back to article Apple assumes you'll toss the Watch after three years

Apple has dropped a little hint about the expected working lives of its products, suggesting its Watch will only be used for three years. The three year timeframe gets a mention in a document Cupertino released today titled More answers to your questions about Apple and the environment. One section of the document answer the …

Silver badge

Four years?!?!

My late 2008 MacBook is still going strong. I've also seen people with even older MacBooks too.

20
0
Silver badge

Re: Four years?!?!

2007 iMac, 9 years old.

I suppose this announcement means Apple recognises that they don't make 'em like that any more and that 10.12 will drop support for older hardware like this.

7
0

Re: Four years?!?!

Same here, late 2008 MacBook sd & 8gb ram, still going well, despite being officially listed as obsolete. I suspect it'll keep going for a while and be the oldest supported device on new Mac OS's.

3
0
Silver badge
Happy

Re: Four years?!?!

A Mid-2010 17" MBP here (anti-glare not glossy screen). Still going strong after 6 years of use and recently given a new lease of life with a 1Tb SSD. Looking at the other comments I think I can expect many more years of reliable service.

That said - I can't help thinking the new "It's-all-soldered-to-the-MB" Macs that can't be upgraded or repaired, effectively disposable, would struggle to last four years.

As for the iPhone - I get two years out of it, then I get a replacement and hand down the old one to my parents who get another two years out of it.

4
0

Re: Four years?!?!

Yep, I still use my late 2007 macbook for certain things - only thing failing is the battery so using it as a desktop these days. That said as it's a model with a replaceable battery I should really look for a replacement for that.

1
0

Re: Four years?!?!

Same here, late 2008 MacBook with new battery, memory, and fan, yet more productive than 2 year old Dell / HP rigs.

4
2
Silver badge

Re: Four years?!?!

My 2007 iMac is still going strong as well - running Linux, as Apple stopped providing OS security updates about 2 years ago.

My original AppleTV is also still working - although we only use it for viewing photos now.

The last time I spent Apple Watch type money on a watch was 20 years ago, and it is still going strong...

I put an SSD in my 2010 Vaio notebook and it feels nearly as fast as my Surface Pro 3...

2
0
Silver badge

Re: Four years?!?!

Batteries are readily available on fleabay. Go for it...

1
0
Silver badge
Coat

Re: Four years?!?!

There's not really been much improvement in the last ten years in laptops, Apple or otherwise that a new battery, an SSD and maybe some more RAM can't fix. (Oh, and clean the fluff out of the fans and heatsinks while you're popping the SSD in).

>>>> mine's the one with some small screwdrivers in the pocket.

3
0
Silver badge

Re: Four years?!?!

I've got a 2010 MacBook Pro… but that doesn't make me average. Businesses will probably have a higher turnover due to accounting rules and I suspect they'll make up the majority of purchases: including stuff being bought by employees. As Apple kit usually has higher resale values a lot of kit goes on to find new owners.

1
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Four years?!?!

Ugh... I shudder to think how 'non current' I'd be if I kept Apple kit for 4 years. That's what PC owners do and look at them with their grubby Windows and creaky plastic.

Apple kit needs to last however long it takes them to get the next generation shiny to my house and for me to get the now woefully embarrassing previous generation unshiny onto eBay.

3
4
Anonymous Coward

Re: Four years?!?!

Yep me too - early 2008 Mac Pro still going strong and I have no plans to replace it. Dual quad-core 3GHz processors and 16GB memory is more than enough 8 years on.(*)

I am even running a 2nd Gen iPod touch from 2007 which works perfectly as a music player (including streaming internet tunes if I can find a WiFi hotspot) despite it having been deprecated from the iOS SDK several years ago meaning no more apps or updates for existing apps.

(* I actually improved the machine's performance significantly by ditching the expensive POS which is the Apple RAID card and fitting newer high-speed 3TB SATA drives using software RAID. There is still scope to improve further by adding a flash drive for caching)

1
0
Silver badge

Re: Four years?!?!

Nonononono. People won't be ditching them because they've stopped working. They'll be doing so because they aren't aesthetically de la mode any more.

5
0
JLV
Silver badge

Re: Four years?!?!

Ditto. Early 2011, 17". Survived some rather nasty shocks, case still looks pretty decent. Very durable.

