back to article NOxious Volkswagen diesel emissions scandal: Chief falls on sword

Volkswagen's boss Martin Winterkorn has quit his job as the diesel emissions cheat scandal continues to engulf the German car maker. Winterkorn – who characterised the saga as a "grave crisis" for VW – resigned on Wednesday saying that he was "shocked by the events of the past few days". Late last week, it was revealed that …

Page:

  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Not all need to be recalled.

    Only those sold in certain "developed" countries need to be recalled. Most of the world cares much less about emissions or any air pollution until they can no longer breath and even then they won't adopt equivalent standards.

    As for VW they took advantage of a system that assumes companies wouldn't break the law. We need to keep that presumption of innocence as it is the cheapest enforcement system but for it to work there needs to be very serious consequences when abused. Among them should be restricted access to markets.

    If you can't play by the rules, you shouldn't be allowed to play at all.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Not all need to be recalled.

      Among them should be restricted access to markets.

      You are quite correct here. Idiot civil servants, politicians and regulators are in love with the concept of "fines up to 10% of turnover", they rarely think about blocking sales. I work for a large company that has repeatedly had multi-million pound fines from the industry regulator, and these seem to me to be treated as an occupational hazard of our industry. But I can assure you that the one thing that made our directors sit up and take notice was when a competitor was barred from selling for a mere ten days or so.

      I suspect this is also why the financial services sector are always up to something crooked or immoral - because financial penalties rarely affect bonuses, and the corporate reporting just treats them as a "non operating expense". If the big banks had been banned from all product sales in response to their PPI mis-selling, that'd hit people's bonuses up and down the food chain, it'd hit end of year operating profits, and they'd start to think that the game of mis-selling wasn't worth the candle (whereas it usually is). Such sales bans don't even need to be protracted - as noted above, the company who were spanked were blocked from selling for less than two weeks.

      Simple, easy to implement, easy to police, and with the effects felt by the guilty. The PR impact of having to tell current and prospective customers enquiring about products that you've been suspended from the market is also a useful punishment.

    2. GW7

      Re: Not all need to be recalled.

      Having been sold a diseasel by VW and being quite happy with the driving performance, I'll not be at all happy if VW try to modify my vehicle to enable THEM to comply with the law. If it turns out the modification will steal power or is likely to result in expensive repairs not far down the line, the answer will be NO WAY. The engine uses EGR to reduce the combustion temperature to reduce production of NOx. This unfortunately produces lots of soot, which is collected and burned in the expensive DPF. Unless VW retrofit a urea based system, reducing NOx will be achieved by a software update to increase EGR. That will reduce output power and increase soot, clogging the EGR system and the DPF sooner than if the software wasn't updated. A simple software update versus the laborious installation of tanks of concentrated piss... Hmm, I wonder which VW will choose as the "fix" for their cheapskate design-and-cheat snafu?

      1. nematoad
        Go

        Re: Not all need to be recalled.

        "I'll not be at all happy if VW try to modify my vehicle to enable THEM to comply with the law."

        So sue them.

        It's not your fault that the manufacturers cheated and if you are unhappy with the remedy, take them to court. It's unfortunate that you may well have a less efficient car than the one you were promised but as a non-VW owner I'm glad that they are going to be made to clear up the mess.

        If you are unhappy then you know what to do. I'm sure that you will not be alone in this and a class action is a way of reducing the cost of litigation.

        The best of luck, I hope you win.

        1. GW7
          Stop

          Re: Not all need to be recalled.

          @nematoad

          I won't be suing VW for messing up my car performance and longevity with their dodgy recall because I won't allow them to apply it in the first place. They have no legal right (in the UK) to mess with my ride.

          The fact that VW cheated the type approval / vehicle certification is not my problem.

          11 million horses bolted before someone noticed VW's stable door was open. There is no good (nor legal) reason for owners to submit to VW's recall requests, as this is not a vehicle safety issue.

      2. iansmithedi

        Re: Not all need to be recalled.

        I love my pre-DPF clog-free diesel, especially if someone is following too closely: foot down and they disappear.

        1. Nigel 11

          Re: Not all need to be recalled.

          @iansmithedi

          There's something wrong with it, if it blows a cloud of soot. Get it fixed. I've got a pre-DPF diesel and there's never any visible soot (except for a brief puff when it's started from very cold).

