Not just Coke
Drink as little as six litres of plain old water in a few hours and you may die of water intoxication.
New Zealand’s Coroner for Dunedin, David Cerar, has reportedly found excessive consumption of Coca-Cola helped to kill a woman. Natasha Harris, a 31-year old resident of the southern city Invercargill, died last year. The Coroner's report, which was sent to The Reg by the New Zealand Justice Department, says Harris’ partner …
Drink as little as six litres of plain old water in a few hours and you may die of water intoxication.
It was throughout the day.
But damn. I started to wean back after doing 2+ liters of diet coke a day.
(And its probably my addiction to caffeine that made it difficult to diagnose my ADD until I was 40 )
Had she switched from Coke to diet... things might have been different.
Will always surprise you with new and inventive ways to top themselves.
Small Point: caffeine will make it difficult to diagnose ADD.. mainly because it treats it. Caffeine works in a similar manner to Ritalin and Adderall, as such it is an excellent treatment for mild ADD.
The tobacco consumption is substantial, too. Too many times, the collateral damage from smoking is glossed over by coroners with 'agendas'. I had a parent that died of smoking-induced lung cancer and the death-certificate only indicated cancer. A pack and a half certain contributed to this death, but they want to talk about Coke because it gets headlines in the press.
Smoking is killing people. Why doesn't it appear on more death certificates?
Her teeth had all dissolved away, and at least one of her children was born without enamel!
If she hadn't already bred she'd be up for a Darwin Award.
And other idiots will spew bullshit about the obvious, to "fix their misunderstandings" about reality.
"Coroner Cerar will issue recommendations to the effect that soft drink bottle labels should more clearly explain how much caffeine they contain and the dangers of excessive consumption. ®"
Sounds about as smart as printing, "You must not eat your shit from the toilet bowl" on the toilet paper.
Treating ADHD with mild doses of Caffeine is a good thing.....
But so is good food, adequate rest, plenty of exercise and a stimulating environment.
Uhm yup that is why I wasn't diagnosed until I was 40. ;-)
My addiction to caffeine and the fact that I started to take harder courses in high school (requiring more focus and interest) cause a dramatic improvement in my GPA.
While some joke about ADD, its both a blessing and a curse.
Probably wouldn't have even made it to 30 here in the States. Unlike most of the rest of the world which uses sugar cane in Coke here they use the cheaper high fructose corn sugar which has some evidence of being even worse for you than sugar cane.
Coroner Cerar will issue recommendations to the effect that soft drink bottle labels should more clearly emphasise the dangers of excessive consumption. ®
Because of course if the warning was there then this idiotic woman would have consumed less. Be one of the first to admit that it's fizzy sugar water of no nutritional value and far too much sugar. But I don't think blaming the manufacturer is the way to go abusing any product to this extent (even tap water for that matter) is liable to lead to health issues. This woman obviously hard serious issues beyond the help of better drinks labelling.
She had 8 kids by 31, they were apparently being born with issues due to her insanely poor diet and health.
10 litres of coke a day, 30 a day cigarettes and 8 kids.
The planet is a better place now she's dead, no doubt.
And with eight kids she can't even win a Darwin award....
"And with eight kids she can't even win a Darwin award...."
That's harsh. I upvoted it.
Sadly it sounds as if the kids might be better off too, anyone who drinks that much coke is sure to feed it to their kids...
When her kids were born without enamel on their fucking teeth you'd think she'd have cottoned on.
I think there might have been more concern about her children being born with teeth in the first place... highly unusual - teeth don't normally start to make an appearance until some time after birth!
You can tell I'm not a parent, can't you!?!
Why on earth did a story mention the enamel thing then?
This report also missed the fact (mentioned on the BBC) that all of her teeth fell out over a year ago...
Only thing I can think is Moron.
And maybe that her partner should be held liable, because if my partner started to do something incredibly stupid and dangerous to her healththen I'd be stepping in their quick smart to try and stop it...
"then I'd be stepping in their quick smart to try and stop it"
What is your partner's "quick smart" and how do you step in it?
Coke contains 106 grams of cane sugar per 100 litreSounds pretty safe to me?
So it would have been more likely that she might have died a bit earlier or later and in a somewhat different matter, probably boringly so. Is this like a less-tasteful version of the parrot skit?
Additionally, that is an alarming item to read in an El Reg newstory.
....So much wrong with that.
