How friggin awesome is evolution!
Top scientists have discovered grasshopper mice feel no pain when they are stung in the face by scorpions: they simply carry on gobbling up the fearsome poisonous arachnids. Youtube Video CONTENDERS!! ARE YOU REEEEADY?! The mighty mouse, native to the southwestern US, has managed to take the toxin, which is lethal to other …
I think you find this is intelligent design at work. Although that does imply that the head of design is a grasshopper mouse. Which is a bit H2G2.
Go Intelligent Design! Whoa! Bring it on!
It can't be evolution - if the poison kills you, then you can't breed in a protection against it, therefore this is 100% proof that evolution does not exist. Protection could only be given by God.
God must have given these mice the protection for a reason. Probably so the scorpions have a natural predatory so that they don't explode in numbers and maintain the balance of life. (oh, wait, natural selection would be, er, evolution at work).
Hey, it's Friday afternoon, nothing like a bit of trolling to wile away an afternoon if you're stuck in the office and not in the pub.
Long live evolution :)
So ... God is a mouse?
They're hyper-intelligent pan-dimensional beings who commissioned the construction of Earth.
Realistically what are the odds of a mouse, which presumably can find other creatures to eat, comes along but due to some odd occurrence happens to have a natural genetic mutation that allows it to survive the stings, lives long enough to mate and those particular genes get carried forward to the next generation.
Then some time down the line one of its descendants has a genetic mutation that turns this toxin into something that also numbs the pain.
And if it didn't have other creatures to eat we have to factor in the chances of the whole species just being wiped out.
I'm not talking God vs Evolution - I'm talking mathematically what are the odds.
If the chance was 100 billion billion to 1 before the event happened. After the event happen the chance was 1:1, it's the other 999999...:1 things that didn't happen.
For instance, if you were to pick a grain of sand anywhere on the planet and then asked me to go an pick a grain of sand the chance of me picking the same grain of sand would be unimaginable. However if there was no precursor and I just happened to have picked up a grain a sand the chance of me picking up that particular grain of sand is 1:1.
Once an event has happened, trying to statistically work back to the chance of that event happening and determining therefore that the result is, in itself, an impossibly rare occurrence and therefore couldn't have happened (without the help 'magic') is a fallacy.
I know you are trolling but this probably supports evolution more- the mice that don't have the immunity die and therefore do not procreate, whereas the ones that do, get to pass on that trait to the next generation.
I will now prove that black is white and die on a zebra crossing.
I doubt many US based readers would appreciate the connection...
Judging by your down votes, I'd say about a 0 in 4 chance and declining.
> If the chance was 100 billion billion to 1 before the event happened. After the event happen the chance was 1:1, it's the other 999999...:1 things that didn't happen.
Which event? The genetic mutation? Not being eaten by an owl? Finding a mouse-mate with matching genes? How many times did that genetic mutation occur without all the other factors being in place?
With the lack of mice relative to the odds, this looks like homeopathy. I'm well, therefore homeopathy works. Since it exists, it did evolve. Against any odds, evolution is the cause because we have already removed all other options from consideration.
"Go Intelligent Design! Whoa! Bring it on!"
True enough. Nature isn't intelligent, nature is a frigging genius at creating problems and creatures evolving brilliant solutions quite quickly.
The odds are far greater for the mouse to have all that fall into place than for the platypus to have survived to the current day.
Funny thing about playing the odds with nature, on occasion she leaves one with some serious head scratchers!
A few of we US citizens do read books. Of those, a modest number have learned to believe those friendly words, "Don't panic!". :)
"Which event? The genetic mutation? Not being eaten by an owl?"
Owls aren't that common in the SE US. It's largely desert.
That harsh environment actually improves the odds of the odd mutation or three.
1 thumbs down for "So ... God is a mouse?". I didn't know cats had thumbs
It can't be evolution - if the poison kills you, then you can't breed in a protection against it, therefore this is 100% proof that evolution does not exist.
I should think that how this evolves is something like this.
To start with, the mice attacked scorpions the same way mongooses attack cobras. Very carefully. They're faster and smarter than their prey, so mostly they get to eat it rather than die. The less nimble ones get dead more often, and the species gets nimbler. Note that all hot-blooded species have a fundamental advantage over cold-blooded ones in the morning, before the cold-blooded ones have a chance to re-warm their bodies from the overnight chill.
Sometimes when battling or eating the prey, a small amount of venom gets into their bloodstream. Enough to harm but be survivable. Genetic variability means that for the higher doses, some survive and some don't. Gradually, genetic tolerance of the venom gets bred in. When a sting ceases to be lethal 100% of the time, risk-taking mice gain an evolutionary advantage over the original extremely risk-averse mice.
And so by slow and gradual evolution, you arrive at mice that laugh at scorpion venom.
I'd guess that the final stage is that mice which feel less pain when stung have a slight advantage over ones which do. Pain is distracting, so they more often get caught by larger predators if they suffer pain? That would create an evolutionary bias in favour of "hard" mice.
One other thing: ability to acquire tolerance of venoms by an individual is near-universal in mammals, including humans. It's the standard immune system response. The immune activity degrades a foreign protein before it can fatally degrade the host's proteins, and is then primed to mount the same response faster and better next time. Immune responses are passed (or primed) from mother to child via breast-milk. It's an area we don't yet fully understand. There may be epigenetic factors at work, and Lamarkian evolution may not be completely discredited when it comes to inherited immune response. Just a thought.
