back to article NSA to world+dog: We're only watching 1.6% of internet, honest

The US's National Security Agency (NSA) has issued a document titled The National Security Agency: Missions, Authorities, Oversight and Partnerships (PDF) that explains some of its operations - and includes a claim it “... touches about 1.6 per cent... “ of daily internet traffic and “...only 0.025 per cent is actually selected …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.

Page:

    1. David Pollard

      Re: having been involved in this sort of malarkey....

      It would be rather remiss of the security services if they weren't using the resources of Google and others.

      The major commercial players have leading edge software and massive data capture as a matter of course, so are in a position to assess a large part of the internet relatively inexpensively. Google, for example, has been analysing net traffic to pick up hints of developing influenza epidemics for some while.

      This is one reason why the NSA 1.6% figure may not be wrong, because other organisations are doing the pre-analysis for them. What is wrong is that no details of the arrangements are made public.

  1. The BigYin

    OK, that's fine then.

    Paedos only rape 0.0001% of children, so that's OK too?

    Terrorists only kill 0.001% of people, so is that OK?

    Muggers only blight the lives of 0.01% of people, that must be fine.

    Seriously NSA, you are meant to be smart. An immoral act is an immoral act, regardless of the number of people it affects.

  2. Dodgy Geezer Silver badge

    Outsourcing?

    ...it “... touches about 1.6%... “ of daily Internet traffic ...

    That's OUR systems, of course. Most of the grunt work of monitoring the ENTIRE internet is outsourced...

  3. TheOtherHobbes

    "Released on Saturday with little fanfare, the document's prologue explains that the NSA lacked tools to track one of the 9/11 hijackers."

    Interesting. So they had the ability to track the others?

    But they still somehow missed that whole "Let's fly some airliners into big buildings" thing?

    I'm feeling very reassured now that whatever they're doing is totally worthwhile.

  4. Anomalous Cowshed

    Ad for new NSA Internet snooping employees

    WANTED - for friendly local media company in Washington DC.

    Fancy sitting around watching the Internet and reading e-mails for a living? Then, we kid you not, there is a vacancy available at our friendly local company. Apply now! Credit and background checks will be conducted. Applicants must be able to demonstrate a love of cats and pussy in general.

  5. Ace Rimmer

    Forget the NSA

    The REAL controversy here is finding out El Reg operates on Lotus!

    1. David Pollard
      Boffin

      Re: Forget the NSA

      Not only that, but they have an English spell-checker!

  6. Graham Marsden
    Big Brother

    "of the 1.6% of the data, only 0.025% is actually selected for review"

    Those sound such small numbers, don't they?

    But, of course, they aren't *numbers*, they're percentages and is a neat way of burying the fact that actually huge amounts (in numerical terms) of data is being scanned on what is nothing more than a massive fishing expedition in the hope that, somewhere in all the dross, they'll come up with something useful.

  7. Eradicate all BB entrants

    1.6% of all traffic eh?....

    ...... numbers are fantastic, they can tell you everything. So Mr NSA fella, if I download a 30GB game from Steam, and it takes on 34Kb to tell you about it, what percentage is that?

  8. John Smith 19 Gold badge
    Gimp

    I think we need some kind of "pig with snout in trough" icon

    Because I don't think these guys understand moderation.

    They want it all and they want it now.

  9. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Playing the system (or breaking it)

    Since the NSA are playing silly buggers, why not return the favour.

    We need a small piece of software that will create an email with keywords from a suggested list (some but not all of the words) - thus plot, bomb, New York etc.

    The same piece of software then needs to adjust a 250kb image of say the president of the USA, make sure the CRC changes, that the image metadate is different, date and time would be current to the program.

    It would then take your outlook (maybe other e-mail clients) and mail a slightly different message of different length to each person in your address book.

    In turn it should be able to receive such e-mails adjust the content slightly and maybe reply.

    Finally we get a load of americans to use this tool for a couple of days, and thereafter on occasion to friends outside the USA.

    From an individuals perspective, you get a bit more junk mail that you would normally get in any given day (but its in a good cause!).

    From the internets perspective there would be an increase in email volume comprable to a large SPAM campaign, or the release of some topless photos of a famous celeberaty.

    From the NSA perspective..........

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Playing the system (or breaking it)

      I have a similar idea based on corporate bullshit generators... the ones you can supply your own vocabulary to. Then we could have

      -the jihadist manifesto bullshit genetator

      -the drug lord shipment schedule bs gen

      -the people trafficing bs generator

      The potential is endless...

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Playing the system (or breaking it)

        Accountancy firm confidential Tax evading advice newsletter

        Leaked fake nsa revelation bulletin... they will deny evrrything, even that which is true

        Political party broadcast bs ... oh they have those already

  10. Wize

    "Here at Vulture South we write in a word processor (Lotus Symphony)..."

    Do you use Lotus Notes too?

  11. Pallas Athena

    Only terrorists???