500SSD, HDD switched to CD caddy. Want to bump it up to 16gb ram next - VM work gobbles that.

Would trade a 1920x1080 17" over a retina 15" any day. What kind of idiot @ Apple thought up that retina is going to do much for bash terminal screens 2 feet away? Or even for surfing the web?

Sitting on the fence on a new one down the road. Yes to the OS, yes to the build quality. No to the smaller screen and to unchangeable ram. So probably will keep this one for a while. It's plenty fast enough.

1
0

Re: Four years?!?!

My iMac is from late 2009, but it was modernised when the HD died, it was 5 years old at that time. I maxed the Ram, put thhe system and applications on an SSD, and data on a new HD (which is in the dvd bay).

Apart from the lack of usb3, the machine feels up tod ate, and i think it will easily serve another two to three years, hope to get it to ten years before i buy a new one. Even then, i may use it for something else, like a server or a smart tv

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Four years?!?!

I actually improved the machine's performance significantly by ditching the expensive POS which is the Apple RAID card and fitting newer high-speed 3TB SATA drives using software RAID. There is still scope to improve further by adding a flash drive for caching

SSHD drives might be good for you too then. eg:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Seagate-Serial-Solid-State-Hybrid/dp/B00FQH7MQ2

There are other vendors for them too, though I've only used the Seagate ones personally. (not bad thus far)

0
0

I must not be typical.

My Macs typically last about 10 years before I get a new one.

I'll be using my Apple Watch as long as it tells time.

I still use my original iPad along with numerous later models.

I do update my iPhone ever 2 or 3 years.

6
0
Anonymous Coward

"I'll be using my Apple Watch as long as it tells time."

That's about 14 hours then.

1
0

As a service...

stuff tends to break after 5-6 years :D

On the other hand, I still habe PPC machines going strong, not to speak of Newton Message Pads that just won't die.

5
0

Re: As a service...

What time is it on your other hand though ?

0
0

Use vs last

I realise that the headline wouldn't be so eye catching, but doesn't that quote from Apple's document actually say that they expect first owners to use/keep their devices for three years, implying that they may well then go into the second hand market?

Not sure why, but the second hand market for Apple products is incredibly strong.

10
0
Silver badge
Paris Hilton

Fashion accessories only have a limited useful live

Its not the "life" of the product. Its the time that Apple amortizes the cost over when working out how much they think they can gouge for their overpriced kit. They come up with a number that they think the suckers their customers will see as an acceptable annual value and multiply by their expected fashion accessory life to determine the sale price. After the "life" time the marketing will convince people that they have a hopelessly unfashionable accessory and need to update their look wth the latest gadget.

Paris because she is the ultimate fashionista...

16
5
Silver badge

Re: Fashion accessories only have a limited useful live

Your right. I'm amazed by the number of "new" kettles that are double the price of the "old" ones, that are just half a shade redder than last year. Next year they will have a chrome trim, the year after that cream, then back again to repeat the cycle.

All the time people get rid of the old, for the new and pay the over the odds price because they could not bear to buy one a different colour.

4
0
Silver badge

FIRST OWNER

The Reg author conveniently ignored that part of Apple's statement, because it doesn't fit their narrative about "throwing away" devices after a 3 or 4 year lifetime.

I have owned my iPhones for between one and three years, but I sold them all for between $200 and $450, and they were in good shape when I did so. They all went on to second and perhaps later third owners.

6
1

Re: FIRST OWNER

I'm not sure it is a case of The Reg conveniently ignoring it. Sure, that's what it appears to say but that would make absolutely no sense whatsoever (as the reg points out later). Why would you ignore 2nd hand use when working out a device's environmental life-span? It is in YOUR favour to estimate the device's lifespan as being longer as the environmental impact per year is "total environmental cost" divided by "total lifespan in years".

0
0
Silver badge

Re: FIRST OWNER

Shhhhhh not totally ignoring it but not emphasising it.

After all, we all hate Crapple here don't we eh?

{2009 13in MacBook just upgraded to El-Capitan. Going great.}

2
2

Re: FIRST OWNER

Yeah, well, except they did emphasised it by putting it in a bootnote

0
0
Mushroom

Built to Last?—Not Any More

In our gaff, we also have old Apple MacBooks and desktops, which are still going strong, in spite of being bashed, battered and dented [albeit running Debian now, coz they can't handle OSX]. We also have two recent MacBook Airs, which have been mollycoddled; one of which died within a year and the other which is slowly falling to pieces, one glitch at a time.

