Bottom or top
"Rest assured, The Register will do its very best to get to the bottom of this story."
Hm, I thought you, dear El Reg, would be on top of things...
Commuters at Washington DC's Union Station were left unsure if they were coming or going on Monday, when streamed smut started to appear on digital signs during peak hour. And it appears there's a rash of such incidents taking place around the world. As Twitter users like @_joannaw recorded, “The monitors at Union Station just …
I accidentally did this in a restaurant a few months ago.
A thing popped up on my phone saying "stop streaming?", so I cancelled it...
And the restaurant background music stopped.
Obviously I should have started streaming my date's favourite music, but I didn't have any on my phone. Word to the wise - be prepared.
Passersby shocked by jumbotron showing Japanese porn in South Jakarta
The complaint seems to be that it's Japanese porn instead of local porn for local people.
No, it came with pixels on the privates, if you're going to display porn in public at least display the uncensored stuff! I mean, I've heard Japanese porn is censored and has pixels on the privates, umm, so I was told by err, the next person who posted in this specific thread.
Ohh, you know Dave too? Dude told me about how the Japanese get around it with software that removes the pixels. Can't see why they would do that though when they can just go to the local train station and get the good stuff.
Unless the good stuff was posted up by one of them trolls who will now send DCMA notices to the train companies and demand $100,000,000 per viewer of their illegally obtained porn.
Dave says hi.
Yes, I believe they were assaulted by some nuts. :| *
If I were Samsung, I would just build phones that only display random pr0n, make billions and thousands of dollar bucks, and THEN they've got something!
"it's Japanese porn instead of local porn for local people."
We're a local porn shop, for local porn people, we want no porn trouble from you!
* the rare, yet magically delicious, straight-faced emoji
Why?
A bus stops at a bus station, not a road station. You can therefore catch a bus at a bus station.
I do not want to catch a "railway", I want to catch a train. Shouldn't I be going to a train station?
(I know it's a quirk of the language, so this is more a general wonderment rather than a finger-pointing exercise at you)
And have you noticed that the thing you're sitting[1] in isn't a train any more, it's a "service". As in the next station stop for this service is Lesser Picklington[2]...
It all started getting silly when they started calling us "customers" rather than "passengers". At least the latter implied some suggestion that the ride they were taking you for was a literal rather than metaphorical one.
[1] Or standing, depending on the time and location
[2] Or wherever
It's correctly called a railway station, as whenever i get to it there's never a train in sight. Just rails. And some old infrastructure well beyond needing a refresh (by which i do not mean overpriced,overlit retail outlets).
But very rarely a train.
This post has been deleted by its author
I ride the commuter rail to South Station in Boston. The recorded announcements are sometimes interesting. Recently, I heard the following:
"When leaving the train, please use caution to avoid tripping at the space between the train and the platform. Thank you."
Three words would have sufficed, but this is America, and, well...