back to article One thought equivalent to less than a single proton in mass

A headline in the venerable New Scientist magazine "Protons are lighter than thought" has prompted El Reg's Standards Bureau to consider the notion of thought as a small unit of mass. It was believed that the proton was about 0.877 femtometres, less than a trillionth of a millimetre. But now scientists have found the subatomic …

TRT
Silver badge

Well it's known...

that it's harder to think positive thoughts than negative thoughts, so presumably catcogitates are heavier than ancogitates.

18
0
Silver badge

Re: Well it's known...

Come on, not the perennial joke about the electron on the shrink's couch.

5
0
TRT
Silver badge

Re: Well it's known...

It's far, far harder to be neutral!

10
0
Silver badge

I tried to do the maths, and came up with a division by zero error.

11
0
Silver badge
Joke

For future reference, breaking it down it single steps, ie "do the math", makes it easier to find your mistake.

And, of course, less thinking of heavy thoughts reduces the likelihood of neck strain or, worse, whiplash,

2
0
Silver badge

The Register wonders how many Katie Hopkins columns it would take to amass a single unit?

More than she could ever write before the heat-death of the universe...

27
0
Silver badge
Unhappy

The sad fact is that Hopkins puts a lot of thought into the poisonous bile she writes which is crafted and honed to radicalise and inflame hatred.

13
3
Silver badge

Not sure that one needs to put all that much thought into such things. Simply mentioning specific keywords is usually enough to get the target base all riled up.

In other words : just wave the red flag aggressively, the bulls will charge soon enough.

1
4

@Jason Bloomberg, So you think that the whole public is pristine and innocent and kind and gentle and it's Hopkins articles that make them hate others? Do you not think that she is just saying stuff that many of the public already agree with?

6
2
Silver badge

@The Axe: I know full well that there are plenty of racists, bigots and other haters out there. And, no, I don't think they only exist or are how they are because of what Hopkins writes. What Hopkins does is deliberately fan the fires of hatred.

10
4
Anonymous Coward

I'd have thought that her writings were anti-mass, given the way they seem to repel people / inanimate objects

0
0
Anonymous Coward

So you think that the whole public is pristine and innocent and kind and gentle

There's plenty of crummy people around...

and it's Hopkins articles that make them hate others? Do you not think that she is just saying stuff that many of the public already agree with?

...and confirmation of the legitimacy of their views by seeing similar views in print, in newspapers, will lead to trouble.

If you don't push back against shit opinions, then one day those with such opinions will attract sufficient backing to get elected. Then they stop being opinions; they start becoming policy, with the ability to enact them.

It's all too easy for those with comfortable, easy going liberal views and lifestyles to assume that everyone else shares the same ideals, and that there's no need to proactively maintain an equitable status quo. Biggest mistake ever. The USA got Trump. We nearly ended up with an incompetent Trotsky-ist with as much of an idea of how to be prime minister and run a country as a rotten turnip, because too many Labour MPs thought he'd never win their leadership election and then too many voters took his oh-so dubious promises to heart without any idea what the consequences would be (tanked economy, crippling borrowing rates, rampant strikes, no jobs, no money).

4
8
Silver badge

Katie Who?

The best thing you can do is ignore her.

6
0

This post has been deleted by a moderator

Bronze badge

" We nearly ended up with an incompetent Trotsky-ist with as much of an idea of how to be prime minister and run a country as a rotten turnip"

Instead we get a dictatorial incompetent who appoints other incompetents to handle delicate negotiations. Its funny how mildly socialist views are now seen as Trotskyist. Is the Swedish government marxist or trostskyist? Many European governments hold similar views to Corbyn, oddly none of them are labelled quite so aggressively. Crippling borrowing rates? Like our 1.7 TRILLION debt - more than all labour governments in history combined? You buy into the tory dogma that any social spending is bad for the country - well, from the perspective of the very wealthy it certainly is, why waste money on the peasants you could squirrel away overseas for yourself?

2
0

Dons tin hat.

Her comments pale in comparison to the bigoted racist hypocritical left wing rubbish spouted by the likes of the Gruniad and BBC.

1
3

Well given that said columns are basically a vacuum

the number of them needed to make the mass of a proton approaches infinity.

Which means presumably you could now reference "the speed of a sheep in a Katie Hopkins column"?

10
1
Silver badge

Re: Well given that said columns are basically a vacuum

Interesting thought, which raises the question whether the column is vacuum, or merely vacuous? I would suggest the latter, as a true vacuum is so full of bovine excrement, which would exert a noticeable drag force on any sheep

8
0
Coat

Re: Well given that said columns are basically a vacuum

Of course the standing of a column is in direct proportion to the number of potential speaking engagements it engenders - that is, it has a height equivalent to the theoretical plate.

2
0

Re: Well given that said columns are basically a vacuum

@MHFW - egad, I do believe you've solved a major problem in astrophysics! So that's what dark matter probably is!

3
0
TRT
Silver badge

"Of course, we know that thoughts are generated by the firing of neurons in the brain"

"...and don't have a physical weight."

Well, given that neuronal firing is a synonym for the rapid movement of ions across a neuronal membrane, there would be a shift in mass involved. I'm sure someone could work it out if it actually achieved anything by doing so.

4
0

Re: "Of course, we know that thoughts are generated by the firing of neurons in the brain"

"...and don't have a physical weight."

That's a weight off my mind...

