back to article Experts build AI joke machine that's about as funny as an Adam Sandler movie (that bad)

Researchers in Japan have tried to build an artificially intelligent system to make people laugh – but, surprise, surprise, the jokes it told were terrible. The “Neural Joking Machine” (NJM) was created by computer scientists from Tokyo Denki University and the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology …

Page:

  1. Richard Scratcher

    Comedy versus tragedy

    Instead of trying to build an artificially intelligent system to make people laugh, they should build one that makes people cry. Computers are already good at that. Who can forget the old classic that, even to this day, still brings a tear to my eye...

    Not ready reading drive A

    Abort, Retry, Fail?

    1. Alumoi Silver badge

      Re: Comedy versus tragedy

      Keyboard not found, Press F1 to continue

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    The only thing worse than an Adam Sandler movie is a Ben Stiller movie.

    I have recurring nightmares where I'm on a long haul flight trapped at the window seat by a really fat bloke and the only thing playing on the entertainment system in a Ben stiller movie that can't be switched off.

    1. Charlie Clark Silver badge

      Ben Stiller's stand-up can be very good. But the translation to film often fails.

  3. onefang
    FAIL

    '“Laughter is a special, higher-order function that only humans possess,” they wrote in a paper emitted online this week. It’s something that is difficult to quantitatively measure, but they gave it a shot anyway.'

    I'm always annoyed at "X is something that only humans do" nonsense. Especially for something that is "difficult to quantitatively measure". Almost all boil down to "we never bothered to check if any other animal can do X, but we state without a doubt that only human animals does X". You can often find research that shows that other animals do indeed do X.

    1. Charlie Clark Silver badge

      A couple of series of The Infinite Monkey Cage debunked this when one of the panelists discussed laughter among her lab rats, including things like anticipatory laughter when she entered the room. So, yeah the premise of the research is flawed: humour == laughter.

      1. VikiAi

        I know from personal experience that Australian Magpies, while not physically able to laugh, are quite capable of a corvid equivalent. - A tiding of about 6 magpies (typical tribe size), sitting in a line of a fence watching a stupid pee-wee trying to do a typically Magpie swoop (on me) and reacting with obvious shared amusement when it failed spectacularly!

  4. Teiwaz

    Well....

    If they managed to get funding for this nonsense, then at least they are laughing.

  5. TRT Silver badge
  6. onefang

    At least the AI found the jokes funny, so there's that.

  7. Cuddles

    Not a good start

    "Laughter is a special, higher-order function that only humans possess"

    Laughter is common among primates, and there's decent evidence for similar behaviour (ie. enjoyment coupled with specific vocalisations) in plenty of other animals. Look up videos of things like crows giggling to themselves while tobogganing and try to convince yourself it's meaningfully different from human laughter.

    Perhaps people attempting to study behaviour should learn at least the basics before diving in and trying to publish meaningful results. It seems particularly odd in a case like this where the goal is essentially to reproduce human-equivalent behaviour or intelligence; failing to understand what "human-equivalent" might actually mean really isn't a good start.

    1. Robert Helpmann??
      Childcatcher

      Re: Not a good start

      The “Neural Joking Machine” (NJM) was created by computer scientists from Tokyo Denki University and the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology to see if humor could be automatically generated and studied academically.

      If this doesn't sound like the setup to a really lame joke, I don't know what it is. Word of advice to the researchers, if you have to explain the joke, it's not funny. If you have to explain how to tell the joke, too, it was never going to be funny.

  8. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Humour and Japanese

    The Vicar at the chuirch I used to attend once went to visit churches in Japan we had links with via a Japanese missionary who had attend our church in th epast. When there he preached at services with the this contact translating into Japanese for the listeners. During one talk he was telling one of the jokes he used but as he told it he realized the humour depended on a combination of the Englsh words used and the meaning in different contexts so he was surprised to get lots of laughs at the end. After the service he raised this with his interpreter and said how surprised he'd been that they got the jjoke - only to get the reply "Japanese people aere very polite and would not want to embarrass a visitor so I told them that you were telling an english joke and could they please laugh at the end"

  9. Updraft102

    I am Funnybot!

    ...crickets.

    Awkward!

  10. Sam Therapy

    “Laughter is a special, higher-order function that only humans possess,”

    Starting from an incorrect premise is always going to give dodgy results. Laughter is derived from the standard fear response of other primates. There is evidence to suggest human laugher is still an involuntary fear response, since many jokes depend on the unexpected, or the subject being placed in an uncomfortable situation.

    1. Charlie Clark Silver badge

      I thought research was suggesting that laughter fulfills a social function and is not restricted to primates.

      Certain forms of humour do rely on fear – Feydeau said that the difference between farce and tragedy is timing – as exemplified in slapstick: we anticipate the custard pie or the anvil… That is laughter and humour are related but not the same.

  11. Jason Bloomberg Silver badge

    Take it round some jaffa cakes.

    It’ll be a long while yet before Alexa, Siri, or Google Home can make us laugh

    I don't know; "I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that" might hit the spot at the appropriate time.

    Humour's a fickle thing. I've watched entire episodes of comedy sitcoms without exercising a single face muscle and they are written by teams of writers who have supposedly honed their craft over many years. On the other hand I have near wet myself at a perfectly timed expletive.

    Good luck to any AI trying to figure out what's funny and what isn't

  12. Paul Hovnanian Silver badge

    A long way from Interstellar

    TARS: [as Cooper repairs him] Settings. General settings. Security settings.

    TARS: Honesty, new setting: ninety-five percent.

    TARS: Confirmed. Additional settings.

    Cooper: Humor, seventy-five percent.

    TARS: Confirmed. Self destruct sequence in T minus 10, 9...

    Cooper: Let's make that sixty percent.

    TARS: Sixty percent, confirmed. Knock knock.

    Cooper: You want fifty-five?

  13. Jason Hindle

    The Sandler comparison

    Is surely insulting to our new AI overlords?

  14. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Maybe try them with humor first, leave humour for next century

    I can see them managing to produce humor - you mention Mr. Sandler.

    Trying for humour is an altogether different matter - it doesn't even cross the Atlantic, so how can computers be expected to manage it?

  15. Meee Shhh

    "du méchanique planqué sur le vivant"

    Henri Bergson spotted this a long time ago: "du méchanique planqué sur le vivant" - or human action made mechanical. Is it sad, funny or ... let's let the machines decide.

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like