back to article User stepped on mouse, complained pedal wasn’t making PC go faster

Welcome again to On-Call, The Register’s weekly column in which we provide a little therapy by letting readers share their stories of horror tech support entanglements. This week, met “Vince”, who “during 2002, unwittingly took on a contract with my local council to setup and operate a community cyber cafés.” Vince told us he …

Page:

          1. Mark 85

            Re: Reminds me of a story

            Ive noticed something with my kids and their friends.. they dont "click". They "tap".

            My late FIL, said it was "poke" as in "should I poke that icon?".

            1. Marcelo Rodrigues
              Trollface

              Re: Reminds me of a story

              "My late FIL, said it was "poke" as in "should I poke that icon?". "

              Never, EVER, poke an icon. It might slap You back! :D

            2. Bernard M. Orwell

              Re: Reminds me of a story

              "My late FIL, said it was "poke" as in "should I poke that icon?".

              Did he "peek" afterwards?

          2. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: Reminds me of a story

            Started looking for quality lawn ornaments?

        1. peter_dtm

          Re: Reminds me of a story

          @David Nash

          actually you "tap'' of “Press” or “Long Press” or maybe “Force Touch” - another incorrect instruction to the user

      1. cosmogoblin

        Re: Reminds me of a story

        Exactly. The cursor and mouse are separate, and a teacher shouldn't assume that they can use the shorthand of pretending they're the same with brand new students.

        After reading this story, it took me only a few seconds to come up with a game I think would help - a variation on the "wire loop" game (where you hold a metal loop and move it along a winding wire, avoiding letting them touch). Use the mouse to move a sprite around a maze without it touching the sides, and click when you reach the end. 5 levels, increasing in difficulty, should give almost anybody the basics - and help to embed the concept of physical objects equating to virtual ones.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      It was funny but she did learn stuff there.

      There is a very steep learning curve with anything completely new - and using a computer really has no analogue in the real world for people born before the computer age.

      More power to them all.

      1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

        Re: It was funny but she did learn stuff there.

        "people born before the computer age."

        There aren't that many left alive. The computer age is older than you think.

        1. Ken Hagan Gold badge

          Re: It was funny but she did learn stuff there.

          "There aren't that many left alive. The computer age is older than you think."

          The computer age for nerds dates from WW2. The computer age for normal people started around about 1990. Most people over 50, of which there are quite a few left, probably had their first serious encounters with a computer in adulthood. Those over 75, and there's a few of those left too, may have decided at the time that this was a young person's thing and they'd give it a miss. Only now, with the government full of spotty teenagers who can't believe anyone could not want to do everything on the web with their smartphone, do that generation realise that this might have been a bad call.

          1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

            Re: It was funny but she did learn stuff there.

            "The computer age for normal people started around about 1990."

            As a domestic, single user device, maybe. But many normal people were sitting at green screens (or orange ones if you wanted to be ergonomic) in offices well before then. Before that they'd maybe have been filling in sheets for data entry clerks to enter into punch cards and getting computer-printed pay slips.

            "Those over 75, and there's a few of those left too, may have decided at the time that this was a young person's thing and they'd give it a miss."

            I'm not quite 75 yet but by the time the first practical micro-driven devices came out, say late '70s. I was in my 40s. Well before the teenagers were playing with their Spectra of C64s I could see just what this could do for lab instrumentation when there wasn't a budget for PDPs or Novas and setting them to work.

            The computer age began well before you think.

          2. ricardian

            Re: It was funny but she did learn stuff there.

            I was born in 1943 and first encountered a computer in 1985 when working for a large Government department with HQ in Cheltenham. The computer was a Commodore Pet which, together with Raeto West's invaluable handbook, enabled 2 or 3 of us to produce some useful programs in 6502 assembler - despite all the Scientific Officers looking down their noses as they produced similar programs in high level language on their PDP machines. A year or so later we got the first IBM PC and an Aztec "C" compiler and never looked back!

          3. kiwimuso
            WTF?

            Re: It was funny but she did learn stuff there.

            @ Ken Hagan

            "The computer age for nerds dates from WW2. The computer age for normal people started around about 1990....."

            Good God! How old are you! The computer age started to go mainstream at the very least, by the early 60s. I was writing RPG (ugghh!), Assembler, and later PL/I since 1966 for a bank first of all, then later after skiving off to the UK, more Assembler, COBOL, then later again 8086 assembler.

            I agree that it started way earlier than that, but that's when it became mainstream - even here in New Zealand. My first job at the (savings) bank was for an online banking system, which incidentally was waaayyy before the Poms, judging by the banking system there in the early 70s.

