Took them long enough after FCC went after others for same thing when they offered online streaming that didn't cost any monthly bandwidth.
FCC wants a word with AT&T about that zero-rated DirecTV streaming
The FCC is taking issue with AT&T over its plans to launch DirecTV as a zero-rated streaming video service. The US watchdog's Wireless Telecommunications Bureau has sent a letter [PDF] to AT&T's senior executive veep of external and legislative affairs asking the telecoms giant to address concerns that by omitting DirecTV from …
COMMENTS
-
-
Saturday 12th November 2016 02:24 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: This won't matter
I'll up vote you for spreading the idea that net neutrality is not of interest. I personally don't see how it exists at all with or without law. It's cool and all that people are to believe it makes a difference, but where has it?
I think the Verizon/Yahoo deal removes neutrality from providers and search engines, just as Google and Motorola did. Let's say for a fact I'm 100% wrong there, can you even mention 1 major deal that "Net Neutrality" has stopped? I can only give examples of where "Net Neutrality" has stopped nothing for monopolization, not a single one where it has helped competition. So maybe its entire concept is just a pony show for the common consumer. Sort of similar to that mythical citizens arrest.
Seriously, I hope I'm not sounding negative because that is not what I want. Just...what has Net Neutrality helped competition? Name something...anything.
-
-
Wednesday 16th November 2016 09:40 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: This won't matter
"If it has no effect, why are the ISPs like Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T screaming about it? Why do the republicans want to kill it?"
Are you really that dumb?
Strict or "hard" net neutrality transfers the costs to ISPs from Google and Facebook and Netflix. It puts new services that need price or performance discrimination at risk. None of this is good news if you are an ISP.
Seriously, dude.
-
-
-
-