back to article The UNTOLD SUCCESS of Microsoft: Yes, it's Windows 7

Microsoft claims it has now sold more than 200 million Windows 8 licenses, in the first update to public sales claims it has offered since last May. Speaking at the Goldman Sachs Technology and Internet Conference in San Francisco on Thursday, Microsoft executive VP of marketing Tami Reller described the sales growth as " …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.

Page:

      1. Steve Todd

        Re: As a developer...

        From one code base? That's clever. AFIK you can't get Windows phone code to run in Metro and vice-versa. The two are subtly and annoyingly different. Providing your code works on Windows 7 you've dealt with 95% of your market for most software.

        1. WP7Mango

          Re: As a developer...

          Not one code base at the moment, but I do use portable class libraries wherever possible.

          I'm looking forward to the WP8.1 SDK because it looks like this will make it much easier to develop WP8.1 and W8 apps from a single code base.

      2. Daniel von Asmuth
        Windows

        Re: As a developer...

        I'm targeting Windows 2000 and later (desktop and laptop). Compatibility (Win32 API) is of the essence. Working on a 64-version for release later this year.

  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Do they include enterprise licences in those figures?

    We're on a volume agreement and get a significant number of Windows 8 licenses, along with 7, XP, Vista and the like, but we won't be using them.

    1. WP7Mango

      Re: Do they include enterprise licences in those figures?

      No, Volume Licensing was not included in those 200 million, according to Microsoft.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    open goal

    The new Microsoft guy must be rubbing his hands. It's an open goal in front of him.

    After Vista, MS just had to do a bit of tinkering to produce Windows 7 which is generally regarded as the best ever.

    It's pretty obvious what changes Windows 8 need, if MS had have listened to feedback on the pre-release versions, they'd have done this from the start:

    1. Put a proper start button back

    2. Have a proper start menu

    3. Don't force anything to full screen, don't split settings between desktop and full screen places.

    Basically if they really must have these Windows apps things, then just have it as something that can run in a Window within the normal desktop environment so people aren't forced out of their desktop.

    It doesn't need a huge amount of engineering or research to know what the problems are or to fix them. And as with Vista -> Windows 7, if they do a decent job, then they'll be able to sell it.

  3. Al.Kaholic
    Angel

    Clueless

    A huge percentage of Windows 8 licences are simply Windows 7 Professional with the Windows 8 sticker.

    Subtract those numbers and you're left with the cheap machines from big box stores purchased by people who did not know better. In the case of the truly clueless, Windows 8 can be useable for Facebook and webmail.

  4. Bob Camp

    Windows 8.1 isn't bad with a touch screen

    I find Windows 8.1 to have a split Metro/desktop personality, which is annoying at times. But my new notebook has a touch screen AND a touch pad. My wife, who is not very computer literate, took to the Metro interface right away using this notebook PC. When I use it, it's the best of both worlds -- I can just swipe to navigate as designed, yet I can also use the touchpad for accuracy and right click when I need to.

    One of my desktop PCs has Windows 7, and I'm not going to upgrade it to Windows 8 because I can't imagine navigating Metro without a touch screen while maintaining my sanity.

    The other desktop PC is happily running XP and will continue to do so until it stops working.

  5. Daniel von Asmuth
    Windows

    seven, eight, nine, Microsoft rules fine

    come April, all those old Windows versions can upgrade to XP, the Stable OS; mission accomplished!

  6. roselan

    meamwhile... xp growth beats windows 8

    At least according to netmarketshare, which can't be said to be anti ms to what I understand.

    Of course this is a ripple in the downward trend of xp, but still, it's telling... (xp usage is 5 times higher than win 8).

    Now we hear Nokia will do an amazon and release an android phone. Linux and chromeOs are free, OEM get paid for android (they receive part of google stores revenue). OSes are free like browsers now. For enterprise web apps becomes the norm. Services are king.

    It wouldn't surprise me if, in a few years, android or chromOs *hardware* is given for free, embedded with the ISP router, tv, nas, or even chromeboxes.

  7. bex

    yes but

    I really don't like the Modern UI (or whatever they are calling it now) on a desktop, it's a mess.

    That said if you circumnavigate the tiled interface the new desktop style makes windows 7 look old.

  8. Oldgroaner

    Win 7 is good enough. Why spend on new OS? Microsoft's idea -- we'll come up with something that means you have to unlearn everything for a decade or more -- and for non-touch desktop owners is incredibly inconvenient. This is our usp. We can't be bothered to implement improvements in speed, stability or security (Win 7 SP2) And now they wonder why Win 8 is seen as a rat sandwich (and death to many PC manufacturers).