            I might add, that if the oldies didn't get it, I would suggest that was more the fault of the instructor rather than the pupils. If you have never struck a concept before, then saying "click on an icon" is totally meaningless, as is expecting anyone to know instinctively what a mouse was and how to use it. I knew a bloke once (a lawyer, so entirely thick) who was never shown how to use one, but managed to eventually work it out for himself. The only thing was, he held the mouse back to front, with the "tail" trailing over the front of the desk. Consequently any instruction to "right" or "left" click was totally arse about face for him.

            Happily retired now and nearly 75, there are some modern concepts that people take for granted that I sometimes have a struggle with. Being used to a Samsung tablet and an Android phone, both with home and back buttons, I recently purchased an iPad which of course only has a single button, and of course these days no user manual to get you going. I am still learning new stuff on it because it operates quite differently to Android. Swipe up from the bottom of the screen to switch to another open app (amongst other things). Oh yeah, totally intuitive. I figured it out because I worked out that there had to be an easy way, so tried all sorts of gestures, swipes etc, until stumbling upon it.

            Incidentally an "intuitive" interface is all in the eye of the beholder. If you've written the interface then of course it's intuitive. Not so much for other people. I still have problems with a lot of website interfaces which in my humble opinion are a pile of garbage. It is also NOT clever to put yellow writing on a light brown background or vice versa. And there are several other colour combinations that do not work all that well either.

            But then what would I know. I've only had over 40 years experience or writing software, designing interfaces, and learning how people handle such things. First rule, do not assume that you know what works for people, just because you understand it.

            BTW why is El Reg using an American dictionary in a UK publication? It just flagged up "colour" which everyone knows is the correct spelling despite the efforts of some to "simplify" English.

            1. kiwimuso

              Re: It was funny but she did learn stuff there.

              "I knew a bloke once (a lawyer, so entirely thick)"

              That should have been, of course, NOT entirely thick, but on reflection maybe my original mis-comment was correct.

        2. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

          Re: It was funny but she did learn stuff there.

          "There aren't that many left alive."

          That reminds me, The Times last weekend carried an obit. of Tim Berners-Lee's mother who seems to have had in interesting computing career of her own back in the earlyish days. It's a pity el Reg didn't pick up on that.

      2. Updraft102

        Re: It was funny but she did learn stuff there.

        "There is a very steep learning curve with anything completely new "

        That means that at first, a tiny bit of effort and learning results in a huge gain in proficiency, and that it happens very fast.

    2. Faceless Man

      Re: Reminds me of a story

      It reminds me of one of our "top" programmers back in the day, when I did desktop support, he'd decided that to avoid Occupational Overuse in his arm from his mouse, he'd put it on the floor and use his foot. He attached little foam pads to make it easier to tell where the buttons were, and everything.

      Of course, it made it difficult for anyone else to work on his computer, made the mouse gunge up even faster than normal, and he eventually got told off by our Workplace Health and Safety people for basically being an idiot.

  1. frank ly

    Pressing the foot pedal

    Hindsight is wonderful, if you can have it. Perhaps he could have made an introductory video, showing himself or a friend using a computer and pointing out the 'important bits' and how they are used.

    You only realise that certain problems can even exist after you encounter them.

    1. BoldMan

      Re: Pressing the foot pedal

      ... and how would you get them to watch the video... "click on the video button"...

      1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

        Re: Pressing the foot pedal

        and how would you get them to watch the video... "click on the video button"

        Perhaps, like the grannies who've never seen a computer mouse, you've never encountered this thing called a"projector".

    2. dave 81
      Facepalm

      Re: Pressing the foot pedal

      > Perhaps he could have made an introductory video, showing himself or a friend using a computer and pointing out the 'important bits' and how they are used.

      Nice idea in principle Frank Ly, but in practice, I have tried to train people who could watch someone perform the most simplistic task, (move the mouse and push the button) and be utterly unable to replicate the task without massive amounts of instructions and reassurance. Then once they have finally mastered the task, and need to repeat it the next day to actually open an application, the mouse is yet again scraping across the screen. I kid you not.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Pressing the foot pedal

        No offence... but both lack of experience applies to us all at times and I would assume a ton on early onset dementia is much more likely than we realise!

  2. chivo243 Silver badge
    Boffin

    Hey Gran!

    It's not a sewing machine!

    1. DuchessofDukeStreet

      Re: Hey Gran!

      Nor is it a dictation foot pedal she may have used as a typist to control playback of audio tapes - although it's quite similar in shape and appearance.

      1. 's water music
        Happy

        Re: Hey Gran!