          Or do you just mean that it accelerates in 5th gear at a rate that few ordinary petrol cars can match?

          1. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: Not all need to be recalled.

            There's something wrong with it, if it blows a cloud of soot. Get it fixed.

            The soot is caused by a combination of driving style and injector effectiveness. As the injectors wear, the fuel dispersion gets worse, leading to incomplete combustion and more soot (although there's an element of soot even with new injectors), but unless you have a gentle right foot this soot doesn't accumulate in the exhaust. When it accumulates, that's when hard acceleration and faster exhaust gas flow ejects the soot in a plume.

            Injectors are very expensive to replace at £200-400 per injector, so there's no reason to change it if you're happy with the performance, and if you normally drive with a gentle right foot, you'll have an exhaust pre-loaded so that you can lay smoke like a destroyer when passing cyclists. What's not to like?

      3. Probie

        Re: Not all need to be recalled.

        I feel that if I loose performance in the car, VW should refund my purchase, in whole preferably, but at a minimum the close to current used car sale price at a registered dealer forecourt, and the price would be set JUST before the scandal broke. I say this because the car after adaptation would no longer be the same car with the same specifications that I bought.

        1. Dr. Mouse

          Re: Not all need to be recalled.

          and the price would be set JUST before the scandal broke

          Unfortunately I doubt this would happen.

          I have a friend who bought a house in a little area surrounded by farmers fields. Planning permission went in, and was granted, for a warehouse to be built, basically around the house. The company building the warehouse have now offered to buy the house, but at the current market rate. This is over £100k less than it was before they got planning permission, and will leave them significantly out of pocket.

          If they do offer to buy back the cars, it will likely be at the current market value, significantly reduced from the value pre-scandal.

          1. This post has been deleted by its author

          2. naive

            Re: Not all need to be recalled.

            Americans are idiots, bottom feeding journalists and tree huggers make a story out of nothing.

            These cars are fine, use little gas and still press one in the seat at 70 mph when flooring it.

            So indeed, do not let them update the ecu software, the tree huggers will do try to take your driving fun. Show them finger and continue buying VW's, let them rot in their ugly Prius boxes, which are 100 times more polluting in their life cycle then any TDI ever will be after decaying Prius batteries start killing little kids on some dump in Africa.

            So cuddos to VW trying to defy those EU politicians and others whose legislation with 100gr C02/km gave us these 3 cylinder lawnmower engines and killed the 6-cylinder BMW engines.

            And if the allegations about the software feature are true, hail to Martin Winterkorn !.

            So take that and vote down :)...

            1. JeffyPoooh
              Pint

              Re: Not all need to be recalled.

              naïve "These cars are fine, use little gas..."

              Very little, considering that they use diesel fuel.

              "...then any TDI ever..."

              than...

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Not all need to be recalled.

      "Most of the world cares much less about emissions or any air pollution until they can no longer breath and even then they won't adopt equivalent standards."

      Bollocks.

      Most of the rest of the world uses smaller cars that use less dino-soup, so creates less CO2, which means they contribute less to the really important thing called global warming.

      Any other toxicity problem is a localised one, and won't turn the planet into a disaster zone for our children's children.

      Also, the "others" often have functioning public transport, and not three cars per household on average. And they even walk and cycle sometimes.

      1. JeffyPoooh
        Pint

        Re: Not all need to be recalled.

        AC "... not three cars per household on average."

        Actually it's YOU that obviously lacks the real world common sense.

        Running a household with a teenager and just ONE car uses more fuel than getting him his own car. Chauffeuring him back and forth (drop off) and back and forth (pick up later) is twice the fuel of him driving himself.

        If you see a house with three cars parked outside, please notice that they're parked (not moving, not burning fuel). The next house with no car parked outside is because Daddy is out, driving across town to pick up Junior again.

        That you don't get this indicates that you're not qualified to offer informed opinions.

    4. enormous c word

      Re: Not all need to be recalled.

      If you have an affected diesel VW - you could make the case that it is not fit for purpose or that it was sold under false pretences and just get your money back. What will VW do with a 3 year old car no-one wants. What about all the inner-city located cars that have low/no-TAX concessions due to their stated low-emissions? Where are you going to park now? After the SW *upgrade* has killed performance who will want a gutless VW diesel?

