back to article Azure TITSUP caused by INFINITE LOOP

The post via Tor (right) and what Aussies saw. The post via Tor (right) and what Aussies saw. © The Register A global balls-up of Redmond's Azure's caused by an infinite loop bug might have crept by those dwelling in the antipodes thanks to a seemingly fat-fingered admin who geo-blocked the region from reading the news. …

Facepalm

backronym error?

TITSUP (Total Inability To Support Usual Service) ...

Wouldn't that be TITSUS? Or have I detected a failure of Processing?

6
0
Silver badge

Re: backronym error?

Performance. It's "Performance".

4
0
Silver badge
Joke

Re: backronym error?

Nah, it's just that the service (or lack of it) was taking the P...

0
0
Silver badge
Headmaster

Where is the P?

"The TITSUP (Total Inability To Support Usual Service)" - TITSup what?

TITSUP - Total Inability To Support Usual Service Processes/Procedures/Practice?

1
0

Let's "Unspin this"

"As part of a performance update to Azure Storage, an issue was discovered that resulted in reduced capacity across services utilizing Azure Storage, including Virtual Machines, Visual Studio Online, Websites, Search and other Microsoft services," Zander told the Northern Hemisphere.

"During the roll out we discovered an issue that resulted in storage blob front ends going into an infinite loop, which had gone undetected during fighting (testing).

"As part of a performance update" = the rest of the comment I am going to give you is utter bullshit

"An issue was discovered that resulted in reduced capacity across services utilizing Azure Storage" = No shit, the users discovered this faster than the tech's, It's easy to "discover an issue" when your phone-line is being burnt down about it.

"During the roll out we discovered an issue that resulted in storage blob front ends going into an infinite loop" = Data does not go into an infinite loop, the commands dealing with it can, if they are ill-conceived. i.e. : I detect a change, send me the new file thus I detect a change send me the new file

"which had gone undetected during fighting (testing)." = It wasn't tested (at all) properly

8
3

Infinite Loop?

Is this just a subtle, lawyer sidestepping, way of accusing Apple of sabotage?

5
0

Re: Infinite Loop?

Someone has to be the culprit.

Outside of Microsoft, of course.

0
0
Silver badge
Facepalm

People really run windows as a *server*?

For real? Well I never. And then they are surprised when this keeps happening all the time?

9
9
Anonymous Coward

Re: People really run windows as a *server*? @Bob Vistakin

Keep trying, Bob - some day you might be up to Eadon's standards. Reach, Bob, reach!

10
7

This post has been deleted by its author

Silver badge
Trollface

Re: People really run windows as a *server*?

The "server version" is actually the only acceptable version.

If they could just reduce the needless emphasis on the graphical muhser interface.

2
0

Re: People really run windows as a *server*?

I guess a Windows server is better of late than the number of Linux issues [think if you can Heartbleed or the recent Bash problems - almost exclusively on *nix systems - and they aren't completely fixed].

1
6

@Gis Bun

you're misinformed:

Heartbleed affected some applications used on MS Windows as well, GNU/Bash is a cross-platform software too.

No, the problems are completely fixed. Comparing Microsoft with all the *nix systems would be very unfair and incorrect, since MS ship only a tiny portion of what the latter provides.

Please learn more about the topic before making an incorrect statement.

4
1
Silver badge

Re: People really run windows as a *server*?

Why are you so worried about fixed problems like Heartbleed and Bash? If you're a Windows guy you should be more worried about MS14-067, 66, 64, 58, 57, 43, 38, 36, 22, 19, 17, 13, 11, 08 and 07? I think those are all of the remote code execution vulnerabilities marked 'Critical' by Microsoft this year including their problems similar with SSL/TLS and drive by webpage exploits. That's more than one per month and three just this month and we've still got December to get through before we start on the MS15-series. NoteOf course I didn't include those like MS14-069 which is just an 'Important' remote code execution vulnerability or any of the privilege escalation or security bypass holes.

3
0
Anonymous Coward

SyntaxError

EOL while scanning string literal

1
0
Joke

One Infinite Loop

According to Auntie Beeb, Apple were affected, but I didn't realise that this affected the reality distortion field in Cupertino.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: One Infinite Loop

I'm sure I read somewhere that Apple's iCloud is using Azure.

0
0
Silver badge
Gimp

Low lying fog

tl;dr Azure can't be seen when there's a break in the clouds.

2
0
Happy

5 nines

How many years does Azure have to run at 100% to get back to 99.999?

5
0
Silver badge

Re: 5 nines

Depends how long it was already running at 100% of course but each minute lost means over 69 days of perfect performance are required to meet 99.999%.

For an outage of hours it is essentially impossible to recover that level (100 minutes is 7000 days, 19 years).

Do they promise that or is it more like 99.9%?, a little easier to actually do.

Also, is it a 'total' or individual thing because lots of parts kept working and some people say they never noticed an outage.

Still, I think 99.999% requires a system never having a system-wide outage, a lot to ask apparently.

1
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: 5 nines

99.999% = 5 minutes and 15 seconds per year correct ?

Therefore

7 Hours outage = 420 minutes correct ?

Divide 420 minutes by the 5 mins 15 seconds

( 420 minutes x 60 seconds = 25,200 seconds divided by 5 mins 15 or 315 seconds )

25,200 / 315 = 80

80 YEARS !!

80 years without outage to get back to an average 99.999% uptime ??

WTF ?!

3
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: 5 nines

"99.999% = 5 minutes and 15 seconds per year correct ?"

It's only a Marketing 99.999% they rounded it up from 95% !

5
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: 5 nines

"How many years does Azure have to run at 100% to get back to 99.999?"

btw Azure isn't designed to be a five 9s service. 3 or 4 nines depending on service at the most.

As the SLAs are measured monthly, the answer is until the end of December this year.

0
0
Silver badge

Re: 5 nines

"It's only a Marketing 99.999% they rounded it up from 95% !"

After it was rounded up to 95% from 80% by another division of the marketing dept, who got the 80% by mishearing when one of the IT guys said, "Eh, who knows?"

(Geez, I'm in a mood today. Time to break for coffee and a cigar!)

2
0
Anonymous Coward

CloudFog

If the ClOUdFOg was an aircraft, someone sneezing could bring it down...CloudFog Redundancy, hello?

0
0
Silver badge

"storage blob front ends going into an infinite loop, which had gone undetected during fighting"

I wonder what game those network guys are playing.

Sounds like fun, even if it is not very effective.

2
0

Re: "storage blob front ends going into an infinite loop, which had gone undetected during fighting"

Microsoft Flight Simulator?

0
0
Silver badge

Re: "storage blob front ends going into an infinite loop, which had gone undetected during fighting"

Microsoft Flight Simulator? which is running on a special version of Windows? ("Windows Aircraft Edition" perhaps)

I really wished I had book marked the page that had the screen shot of the image that I have in mind. It features a pilot and co-pilot at the controls with a BSoD on the screen, with the caption (paraphrasing it a bit mind you) "Where do you want to crash today?"

0
0

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Forums

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018