back to article STILL TRUE: Facebook and co to handle taxpayers' ID

Cast your minds back to June 2011 when The Register exclusively revealed the Cabinet Office's plans to allow British citizens to sign into public services online via social networking log-ins such as Facebook. Now, if you glance at the national press today, you'd be forgiven for thinking that something new had happened with …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.

Page:

    1. Why Not?
      Stop

      Re: I just dont get it..

      there are more active NI numbers issued than people legally in UK.

      They issue them like smarties.

      Basing any database against them would be foolish, surprised it hasn't been mandated.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: I just dont get it..

      NI numbers aren't unique

  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    OK

    So you get rid of one web site that you don't like and the replacement is just as bad - in fact it turns out to be largely the same as the old one.

    Why is this such a surprise? Considering it's being organised by politicians that's exactly what we should expect - like everything else they do.

    My guess is that the civil servants and web designers are largely the same and just getting paid for doing the job a second time. Again, no surprise there. It's the same in most policy areas.

    In our democracy, you're just voting to change the front man, not the way the country is actually run. To change that, you need to step outside the box and do a bit of protesting, preferably in a way that the politicians really hate.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Coffee/keyboard

      Re: OK

      Yep, that's the problem with all forms of government, save dictatorship, which has it's own special problems.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: OK

      "My guess is that the civil servants and web designers are largely the same and just getting paid for doing the job a second time. Again, no surprise there. It's the same in most policy areas."

      That would almost make sense. In fact, it's another lot, so we're paying twice. And, we've been here before: before gov.uk, ditectgov; before directgov, ukonline. And let's know forget DotP.

      I would love to know how many tens of millions have been spunked on government supersites and failed attempt to centralise government web sites. As far as I know it's:

      Directgov - £126 million over 7 years

      www.gov.uk beta - £4.5 million so far

      DotP - £35 million

      ukonline - don't have any idea, sadly

      Anyway, even that undoubtedly incomplete picture adds up to £165.5 million, which is a lot for running a website. And that doesn't include the costs of the un-assimilated government websites

      So, www.gov.uk - 3rd or 4th time lucky? Don't bet on it

Page:

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like