"... and serves no purpose but to perpetuate gender stereotypes”, the poster added.
Using the word 'man' is wrong? Always? Isn't this just another instance of humourless absolutism?
But poster above insists we must use 'person'? Is that really reparative, or merely retributive social flexing? Ah, but social rage is all the rage.
When individual words become more important than the larger picture and message, you're indulging in dickhead signaling. (oops)
BTW: when the next person suggests to you that we *must* have N number of <previously excluded class> as heads of organizations *now*, to correct out past imbalances in representation, ask them to suggest the next N heads of, say, NOW *must* be men. That'll be fun.