  9. Grade%
    Windows

    Ye cannae 'ave my sweet, sweet Aero!

    We be usin' the Aero see, an' wi' no Aero in Windah8 but that mawkish fla' colour 'ard on de eyes it be no good. An we sit back an' look on ye monitor so to smear the screen wi' me greasy fingers be not very nice at all. And what be that App Store? Ye be makin' me ill wi' that.

    Ge way wid ye an' come back nay wi' out somaht good!

    1. mmeier

      Re: Ye cannae 'ave my sweet, sweet Aero!

      Ceterum censeo Aero esse delendam

      The code sown with salt, it's users scattererd into a diaspora or brought to the circus and it's developers cruxified along Microsoft road

      Just to be sure

  10. Zmodem

    are they going to fix security permissions not being inherited from the parent soon

    replace all permissions on child objects, only half works, and any directory that is a child you make a new file is will have no permissions

  11. Sub 20 Pilot

    I have to use Windows for my work, having to run several stupidly expensive software packages that cost me several thousand pounds a year to keep licensed and updated. I don't have the time or inclination to learn a whole new set of shortcuts, commands or whatever just to do my work.

    I am far from being stupid or dumb, before the usual commenters come up and tell me it is so easy to just learn dozens of shortcuts, install a pile of thirs party apps etc. I have several qualifications, including some very technical design stuff, a pilot's license and some medical qualifications. I have learnt how to deal with software through necessity as I am self emplpyed and don't have recourse to a huge IT department.

    The change from XP to Win 7 meant I had to spend days finding and testing a variety of solutions so that I didn't have to scrap a perfectly working A1 format colour plotter. This lost me hundreds if not thousands of pounds, for no reason other than having to buy a new pc.

    Microsoft are in the business of selling software, that is fine. I don't have an issue with them making billions of profit year after year if they can. I have to use their stuff for my work because so many of our governments have rolled over and let them get away with murder in their monopolistic practices in the last 20 years.

    For this reason, I accept, reluctantly, that I will have to give them more money when my PC next needs replacement. The issue I have is that they are forcing me to spend thousands on unneccesary hardware or software just to keep working.

    The final straw is this abortion of an OS that will cost me a small fortune in lost productivity, trying to resolve driver and hardware issues. Just make a basic OS and let me pay for it. I am happy to do so just in order to get on with my work.

    If I could get all of my software to run on Linux I would have done so but currently that is not possible. Roll on an alternative OS that can work with windows based software. either that or roll on retirement so I can dump the whole lot and buy a nice cheap laptop and an open source OS for basic email and browsing.

  12. James 51

    I have used 8.1 on a laptop with a touch screen and a desktop without a touch screen. It's just about bareable on the laptop but on the desktop, frustration kept smacking me up the side of the head as even simple tasks were needlessly complex. For anyone using a PC for work, I'd avoid like the plague, particularly if you don't have a touchscreen.

    Windows 8 natural home might be those 8" tablets that are coming out now. The messed up interface might work on a small touch screen. Put in a 64-bit copy with 4GB of RAM and a 2.5" SSD with at least one USB 3 port and they could be on to something.

    1. WP7Mango

      james51,

      That's what the Surface Pro 2 tablet is for. It has a 64-bit Haswell Intel Core i5 processor. You can choose either 4 GB or 8 GB RAM. You can choose either 64 GB / 128 GB / 256 GB / 512 GB SSD (mSATA). It has a USB 3.0 port, a Micro SD card slot, and a Mini Display port to drive multiple high-res external monitors. It has an integrated Wacom digitizer.

      I have the 8 GB RAM / 256 GB SSD version and yes Windows 8.1 works great on this kind of device. And because of the spec, I can even run a VM and virtualise a copy of Window 7 or XP on it if I need to use any old software.

      1. James 51

        Yeah, but the surface pro 2 is over £700. That's straying into ultrabook territory. That's at least £200 more than the 15 inch iCore 5 touch screen laptop with a lot of ram and a big hdd and a decent gpu that my wife bought a few months ago. £350 is the most I'd pay for convience of being able to carry my tablet in my bag and be able to use it to do some light work on as well.

        1. WP7Mango

          Yes, but the cheap laptop you speak of doesn't have a Wacom digitizer, it doesn't have 8GB RAM, and it doesn't have an SSD. The Surface Pro will significantly outperform it.

          Besides, I was just pointing out that the tablet spec you mentioned already exists, and the Surface Pro is just one example.

Page:

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like