300-400mg of caffeine is the ceiling dose without side-effects in most people. Considering that a fair few "pharmaceutical miracles" are considered safe with side-effects that make jitters, sleeplessness, and an upset tummy look like, well, jitters, sleeplessness, and an upset tummy; "safe" is a very loosely defined word here. Better to say that the toxic dose of caffeine is approx. 10g (depending on tolerance and body mass - ~175mg/kg) Which this gal was nowhere close to. 400mg of caffeine would be lethal to someone weighing in at 2.5kg, I presume she weighed a bit more than that.
She didn't die from caffeine or smoking. She kicked the bucket due to malnutrition. The caffeine probably didn't help, but as others have said, if she were drinking root beer (No caffeine, slightly less sugar) with the same exclusivity and not eating, she still would have died. Possibly sooner from starvation rather than malnutrition.
Agreed. "... a safe level" is nearly meaningless in this context. And Cerar's vilification of Coca-Cola is equally rubbish. I hate the stuff myself, but this is clearly a case of malnutrition exacerbated by smoking and other unhealthy behavior. I suspect the caffeine aggravated the eventually fatal arrhythmia (I'm assuming Cerar got that bit right), but singling it out is a bit like blaming the gas pedal when someone dies in an auto accident. I know the Reg publishes this sort of thing for the fun of it (and it is in Bootnotes), but really, Sharwood could have been a tad more critical.
Which just a few hours ago dispensed not one, but TWO nice 20 oz plastic bottles when I asked for only one. Having finished the first, my bladder has performed its function and awaits draining.
No cigarettes or 8 kids for me, but geeze, 9 liters, a day! Give me a break, any liquid in that amount on a daily basis would finish one off!
"Give me a break, any liquid in that amount on a daily basis would finish one off!"
There was some girl who dies as a result of a promotional contest to see how much water people could drink in a given amount of time (I'm too lazy to look up the details though).
Then there's this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_Schiavo from which I cite:
Her medical chart contained a note that "she apparently has been trying to keep her weight down with dieting by herself, drinking liquids most of the time during the day and drinking about 10–15 glasses of iced tea." Upon admission to the hospital, she was noted as suffering from hypokalemia (low potassium levels): her serum potassium level was an abnormally low 2.0 mEq/L (the normal range for adults is 3.5–5.0 mEq/L). Her sodium and calcium levels were normal. Electrolyte imbalance is often caused by drinking excessive fluids. A serious consequence of hypokalemia can be heart rhythm abnormalities, including sudden arrhythmia death syndrome."
Also see http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-57367638-10391704/british-teen-stacey-irvine-hospitalized-after-eating-nothing-but-chicken-nuggets-for-15-years/.
Moral: Some people are so fucking stupid it isn't even funny.
"Hold your wee for a wii" was the show/stunt
Yes, a lot of liquid! Explains why she died while sitting on the toilet.
Fail icon is for stupid dead woman, not for any commentard.
As a fellow Kiwi, I can't help but think "oh well... Darwin Awards, and all that", but she spawned 8 brats... ffs.
So all I can think is "what a dumbass she is/was, and so is her family"
Scott 26 ,
Unfortunate that there are lots of people who seem to drink large quantities of Coke.
I watch the trolleys at the local Supermarket(PaknSave) and lots of them are piled up with Coca-Cola and that rubbish cheap white Bread.
Forget the warnings on Coke, why don't they post warnings on the cigarettes she was puffing away at every day?
What do you mean they already have warning labels on those? Are you telling me that warning labels don't do a thing to dissuade crazy addicts from consuming to their bitter ends? Nonsense.
"Forget the warnings on Coke, why don't they post warnings on the cigarettes she was puffing away at every day?"
They could put her lovely toothless smile on Coke bottles as a warning like cigarettes. That will cut down consumption...
"They could put her lovely toothless smile on Coke bottles as a warning like cigarettes. That will cut down consumption"
Why would it? Her photo only proves you can get like that when you drink 10 litres of the stuff a day, after all, which isn't the norm. It proves nothing about lesser consumption, so why should it discourage people who drink less?
Yes she was stupid. However, crazy and addict can't automatically be lumped together.
"hardly ate, usually skipping breakfast, eating only small lunches and seldom partaking in an evening meal. She would often vomit upon waking in the morning. She was also a 30-a-day smoker."
But I am guessing that CocaCola will be the target of all the Lawyers now doorsteping the relatives with promises of untold riches
Eating's kind of a pain when you don't have teeth. Much easier to have something to drink instead.
