back to article UK drivers left idling as Tesla rolls out Autopilot in US

Tesla has offered to make its customers more confident drivers by allowing them to hand over control of their vehicles to software. The manufacturer started pushing its Autopilot technology to its Model S motors with its Tesla Version 7.0 software yesterday - in the US anyway. Autopilot will take advantage of tech built into …

Terminator

I wish Muskie would make up his mind

He bleats about the perils of AI, but has no problems selling you an autonomous automobile.

5
1
Silver badge
Terminator

Re: I wish Muskie would make up his mind

My function is to -- keep -- Muskie -- safe, not to keep Muskie, like, totally stoked about the general vibe and stuff. That’s you. That’s how you talk.

0
0

Re: I wish Muskie would make up his mind

It's not an autonomous vehicle. It's a "keep your hands on the wheel but become more easily distracted and face peril since it's only semi-autonomous" vehicle.

2
0
Bronze badge
Terminator

I for one..

welcome our auto driving overlords!

0
0
Silver badge

So, you flick the indicator to switch lanes (on what planet does that really happen?) and your Tesla will automatically switch lane for you. Er, if your hand can reach the stalk, your hands are probably already on the steernig wheel. So why not use your hands to turn the wheel?

And what if no one wants to let you push in to their lane? Does the Tesla have a defense against road rage (probably involving guns if it's the USA)?

2
3
Silver badge

On Planet Italia

as soon as the get onto the autostrada they flick on their LH indicators and they remain on for hundreds of miles hoping that the mere instance of a flashing light will make other drivers move over.

IMHO the tailgating is far more effective....

As to UK Tesla drivers missing out. Who really cares? The only time I ever see one it is being charged.

1
1

Re: On Planet Italia

I've only seen one. It was on the M42. On the back of a flatbed.. with most of the front missing.

1
0

What happens when the software meets a non-American road, ie one that's not straight, has roundabouts, features non-right-angle bends, and may involve pedestrians, hedges, ditches, or even farm animals?

Does it even know there are parts of the world where people drive on the left - you know, backward countries like Japan?

Just say "No".

4
5
Silver badge

UK drivers left

@AndrewDu

Most of the rest of the world drivers right... One would hope the correct satnav info gets loaded for the lefties.

3
2
Trollface

Re: UK drivers left

Most of the rest of the world drivers right

It's about a 33/66% split with the smartest 33% driving on the left.

19
2
JDX
Gold badge

@AndrewDu

Jeez, you should probably apply for a job at Tesla. They could do with someone to point out those things, I doubt any of them have eve driven a car or spent time thinking about such unlikely things.

13
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: UK drivers left

Aside East London BMW and Merc drivers with CD's hanging from the mirror and loud stereo's who think driving in the middle is their right on all roads

0
0
Silver badge

Re: UK drivers left

Because it is smart to keep your sword hand free.

1
0
Silver badge

Not straight, has non-right-angle bends, traffic circles & pedestrians? You mean, like Broadway in New York or Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, DC? If by hedges you mean "hedges across the road", then no I haven't seen them in the US, and I only wish I could say the same for ditches.

3
0

What happens when the software meets a non-American road, ie one that's not straight, has roundabouts, features non-right-angle bends, and may involve pedestrians, hedges, ditches, or even farm animals?

Your belief that the whole of the U.S. (and presumably Canada as well) is exactly like Manhattan is ... perhaps not unexpected. Do you only get your information from cop shows?

1
1
Silver badge

I've lived in places(US) where the streets were laid out following a snake. Why does 10th street make a stupid curve here? They were following a snake the day the mapped the road.

I've also lived in Chicago where the grid is the standard, except for a few oddballs - Milwaukee Ave, Lincoln Ave. Halsted Ave. They cross against the grid forming triangle city blocks...

2
0

"What happens when the software meets a non-American road, ie one that's not straight, has roundabouts, features non-right-angle bends, and may involve pedestrians, hedges, ditches, or even farm animals?"

You've never actually been here, I take it?

https://www.google.com/maps/@40.0827063,-75.4954618,3a,75y,186.47h,71.14t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sx67AQRfxPLXssrA0a41Hbg!2e0!7i3328!8i1664

2
0
Silver badge

Actually we do have those kinds of roads and hazards in most places. Even our major highways aren't straight.