22
1
Silver badge
Boffin

Re: "Of course, we know that thoughts are generated by the firing of neurons in the brain"

Well, given that neuronal firing is a synonym for the rapid movement of ions across a neuronal membrane, there would be a shift in mass involved.

However, a swift kick to the head to dislodge some stuck thoughts doesn't usually achieve the desired results.

But we have to experimentally validate to see if that is actually is the case, and in the process we might indeed find a value for the mass of a thought, by applying standard kicks to the head (calibrated in NorrisLinguini) and averaging the number of unstuck thoughts resulting from that.

0
0
Thumb Up

Original thought

Would it have to be an original thought to have mass?

Thus as the sum of human knowledge increases, it becomes less likely to have an original thought.

So perhaps thoughts gain mass as time goes on. To know everything would require more mass than exists in the universe, perhaps?

2
0
Silver badge

Re: Original thought

> Would it have to be an original thought to have mass?

I suspect thoughts are entangled, which is how the same one can appear to be in many places at the same time. If so, there are only original thoughts.

2
0
Coat

Re: Original thought

"I suspect thoughts are entangled"

Would this make the human brain the original quantum computer?

To put it another way: Schrödinger's thought process -> a human is both smart and incredibly stupid simultaneously, and listening to their thoughts changes the outcome?

I know, I know, mine's the one with poison in one pocket and a kitten in the other.

3
0
Silver badge
Boffin

Zeno's thoughts measurement

To know everything would require more mass than exists in the universe, perhaps?

At the very least, knowing everything there is to know would make the total mass of all thought a new data point which has to be known, increasing yet again the total mass of all thought, etc.

0
0
Silver badge

Wouldn't Katie Hopkins' "thoughts" be anti-thoughts, so we have to look at anti-protons? (and yes, those have the (positive) same mass as protons, but it's the thought that counts)

Alternatively, given the often self-contradictory nature of what passes for thoughts in her case, some particle that is its own antiparticle (a Majorana fermion) would be suitable. As the most probable candidate for such a particle is the neutrino, which has near zero mass, this might be ideal

11
0

Damn it. You got in there before me.

0
0
Silver badge

I was wondering if scientists ought to be examining Katie Hopkins brain. It could well be where all the missing dark matter of the universe is hiding now that we think thoughts might have mass. She certainly seems to have a lot of dark thoughts.

0
0
Silver badge

I was wondering if scientists ought to be examining Katie Hopkins brain.

First... they would have to find it before they can examine it. Electron microscope?

0
0

Confused units

"It was believed that the proton was about 0.877 femtometres, less than a trillionth of a millimetre. But now scientists have found the subatomic particle is 30 billionths of a per cent lighter than that estimate."

0.877 femtometres is a length. You can't be 30 billionths of a percent lighter than a length.

38
0

Re: Confused units

Indeed. I think the - what should we call it, writard? - is confusing the proton radius puzzle - where the radius seems to be smaller than we thought - with the current article's measurement of the mass.

9
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Confused units

How many parsecs did it take to write this article, one wonders...

27
0
Silver badge
FAIL

Re: Confused units

I think I lost brain cells, and thus brain weight, just trying to read this article. :(

6
0
Happy

Re: Confused units

Writard, I like that. It's definitely nicer that re(por)tard.

8
0
Silver badge
Boffin

Re: Confused units

The Register wonders how many Katie Hopkins columns it would take to amass a single unit?

The units are indeed confused. Katie Hopkins columns are so insubstantial they actually have no mass at all. The appropriate unit to use therefore is the 'nat' from Shannon information theory, as her columns convey precisely zero information.[1]

[1] Although they may leak information about herself.

11
0

Re: Confused units

oh, less than 12 I'd guess.

1
0
Boffin

Re: Confused units

Q. "How high is green?"

A. "The faster, the smarter."

2
0
Silver badge

Re: Confused units

@bob

Wrong question. How high is a Chinaman.

1
0
Gold badge
Mushroom

Re: Confused units

How high is a Chinaman.

Depends if he's played the piano in General Kash Mai Chek's secret NAAFI or not...

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Confused units

Trying to figure out what's lighter than 0.877 femtometres made my head go like the title image.

With this and the mix-and-match of mass and force in the Watt balance article, there is some crazy physics going on at El Reg this afternoon. I'll have what they're having.

3
0

Re: How high is a Chinaman

5,068m if he's on the Xining-Golmud-Lhasa railway, we learned that earlier.

5
0
Pint

Re: Confused units

Five parsecs. They wrote it on the Kessel run.

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Confused units

@technicalben My brain cells have been replaced by plaques. Most noticeably a blue one with 'Tom lived here'

2
0
Silver badge

Re: Confused units

Perhaps someone in this thread has had their mind twisted enough to tell me why a raven is like a writing desk?

2
0
Silver badge

Re: Confused units

I think the same as the Alderaan run...

0
0

Re: Confused units

Indeed: a person crueller than I might consider the whole piece innumerate tosh. Thoughts do of course have "physical weight" (what other sort is there? Spiritual, literary I guess). The firing of a neuron occurs through passage of many neurotransmitter molecules across a synaptic gap, and they have a finite molecular weight.

1
0
Silver badge

Re: Confused units

"Perhaps someone in this thread has had their mind twisted enough to tell me why a raven is like a writing desk?"

Oh, that's simple: The notes that they're normally noted for are not musical notes.

0
0
Bronze badge
Coat

"why is a raven like a writing-desk?"

Poe wrote on both.

3
0

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Forums

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018