Let me get this straight, in her 10-11 kg of cola daily diet she put down of roughly 1 kg of sugar at roughly 4,000 calories. If I edge just over half of that for more than a few days in a row it shows immediately on the scale and that includes a 70-80 minute workout 3-4 times a week. Maybe the caffeine upped her metabolism enough to prevent her from becoming an oblate spheroid and I imagine battling a byte of brats burned off a bit as well.
for the charming alliterative metaphor, "battling a byte of brats"
I've often wondered what the collective noun for a large quantitiy of cracker spawn is.
> for the charming alliterative metaphor, "battling a byte of brats"
You missed: "battling a byte of brats burned off a bit as well."
...your Coke stock.
He brought HOW much with him at the beginning of the day? Forget getting fat, I want to know whether he was refilling the empty bottles during the day or 'making it rain' for the poor schlubs on the ground?
How did she manage to avoid diabetes after consuming so much sugar ? ( I was under the presumption that large sugar intake and Diabetes (type 2) were related).
Also , as much as I don't like Coca Cola and the advertising world, I think it would be unfair to blame them for the stupidity of this woman.
This woman had serious psychological problems not Colca Cola problems.
Coca Cola should to some extent be responsable for the tooth decay problem though.... I agree with the other poster that said pictures of "severe tooth decay" should be displayed on the bottle.
"How did she manage to avoid diabetes after consuming so much sugar ? ( I was under the presumption that large sugar intake and Diabetes (type 2) were related)."
Good question. But I don't recall seeing in the story the length of time she was on the, uh, training regimen. Diabetes does take some time to develop, so the "length of time on training regimen" x "percent of amount of Coca-Cola ingested compared to the quantity needed to induce diabetes in a smoker" further multiplied by an age coefficient probably equals a value under the necessary threshold.
She successfully avoided diabetes by dying of a heart attack first.
She probably avoided diabetes by not having a genetic tendency to developing diabetes.
Diabetes is not a disease that you catch from a high sugar intake or from being a fat fuck.
It is a disease that you are genetically pre-disposed to develop but (in the case of type II diabetes) has varying severity. The level of severity is adversely affected by your sugar intake and level of wappitude so it is perfectly possible for two otherwise identical individuals (with a genetic tendency* to type II diabetes) to have different levels of compromise from the condition - one with a 'healthy' diet and active lifestyle may never notice the condition whereas one with a coke 'n' couch** lifestyle may well be crippled by diabetic side effects from an early age.
However, a person with none of the genetic predisposition to diabetes can chod down on as much sweet sweet sugar as they like and never develop diabetes.
* I say genetic tendency because it is a multi-factorial inheritance aetiology so you also get variation in severity from person to person depending on which out of the various factors they have in their genome.
**Choice of champions.
Kind of correct. It's more to do with how much insulin your pancreas can be forced to churn out before it gives up the ghost, there is a genetic component to the amount of abuse it can take, the amount of abuse itself is obviously important. Plenty of people can have a predisposition to developing type II diabetes without actually succumbing to it by not forcing refined sugars down their throat, and conversely, those without such a predisposition can damage their pancreas through prolonged excessive blood glucose levels. The western diet generally has too much refined sugar in it, hence the current 'epidemic' of diabetes, where a significant proportion of people are stressing their pancreases beyond the point where they can cope. This is hardly surprising given the fact that we didn't evolve on a diet of refined sugar.
Kind of correctish....
Type I diabetes is caused by a failure to produce insulin in the pancreas (as you desribe). This is usually diagnosed early in life (at puberty or thereabouts) as this is when the pancreas starts to be more stressed and gives up the ghost.
Type II diabetes is caused by (still not that well understood) failures in the insulin receptors on other cells of the body (notably fat, muscle and liver cells) so whilst the pancreas is still producing plenty of insulin, the body is not reacting to it appropriately (later on you can get insulin production falling off but this is more often than not caused by the individuals' natural pancreatic insulin production being suppressed by the treatment insulin they are taking to supplement their natural production as a consequence of their diabetes).
Both types are exacerbated by poor diet and high wapness but neither are caused by them.
The refinedness or lack thereof of sugar intake is somewhat irrelevant other than refined sugar can usually be consumed in greater quantities than other types as it is more concentrated and quickly absorbed into the blood (e.g. you only have to drink a liter of coke to get the same sugar as 4 apples and the apple sugar is absorbed over 1-2 hours instead of the coke sugar's 15-30 minutes) - the height of the peak blood sugar level attained after eating is what causes all the problems arising from diabetes.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017