Are they like Phone-machines? and TV-machines? and Word processor machines?
Despite being hailed for its techno-innovation, Japan is a little more traditional than many people think – over half of homes apparently still contain fax machines. The country’s businesses and government organisations continue to rely on the legacy technology to transmit important documents, while 59 per cent of households …
Are they like Phone-machines? and TV-machines? and Word processor machines?
The name is an historical artifact, Wombling_Free. When they were first widely available, they were pretty much the only electrical bit of common office equipment. It's a contraction of "facsimile machine".
And as a side-note, back in the day I recall people calling IBM Displaywriters "word processing machines", and mainframe computers "computing" or "calculating" machines. Also, Xerox products were called "copying machines", and etc.
Of course, they are all named "Fred" ... "Fucking Ridiculous Electronic Device" ;-)
"When they were first widely available, they were pretty much the only electrical bit of common office equipment."
Except the telex machines that they replaced.
Plus electric typewriters and dictaphones.
What's wrong with "fax machine" as a name for it? I've only ever known them by that name, in fact.
Or should I be asking you to get back under your bridge?
(Fuss point 1: If you are going to poke fun, learn to spell "kawaii" correctly... It has a double-i at the end.)
(Fuss point 2: This goes back to the article itself. Yes, Japanese has three scripts, but... Kanji are (normally slightly modified) Chinese characters. Hiragana and katakana are heavily modified Chinese characters. Native Japanese words and Chinese-origin loanwords are normally written in kanji. Japanese grammatical particles and other very small Japanese words (e.g. "san" = Mr, Miss, Mrs, or Ms.) are written in hiragana. Loanwords from other languages, mostly English, are written using katakana.)
They are like a photocopier where the scanner and printer are at opposite ends of a telephone line.
Since the information being transmitted is called a fax, not the machine, how else should it be named to differentiate between the two?
@Wize - call it a faxer?
That's the person sending the facsimile document.
... that Faxing is a terrible waste of resources.
Funny thing is that most of 'em think they have been sold on the "paperless office" concept ... and are still keeping paper files on their clients!
Nowt daft as folks ... Especially folks who think they have a "superior" education, which seems to include damn near every holder of a single doctorate ;-)
> are still keeping paper files on their clients!
Often they have a requirement to keep files for decades - what electronic format would you recommend I store a 99 year lease in? Word .doc or .docx?
There are also a whole bunch of regulations on privacy and handling for some industries - it's a lot easier for me to prove in court that nobody broke into a locked filing cabinet in a locked office than it is to prove a computer wasn't compromised
Personally, I store all my important documentation in 7-bit ASCII ... Formatting, fonts & colo(u)r aren't strictly necessary for any such files. By way of reference, I still have every file I have created since 1975 at my fingertips. Sometimes I print contracts out on a daisy-wheel printer, when I know that an old-timer will be reading it :-)
Yes, I know about the rules & regs on paper docs in such offices. The so-called "paperless" stuff is in addition to the paper trail ... and quite useless, in the great scheme of things (billing, digital X-ray & inventory excluded).
Your "locked office and file cabinet" isn't as secure as you think it is. Lock picking isn't exactly rocket science. Chances are that I can pick your locks and leave no traces ... on the other hand, most folks breaking into computers aren't skilled enough to leave no trace.
 Yes, I know, not all countries use alphabets compatible with "normal" 7-bit ASCII ... so IBM invented so-called "code pages" for EBCDIC, before ASCII existed, which ASCII later emulated. Both have issues when it comes to CJK/V written languages. But that's been worked around, too. I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader to figure out to avoid "tl;dr" comments.
 It's a handy skill to learn, and contrary to popular opinion NOT illegal, unless you use it in an illegal manor.
My dentist take digital x rays easier to store an look at , insurance requires him to take the old fashion x ray films to get paid.
So do you really get x-rayed twice? Seriously?
Do tell where these illegal manors are located so I can avoid them...
Perhaps they don't see the point of modern way. The point is, sending couple of pages to another location right?
On fax: put them to feeder, enter number, press start button. You will also know they are there, physically or digitally.
On "internet": boot win, find the awkward scanning application generally outsourced to some Indian company or coded by Chinese, find "document" setting (they are always set to photo), downgrade resolution (or you will get 1200 fake dpi), select tiff or pdf as file type (not jpeg!), scan, find file. Should I continue to "mail" part and tell the funny part where recipient's mailbox is full because of funny cat photos so it bounces?
