back to article Big Brother is born. And we find out 15 years too late to stop him

The "Big Brother" comprehensive national database system feared by many MPs has been built behind their backs over the last decade, and even has a name for its most intrusive component: a central London national phone and internet tapping centre called PRESTON. PRESTON, which collects about four million intercepted phone calls …

Anonymous Coward

Re: Curious

Dadmin - you have really hit the nail on the head here.

It is coming to light that ISIS is a creation of the US DoD, and there are some documents to prove it.

How else would they get their funding. There appears to be rogue elements in the CIA/MI5/6 that are creating and causing these acts to get people to give up their freedoms.

How is it that since 9/11 we have had a dramatic increase in the number of terrorist organisations, when prior to that there was only one?

See this..

http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1191-disclosure-showdown?showall=&start=1

10
2

Re: Curious

Indeed. Obvious solution: inject more needles.

1
0
Silver badge

Re: Curious

"How is it that since 9/11 we have had a dramatic increase in the number of terrorist organisations, when prior to that there was only one?"

Because since 9/11 we have been bombing the shit out of various mostly or entirely innocent people with the glaringly obvious direct result of creating more terrorists.

The DoD doesn't need to directly create them. We give millions of people a burningly strong reason to hate us, we leave huge caches of weapons around, we even train people who are supposedly on our side before forcing them to turn against us.

It would be startlingly weird if there were not lots more terrorists.

16
0
Silver badge

Re: Curious

> 'you should not mind being spied on if you have nothing to hide'

Yes, have an upvote, and here's a suggestion - publish the names and address of all intelligence and police staff (and contractors, just in case). If they're not doing anything wrong, they have nothing to hide.

No publication => obvious deduction.

7
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Curious

"inject more needles."

Don't you need needles to inject in the first place?

Yo dawg, I heard you like needles, so I put needles in your needles so you can inject while you inject...

2
0

Re: Curious

The terrrist attacks must continue - if they can keep us in fear, they can keep us in line!

2
0

@NigelD Re: Curious

I also do not buy this sort of argument. It seems to go hand in hand with the 'you should not mind being spied on if you have nothing to hide' view. No. Enough.

The question is now how do we overturn this nonsense?

The traditional way of resolving this is: a revolution.

And that is precisely why the Government want to keep tabs on all of us. They are probably already making a league table of my past, present and future indiscretions, that will be ready for publication ... be left on a train ... be inadvertently photographed in the hands of a Government minister as he walks into No. 10 ... mysteriously appear in the public domain should I ever decide to step out of line.

6
0
Silver badge

Re: Curious

Additional evidence of "constructed terror":

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/technology/hackers-trace-isis-twitter-accounts-7010417

2
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: @NigelD Curious

Blakes 7

1
0
Silver badge

Re: Curious

"Indeed. Obvious solution: inject more needles."

And make sure they're nonferrous, so they can't be picked up with magnets.

Preferably, use biological materials like bone so that even technology will have a hard time distinguishing the needles from the hay.

1
0

Given the seriousness of this, I'm curious what their justification is for not informing MPs of it, given that MPs are supposed to be the ones who decide whether to allow it to continue, pass an Act to legalise it or pass another to ban it. Apart from the obvious "they might ban it" excuse, which basically admits to knowing it's illegal, or "they might talk about it", which would be covered by the official secrets act

17
1
Big Brother

As that old saying goes: Slowly slowly catchy monkey

In this case scum have managed to build a true big brother database (I suggest the term database be used in any talk on this bill and is said loudly and often) and are slowly revealing little bits to clueless MP's until its too late:

"And this bit here holds the phone call records. To, err, see if Terrorists (Terrorists! yes that's brilliant) make phonecalls"

...a year later...

"And this bit keeps the travel records, so we can see where the terrorists are flying from and to"

Ad nauseam

11
1
Silver badge

As that old saying goes: Slowly slowly catchy monkey

Nope, the steady drip, drip, drip of leaks and/or legislation is more akin to boiling a frog, lobster or crab.

The family I rent a room from is Black and I've been living here so long (15 years), I'm one of the family now. They've been calling these revelations as nothing new ('But they've always been doing this.'), even actually mild in comparison to what's 'actually going on.' Guess this 'White Boy' needs to clean out his ears.

8
0
Silver badge

I'm curious what their justification

I'm curious what their justification

Absolute power... Corrupts Absolutely...

11
0
Flame

EU?

Ok, I'm getting sick of this shit - how do we find out what information our own government is holding on us? There must be an EU process no?