        Nor is it a dictation foot pedal she may have used as a typist to control playback of audio tapes

        or playback of digital audio files on a PC for audio typists. I dream of one day seeing a deskside support person attempt to use such a device as a mouse.

        1. Peter2 Silver badge

          Re: Hey Gran!

          Some years ago I taught a ninety something year old to use a computer. She wanted to have a computer to communicate with her great, great grandchildren who are obviously more used to emails etc for sending messages and pictures than using snailmail.

          Frankly, it wasn't particually difficult. In fact, i've had more problems teaching pointy haired bosses, because she accepted full well that she didn't know and just listened to what she was told. Getting her used to the mouse was perhaps the most difficult task, but acheived by shoving the sensitivity to the lowest possible and then introducing her to a "whack a mole" type flash game.

          A week later she'd gotten pretty good at that flash game and I was boosing the sensitivity on the mouse somewhat and showing her how to do that as she got more used to it. The only problem she ran into was that she'd been saving documents over the top of each other, but grasped the concept of a file system pretty quickly when it was explained.

          Ultimately the oldest people alive now grew up in a country where transport was done with horse and cart, with the odd rich guy with one of those newfangled cars and really well off businesses with a van. Steam engines were still being used in fields for the harvest. Gas lighting was the new thing, and the toilets were at the end of the garden somewhere near the outdoor pump for getting water. She'd lived through two world wars and seen the development and deployment of interior running water, electricity, television, computers and the internet. Now, bearing this in mind, why do you think older generations have trouble grasping new concepts?

          As so long as things are put sensibly to them in my experiance they don't have any significant trouble grasping new things.

          1. phuzz Silver badge

            Re: Hey Gran!

            "the toilets were at the end of the garden somewhere near the outdoor pump for getting water"

            Hopefully not too near...

          2. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

            Re: Hey Gran!

            "Gas lighting was the new thing"

            Errr. How old do you think the oldest people still alive are? Pushing towards the second century?

            Gas lighting still having been a thing, however, is quite realistic. We had gas lighting in the house I grew up in until we moved just before I was 14.

            1. H in The Hague

              Re: Hey Gran!

              "Gas lighting still having been a thing, however, is quite realistic."

              There are still areas in London with gas street lights (with gas mantles), spotted them earlier this week. And the Theatre Royal Bristol still had gas emergency lighting (fishtail burners) into the 1990s I think.

              1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

                Re: Hey Gran!

                Theatre Royal Bristol still had gas emergency lighting

                "In case of" or "the cause of" ?

              2. J P

                Re: Hey Gran!

                There are something like 1,500 gas lamps still running in central London (mostly round Covent Garden & the Mall, I suspect primarily for aesthetic reasons) and also one still running on sewer gas - ironically, just out the back of the Savoy Theatre which of course was the first electrically lit public building in the world.

    2. Dave 126 Silver badge

      Re: Hey Gran!

      And yet sewing machine foot pedals made in the 1980s do look like big beige mice! And a beige PC case is roughly the same size as a beige sewing machine.

      There's possibly a deeper lesson about user experience here, specifically Information Ergonomics, muscle memory and Alzheimer's.

      Why would the foot pedal be in the desk at the start of the session? Some mothers would pick up the pedal to stop toddlers sitting on it.

      The other possibility was that the old lady knew exactly what she was doing and just reckoned that winding up the computer guy was a splendid bit of sport!

      1. allthecoolshortnamesweretaken

        Re: Hey Gran!

        Yup.

        (squints ) "Not sure if senior moment or expert trolling."

        1. Peter2 Silver badge

          Re: Hey Gran!

          WIth regards to gas lighting being new to her, she said they were using (fuel burning?) lamps in the early part of her life and as she lived it then she's a primary source, rather than a secondary source like a textbook. (or me, passing on my recollections of what she said)

          Presumably like high speed broadband high population and affluant areas got gas lighting first and lower population areas in the rest of the country didn't get it installed until much later, or the alternatives were cheaper.

          I don't really know, and frankly don't really care too much. My point was simply that older generations are provably quite used to dealing with major change, and can easily accept a few more changes if taught decently and respectfully. You can learn new things from them, as well.

          I also hope that if i'm reasonable with the older generations today then when i'm ninety something then somebody born in a few decades time might be as patient with me.

  3. Potemkine! Silver badge

    If somebody does not understand...

    then the one who explains does not his/her job correctly.

    It's up the teacher to find the way to be understood, whatever his/her audience. A teacher unable to do that should think about a quick carrier change, it would be the best for his/her poor students.

    1. Justin Case

      Re: If somebody does not understand...