      Expect lots of VW diesels on eBay for very little money real soon.

      Perhaps some enterprising after-market *downgrades* to restore the performance lost by the forthcoming emissions *upgrade*.

    5. werdsmith Silver badge

      Re: Not all need to be recalled.

      Drivers who have been paying for lower priced VED bands, and less company car tax based on the false emissions figures will be required to back-pay their arrears at the correct rate then try and claim it back from Volkswagen.

      OK, maybe not, but I wouldn't be surprised.

    6. N13L5

      Re: Not all need to be recalled.

      I think they all should be recalled for installation of smarter software, that not only recognizes when a test is performed, but also when someone is trying to find out about the software itself.

      To those who are babbling about restricting access to markets: You are mistakenly thinking we live under that fabled political system called "democracy". So you believe in the puppet theater front of a new, modern fascism, where corporations call the shots and the input of elected officials is a carefully kept up illusion. (TTIP anyone?)

      You might think Hitler did a disservice to fascism, with the term getting confused with all sort of other things. But he worked out quite well for the corporations and bankers who funded him. They never expected or intended for him to win his strange crusade. As a whole, it worked out even better than all the other wars, where banksters have been digging up crazy people to start wars and then financing both sides for endless fun and profit...

      In modern fascism, wars are all waged at safe distance and to 'bring democracy' as the most easily corruptible form of government. No corporation or bank will ever really be harmed by a government. Individual employees who write bad software, maybe... But the ~140 families (see Swiss statistical study) owning 90+% of the worlds largest banks and corporations will never be touched.

      If you think Lehman Brothers was an example to disprove this - no, that was just several banksters taking out another one, which they had grown particularly tired of.

      So, nothing will happen to VW, aside from the possibility of some people looking at other brands to buy. Either way, if I was a car buyer, I'd rather buy a car that spits out too much nox, than a car with ignition key issues that could lead to accident and immediate, personal death.

      Winterkorn was pretty clever to get out right away... he couldn't have held on for very long anyway. And he would have just gotten tarred and feathered over and over.

      .

      - The intelligence of a species is inversely proportional to its distance from the center of the galaxy it lives in. This perfectly explains why this planet is such a loony bin and why our idiotic culture still revolves around the biggest monkeys trying to keep all the bananas for themselves.

  2. chivo243 Silver badge
    Thumb Down

    Win Win

    So, I'm the CEO, I make damn good coin. Now I leave the company, what kind of walk out the door cash do I get?

    Profit! And then go to work for the competition! Profit Profit...

    1. Richard Jones 1

      Re: Win Win

      I am going to guess that he will be rather closer to the tail of along jobs queue for car maker's jobs that will likely grow from the head end rather than behind him. Mutter in the gutter is that the bottom may well fall out of the car market and not just for VW. It might be a good time to buy a cheap car, but on the other hand perhaps not.

      God forbid that will all have to rent a field for our transport horses in future!

      1. jason 7

        Re: Win Win

        He's 68 so I'm pretty sure him 'leaving' was fully discussed as a media strategy, well arranged and compensated.

        Enjoy your retirement! (rolls eyes)

        1. jason 7

          Re: Win Win

          Ah I was right! A $67 million pound retirement to be precise!

          http://consumerist.com/2015/09/24/ousted-volkswagen-ceo-might-still-get-67m-payday-plus-company-car/

          Such harsh punishment.

      2. chivo243 Silver badge
        Happy

        Re: Win Win

        @Richard Jones 1

        I own a Kia Picanto... it's a 2010, it's paid for, and welcome the day when it's a luxury car.

        1. Scott Broukell
          Meh

          Re: Win Win

          @chivo243 - Didn't you know, just tweak the software and it will magically become a six-seater luxury SUV in an instant.

        2. Nigel 11

          Re: Win Win

          Nah, an old enough Merc will be a luxury car until the sale of distilled petroleum products is banned. Old enough, because back then they built them to last forever, and many of them are still going strong with multiple light-seconds on the clock. Shame about the fuel consumption, but if you can afford luxury, do you care?

          Or get a 'leccy car and enjoy the music system and the 0-30 acceleration.

      3. N13L5

        Re: transport horses

        Whatever happened to walking, rollerskating, bicycling?

        I haven't bought a car in 13 years.