What about them owls wot live in cacti...? Thought they were native to AZ and TX - or am I imagining things again...?! Maybe I should quit posting when Jacobed - but then I'd not post at all (shut it! I can read the collective mind of Reg regulars, y'know...).
Great bit of evolution there
Chuck Norris mouse?
Chuck Norris?! You seem to have never heard of David Carradine, if that were possible?
" If that is our destiny, you cannot change it. But do not go with fear, Grasshopper; fear is eternal darkness. Go instead with inner strength, for it is like a deep river into which all streams flow. It increases, always moving forward; and soon, there is nothing that can stand in it's way. " -- Master Po
Although I enjoy your logic, I'm fairly sure the mouse isn't going to die from auto-erotic asphyxiation if multiple scorpion stings to the face don't even faze it. The mouse must be Chuck Norris, as it doesn't HAVE to breath while it jerks off, it CHOOSES to.
Nah, Chuck just roundhouse kicks at the air until it's forced into his lungs.
This is pure darwinian evolution at work and when you see all these wonderful little adaptations taking place is does make the whole process seem pretty awesome.
grasshopper mouse just don't give a shit.
Student of Mouster Po.
Gives an advantage to one while taking from the other. Very impressive to see
Can Boffins not take this research further and produce an effective hangover cure?
Possibly - but you may need to have been drinking scorpion venom.
El Reg: Sounds like we need a session concocting a new cocktail.
To the pub ...
"an effective hangover cure?"
One that involves a new way of processing beer
No, the hardest would be the rockhopper. Also, F Boyle did already say that.
I bet he drinks Carling Black Label
Don't be daft. Carling BL is just watered down mouse piss....oh! I see what you did there.
So how come dogs haven't evolved to tolerate the theobromine in chocolate?
"So how come dogs haven't evolved to tolerate the theobromine in chocolate?"
Because Cadbury's hasn't been around for a millennia.
Or you cloud believe dogs are evil and mice get divine intervention, anyway, shouldn't you be out assimilating other [wrong] religious types?
Perhaps it's because they haven't spent millions of years having to eat Dairy Milk to survive.
But the mouse must have had other things to eat too? If it didn't then what are the chances of this mutation occurring before the mouse species is wiped out by the stings?
If the odds of this occurrence is high over a large number of years then why haven't other animals also evolved to eat this scorpion?
Read a good book that explains the subtleties of evolution, such as Almost LIke a Whale - it will answer all your questions.
You're confusing evolution with natural selection.
You don't gain immunity from trying, you merely kill off the non-immune dogs.
The genetic complexity has to already exist.
I suppose it is possible that the Mexican hairless dog, a pre-Columbian breed from an area with long-established cacao cultivation in the order of several millennia, may have developed some theobromine tolerance. Further study is required.
What a mouse ! .. Stung repeatedly in the face and just keeps going.
Mighty Mouse eat your heart out ! we just found SuperMouse :)
IT angle ? none perhaps but what a video ! .. Thanks for posting.
...... a man or a mouse?
A mouse, a badass grasshopper mouse.
A supper and a botox shot in one great deal. All in the mouse's night...
Nice Genesis* reference there!
*Pop group, not opening chapter of Ye Olde Booke of Desert Fairie Tayles.
Desert? Now yes, back then not so much.
I see that once again the right-wing media are giving us a bad rap. You will note that my unfortunate colleague was merely DEFENDING himself from the WHOLLY UNPROVOKED attack by that thuggish mouse - a mouse who still walks free.
Now, I have nothing against mice. Some of my best friends are mice. I am absolutely not a mousist. BUT! We do not suffer these assaults from OTHER rodentines. When did you last see a rabbit attack a scorpion? What horny arthropod was ever exercised by the violent attentions of a red squirrel? For too long we have tolerated these scorpiophagic killings in the name of 'political correctness', but there comes a time when a line must be drawn. These mice must be punished! And if the individuals responsible cannot be identified (and let's face it, you can't tell them apart), then the regrettable consequence is that ALL of them must be made to suffer! Which is why we have engaged the services of Mr Thomas Cat Esquire.
Scorpion Solidarity League
PS. Apologies if that sounded a little venomous.
As always the left wing media has spun lies that the Scorpion Solidarity League has provided them with, if you view the unedited video, you will see that Jerry the mouse, was minding his own business when a gang of scorpions broke into his house (how else did they both get in there? And none of that ‘higher power BS), while the mouse was diplomatic enough to advise the other to leave, this scorpion, high on PCP remained in the home and attacked Jerry’s children.
Jerry’s actions, while unfortunate, where completely in the name of defending his family, an investigation has revealed that this Scorpion was wanted for an unprovoked attack on a number of innocent chipmunks, one, known as ‘Alvin’ is still in intensive care.
Once again the Scorpion Solidarity League (SSL) has used the fallout from actions its members instigated to attack the reputation of the peace loving Terrain Living Small-mammals group (TLS).
The TLS will no longer put up with this hatred lies coming from the SSL, and the TLS, not SSL should be viewed as the preferred standard for information relating to these incidents.
And don’t get me started on the VPN (Viper Protection Network).
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018