Really, which way is practical?
Really? You tend to be the one who goes on about how many boats you've got, how many cars, all the computers you own and you complain about fax being a waste of resources?
It's not necessarily a question of is it really secure - it's how much does it cost me to argue in court.
Being the test case of SHA-1 message digests and explaining PKI to a 100year old judge and 12 citizens of ToadSuck Ak. is likely to be harder than showing them a scrawled signature at the bottom of a fax.
Yes he zapped me twice. Got to love American medicine.
I have my toys because I know how to use my resources (and I'm stingy).
Faxing is a waste of resources.
There are several reasons why the Fax is still popular in Japan. The CCITT Group 3 image standard used in Fax machines was designed to be just enough resolution to read handwritten kanji characters as used in Japanese. Before the advent of word processing, Japanese companies had terrible difficulty producing typewritten documents, so businesses usually circulated handwritten documents via fax. There's a really interesting article on El Reg somewhere, written by a really clever guy, about Japanese typewriters and word processing. It explains all this stuff, you ought to read it.
But the main reason why Faxes are still popular in Japan is not obvious: the cryptic Japanese street address system. Most businesses and homes have fax machines so they can send hand drawn custom maps to people who need to visit or make deliveries. Japanese street addresses are numbered by the age of the building. Street names are often unmarked and are often laid out in strange patterns. I recall buying my first Japanese Zaurus PDA in 1994 and being astonished that it had detailed maps of major Japanese cities stored in ROM, you could draw on them and fax them to people. This is why GPS systems were first popular with Japanese consumers. As GPS smartphones take over, and everyone can use their phones to access the internet for maps, the fax will gradually decline. But for most people, a fax machine is still easier.
Also, in Japan, you sign legal paper documents with an inkan (an inked stamp bearing the characters of your name). Think of it as a kind of hardware authentication token... So there's a lot of faxing, 'signing' and faxing back. (The Wikipedia entry on inkan is quite thought-provoking, if you are interested in the subject of identify)
There are also digital equivalents to inkan & hanko - read the Adobe Acrobat documentation for an example
I wonder if the relative 'non-computerisation' of Japan is related to the unsuitability of the keyboard for entering kanji, and if the ease of writing kanji on tablets will create a tipping point.
In the UK, I have (as a relative youngster) only used a fax machine for sending my time sheets back to my employment agency. I have been told my signature on a fax carries more legal weight than on an email- I don't know if this is true, but at least a sender can be reasonably sure that the fax has gone to a specific geographical location.
Now, does any one here remember Arthur C Clarke describing his plan for hacking his fax machine so as to bankrupt people who sent him spam faxes? (it was included in 'Greetings, Carbon-Based Bipeds')
In contrast to the muddled information in the article, Charles E and FatsBrannigan have hit the nail on the head in identifying the two primary reasons for the persistence of the fax machine in modern-day Japan -- faxing hand-drawn maps and signing documents. I use smartphone apps for those functions now, but still send plenty of "electronic faxes" from my phone.
The notion that entering Japanese on a computer is time-consuming or difficult and that people thus prefer to write by hand is quaint, but complete rubbish. Japanese is not my first language, but I can type a complete Japanese sentence on my smartphone or PC _faster_ than I can enter the equivalent sentence in English, as can any Japanese under the age of 50. In fact, old folks are fond of complaining that "young" people (i.e. anyone under 30) can no longer write by hand, as the smartphone and PC have nearly obsoleted those skills.
>sure that the fax has gone to a specific geographical location.
Actually you can't - unlike a telex.
That's why you can't fax a patent application to your lawyer - you can't prove that the fax didn't get a wrong number and so a fax counts as published. An encrypted email is allowed - one of the few area where patents caught up.
...Fax is still most popular way of sending legally binding documents, just try to ask a bank how they communicate with businesses not on the SWIFT... the answer is: by fax.
When dealing w/printed forms filled out manually, wretched software for scanners means it's actually much faster to drop the form in the feeder of a fax machine and punch in a phone number, as opposed to discovering whether or not the scanner driver has mysteriously gone tits up, necessitating a reboot.
HP's been selling "all-in-one" fax/print/scan machines for ~20 years now and over that period they've accomplished a remarkable feat: the software for these devices has grown steadily worse for the entire time. If they'd just freeze their product cycle for a few days or even just minutes and actually try eating their own rubbish they might get a clue as to why they're in a death spiral.