        While I do admit to renting cars occasionally, when I need to transport something heavy, I think cars are so massively over-used, that a bad ending seems unavoidable.

        Just don't forget, that Ford, Exxon and Goodyear conspired in the first half of the last century to dismantle public transportation in Los Angeles, in order to sell more cars, tires and gasoline.

        And in the latter half of the last century, Coca Cola corporation offered to help fund Los Angeles public schools with just one condition: remove classes on proper nutrition from the curriculum.

  3. Buzzword

    Nitrous Oxide? You're having a laugh(ing gas)

    NOₓ includes nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), but not nitrous oxide (N₂O).

    1. ToddR

      Re: Nitrous Oxide? You're having a laugh(ing gas)

      And N2O4 at high pressure

  4. This post has been deleted by its author

  5. Outcast

    /Tinfoil Hat time

    Makes you wonder if the former ousted CEO of VW didn't drop a sneaky heads up to the relevant testing authority ?

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      That evil thought crossed my tinfoil surfaced brain as well. Furthermore, what other Hacks exist out there in their and other company's ECU's? I swear, those hamsters in my head are nearing warp factor one.

  6. Sykobee

    VW had better be hoping that the affected cars have the capability to be modified to incorporate the NOx reducing technology they left out, and then claimed they didn't need.

    I.e., refillable Urea tanks (need space), integration into engine/exhaust system (might need new components to replace existing components - let's hope that doesn't require a full engine strip down), mitigation for loss of advertised performance, driver compensation, ... could be thousands per vehicle, before corporate fines (tens of billions), lost revenue from sales, loss of market position, loss of goodwill, and so on...

    This will probably cost them $50B or more in the end, $100B isn't far fetched. That doesn't look good on your CV if you were CEO when this plan was put in action.

    1. Mark 85

      That doesn't look good on your CV if you were CEO when this plan was put in action

      That could be why he quit now... protect his golden parachute, claim he took responsibility and did the right thing even though he claims he knew nothing about it. Other companies will look at him and say: "Oh, a CEO with ethics, grab him.". <For some value of ethics as defined by corporations>

      The question that will never be asked is: "Why didn't he know? He was in charge."

      1. iansmithedi

        I would have made him work his notice period to sort out the mess. It's a year for a CEO typically isn't it? Now that would be punishment.

      2. enormous c word

        Taking a (golden) bullet for the team

        ? He did nothing - just quit before the sh*t-storm really started. He would inevitably have to quit anyway - better to do it now at 67 under the noble pretence of *taking the bullet for the team*

        1. N13L5

          Re: Taking a (golden) bullet for the team

          Yes, it was the only move to dodge all the bs coming down the pike.

          Even a person of below average intelligence should have been able to call that.

          Its like avoiding the unnecessary amputation of a leg - not that hard to figure out.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      This will probably cost them $50B or more in the end, $100B isn't far fetched.

      I was thinking along similar lines. And those sort of numbers wipe out the equity shareholders interest and possibly the debt holders.

      Nice one VW. Major Ivan Hirst saved you from the ashes, and then you flush yourselves down the toilet like this!

    3. Salts

      Well, you would think this, but this is the banks all over again, if VW is let to go bust all the workers end up on the dole and exports are down the pan, hence the German government will end up underwriting this.

    4. Lusty

      Why would I let them retrofit anything to my car? It doesn't work as advertised, I want a full refund lickety split as per my consumer rights. The fact that this would then write off any depreciation I have incurred since purchase is besides the point...win for the consumer for a change.

      1. Nigel 11

        Why would I let them retrofit anything to my car?

        At present you don't have to. However, if (when?) the government decrees your car to be illegal because it emits too much pollution, then you'll have no choice.

        So, you'll sell it (at depressed value) and buy another car, and have a very good case to sue for the lowered resale value that VW inflicted on you. Assuming VW isn't bankrupt by then. Interestingly, your case is probably against your car dealer, not against VW. It's the dealers that'll sue VW.

        I'm really glad to be driving a 2002 model, though I live in fear of my car being retrospectively legislated off the road. Nobody except me thinks it's worth more than £1000, and that only on the day after it passes an MOT.