I was never 'fine' with any of this and as a direct consequence of the Snowden papers now use a VPN, Protonmail etc. (because, y'know - PRIVACY) - but the extent of this is too much now - I want to know everything they have on me even if it's benign. There has to be some legal way...

13
1
Coat

Re: EU?

Freedom of Information Act?

EU, not so sure...

Mine is the one with hundreds of heavily redacted pages in its pockets...

5
0

Re: EU?

Yeah, I was thinking FOI might be the logical place to start the process (of course, you won't get your 'Preston' dossier because 'national security') - I'm thinking the EFF might have some ideas?

1
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: EU?

Eu does something only when the ENEMY is involved.

When the Russians defined in law, built and deployed (with at least some legal oversight) the same system in the late 90-es we:

1. Ordered the howling monkeys in the media to howl their ass off.

2. Eu/USA/UK financed an "independent non-government" organization (quotes intended where they are) to drag them in front of the European court of human rights (and after that we wonder why the hell did they tighten up the rules on external political financing so much).

'cause that was the ENEMY. When we do the same (actually worse - no regulatory regime and no legal oversight in any form even by a kangaroo court), what do we do? We smile and wave.

Do not do as I do, do as I say.

5
0

Re: EU?

DPA Subject Access request?

0
0
Silver badge

Can we hire the guy who the Americans get to make up their acronyms? Patriot and Prism vs RIPA and Preston? Oh dear...

11
0
Silver badge

Acronyms

Independent Directorate for Information OversighT

or IDIOT - which is what we've been taken for in the name of "security".

Best thing we could have done on 11th September 2001 was shrug our shoulders and say "Life goes on. Don't expect us to do your work for you, Mr Terrorist."

16
1

The British tend to use very innocuous names. The general rule is the more innocent and dull sounding the name, the more dangerous the named item will be.

Just waiting for GERBIL to be brought on line

14
0
Facepalm

Names?

ROLAND, KEVIN, EROL and GLENIS!

5
0
Silver badge

Re: Names?

As long as it isn't SCORPION STARE

1
0

Re: Names?

"KEVIN"

Key-Encrypted Verifiable Insurgent Node

1
0

Re: Acronyms

MyffW Reminds me of the acronym floating around in SHAPE inn the 1960's Supreme Head Intelligence Targeting or SHIT for short.

1
0
Anonymous Coward

Telecommunications Act of 1984

Pure comedy!

Wait...

8
0

Aluminium beanie on order

How do you tell if your phone has been hacked? I'm asking perfectly seriously as mine is behaving strangely and considering the sort of people known to be being spied on domestically as a Yes Campaigner, member of SCND and active in RIC I would certainly qualify.

4
2
Anonymous Coward

Re: How do you tell if your phone has been hacked?

take out the battery

then buy an Alcatel 2G phone at EE for a tenner in cash with free Google Cardboard viewer and a ten-pound top-up activated international SIM included,

and you'll have a phone that hasn't been hacked. (You'll be identified in the PRESTON database as soon as you use it to talk to anyone tho')

I refer you to the Clash Lyrics for 'know your rights- all 3 of them'

8
1
Silver badge

Clearly the facists won the war after all.

All reports to the contrary are propaganda.

22
1
Anonymous Coward

"Clearly the facists won the war after all"

arguably, they did, in the form of Uncle Joe and friends. Go far enough to one political extreme and start to come back around full circle?

7
2
Silver badge
FAIL

Re: Teiwasteofoxygen

"Clearly the facists won the war after all....." So you missed the bit where New Labour were in charge for the majority of this program?

3
4
Anonymous Coward

Re: Teiwasteofoxygen

New Labour? Rings a bell. Oh yes: When Margaret Thatcher was asked what she regarded as her greatest achievement, she is said to have replied: “New Labour”. 'Nuff said.

7
0
Anonymous Coward

And so technology becomes the enemy

Civilisation was fun while it lasted.

11
1
Bronze badge
Big Brother

the truth comes out at last

1
0
Silver badge
Big Brother

A little more at least.

Until the next fresh round of infringements are revealed.

7
1

I have been radicalised.

This sort of shit makes me consider suicide. Arguing against it is pointless so perhaps I should Google 'Strap On Bomb' and go visit some of the perpetrators.

There you go... There's a test of how good their capabilities are.

You may assume if I am not posting after Christmas they are for shit or otherwise I am either in a rubber room, being water-boarded in far away places or dead as a result of causes not instigated by myself.

17
1

Re: I have been radicalised.

While this may have been in jest, this may be a good way to hit back,

If everybody started discussing bomb plots with their mates, browsing Jihadist websites and generally trying to generate as many false positives as possible, they would become overwhelmed and may be forced to dial it back a notch or two.