0
0
Silver badge
Pint

"...(and presumably Canada as well)..."

I'll give Musk credit for being honest about the state-of-the-art in self-driving cars.

He's clearly stated that this limited 'AutoPilot' WILL NOT WORK if the lane markings are obscured.

In Canada, the lane marking are obscured (by snow) for MONTHS AT A TIME. Many places are lax about keeping the lines painted. Dark and stormy nights with swirling snow will overload the vision systems. Construction zones are lane line comedy.

Southern California .NE. most of the rest of the world

Self-driving cars are going to be far more limited than most people believe. Luckily, Tesla owners are used to limitations on what their car can actually do in the real world; like inability to drive a thousand miles in one day over any real world route.

0
0

This post has been deleted by its author

Silver badge

Sitting in an exit row increases your confidence as an airline pilot

I had to read that twice, and I'm still not sure whether it's a typo or deliberately hysterical

3
1
Silver badge

This seems like a bad idea

A souped up cruise control option that you can enable and allows you to take your hands off the wheel and eyes off the road for long periods of time during boring interstate driving will cause drivers to do exactly that - despite any cautions from Tesla. Unless it actually enforces that behavior by pulling over if your hands are off the wheel for more than x seconds, salespeople are going to take advantage of the added "free time" to check emails on their laptop, people who have had a long day will fall asleep at the wheel, etc.

I await the first wrongful death lawsuit targeted at Tesla when a driver is otherwise occupied when the car wants to hand control back because it runs into a condition it can't handle and kills someone in another car. Do Tesla's lawyers really think that saying "drivers should keep their hands on the wheel at all times" is going to stop these lawsuits, if the car allows you to do otherwise?

The automated parallel parking is fine, that's something I should hope computers can do quicker and more smoothly than any human could. It is solving a problem that doesn't exist for a lot of people, but even though I can do it fine myself I suppose I'd have my car do it if it could.

6
1

Re: This seems like a bad idea

I am sure ways can be engineered to enforce the required driver alertness and behaviour . It is an electric car after all.... KERRRTZZZZZ.

4
0
Silver badge

Re: This seems like a bad idea

There you are with all this automation stuff enabled and cruising along I-15 heading for Vegas when an 18-Wheeler or worse a FedEx wagon with two trailers comes past you doing 85+ mph.[1] The slipstream sauses your 'automated' car to swerve out of lane and right into the path of another vehicle.

The US Ambulance Chasers will be out in droves. The damages will wipe out Tesla.

This is a good idea but in reality.... it leaves a lot to be desired in practice.

[1]Trucks in the US seem to do whatever speed they like and to hell with the others on the road.

During the extremely wet weather in North and South Carolina at the end of September it was not uncommon for 18-wheelers to blast past me doing 75+ in torrential rain. Those trucks have little or no spray reduction kit fitted.

If this sort of automation can handle those sort of conditions then it might work on non dedicated highways.

0
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: This seems like a bad idea

I must admit that I'm with Google on this one.

There comes a point where these kinds of driver assistance aids become dangers in their own right particularly if they encourage drivers to lose their concentration.

As far as I'm concerned, you are driving the car or you're not. Anything in between is just asking for trouble.

12
0
Gold badge
Meh

Re: This seems like a bad idea

The automated parallel parking is fine, that's something I should hope computers can do quicker and more smoothly than any human could.

I take it you've never actually had long-term use of a car with this feature built-in then? I have.

By the time you've found a spot that both you and the car agree is the right size and then fiddled with the thing until you're happy that it's identified the correct space and will do it and then reset all the controls so that it's happy to take over, you could have parked the sodding thing yourself three times!

Doesn't help here that it'll manoeuvre in such a way as to be millimetres from the other vehicles, to the extent where you're sure it'll hit something. As any competant driver knows that if it does hit something "the car did it itself" is not a valid excuse.......(!)

Bloody brilliant for "look what this can do" moments in the pub car park though which is, presumably, what it's really for. Willy waving.

9
0

Re: This seems like a bad idea

And yet, when a gun is accidentally discharged in America and hurts someone, the manufacturer of the weapon is rarely sued. It is often the gun's owner that gets the blame first.

