Yuk
Well I tried it. Not too impressed. Faster than any other browser? It's lagging like a seventies teletype as I write. I feel like I'm writing the Grandstand pools results.
And the boast about 1.7s against 1.9s to render a page (or whatever the Apple site says) - who ever times a page loading? It's invariably not a slow browser that makes the net appear slow.
And I'm a happy Windows (Vista!) user and I'm no MS apologist - but why must Apply force its UI on Windows users. I'd like my computer to look like it's the same, thanks. I guess Steve HATES apps that break the OSX UI. Amusingly I note its Safari site only features XP as the Windows desktop of choice.
BUT WORST OF ALL - THE FONTS. I assume it's using its own rendering engine, cuz it looks sh1t. And I meant to type "shit" there - maybe I did, I can't tell. A 1 looks just like an I. It's like my laptop is running at the wrong resolution. Jesus, the arrogance of Apple is what does me in. A corporate "can do" attitude I can accept. A corporate "f*ck you" attitude I can't. (That WAS an asterisk.)
You've got 10% of the desktop market. Live with it. While you make your own machines and sell them at a premium with an attitude to go with it, you'll never get beyond that. 90% of the people vote with their wallets before their brains.
You've gone Intel, you've released a Windows browser, why not just take the next step and release the OS to the "native Windows" x86 market fullstop? Don't even worry about legacy hardware - just support Vista-only kit. THEN I might respect your balls, Jobs. If you do that, you'll have achieved something, and might break out beyond decimating the opposition...
PS The scrollbar doesn't work in WinSafari, just noticed as I read what I wrote. No visual feedback, you UI snob.