Good
Weather Channel sucks. They take the NWS RADAR images, pixelify them for lower resolution, and serve them up with ads and XSS 20 minutes late.
The Weather Channel has dammed a downpour of cross-site-scripting vulnerabilities that soaked three quarters of links on the popular site, security bod Wang Jin says. The website received a tsunami of traffic with more than a billion unique visitors checking in each month according to Drupal which noted it was the "highest …
What a coincidence! I had been using weather.com for years, but stopped about a week ago, after they rolled out their new, less usable site design, which lets you have even *less* information on the screen at one time than before - and "before" was already a disimprovement from their previous layout.
For some reason, website designers think that people go to websites in order to click buttons and play with gadgets than accomplish a purpose.
I can't seem to find any example of this being a problem. Can anyone validate this? The only reference I can find to the vulnerability is here http://securityrelated.blogspot.sg/2014/11/the-weather-channel-weather.html and the video and images show the OLD site, not the new (Drupal) one.