I'm not saying that Tesla has carte blanche to release whatever software or features it wants without proper quality checks, I am pointing out that some responsibility does lie with the user of a machine to use it as it is designed to be used. A company can never protect itself against every possible manner in which a creative idiot can deliberately misuse it's products

Incidentally, I have a burning hatred of salespeople, so perhaps we can set up a test involving lots of them, lots of these cars, a large stretch of private highway and see how many of them end up qualifying for a Darwin Award.

4
0
Gold badge

Re: This seems like a bad idea

Except of course, that the only reason your car currently swerves when passed by a truck is that you're not expecting it and don't react quickly enough.

Under computer control it won't swerve. At all.

If you've ever experienced an aircraft landing in high winds under both manual and autoland control, you'll know what I mean. The first is a roller coaster, the second won't spill your tea.

6
0
Silver badge
Coat

Re: This seems like a bad idea

The first is a roller coaster, the second won't spill your tea.

Tea? For landings like that I expect at least a double G&T.

4
0
Silver badge

Suing gun manufacturers

That's not the same thing AT ALL, because today's gun isn't some futuristic sci-fi thing where you identify a target and after you fire it steers the bullet around a corner into it (or into a bystander if there's a bug in the gun's software) If the gun maker should be liable, then Ford should have been liable the first time a Model A ran down a pedestrian.

I agree the user has to bears a lot of the responsibility, but for something like this I'd argue (as would a lawyer and undoubtedly plenty of 'peers' who would sit on a jury in the US) Tesla 'should have known' would cause problems. The misuse doesn't even have to be deliberate - people sometimes fall asleep while driving today. How much easier will it be to nod off when you don't even need to keep your hands on the wheel?

That's my #1 dream about getting a self driving car - instead of getting up at 5am to catch an early flight and make a connection at a hub where I catch a second flight, reaching the destination that afternoon, I could simply have my car leave at bedtime. I'd fully recline and sleep, then surf the internet or watch movies after I wake up for the rest of the trip, and reach my destination earlier, more rested and more stress free!

This isn't a "creative idiot finding a way to misuse their products", but someone using it as intended but not following every recommendation. While the driver would undoubtedly be found to be at fault as he knew or should have known the car couldn't handle all situations and his attention may be required at any time, that won't stop Tesla from getting sued. Because they would bear part of the blame, and more importantly for the lawyers and their plaintiffs, they have much deeper pockets.

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Suing gun manufacturers

I'm pleased that EM has had the guts to push ahead and take a step forwards.

If the world is going to be ever more in fear of litigation then we are paralysed and progress will grind to a halt.

So I say fuck 'em, go for it. And to hell with all the doomsayers, negativistas and cynics.

And anyway, I'm certain that EM and Tesla have paid for some top class lawyers to look over this, and those folks probably know a sight more than a few Register comment folk.

0
0
Bronze badge
FAIL

Re: Suing gun manufacturers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_bullet

They do exist

0
0

Re: This seems like a bad idea

"And yet, when a gun is accidentally discharged in America and hurts someone, the manufacturer of the weapon is rarely sued. It is often the gun's owner that gets the blame first."

Bad analogy. Gun manufacturers and NRA have very successfully lobbied the US gov to such an extent that US law excludes manufacturer liability for firearm accidents. Gun manufacturers are rarely sued because the possibility of winning is close to nil.

That aside, I agree with you that liability SHOULD lie with the vehicle operator

0
0
Coat

Parallel parking

Or as real men call it, parking.

14
0
Silver badge

Re: Parallel parking

> Or as real men call it, parking.

Real men don't need no automatic parking system, they use the hand brake.

Of course if you really want to be macho about it you'd use the throttle and oversteer into the space.

6
0
MrT
Silver badge

Re: Parallel parking

Russ Swift would agree there.

He brought his team to the garage where my dad worked in the early 80's for the then-new Vauxhall Nova launch event. Did all sorts of stuff, including a routine in a FIAT Panda that went sideways so much that afterwards one of the salesmen looked at the car and all the tyre rubber on the forecourt, then walked off muttering to his colleague if he new of anyone wanting a car with square wheels.

0
0
Vic
Silver badge

Re: Parallel parking

Russ Swift would agree there.

I once emailed Russ Swift to see if he did lessons. I asked if he'd "teach me to drive like a nutter".

