back to article Star Wars set for 3D rehash

Lucasfilm has finally announced that all six Star Wars films will get the 3D treatment, starting with Episode I: The Phantom Menace, due to hit tridimensional screens in 2012. John Knoll, visual effects supervisor at Lucasfilm's Industrial Light & Magic, insisted he's "committed to ensuring that the 3D conversion delivers …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
    1. Ihre Papiere Bitte!!
      Thumb Up

      James diGriz FTW

      A Stainless Steel Rat film would be most awesome, I loved those books.

      As long as they drop the entire Esperanto-push, anyway.

  1. krakead
    Stop

    George, please put down the stick...

    Dear god, *another* version of Star Wars? Put down the stick, George - the horse is well and truly dead. Someone really ought to enforce Mr Lucas's retirement - no amount of re-hashing or technology of dubious value can hide the fact that it's been a long time since he's done anything even vaguely decent.

  2. Loyal Commenter Silver badge

    Oh Good

    Jar-Jar Binks in 3D. How could that possibly fail?

    For some reason I'm reminded of the episode of Spaced where Simon Pegg rips into the little kid who has saved up his pocket money to buy the Jar-Jar figurine...

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Thumb Up

      The title is required, and must contain letters and/or digits.

      "I've been fired"

      "why"

      "differing opinions"

      "the phantom menace?"

      "yes"

  3. Sweep

    Hmmmm

    I don't see how this is going to be good. The 3 prequels are utter drivel to begin with (esp Phantom Menace) and I'm not sure how much I want to see 3D Ewoks either.

    As I understand it proper made for 3D films are shot with cameras with little focal length (or animated) so that everything is in focus. Converted to 3D films don't really work (and bring on headaches) because everything looks almost 3D but you can't focus on everything on the screen because the camera wasn't focused on everything. I don't see any techniques which could bring everything into focus in the original films other than CGI....

    I would hope also that they would use the original films rather than the "special edition" with added shit CGI....but it is Lucas..

  4. Raumkraut

    Neigh dammit! *flog* *flog* *flog*

    Lucas will do anything for the chance to squeeze a few more bucks out of the Starr(Wars)y-eyed fanatics.

  5. Mike Street
    Thumb Down

    Space Opera in 3D is still Space Opera

    'people who were there in 1977 staring at the screen with mouth agape.'

    wondering, presumably, how this trite storyline with its many contradictions (advanced weapons you have to target by hand, explosions in space making a noise etc. etc.) could have been considered interesting enough to make a whole series of films out of.

    Still, I understand some people like them...

  6. Anonymous Coward
    Troll

    Just one more re-release, honest.

    I am sick and tired of Lucas rehashing these old turkeys every chance he gets.

    Add a little here and pretend it's a completely different movie.

    I did enjoy the first one when I was a kid but got bored quite quickly and now I'm just fed up of hearing about another re-release.

    It isn't like he's short of a few quid and needs to wring the last few drops of blood out of the, surely pissed off, fanboys.

    /rant

  7. Anonymous Coward
    Thumb Down

    Delivered in "William Shatner" mode

    Must # screw # MORE # money # from # cash # cow!

    George, move on!!

  8. Anonymous Coward
    Thumb Down

    gnarf

    GL running out of money?

    another rehash of SW, in a long line of remastering etc. to follow over the years?

    Just let it be as it is, for once.

  9. Captain Hogwash
    Megaphone

    Star Wars: The Phantom Menace

    Never a truer word said. It seems to stalk us like a spectre at every turn. Lucas! Just let the damn thing rest in peace and leave us all alone.

  10. Anonymous Coward
    Thumb Down

    Oh FFS

    Give it a rest will you.

    You managed to collectively ruin the franchise 10 years ago, how many times are you going to flog this dead horse..

  11. Gaz Jay
    FAIL

    Should be re-written...

    George Lucas has discovered another way of getting even more money out of his Star Wars franchise by re-releasing the same films he's re-released several times before in 3D.

  12. ShaggyDoggy

    he 3D conversion delivers results as good as a movie shot and authored in 3D

    fuck off hollywood do you thing we are that stupid

    oh, wait ...

  13. Leigh Brown
    Thumb Down

    No thanks

    Money grabbing, no more, no less.

  14. Anonymous Coward
    Thumb Down

    Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    3d is a fad and sucks, films made for 3d don't make good 2d films because the bits that are meant to fly out just look wierd and now they are taking six films filmed long before things like CGI existed and trying to shoe horn 3d out of them.

    Blatant money making exercise.

  15. Tom Servo

    Plinkett review on this crud

    Possibly the finest piece of film criticism created.

    http://redlettermedia.com/phantom_menace.html

  16. Craig Chambers
    Alert

    Maybe a chance to remover Jar-Jar?

    Maybe the fat-necked greedy git* can do a bit of turd polishing and remove pretty much all screen appearances by Jar-Jar?

    * Incidentally, my wife has already threatened me about giving him more money by buying the set *again* (on Blu-ray). After two sets of EP4-6 ("original" and "Greedo shot first" versions) on VHS and all 6 on DVD, I think she has a point.

  17. Lottie

    3d

    so we'll be doubly dissapointed when we find that it's still impossible to kick jar jar in the happy sack.

  18. Efros
    Flame

    How much

    can you milk a franchise for.

  19. Winkypop Silver badge
    FAIL

    Wrong

    Just plain wrong.....

  20. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    If you can't make a good movie...

    ...make a 3D movie.

  21. Pastey
    FAIL

    New generation

    of kids to sell merchandise to?

  22. Jimboom
    FAIL

    Guess it's that time again

    George must want to build that expansion on his house. Either that or he needs another private jet.

    Sad thing is that a lot of Fanboys will go watch this just because they have to see if it is as bad as it was the first time round. Me, I'm going to wait for it to come to tv.. you know, cause 3d tv's will be the standard by then.

  23. Robajob
    FAIL

    Rubbish.

    Two dimensions of The Phantom Menace was plenty bad enough, thanks.

  24. Anonymous Coward
    Boffin

    differences

    Avatar was filmed in 3D.

    Clash of the Titans had 3D applied in post-production, as with the majority of live action 3D releases.

    Both were average movies, but Clash of the Titans looked much crappier. If you serve up a crappy product, of course there'll be no demand for it.

  25. Systems
    Thumb Down

    No 2D Blu-Ray release coming then?

    Does this mean that the BD release will be delayed so that he can release a 3D-BD version? Who am I trying to kid? He'll release both of course.

    When my son's old enough for the films I'm only showing him IV,V and VI any way. The other three were toilet and I'd rather watch Ewok Adventure again than those.

  26. Matt Bradley
    FAIL

    Selling your own legend for a few extra dollars

    Lucas has already destroyed the legend of his finest achievement by diluting it with round after round of awful makeovers / prequels.

    I suppose all that's left now is to run completely into the ground for the last squeeze of profit, then retire.

    In other news, plans are afoot to retouch the Mona Lisa now that pigment technology has improved.

  27. Anonymous Coward
    Thumb Down

    Do not want.

    Even my well-developed sense of morbid curiosity kept me out of the cinemas for the release of Episodes II and III, judgement which subsequent viewings on free-to-air telly have proven to be utterly sound, and now I won't have Star Wars in the house.

    I will not be shovelling any money into Lucas' neck-pouch this time around.

  28. Maninthemoon101010

    We don't need this

    "These are not the remakes you are looking for...."

  29. Chris King

    @Tom Servo

    I prefer the Four Word Film Review version (from http://www.fwfr.com/)

    "16 years for THIS ?"

    Not quite up there with "Yoda's Disability Benefit Withdrawn", but there you go...

  30. Dr. Mouse

    Free Hat:

    'the word "Wookiee" has been changed to "hair challenged animal" and that the entire cast has been digitally replaced by Ewoks'

    Also, The China Probrem:

    'They're just taking Indiana Jones and they're... they're raping him!'

    'Why would Spielberg and Lucas do this?!'

    While I will admit that the re-master of the original trilogy had some good developments, it was completely unnecessary and spoiled the feel of the film. The move to 3D will likely be similar, a few good bits (I'm thinking Luke bombing the death star will look pretty cool) but overall spoiling the film.

    And starting with Phantom Menace? I don't know many people (unfortunately my mother is one) who enjoyed that film. It should be removed from the history books. Ep 2 wasn't much better. And, although Ep 3 wasn't bad, I was really dissapointed. It could have been so much darker, instead they pandered to the majority again and produced a mediocre film. I won't bother going to see any of that trillogy, and doubt I will go to see the "original" trillogy in 3D either.

  31. Anonymous Coward
    Thumb Up

    Is this a title?

    I love 3D. I really hope it catches on big time, because if it does it means I'll never be watching movies, TV, etc, ever gain, thus giving me a lot more free time.

  32. NoneSuch Silver badge
    Unhappy

    What...

    ...does George Lucas have against Simon Pegg. Another Phantom Menace film will drive him balmy again.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      And the last thing we want

      ...and he last thing we want is to make Simon Pegg turn into a soothing skin cream.

  33. Slappy
    FAIL

    OMFG!

    WTF?

    GG!

    Really George?

  34. Anonymous Coward
    FAIL

    Way to go, George ...

    Take whatever respect and good-will your fans might have left and piss it against the wall. Yep, that'll work.

    The bank balance looking a bit peaky, is it?

  35. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Speaking of milking...

    I'd rather watch pr0n in 3D.

  36. Peter 39
    Happy

    only if ...

    Only if they delete Jar-Jar Binks

  37. DaveB
    Happy

    The Crew will be happy

    I have a friend who was a senior member of the crew on an early Star Wars movie. As I understand that every time they re-release the movie the cast and crew receive the same pay they got for the first movie. This will make a nice retirement bonus.

  38. Frobozz of Rassilon
    WTF?

    Am I the only one that enjoys 3D?

    It's amazing, every time there's a 3D story on any news site that allows comments, there is a flood of "3D is a waste of time" and "it gives me headaches" and "I don't like wearing glasses".

    Crappy upconverts, crappy 3D movies in general (ones that would be crap in 2D as well) and the Phantom Menace sucking bag aside, I don't get why so many people trash the technology in general.

    If you don't want to wear glasses AND don't want to sacrifice resolution and viewing angles, you'll be waiting a while. I say enjoy it with glasses now, and upgrade to an autostereoscopic display later when they suck LESS than glasses and don't cost as much as a new car.

    IMHO, any inconveniences about glasses or any complaints about quality 3D movie/TV content are presently outweighed by the 2D->3D hardware upconverting of ALL your existing 2D stills and motion content, 3D live sports and video games (Xbox 360, PS3 and PC... they're all great).

    Other apps, as well, really benefit from the upconvert... e.g. Google Earth, Microsoft Worldwide Telescope. Check out the exploding crab nebula in 3D and tell me it ain't some cool shiz.

    I can't comment about headaches... that'd piss me off too. I guess I've been wearing LCD shutter glasses since the Sega Master System so my brain is wired for them now... I can wear glasses for a full workday and no worries.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      It's not that I don't like 3D

      It's that I don't like being forced to wear the cheap, crappy, dirty, limited field of view glasses that most cinemas make you use and then dump in a bucket for the next victim on your way out. Cheap thin plastic lenses warp and then the effect is marred. The only semi-reasonable glasses I've experienced are the ones at the Imax cinema. The again, maybe I'm just sensitive, I've, on occasion, had to complain in a cineam that a projector was out of focus when everyone else was sitting there blissfully unaware.

      When 3D comes to our homes hopefully we'll have a choice of different types of glasses... but...

      having spent a small fortune having lasik so that I don't have to wear glasses they're really not something I look forward to putting on again.

      Glasses free 3D I would quite happily have though...

  39. Robbie
    Thumb Down

    Terrible, terrible idea

    I don't get the whole 3D fad at all. I'm holding out for the inevitable holographic edition!

  40. A. Coatsworth Silver badge
    Coat

    3D??

    I don't think we have the technology to get more than *one* dimension out of the characters present the second trilogy, let alone 3...

    But when all is said and done, Lucas will be a little bit richer, I guess that's all that matters

  41. mr-tom
    FAIL

    They're actually trying to polish the turd

    If anything can kill off 3D TV, this is it.

  42. TheRealRoland
    Troll

    Speculation?

    >However, Variety reckons the Star Wars rehashes

    >"should stifle speculation that the format is a fading fad".

    But at the same time, it may start speculation that they need more money before they can start with the first of the next three movies?

    Me-sa can't wait to see Jar-Jar in 3D, Anakin!

  43. Dale Morgan
    WTF?

    I dont understand?

    Why start with the worst of all the star wars films if they want to make money?

    Jar Jar binks in 2D was bad enough, why would I want to see it in 3D?

    1. Vladimir Plouzhnikov

      Neither do I

      I've heard many people complaining that the latest 3 SW movies are so bad and the PM is the worst of all, however, when asked to elaborate none can come up with any rational explanation to what is actually so wrong with the movies and how they are so much worse than the original 3.

      I came to a conclusion that the complainers have watched the original movies when they were children and when they saw the new movies they expected that somehow magically they will be transported back into their childhood, so now it's Lucas fault that it didn't happen.

      Objectively, the latest 3 movies are at the very least no worse than the first 3, if not better (while the acting is of the same quality the, effects are, of course, better and there is a semblance of plot as well).

  44. Chezstar
    Paris Hilton

    I think this is a great idea!

    I can't watch 3D movies, my brain is too intelligent to be fooled into thinking that a flat image is actually 3D, at which point, in walks Mr Headache to remind me not to sit through this so called 3D pap.

    But that's fine, it gives me some extra pub time having a few drinks while every other schmuck hands over the extra cash to watch the same sad old movie again.

    It gets rid of all them ratbag kids from my favourite drinking establishments, so good on you Georgie boy! Got anything else you can drag out of the basement and re-re-re-rehash a few more times? Can you start releasing the films on a Friday night instead of a Thursday night in Australia, so that it makes after work drinkies more worthwhile? :)

    Paris, because she would be down at the pub too, she can't wear the glasses, it makes her look less attractive :)

  45. Henry Wertz 1 Gold badge

    Maybe you are the only one that enjoys 3D...

    I watched Avatar in 3D. Did I enjoy it? Actually I did. But I also saw it in 2D, and I didn't feel like I missed a whole lot in comparison. Maybe it's like stereo versus surround sound, I've been to a few movies that really used the surround sound to good effect, but most it's like the THX Logo uses it (it sounds like stuff's going all over the place), then the movie really doesn't have any scenes where stuff would be beside or behind the viewer anyway so it could have been in stereo and not lost much. Given Avatar was a movie actually MADE in 3D and I didn't feel a big loss watching it again in 2D, I expect conversions to be most unimpressive. Finally, I didn't get a headache from the glasses, but did find them fatiguing to the point that I wouldn't want to wear them unless a movie is ACTUALLY 3D, and not a 2D movie with a few gimmicky 3D scenes thrown in (I'm not implying Star Wars will be like that since almost the whole thing was CGI anyway... but maybe.)

This topic is closed for new posts.