      >>....should think about a quick carrier change

      Like from FedEx to DPD?

      Just askin'

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: If somebody does not understand...

        It could be referring to a pigeon?

    2. Elmer Phud

      Re: If somebody does not understand...

      Thus speaks someone who has NEVER experience the joys of training non-tech people (and managers in tech companies).

      Ah, if only life was so easy.

      1. sandman

        Re: If somebody does not understand...

        Oh God yes, I've been training/supporting people for more years than I care to remember and some of them seem to be utterly incapable of learning - well, anything new. At one company, I used to hold the chief executives hand and move and click the mouse for them when they were video-conferencing. Because they only did it once a month, they would forget how between sessions (no, the printed (large font and pictures) user guide on the desk next to them didn't help). Possibly they just liked me holding their hand of course. ;-)

        1. Dave 126 Silver badge

          Re: If somebody does not understand...

          Urgh! Transferring photos from a camera to a PC often involves so many unnecessary steps! Even 'Make device safe to remove' involves one more click than it should, and half the time, after a pause, decides not to work because a window is still open. I hate it.

          For many people, looking after photos is a primary reason for using a PC. Thank heavens many find phones are adequate for family snaps (and many phones are far better that the digital cameras many people were using a dozen years ago).

    3. joeldillon

      Re: If somebody does not understand...

      Alright, go teach a classroom of 5 year olds the general theory of relativity.

      Sometimes the subject/audience disconnect is too wide to be bridged. That's not the teacher's fault.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: If somebody does not understand...

        "Alright, go teach a classroom of 5 year olds the general theory of relativity."

        A professorial friend maintains that his sons grasped the Theory of Relativity at the age of 8 - far better than did his new undergraduate students.

        There was a story - possibly by Charles Dodgson (Lewis Carroll) - about an alien device suddenly appearing in a household (think wormhole). It looked like beads on wires - but if you moved a bead it would often go to an unexpected position. The learned father could not work it out - but the children happily played with it. Eventually the youngest child appeared to have mastered the predictions - and then he and the device suddenly disappeared.

        1. MarkB

          Re: If somebody does not understand... Children and relativity

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mimsy_Were_the_Borogoves

          1. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: If somebody does not understand... Children and relativity

            "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mimsy_Were_the_Borogoves"

            Thanks for that link. The Lewis Padgett story has the right plot line - and the right cues for my possible memory key of "Lewis Carroll". Unfortunately many of the details do not ring any bells - as if I originally read a much shorter form of the story 40 years ago. The sci-fi section of my bookcases was down-sized many years ago - so it is unlikely that I still have the appropriate anthology.

          2. BostonEddie

            Re: If somebody does not understand... Children and relativity

            Mimsy were the borogoves--a similar story but not that one. I'd bet it was by the same author who's name I'll remember as soon as I close.

        2. cynic 2
          Thumb Up

          Re: If somebody does not understand...

          Lewis Padgett : "Mimsy Were the Borogoves"

        3. KLane

          Re: If somebody does not understand...

          The story was "Mimsy were the Borogroves" by Lewis Padgett.

          From Wikipedia:

          Mimsy Were the Borogoves" is a science fiction short story by Lewis Padgett originally published in the February 1943 issue of Astounding Science Fiction Magazine.

          1. BostonEddie

            Re: If somebody does not understand...

            "Mimsy" isn't quite the same story, but it's close. Mimsy (and the Momsy raiths upgab) was about a baby upgraded by transdimentional aliens to an superntelligent baby who, being a baby and never disciplined, was a pain in the butt. Eventually Baby fools with a gizmo and is...I forget...either reduced to a true baby or vanishes completely. I remember it from Tales of Time and Space, my constant companion for the past 55 years.

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Headmaster

        Re: "Teach a class of 5 year olds general relativity"

        Easy! Trampoline and some tennis balls/foot balls etc.

        Next challenge?

      3. David Nash Silver badge

        Re: If somebody does not understand...

        "Sometimes the subject/audience disconnect is too wide to be bridged. That's not the teacher's fault."

        But not in this case. Teaching an adult human how to use certain technology they are unfamiliar with is not comparable to teaching a 5-year old relativity.

    4. wiggers

      Re: If somebody does not understand...

      I've taught and helped maybe a dozen 'silver surfers', but one lady defeated me. All she wanted to do was transfer photos from her camera to her computer and organise them. During the first session she seemed to be doing well, taking notes to remind herself. Got a call a couple of weeks later and she was struggling to find and open Windows Explorer. After two more teaching sessions I had to admit defeat. Her recall after only a few minutes was gone, even with her notes.

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like