He replied that the only Vic he knew already drove like a nutter...

The guy in question had the same surname as me, but sadly, wasn't me.

Vic.

1
0
JDX
Gold badge

"We’re not totally clear how the car intends to deal with being rear-ended"

Maybe blame the car behind, like a human driver would do?

5
0
Silver badge
Stop

Re: "We’re not totally clear how the car intends to deal with being rear-ended"

> Maybe blame the car behind, like a human driver would do?

Indeed, that's what the coppers do at the scene of most accidents when someone inevitably bumps into someone in the traffic jam that ensues. If you weren't quick enough on the brakes, you're driving without due care and attention. If you were driving too close, that's reckless driving. Either case, have some points and/or a fine.

Icon - that's what you should be able to do if the person in front does first

11
0
Silver badge

Re: "We’re not totally clear how the car intends to deal with being rear-ended"

Of course here there would be the interesting situation that Jack the lad (or Jacky the Laddette) sees a Telsa approaching in the wing mirror (OK it's on the door these days) and jinks right to cause the Telsa driver spit their coffee as the Telsa's automatics pull an emergency stop. They hit the brakes far faster than any human driver could and so the car behind doesn't have time to react -BANG. OK, so the car behind was still too close but you've still been hit.

0
1
Silver badge
Joke

Re: "We’re not totally clear how the car intends to deal with being rear-ended"

Nah,

the rear number plate would fold down and device would appear. Then from hidden speakers a loud Dalek voice would say, 'Exterminate' and the offending car complete with driver would disappear.

1
0

Re: "We’re not totally clear how the car intends to deal with being rear-ended"

It'll eject the warp core. Then they'll be sorry. Anyway, once someone's close enough to read the maker's name, they'll hopefully back off unless they've got a dry-powder extinguisher. Especially in the wet. It's much like Steam early access in that respect I guess. So I think I'll skip V7 and wait for Tesla to produce a V8.

0
0

Re: "We’re not totally clear how the car intends to deal with being rear-ended"

Tesla produce a V8? That's kinda unlikely.

0
0
Silver badge

According to the BBC

"It should not hit pedestrians, hopefully," he told the media. "It should handle them well.""

Well he sounds so confident

0
0
Silver badge
Childcatcher

Re: According to the BBC

He could have certainly worded it better but as long as it's gentle and doesn't fondle them excessively I suppose it'll be alright.

1
0
Silver badge
Paris Hilton

Re: According to the BBC

Ah... a large, feather-down mattress pops out and affixes itself to the front of the car...

Icon.. well.. I said "mattress".. reason enough.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

I can think of nothing more dangerous...

...than a beta version autopilot.

They'll have to make sure this system won't lull Tesla drivers into a false sense of security.

1
0
Silver badge
Thumb Up

Why the snark?

Interesting article, but why the snarky "At last - Americans finally get to parallel park" subhead?

Try visiting any large US city. Parallel parking aplenty.

Having said that, I parked in Portland Oregon last week and I felt like a total n00b. It took me about 3 attempts to get perfectly lined up with the kerb - could have had something to do with the shiny new Aston Martin that was parked behind me, and a little voice in my head saying don't hit it don't hit it don't hit it, for the love of God don't hit it...

5
1
Silver badge

Re: Why the snark?

The issue some Americans have with parallel parking is because of the cars we drive. Take the average European who thinks they're hot shit in the parallel parking department and place them in an F150 or Land Cruiser and see how well they do trying to parallel park when there's less than a foot of room on either side and you don't really have a decent idea exactly where the ass end of your vehicle is.

2
1
Silver badge
Happy

Re: Why the snark?

@DougS Take the average European who thinks they're hot shit in the parallel parking department and place them in an F150 or Land Cruiser

*shudder* Too true. Or something like an F-350 Super-Duty dually (quite a few of those around this part of OR). Anyone who even takes one of those downtown has bigger cojones than I - never mind trying to park it in anything smaller than a football field. Proper football or American, take yer pick.

(Note for Brits: the above is a 4-passenger pickup truck with approximately the external dimensions - and fuel throughput - of Stanlow refinery. Not the biggest truck on the market though... see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8P5vGcf-NU for The Ultimate.)

1
0

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Forums

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017