HP's massive drivers that won't cope with the advertised resolution, and are NEVER updated or patched.
What a pile of stinking merde.
Incrediby, the CUPS (free software) ones included with GNU/linux distributions and Apple computers are quite good (As in they work and get out of the way).
There's a reason it's really called the "common unix pain system". But it's still better than HP's drivers. Or that brilliant idea to require every computer on the network to have the right drivers for every printer on the network that it might want to talk to. PostScript[tm] was invented for that, and while not perfect it is quite a good way to reduce work maintaining larger shops. Reason why I make sure my printers talk ps and then all I need is a simple spooler; lpd will do nicely.
>But it's still better than HP's drivers.
So is letting the dog eat Pate out of your lughole.
they still encrypt their data in 19th century technology in 'documents' and lots of other non-computer shaped technology.
Luckily they took the combustion engine and put it in cars and planes rather than trying to stick it in a horse shaped machine and using it to drag carts of documents containing tons of repeated redundant and mall formed data.
That's information that was created at a shopping precinct?
Which version of PDF would that be? The latest one thought up by Adobe as an inducement to installing their latest most-bloated version of Reader?
I'm a customer of two companies which send me bills as digitally-signed PDFs in an effort to make them more legally binding. In both cases Reader says it can't verify the signature. Now go and ask someone who isn't an IT freak how to roll their own digitally-signed PDF.
PDF is also an excellent attack vector since you can embed practically anything in them.
There's a lot to be said for a scanner and a modem.
I imagine you know this already, but most likely the reason why it can't verify the signatures is because you haven't installed, or trusted, the Certification Authorities (CA) used to sign the signature that signed the document (if using X.509).
However, I fully agree that digital signatures are really not quite there yet, precisely because of the problems on the usability front. (which is unfortunate, since I like the concept).
I suppose I should have expanded on my point, being that I don't think faffing about with the settings in Reader and installing the CA yourself is very secure either. There's nothing to stop the user going to $BADHOST and clicking yes to make the problem go away just because the e-mail/PDF says so.
"I'm a customer of two companies which send me bills as digitally-signed PDFs"
The correct answer is "PDF? What PDF? I never received a PDF ... Snail-mail me the bill, please." PDFs are evil, and should be outlawed. My kit drops PDFs at the routers ... When it comes to .gov, I always call & have 'em send me the paper instead ... Why should I have to allow 36Megs of bandwidth when 1Meg of HTML will do ... or 36K of ASCII ... or a 48 cent stamp & less than a cent of paper?
The mind absolutely boggles.
And you think we don't?
What you're used to always seems normal, but I bet there are any amount of such contradictions in our society that seem equally evident to someone from a totally different culture, but I'm no better fitted to spot 'em than the rest of you.
Like people in the office printing out every piece of nonsense, regardless of whether it necessary or useful to do so?
By fax....? Really? o_0
Install GPG, pinentry and Enigmail (or similar).
Generate a public/private key (if you don't already have one)
Get your recipient's public key (and signing is just another excuse for a party)
Encrypt and send in peace and (relative) security.
Like the old, old joke goes: "I would [do all that], but I don't know anyone else who has [done]"
Which works fantastically well until the day you have to communicate with a non-geek.
(I'm a big fan of digital signatures btw, but I can see their shortcomings when it comes to usability)
@AC - oh, don't start me on how poorly GPG et al hang together at times. But when they work, they work great. Which, of course, is why one would hire a consultant to sort it all out.
But my main point remains, if these are truly important documents then encryption and digital signatures are better than a fax.
The other problem is being sure that everyone knows that it's a key signing party. Otherwise, some people get upset when they can't find the fishbowl.
"Which works fantastically well until the day you have to communicate with a non-geek."
Especially a non-geek who just upgraded their computer, and can't figure out why they can't read any of the e-mails they're getting on their new computer!
Most will have encountered a bureaucratic department (government or otherwise) requiring us to fax them some critical information because it is "more secure" and because anything on a computer could have been easily edited in photoshop!
Oh how I have enjoyed printing things out and then faxing them to the other end, in order that someone else can then scan them back in to a computer again...
Actually, they trust to Telecom's industry record keeping, not 300 (or 200) dpi tiff file which is sent.
I usually paste the image file of my signature into the document, before sending direct to the fax server... preserves the "security" level, while saving paper.
A few years ago I needed to get MSDN keys from Microsoft, they would only FAX them, not email.
systemdwith faint praise
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017