I cant wait for them to get Teddy to cough up
I do hope this is the straw that brakes the camels back.
Microsoft has been granted a patent on a content distribution system that uses cameras built into televisions, PCs, and mobile phones to act as a "consumer detector," to enforce DRM licensing terms. "A fee can be charged for each viewer of the content for each view," Patent US20120278904 reads. "Viewers may be uniquely …
I do hope this is the straw that brakes the camels back.
Sounds great! How much will it cost me to implement this excellent technology in my home? Please send me prices and an order form now, I can't wait to write out the cheque to get the ball rolling.
You guys rock!
I really hate to put a downer on the hatefest, but I doubt if this is intended for the home. More likely, it's for venues that rent huge screens to display to paying audiences or attract audiences to raise revenues, like pubs, who already pay more.
Not exactly lovely fluffy tech but it's never going to get anywhere your telly.
"Not exactly lovely fluffy tech but it's never going to get anywhere your telly."
You didn't notice the reference to Kinect and games consoles then?
Better take down that picture of the 1966 World Cup squad, put away SWMBO's doll collection and throw a cloth over the budgie's cage.
Oh and make sure the set can't spot its own reflection in a mirror...
Rather than rearrange your lounge, have you thought what a blob of Bluetack over the lens might achieve?
System alert, system alert! Attempted tempering detected! System shutdown! License revoked! Fee automatically deducted from your bank account! Insurers informed and electricity supply cut off, to make it impossible for you to leave the premises before our swat team's landed on your doorstep! Sorry for the inconvenience!
Fine, looks like we'll have to fall back on using that old "Polaroid picture in front of the security camera" trick
I have a few issues with this latest "ideation" from Microsoft: one concerning Microsoft's apparent self-appointment as Sherif, policing other right's holder's content and the latter concerning personal and familiy privacy.
So, what right over the copyrighted works of others does Microsoft have? If I buy a legitimate CD/DVD (no mention of Blu-ray in the report - Is that because Sony would sue their ar*ses, eh?) which holds copyright material from, say, Sony or Universal or any other such producer, on what way can Microsoft put themselves in the "value chain" with such producers and, of course, the purchaser (or I should say "content hirer"?) of the material?
In the UK, BBC, ITV, SKY and other boradcasters often "pixelate" the faces of children that may occur in video or photo images they broadcast, such is the climate of fear concerning images of children. If this patented technology is used in the the UK home environment, how many privacy, potential "kiddie porn" misinterprestations are Microsoft prepared to defend?
Be assurred, Microsoft, if I was looking for some media playback device, I would NOT go and buy such a device with camera's built in from you or anyone else that would look to licence this privacy invasion! Are Microsoft certain that they would want to activily be the violation of personal, home privacy?
DRM - Dumb, Risky and Moronic.
"I have a few issues with this latest "ideation" from Microsoft: one concerning Microsoft's apparent self-appointment as Sherif, policing other right's holder's content and the latter concerning personal and familiy privacy."
Since they will negotiate the rights and compensation for presenting that content on their devices with the right's holders I'm not sure what your issue is here.
The way I see it working is along the lines of "Movie Rental Options: Rent movie X for solo viewing - £5, Rent movie X for family viewing (max 4 persons) - £10, Rent movie X for unlimited viewing - £50", so if you want privacy you either don't rent content via the Microsoft device and service or you select the unlimited option - simples.
is a real expensive video camera and sound recording setup as it records the content on my tv screen for later viewing. Piracy will soon be an extreme sport.
If the hardware doesn't detect a face watching it, then does that mean you get to watch for free?
The article links to an patent application, not a granted patent. It was *published* a few days ago, not granted.
Of course Bill Gates, the executive board at EMI and the chief exec of Paramount come round my house and watch TV. Have done for ages........
George Orwell, 1984, big brother is watching you.
I'm afraid I can't allow you to watch that, Dave.
In Soviet Redmond, the TV watches you…
Can't you just put a bit of tape over the lense?
I'll be the one buying shares in Insulation Tape PLC...
Or cover the lense in snot.
Downvoted for being tasteless and puerile.
"Downvoted for being tasteless and puerile."
Carry on doing that here and you'll be busy for at least forever.
UPVOTED for ingenuity!!!
And you sir, DOWNVOTED for being an ID10T.
Now, take THAT!!!
They just wont stop before they can charge you every time you even think about your favourite TV show.
Ah bless, my bullshit bingo sensors are on overload, I bet there was some excited ideas man proposing "leveraging the user@base 360deg/24/7/365 or something"
Getting blood out of the stoned.
So glad I don't have a TV or consume such content.
"A fee can be charged for each viewer of the content for each view" -- FUCK OFF
Best reason to be a pirate if it ever came to market.
They really expect people to accept this?
For the bad guys at least. The camera forcibly on all the time, watching every move in your living room and no way to turn it off.
A whole new business field for bot herders. Especially if people are watching the late night program.
I suppose they will feed the stream right back to a server.
Maybe you'll be offered a free TV with no off switch or which switches on automatically when the ads show.
For a fee, you can get with on off switch and less adverts.
(Yes, Fifth Element)
So your girlfriend and/or wife id going to trust this device, sitting there monitoring you. Even if it is not capable of actual video capture do you think they will believe that? So no more sex on the sofa, rug, floor, table, hanging from the chandelier.
This can not be planned as a home device, they really can not be serious.
Just turn the TV to face the wall !
if I were in Ku-Klux-Klan
and bend over for thorough inspection.
Well could be as interesting to implement as the TSA scanners that see too much..
Seriously, the idea that a camera will be looking back at a user and only seeing a face (yeaaaaah, right!) is as honest as that line "I won't cum in your mouth, darling,.. really.." All it needs is one halfway decent hack and it's a peeping Tom's paradise.
This one will NEVER fly except perhaps with a certain.. ummm shall we say.. 'exhibitionistic' crowd.
The patent is designed to work with both streaming content and downloaded material stored in "RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, DVD or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices." Redmond's patent lawyers are nothing if not thorough.
So I can watch my (silent) Super8 films and listen to my vinyl records without issue then? Cool. :-)
If I fall asleep because it's boring or I'm pissed and watch any old shite will I get a refund?
Oh and about my identical twins...
fscked by SHA-1 collision? Not so fast, says Linus Torvalds