Well, that certainly gives some credibility to the claim it's a state actor.
Security researchers have shone fresh light on the allegedly Russian state-sponsored hacking crew blamed for ransacking the US Democratic National Committee's computers. Sednit – also known as APT28, Fancy Bear and Sofacy – has been operating since 2004. The cyber-mob has reportedly infiltrated machines operated by targets as …
Wonder if they will get the loser blues like the Koch's did in 2012 after blowing through all that cash (or in this case invaluable zero days) with remarkably little to show for it (granted what the Kansas boys did was legal at least).
If these are "state actors" (I'm sold, these guys are NP-hard) we are beyond "legal". "Legal" is for the rubes.
To quote "Raw Deal"
Elevator Operator: Good evening, sir.
Mark Kaminsky: Down.
Elevator Operator: There is no down.
Mark Kaminsky: Hey, I'm not a cop. I'm a player.
What they didn't say...
Was whether the exploits came from that 2013 NSA stash or from that new guy, the one who swiped "terabytes" of NSA documents and files, including exploits. If so, that would diminish the fact that it was a non-USA state actor.
"Most of the targets uncovered by ESET's research have Gmail addresses"
Most of the people I know seem to have Gmail addresses.
And here's a good reason why that may not be a good idea:
Temple University handed over the University email system to google years ago, and everyone involved in this false arrest case thinks the NSA monitoring Temple's gmail, but not understanding what they were reading, is how this fiasco started.
This will be going more often.
Don't expect different results with Microsoft Exchange Online.
Were it my operation, I'd reserve 0-days for my primary function for the group. Which reaffirms just what they are all about, black-bag operations.
Windows, Adobe Flash and Java vulnerabilities
Well, THERE's your PROBLEM!
Seriously, it's kinda known that vulnerabilities are traded on the dark web. It's also likely that the people doing this are NOT 'state sponsored', but may simply be 'anon' type activists. If you want to find them, you'd have better luck hanging out on 4chan or some similar place that 'anonymous' frequents. Pointing fingers at Russia is just Mrs. Clinton's latest distraction, since those leaks make her (and the DNC) look pretty bad...
(not saying that none of the 'anon' actors are NOT inside Russia, which may be true, but that they're probably not sponsored by Putin's gummint)