Apple gear may once have been built to last. But those days are long gone. If anything, those projected 3 and 4 year llifecycles are a bit optimistic.

10
2
Silver badge
Holmes

It Probably Cuts Both Ways _And It is Not Just Apple

There are several factors in play here. Apple is first and foremost a marketing exercise. It is recognising this and whether its life projections are from production to failure or from production to 'selling on' are not a prime interest in the first stage. Fashion items typically have a relatively short life, some a very short life, e.g. women's fashion clothing. So the company's focus will inevitably turn from keeping it working, to up-selling the first purchaser. Looking at those figures in this light makes sense. A purchaser who has had an 'X' for 2~3 years thus becomes a prime target in a market that is likely to be finite with marginal elasticity of demand. If the first mark can sell on their once shiny new toy to ease the purchase of a new one that is a bonus. Just look at the raft of second hand shops, sorry charity stalls and nearly new emporia.

Some makers object, but others who are more worldly wise see it as part of the marketing model. Sell on your old device to a second tier user at a depreciated price. Let them lust after the better item, (better only because it is the newest fashion item). Then hope that the nagging thought that they only bought second best will make them either be a repeat second hand customer for the next gen item, or more desirably a new first time buyer. Hey Presto you have expanded the market, it is the same for almost all visible consumer items ladies coats, dresses, (shorter cycle times), iThings, even cars, (longer cycle times). (Non visible items, used underwear anyone are probably a very limited niche market, - though quite strong in some export fields I have been told.)

I tend to watch the evolution of this marketing model from the sidelines. My two cars are an average of nearly 14 years old, my phone is coming up for 10 years old, my most active desk top 6 years old, my portable 8 years old and so on.

4
3

They probably were right

I have had macs for decades, and other computers too. It *used* to be the case you would upgrade after 3/4 years for the newer faster model, and I did, and it was better / faster / more storage. But since the mid 2000s or so? That cycle stopped. I swapped my 2008 macbook for a 2014 one, and my 2007 iMac was replaced for a 2012 one, which won't be replaced soon. My PC is from about 2009.

3/4 years no longer gives you faster / better / more storage, the changes are smaller and less important. I only updated my macbook because I had a work one with a retina screen and got used to it. Side by side It was faster but it didn't really feel it in day to day use.

I think all computer companies are going to have to get used to a slower update cycle, as there really aren't the compelling reasons to update that there used to be.

Obviously the watch will be different, as it is more a fashion accessory than a technology product, so its market rules are different

8
0
Silver badge

I have some oldies but goodies

Still going strong.. PowerMac G5 (2003) , iMac G5, an old 12"powerbook, still running good ol' 10.5.8.

2
0
Anonymous Coward

Does Some one Believe Apple is not Dirven by Marketing

It appears that we have someone who does not believe Apple is a marketing operation, just like every other mass driven large company. I wonder what such a person believes in?

0
2

Spin

Lordy, what a crock this article is. As noted above, Apple talk about first owners, not product lifetimes. And more importantly, this is information about environmental impact. Apple are being hard on themselves here. It would be in their interests to suggest longer times, and thus improve the environmental rating of their products. Had they suggested significant;y longer times they could (and should) have been taken to task for trying to soft pedal the impact of manufacturing their products.

As any owner knows, Apple stuff tends to be very well built, and outlasts kit from just about anyone else. Further, it keep its value way longer than other kit. You can argue why it might, but the reality is that it does. As products that are viewed from the standpoint of environmental footprint Apple do very well.

6
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: Spin

In some cases kit will be sold on after three years.

In some cases kit will be broken by that time.

In some cases kit will have been left in a cupboard because the owner has bought a newer (better?) replacement.

In some cases kit will be sat in a drawer because the owner just stopped using it.

2
0
Silver badge

MacOS

They've corrected it to OS X. We can all calm down now.

3
0
Silver badge

Support cycles

As a matter if interest.

BBC Radio 4 (You and Yours) has been covering the way that some connected technology ( e.g. Samsung "Smart" TVs) can be dumped at the whim of the makers after a few years.