ALLAHU ACKBAR!

7
3

Re: I have been radicalised.

While this may have been in jest, this may be a good way to hit back,

Have a down vote. My disgust and possible intent has bugger all to do with your interpretation.

0
10

Re: I have been radicalised.

Nope, no no. They'd simply make that sort of anarchy illegal, and your new criminal status would be used against you. Question: how do you feel about being involuntarily recruited to process shrimp?

2
1
Silver badge

The times they are a'changed. Interesting zerodays ahead

There are now dozens of intelligence "Bulk Personal Datasets" on millions of people, "the majority of whom are unlikely to be of intelligence interest", as the government has admitted in documents accompanying the draft Investigatory Powers Bill.

In the blink of an eye, can any number of those millions of no present intelligence interest, take an altogether different path, fully mindful of the intellectual challenges and virtual hurdles to be overcome and circumvented.

’Tis a fine folly to believe that more than just a chosen few, and many, will not be able. And what of the smart groomers of the system, aces in both the delicate micro and mass macromanagement of perception, and whose trails lead to confusing, compromising destinations and novel situations never before encountered, and which it would be a tragedy for systems operations/operatives to foolishly and/or arrogantly ignore or dismiss as too freaky and spooky to explore and/or engage and/or exploit?

Such a non-action is a perfect green light for the further unhindered sowing of obviously exotic and perfectly camouflaged plans.

5
0
Silver badge

Wel, F***k me....

Set up in 1999 by Blair, continued by Cameron.

It didn't stop 9/11. It didn't stop 7/7. It didn't stop Lee Rigbys death. It didn't help prevent Paris attacks.

It doesn't work, clearly.

It was put into place without proper government oversight, without parliamentary assent, without the mandate of the nation.

It's function - whatever that may be - is not in the interests of the British people.

Those responsible for this heinous act should be immediately arrested and tried for treason, then sent down for the rest of their natural lives as a warning that we do not tolerate the subversion of our democracy. Are we not fighting against terrorism to preserve that very democracy?

Or are we just preserving the power of the elite?

This has to end, before we all get "radicalised".

34
2
Silver badge

Re: Wel, F***k me....

So who is going to jail over deliberately misleading parliament?

Yep, thought so...

14
0

Re: Wel, F***k me....

It was put into place without proper government oversight, without parliamentary assent, without the mandate of the nation.

I held this view until today.

I think it had all the oversight the Government wanted. None.

And that is the problem.

The Government should not have the ability to anything except in full view of the public. They repeatedly demonstrate that they cannot be trusted. They are supposed to be acting in our interests - and if they are not, that makes them the ENEMY.

4
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Wel, F***k me....

So what happens when you hit a genuine "Private Snafu" situation where you really, REALLY don't want information to be revealed to the public for fear of Revealing Information to the Enemy?

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Wel, F***k me....

"So what happens when you hit a genuine "Private Snafu" situation where you really, REALLY don't want information to be revealed to the public for fear of Revealing Information to the Enemy?"

You obtain legal counsel and authority, resolve the situation, neutralise the perpetrators, make arrests as needed, ensure the loose ends are tied and then report to the authorities duly notarised as oversight. Eventually, reveal the details to the public who clearly have questions and want answers.

You do NOT hide the facts, let the miscreants carry out their plans, lie to parliament about the scope of your activities, redact all public record and ensure there is no legal or judicial oversight....

....unless you are ISIS.

1
0
Anonymous Coward

When does this hit C4 News, UK mainstream media, etc?

Are New Statesman, Daily Mirror, World In Action (etc) still relevant (if they still exist)?

Or does it need to go direct via Facebook, Twitter, etc?

Rate this article: think of a number bigger than 10. 127 will do for now.

Under eleven months to November 5th.

13
0
Pint

Ta Muchly

Thank you Mr Campbell for your continuing good work. National security is much improved when its methods are open to scrutiny.

13
2

Re: Ta Muchly

For the benefit of downvoters:

A 'secret' security system may at first glance seem better than one which is open to scrutiny. But like back-doors in encryption or proprietary blobs in open source code, when things do go wrong, and sooner or later some aspects will surely be compromised, then it's a devil of a job to get things straight again.

5
0
Anonymous Coward

Out demons, out

Mr Campbell we salute you.

This helps explain why Straw was so keen to get FOI rejigged - he's in on the big database, so feels 'ownership' of it - and if David Davis had got to be PM he'd be joining in the party.

All these fuckers just get off on the power.

(Posted anonymously to show how feeble we drones are, in our attempts to evade the Panopticon)

10
2

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Forums

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017