    Nice to know they select 'foreign entities which might be of interest'. With of course terrorists as example. And so it goes on - NSA is fighting the terrorists, for your safety, what's wrong with that? I'll tell you what's wrong. It has already been revealed that the European Community, and especially it's trade policy, is very high on the NSA watch list. Yes, their trade policies could harm "US interests" - their economic interests, that is. Whatever bad you can say about the EC, terrorists they aren't. And that is only one example that has been revealed - who knows who else is on the watch list?

  12. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Not much of a comfort if...

    ...you're competing against US companies for contacts....

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/503224.stm

    "Journalist Duncan Campbell has spent much of his life investigating Echelon. In a report commissioned by the European Parliament he produced evidence that the NSA snooped on phone calls from a French firm bidding for a contract in Brazil. They passed the information on to an American competitor, which won the contract. There's no safeguards, no remedies, " he said, "There's nowhere you can go to say that they've been snooping on your international communications. Its a totally lawless world."

    1. Tin Pot

      Re: Not much of a comfort if...

      "Journalist Duncan Campbell has spent much of his life investigating Echelon....he said, "Its a totally lawless world.""

      Sounds like he lost perspective some time ago, but not his naivete.

      1. strum

        Re: Not much of a comfort if...

        20 years ago, Duncan Campbell was being dismissed as a paranoid fantasist. Now everything he warned us about turns out to be true.

  13. Gordon 11

    Goose and gander?

    The "NSA joke" is done by using different (self-contained) fonts for parts of the document (show up if you use acroread to convert it to Postscript) and then using character codes that only make sense visually with these glyphs

    This stops you cut&pasting sensible text.

    Presumably it also stops things like Google indexing it as expected.

    So if you don't want the NSA to snoop on messages you send. perhaps you should take a leaf out of their books and send everything as PDF using substituted fonts? [Unless they've got a system for handling that anyway, of course...]

  14. This post has been deleted by its author

  15. Alan Brown Silver badge

    What's not getting much coverage (and needs to)

    The NSA is currently building a data storage centre in Utah for storage.

    not Petabytes, nor Exabytes or even Zettabytes - indications are that they're aiming at YOTTABYES of storage.

    That's more data than has so far been generated by the entire human race through recorded history.

    IE: they want to sneeop every single byte passing their snoop points and keep it effectively forever.

    Thiunk of all those selfies you'd prefer the world not see. Too late.

  16. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    NSA budget is roughly 3.6 Billion a year and they only touch 1.6 percent of the net?

    <Doctor Evil Voice On>

    Riiiiiggggghhhhhhtttttt........

  17. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    "The reassurances of the NSA document"...

    "are addressed entirely to the American people. It simply disregards the human right to privacy of the rest of the world"...

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23669003

    1. tom dial Silver badge

      Re: "The reassurances of the NSA document"...

      Without intending any disrespect, I would note that NSA is an intelligence agency doing mostly what such agencies do and that U. S. Constitutional and legal protections apply, generally speaking, to U. S. residents. Others are subject to other laws governments and might well wish to question those governments about internet and other data collection and analysis activities including, but surely not limited to, those of the USNSA.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: "The reassurances of the NSA document"...

        @tom dial

        WTF? Your naivety is stunning! Is the EU permitted to spy on every US citizen? No! The US would never permit it! So why is it ok for the big bully to spy on the entre world yet chastise China or Russia for the same conduct? The USNSA is elevating itself to an omnipotent position and justifying itself in moral terms, when in reality its spying program has a secret business agenda! You of all people need to study this :-

        http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/503224.stm

        "evidence that the NSA snooped on phone calls from a French firm bidding for a contract in Brazil. They passed the information on to an American competitor, which won the contract"

  18. Nearly Anonymous
    Headmaster

    spin doctors

    “According to figures published by a major tech provider, the Internet carries 1,826 Petabytes of information per day. In its foreign intelligence mission, NSA touches about 1.6% of that. However, of the 1.6% of the data, only 0.025% is actually selected for review. The net effect is that NSA analysts look at 0.00004% of the world's traffic in conducting their mission – that's less than one part in a million.”

    I'm concerned about the numbers along with several others. I would quibble with an order of magnitude.

    0.025% of 1.6% is 0.0004%

    That would be 4 ppm, not "less than 1 ppm." While an order of magnitude doesn't mean much when talking about millions, saying "less than 1 ppm" sure sounds good.

    However, a larger issue, as others have noted, is disingenuously using percentages to distract from the actual numbers. The NSA is still collecting 29 petabytes while reviewing 7 terabytes - *daily*. As for the 1.6%, about ten years ago, I heard a telecomm researcher say about 70% of all network traffic is P2P. I think it's not too hard to ignore several other broad categories of traffic and realize that 1.6% represents important communication. The NSA spin doctors are twisting and misreporting (or miscalculating) the numbers.

Page:

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like