        1. Lusty

          @nigel 11 the law in the UK is that the goods have to perform as advertised. These goods don't and never did which means instant refund regardless what the manufacturer says, no different just because it's a car. The only way VW can get around this is if modifications keep the same or better power while producing the same or better emissions when compared to the spec sold. Other countries may vary in their laws (although I don't believe they do in the EU) but the UK is pretty clear on consumer law.

          1. James Hughes 1

            I suspect that same power, consumption and emissions as per spec will be impossible. Otherwise they would have done it before they sold it....

          2. Nigel 11

            @Lusty

            Yes, but in UK law your legal remedy is against whoever sold you the offending item. That party can in turn sue whoever supplied them, and so on up the chain.

            You can instead choose to ask the item's manufacturer to honour its warranty instead, or to accept compensation from them, but if this route fails you have to take action against the party that sold the item to you.

            So it's the dealers that will be suing VW for the compensation they pay to their customers, and it's the lawyers that will be the principal beneficiaries of the whole sorry mess.

    5. N13L5

      He doesn't need a CV at his age, he can just go retire.

      I do wonder how many more skeletons there are to be found in the world's car companies.

      I always hated all that electronics crap in cars:

      - made them fixable only by people with the proper connections to the car mafia

      - allowed the car mafia to sell $35 circuit boards for $1,600 as a spare part you can't get around buying.

  7. bonkers

    Has anyone got any real details?

    To what extent was it "cheating" is what I'd like to know.

    It would be reasonable to save the finite supply of urea liquid for the times when the engine emits most NOx, under heavy acceleration (i.e driver demand, pedal position) and possibly also at lower revs. Similarly one might wait till the engine is warm otherwise the urea wont turn to gas within the exhaust and would be wasted. There is plausible denial so far, I would say.

    If it measures actual rpm profiles and acts only on those that are a few percent within the standard test profiles, then that is definitely "test detection".. Similarly again, if there is a flag set for "test" conditions, and this remains set for some time, possibly the whole ignition cycle after a "cadence detection" of some sort, then sure, they're busted.

    Where was it, actually, between these two levels?

    Reg readers need to know.

    1. fishman

      Re: Has anyone got any real details?

      Tons of articles about this on places like jalopnik. In short, the cars are tested on a dynometer. There are two easy way to sense that the car is on a dyno - the wheels are spinning but are never turned to go through a curve, and the drive wheels are spinning but the other wheels are stationary. Because of the second case the traction control would try to kick in, cars are equipped with the ability to turn off traction control.

    2. Kevin McMurtrie Silver badge

      Re: Has anyone got any real details?

      Modern cars tend try to run the engine at heavy acceleration as much as possible for efficiency. The gas pedal modulates the transmission to use the highest gear possible for the desired power. Extra RPM is extra friction and extra exhaust. This has been the only trick left after already optimizing combustion, accessory loads, tires, transmission, aerodynamics, etc. This is also why modern AT cars have such terrible acceleration lag. The engine is already near maximum torque so you must wait for a gear change.

      1. Lusty

        Re: Has anyone got any real details?

        There are plenty of tricks left to reduce emissions and improve fuel efficiency. Sadly they all increase manufacturing cost and complexity and so are completely ignored.

    3. Nigel 11

      Re: Has anyone got any real details?

      @bonkers

      The point is that VW diesels don't use urea to clean up the exhaust. VW claimed that their technology was so advanced, urea injection was unnecessary. But they were cheating the tests. The ECU was injecting fuel in a special test programme, that will severely impact on the cars' performance if it is now inflicted on motorists who bought VW cars based on a test drive experience. Also, it's not a minor discrepancy. In the US, VW diesels were discovered to be emitting seven times more pollution on the road, than they did in the tests. That's illegal, by a factor of at least five.

      If other manufacturers are cheating but only by not injecting Urea as much as they do when they detect a test situation, it'll be less serious for them. They'll have to turn on "test mode" for ordinary motoring and supply free urea to motorists. Possibly, they'll have to retro-fit a larger tank, if the supplied one holds less than a ~500 mile supply. Luckily, urea is cheap (and about as non-toxic as a chemical can be). OTOH if test mode cripples on-road performance for other manufacturers' cars, this will become the biggest scandal since the bankers almost crashed the entire global economy.

      1. N13L5

        Re: Has anyone got any real details?

        Why we should all piss in the tank before we drive off.

        Of course it'll get annoying if the wife always honks the horn to get you to come down and supply some urea for her motor...

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon