Aussie censor balks at bijou boobs

They should also...

Make breast enlargement surgery mandatory for married women. There are quite a few wives which are encouraging pedophilia whenever they have sex with their husband.

Down with the Big Boob Nazis!

Small is beautiful, doesn't give my Asian wife back pain or bounce painfully when we mountain bike, and doesn't sag to the kneecaps.

Seriously, Australia and Britain seem to be racing China for most oppressive developed nation status. Unfortunately the US is only a few years behind at most.

Someone needs to have a revolution quick. A few more years and their universal monitoring will bring the cops to your door for badmouthing the government in an e-mail.

How to win over the voters

I wonder how impressed Australian women with non-gigantic breasts are with being told that they don't count as real women? And that their husbands are vile paedophiles for desiring them?

Sanity

Please could you consider censoring post like this?

My self imposed internet filter prevents me from reading most news sites in order to avoid been reminded of the asylum that is the world.

I'm not sure I can keep going if I have to add you to the list.

Paris, because I'm trying to find something positive.

Well, there goes another career option for me!

The politicians over here are a decrepit self-serving joke and have been for decades. But people keep voting them in, so I guess we get what the majority deserves.

Has the good Senator considered...

... tht a liking for small boobs may have very little to do with paedophilia and much more to do with latent pederasty?

Assuming that makes it OK in some strange way...

Paris, just because.

lol @ OZ

Dang I was going to flame by posting link to British beer commercial showing OZ cricket players taking bodyline shots to their crotch and ending with quote "Ohhh you pommy bastard" but better not since at work. Oh what great fun it would be to bodyline the Aussies over retarded laws like this.

Oh, and another thing...

Next time I am between work contracts I will be requesting a breast enlargement operation to be funded by the Dole office to increase my eligibility for work!

No intention of going through wit the opp of course - I have no desire to have myself butchered just to satisfy the sexual lusts of some wrinkly old misogynistic has-been politician.

We need a bill to ban men with small wrinkly willies from public office.

When everything is illegal...

I've been thinking recently, once they outlaw everything, won't the law just become irrelevant? I can just imagine a future conversation... "So you like little girls? Well I happen to like female orgasms, I guess we're in the same boat. Any idea who sells 'special' DVDs around here?" OK I'm exaggerating (at least I THINK I am), but seriously, people WILL have their porn. Pushing it all underground together hardly seems like a good strategic decision if child pornography is the uniquely horrible threat it's made out to be. Plus calling something a vile perversion just doesn't carry the same weight when you say that about everything.

Like many responses here: WTF?!

"Senator Joyce claimed that publications featuring small-breasted women were encouraging paedophilia."

It defies logic - you really couldn't make this crap up.

large enough titles

So, not only arent women allowed to have orgasms, but they arent allowed to even try to look younger.

Someone set the fashion, cosmetics, and all the rest of the real female exploitation industries onto these guys. I would almost feel sorry for them - if they weren't such utter arseholes.

we need a crucifixion icon

Apple link?

Does anyone else think that this might have to do with the upcoming trademark battle between Apple and the Canadian bra-stuffing company?

*Goggles because that female ejaculates stings like hell

Just because it has to be done!

I believe this is now comment # 69. Just thought I'd throw that into the ring, as it were...

When did...

Australia suddenly become a nation of puritanical, prudish retards?

Jesus, you'd think that being a nation of crims would have yielded a different result.

Ridiculous

Whilst I'm not in favour of prematurely sexualising those who aren't sexually mature and think some of the issues underlying the 'barely legal' class of porn could well be a bit dodgy I'm not sure banning it is the answer.

Like a prior commentator, I'd rather have someone crack one off over a young looking porn model than try and find someone underage in real life. Neither do I appreciate someone giving women yet another reason to judge their attractiveness by the size of their breasts. I do tend to prefer bustier women, but their breasts are never a deciding factor in whether I want to be friends or date them..

I shudder to think what they'd think of people into age play, especially when both participants are clearly mature adults. Sexuality is somewhat nuanced and complex, and if one type of attraction is outlawed the affected group will merely try and find a different way of satisfying their desires.

Porn should only feature large breasted females, its all true

Its a good point, obviously to save confusion, all porn should only contain the larger breasted variety of female.

Rather 'ol boy, what !?

Discrimination?

'About the Australian Human Rights Commission

Working towards an Australian society where human rights are for everyone, everywhere, every day.'

http://www.hreoc.gov.au/

There's a lovely picture of a young aboriginal boy on there (and no, I'm not a paedo, tho' he is cute), just wondering if any Australian websites should be allowed to portray images of prepubescent humans - just in case.

Evil Jobs - just because.

Cause or Effect

Has anyone considered *why* small-breasted women have come to dominate pr0n?

In the old days, men's magazines could still shoot 15 year olds legally - I remember one such case and she had DD breasts!

Now we have 20 year old women with tiny boobs wearing ribbons and their hair in pig-tails pretending to be schoolgirls (whilst the schoolgirls are all trying to look like 20-somethings).

Why?

I would blame the current mass hysteria over "paedophilia" (in inverted comments because true paedophiles are not interested in sexually mature but underage girls - they want children, as in 10 yr old and under). Making something forbidden, especially in a sexual context, tends to make it more arousing for some people. Before the great paedophilia paranoia bloomed, this kind of stuff was as rare as hen's teeth!

what the f*ck is wrong with my country

rhetorical question

Wow

This is just... wow. I've been thinking the commonwealths are all equally bad off in regards to this but Australia just pulled out WAY in front. Sorry Mr. Dundee =(

I wonder, is this a conspiracy by the food industry and the plastic surgery industry? After all, to do as little as possible to encourage pedophilia, we should have breasts as LARGE as possible. Thus, everyone should eat as much as possible. Fat is stored in the breasts and overeating will make them very large and not look like a child's.

But that's not enough, we should accentuate this with implants (silicone is popular I hear) to supplement, because sometimes people have high metabolisms which burn off that fat. But I don't care how much you exercise, you won't be metabolizing that silicone!

I also suggest we outlaw male pornography. Males do not have breasts, therefore their lack of mammarial adipose will remind viewers of a child, and this is a risk we can't take! Men should need to inflate their chests through consuming extra food (I believe 'man boobs' abbr 'moobs' is the term for this) as well as consider getting breast implants as some transgendereds do during a sex change.

Another issue which was not addressed, but which should be: body hair. A lot of porno actors like to shave hair in various places around their body. This should be outlawed! We can't have them reminding us of children! Even trimming it shouldn't be acceptable. For those actors and actresses who do not naturally grow much hair, they should need to experiment with trichological pharmacology to accelerate their hair growth.

Furthermore, these hairless flatchested adults are not only a problem in the adult film industry. After all, pornography is NOT the only thing which arouses people. Good-looking people in the media in general tend to arouse people, so therefore we should also ban people without boobs or body hair from appearing in pictures or videos as well. In fact, we really should limit their ability to appear in public altogether, like serving in any sort of occupation that involves leaving the house.

I also suggest we outlaw chemotherapy. Chemotherapy can cause hair to fall out. If an adult undergoes chemotherapy then they might be confused with an infant, and if we convey that cancer patients still may possess some kind of sexuality, it might turn the population into nepiophiles who think it's AWWRIGHT to go do some cradle-robbin'.

this is what happens ...

.. when you give the state the keys to your soul "if it saves one child". This is where the path the mob who say "the government should do something about it" leads you.

To those who insist this could never happen in the UK, I say : it can, and it will. Once we have established the principle the state has a right to pry into your privacy, it's just a question of degree.

The madder the better

The more crazy censorship laws they pass the better - they'll soon reach a tipping point where they become a complete joke to 99% of people, then there'll be the inevitable backlash of a tidal wave of deviancy, which can only be a good thing.

If they really cared about the abuse of children, they'd give children the same protection that adults have from violence, i.e offences like assault. While adults are allowed to inflict corporal punishment on children legally its obvious that all the noise about paedophilia is emanating from their weird sexuality & not from any genuine desire to protect children. I'm suprised this isn't mentioned more, but then of course, there's a lot of guilty parents out there who don't want that issue addressed ever