. Already waiting with baited breath what they'll come up with after BT and TalkTalk have scampered off into the distance...
***"We were only going to do it if BT did it and if the whole industry was doing it. We were not interested enough to do it on our own.”***
Noooo, I don't suppose you would. Naughty *little* boys won't do something that will get them into trouble if the big kid has chickened out.
I think that comment illustrates that the ISPs involved know that the legality of Phorm is (was) borderline at best.
... by 250p.
Look Phorm, you were never a real company were you? Just a bunch of hackers and no-moral idiots with the opinion that making money is the be all and end all of everything regardless of how it's done. Just give up and try doing something truly useful instead!
It's great watching the demise of phorm, so utterly satisfying.
Friday shares closed at 475p - todays shares have closed at less than half that at 233p. 2 days and it's lost half it's value.
All we need now is for VM to jump ship and leave it to sink with the rats on board. As for the Hoon who left BT to go work for them....epic fail, bet your colleagues are having a good giggle over that.
Even if Phorm dies or is renamed or bought by someone else, DPI still now exists and someone out there clearly want to exploit it against everyone else. We need it clearly stated that DPI is already totally illegal and any company trying to implement DPI is instantly breaking the law and totally closed down and its directors thrown in jail. Nothing less. Fines are meaningless This is an attempt to achieve wholesale abuse of an entire population in a supposedly free country and this corruption must go to the very top. Who has been looking the other way? ... and why and what do they get out of turning a blind eye to Phorm? ... This is England, not China!
What arrogant, self serving, greedy narcissistics are behind allowing Phorm to go unpunished this long? ... they need to be found and stopped. This abuse of technology has gone far enough. Even if Phorm dies the fact still remains that Phorm style companies have the same story as some of the worst self righteous, self serving, MPs. The call that we must use new technology when it becomes available. Phorm style companies and MPs need to learn that just because we now have ever more technology to abuse peoples privacy, that doesn't mean that's the right thing to keep on doing ever more.
So there are still very serious questions to be answered about who has been allowing Phorm style companies to continue. Phorm is a truly shocking display of greed at the expense of everyone else, with utter contempt for personal freedom and privacy. There is no freedom in a world where a minority choose to spy 247 on everyone else, but then someone has been gaining to allow Phorm to get away with it this far.
The principle that with great power comes great responsibility seems to be totally lost on MPs. Their take on it is with ever greater power comes ever greater power to control and manipulate others to exploit them ever more. There has to be a limit beyond which the abuse becomes intolerable for an entire population. At that point they trigger a revolution against them. With ever increasing technological progress, if we don't make a stand soon against continued abuses of technology, then we are running into a nightmare world where a minority abuse the majority for their own gain, without any way of pleading with the self righteous rulers to stop and treat others with compassion and empathy. The narcissistics in society will happily abuse technology as far as they can take it and so we need new laws to protect against their ever growing abuses of ever increasing power. The creation of Phorm is proof the narcissistics cannot be trusted to treat other human beings with empathy and so even if Phorm dies now, the technology is still continuing to improve. We need legal battle lines drawn up against the rampant and ever growing abuse of new technology as an ever more powerful tool to abuse others for their own gain.
If we fail society is heading into a nightmare, ruled by an ever more powerful narcissistic power class, manipulating and controlling everyone for their own gain at the expense of everyone else and like all narcissistics unable to see themselves as wrong and so wrongfully assuming everyone against them is wrong. In which case we get no way to stop their abuses of power because they will not listen. Some fairness has to be put back into the system or this abuse of power is going to continue to get ever worse.
The creation of Phorm is a warning not just now but for the future. This heartless greedy narcissistic minority have shown there is no limit to their intentions to abuse others for their own gain. They are without empathy and so we need new laws to stop them.
Actually, a very valid comment from Charles Dunstone. The other side of the dastardly equation has often been forgotten, the advertisers Phorm needed to use OIX. Without BT, is there enough volume to make it worth advertisers considering placing adverts with OIX? Probably not...
Well, I am one of those sad gits that have DSL and cable.
I use my servers on DSL plus as a backup for when cable goes down (happens around once a week for 10 -40 min.)
I am generally very happy with virgin media, but if they are going phorm, I am going balistic, and willl take at least 18 consumer customers plus min. 10 business customers with me.
Reminds me of a Hammer House Of Horror episode where an old guy tap dances on the grave of his ex-wife and her fancy man (I think?). Maybe El Reg might want to run a competition for best on-grace dance or gesture for when Phorm do depart?
I'll throw in my lot with a Windsurfer (a move from Puppetry Of The Penis). Wonder if the PP guys would create a move named after Kent? After all, they did for the Duke Of Edinburgh and David Blaine.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
I dare you VM to sit on the fence for much longer or even take on board the nasty Phorm.
Go on you cowards, be brave and see how much money you can burn when you see the effect on the business, or lack of it, if you adopt this ill conceived DPI snooping.
Where is your backbone? One way or another you have to soon get off the fence. We are all watching.
*'Reasonable' including things such as not collecting personally identifiable information (signing up could require just an email address, no names); not sharing raw data with third parties, only aggregate or analyzed statistics; and other clauses found in the privacy policies of respectable institutions.
Do the right thing and kick these bastards so far into outer space we can't hear them scream, even with a radio telescope.
When they're dead and buried, I shall dig a small hole on top of their grave, and crap in it.