6
0

Re: Support cycles

Did they also mention the infamous Nest Revolv IoT hub, all due to be rendered useless on 15 May?

3
0

Immature product

I agree with the comments about OSX devices having a long service life, but those are basically mature and stable products.

The apple watch is basically a first generation very immature product and, if the whole smart watch concept is viable at all, developments need to be so rapid that the current product is a laughing stock within a 1-2 year time frame.

1
0
WTF?

Another non story.

A clickbait headline and a story with more spin than a whip and top!

In truth this story is about how a company calculates an enviromental impact for different classes of products.

The years they use to calculate this are simply an arbitary number, they could use 2 or 5 years and it would change nothing apart from the enviromental impact score.

It certainly wouldn't change the life expectation of a device or my refresh cycle.

2
0
Joke

The Ghost of Tommy Cooper

El Reg:

"But why measure only the environmental impact of one user?"

Answer:

" I've just bought a watch, its guaranteed for life. When the mainspring fails battery explodes, it slashes your wrist!!"

2
0
Silver badge

Re: The Ghost of Tommy Cooper

Or Terry Pratchett's

Light a man a fire and you'll keep him warm for a night. Set a man on fire and you'll keep him warm for the rest of his life

3
0
Silver badge

not a real watch anyway

I've got two I use. One was made in 1935, the other in 1966. Neither requires batteries. Both will surely be valued by someone many years from now and fetch a price much higher than when new. Both tell the time. (although you have to look at them)

2
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: not a real watch anyway

I have one from 1969. It works, but it needs a service to minimise mechanical wear (dust from the tritium-degraded phosphor can get into the works). Many mechanical watches benefit from servicing every few years. At the time it cost £19, but with its chain mail strap (what Apple call Milanese) it cost £23.

I have a more modern quartz watch too, batteries need to be replaced every four or five years but this is a much cheaper operation (by a third party - I'm not fussed about it retaining its 200M water resistance - if I found myself at that depth, my watch would by the last of my worries).

1
0

Re: not a real watch anyway

Phosphor goes where? And here I thought GTLS tubes had the coating on the *inside*...

Unless there's a mixup and you're on about old-school Radium-enhanced markers or the newer glow in the dark type? (and the new stuff is impressively bright...)

0
0
Silver badge

Re: not a real watch anyway

My Seiko Kinetic is supposed to get a £70 service every year. About three or four years back the storage cell started to lose its effectiveness, so that I have to wear it most of the day to keep it running, which the service would sort out. But so far I've used it for eight and a half years without a service, which is near enough £600 I've saved, far more than the cost of a replacement.

1
0
Silver badge

Folks I know who use Apple kit ...

... typically replace it within 9-18 months.

Fad toys are fad toys, end of discussion.

Just sayin'

4
5

Re: Folks I know who use Apple kit ...

Hello fandroid. What a fanatically ridiculous comment. Considering you probably don't know anyone with Apple kit.

There are the few that want to replace all of the phone/tablet/watch stuff on every release, but that's a good minority now-a-days considering how many of those products get sold every day/week/year. For laptops/desktops; the ones that replace those regularly are probably heavy users for their job/career. Every MacBook owner I know pushes it until it's last breath. One of my friends pushed a 2008/2009 white MacBook to the point the rubber bottom was coming off and therefore degraded the motherboard quickly.

1
2
Silver badge

Re: Folks I know who use Apple kit ...

"Hello fandroid."

If you are assuming I'm a google fan, you'd be wrong. Very wrong.

"What a fanatically ridiculous comment."

Just telling it like I see it, with my own eyes, on a daily basis.

"Considering you probably don't know anyone with Apple kit."

I live in the Northern part of the San Francisco Bay Area. Damn near all the yuppies up here are constantly flashing their latest bit o'Apple kit to be seen with. I just laugh and/or point & giggle at the mindless sheeple.

On the bright side, they pay me an arm and a leg to fix their B0rken BSDOSX systems when they get in over their neatly coifed heads.

1
1
Silver badge

Re: Folks I know who use Apple kit ...

@the-it-slayer: upvoted for calling our dear jake a 'fandroid'. That was a real LOL moment for me.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

The iWatch was toss from the outset

Toss worn by tosspots

5
3

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Forums

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018