When I've filled the hole in, I shall light a fire on top, and dance around it... joined by everybody I know.
Please don't join them in that grave... you will if you persist in the folly of supporting them...
... Have BT actually come out and said Phork Off? If they did then I missed the announcement.
@Lupus (et al). VM have consistently said they're 'evaluating' this hellish brew, but has anyone seen anything emerge from this evaluation - surveys, plans, etc? Heck, if BT are now pulling back (and I left BT on the strength of their Phorming) and CPW are publicly saying 'no', then Virgin would have to be extremely "courageous" (in the sense of the word used in "Yes, Prime Minister") to proceed with it.
So I guess what's needed now is a push by Virgin customers to make damned sure that VM bosses realise that a contract with Phorm is nowt more than a commercial suicide note. Here's my tip - when you phone customer services for something else, mention Phorm, and make sure it's very obvious that you think it's a bad idea. The last CS person I spoke to not only knew about Phorm but volunteered the information that they'd been asked about it before, and "people seem to really hate it". A phrase to gladden the heart of the righteous! ;)
I've just renewed and extended my VM services but, like most here, they'll be getting cancellations of at least the broadband if they do go ahead with Phorm. However, personally I think this is most unlikely and Phorm - the bastard offspring of a snake oil seller and a communist secret policeperson - will die a slow, lingering, and totally justified death.
(Beer icon in honour of the glass that I'll raise when the doors are finally closed at Phorm).
John Sager wrote: "You could try shorting Phorm shares, but I think you would need a friendly broker to help you do that. The interesting thing is, if there is enough shorting activity, it becomes self-fulfilling and the price drops as everyone loses confidence."
I thought they had an anonymous backer that could lend them several million any time they wanted it? If that's the case then even short-selling might not be enough to make the mystery backer lose confidence.
It's good that they're dead but can someone please take the stinky corpse and bury it? I don't really think that there is much of a chance that Virgin Media are going to go along with Phorm. If they do then I'll be telling them exactly what I think of them and moving to a new ISP.
BT have said, they're not not using it because of privacy concerns but due to broadband upgrades and TV stuff, but I don't get that, I thought rolling out Webwise was just pure profit, especially considering they must have spent money upgrading their servers to work with Webwise already. VM said, "Over the last 18 months, Virgin Media has conducted a comprehensive technical and legal assessment of Phorm's technology and ...consumers' attitudes towards interest-based advertising..." so have any VM customers here been asked whether they want deep packet inspection for relevant advertising?
Ah, phuck it, yay! well done BT, even if the reasons given completely ignore your customers worries about privacy and integrity, you've at least done the right thing for the wrong reasons.
if they go ahead with Phorm or any such similar company. I did not know that VM had an 'understanding' with Phorm.
I left BT partly because of their dalliance with Phorm.
I fail to grasp why this interception technology has been allowed to go ahead without definitive legal and political restraint.
When I cancelled my VM account last week giving the reson for cancelling as due to their dealings with Phorm I was first put on hold and then told that VM are categorically not going to implement Phorm. I pointed out the page about their dealings with Phorm on their own website, and said until it was official I was cancelling anyway. Here's hoping VM join the others in abandoning this insideous technology.
...on phormista number one's face even as I type. There's a particularly fine strain of guilty pleasure to revelling in another human being's pain when you just know, they really, really fucking deserve even last bit of it. Sadly they won't be the last, but someone is going to have large brass ones before they try the old "they're all thick so give 'em flannel" approach - no amount of formula grinning and optimistic spin gave this particular turd a shine to outweigh it's horrific stench.
To anyone working at phorm who should read this: up yours - make better choices next time, and reflect on your current ones in the break between CV mailing.
@MinionZero, Couldn't have said it better, but I would have sworn a lot more.
Pretty soon we'll be able to club together and buy them out? How about a whip-round, start a shell company and gain a majority share? :) I'd burn £50 just to see them fired from their own company before all IPR is burned, shredded and magnetically destroyed!
DIE PHORM DIE - god, it's like trying to flyspray a frickin' hornet, it's still squirming!
Somebody get the Dyson! Then we can suck it up and watch its' last squirms!
Slight flaw in your plan....
I'm on here for the pR0n, not just any pR0n, but the free stuff. Now why the hell would I want targeted advertising directing me to sites where I'd have to pay for my pR0n???
And....do they think I need help finding it? Um, ok, forget that, yes I do...but not for the content, I find it hard to type with both hands busy.....
Mine's the one with the handy 10 pack of man size tissues stuck in each pocket......
The original Phorm sales pitch used the phrase 'targeted advertising' which at some point became 'behavioural advertising' and has now suddenly morphed into the euphemistic 'interest based advertising'.
Where I come from a turd is a turd and no amount of marketing spiel can render it otherwise. It is 'DATA THEFT ADVERTISING' and it is still endorsed by a government near you.
You forget the plight of the non-OIX website owner under Phorm - whose website, and hard work in creating it, is plundered willy-nilly for the benefit of OIX advertisers, to the great detriment of the website plundered.
Even if the user who is browsing opts in, Phorm would only ever be equitable if the website owner was asked if he/she wanted to opt in also, and would be left alone, unprofiled, if not.
Something that Phorm could never pheasibly do.
I really couldn't be happier that now they are going to have to phuck off and die. Hooray!
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019