Swiss Light Source
I didn't realise Steve Jobs was Swiss, nor that they had preserved his backside.
An international research team has observed an electron being split into two “quasi particles”, one carrying the original particle’s spin, the other carrying its orbital movement. Spin (giving rise to magnetism) and angular momentum (the path the electron follows around the nucleus of an atom) are two out of the electron’s …
I didn't realise Steve Jobs was Swiss, nor that they had preserved his backside.
It's fundamental dontcha know!
I know you guy's are just cutting and pasting press releases, but the Bohr model was abandoned almost 90 years ago.
Maybe so, but not AFAICT the standard model which says that electrons are, eh, infrangible.
Neutron walks into a pub...
Neutron: How much for a pint of bitter?
Landlord: For you... No charge!
Electrons are still "infrangible"
This here phenomenon seems to occur in a more complex materials that have several electrons and nucleai bunched up in a fracking complex structure.
The problem is that the reporter tries to describe something using imagery that doesn't necessarily apply. One would have to start from the mathematical foundations. The methaphors may come later..
Barman says: "We don't serve your kind in here?"
A neutrino walks into a bar.
Agreed. English language and the quantum world don't mix very well.
Physicists use maths (including lots of imaginary numbers) to very successfully describe that world. But trying to imagine something like an electron as an object made of other stuff just doesn't apply.
For example, Quantum Field Theory describes an electron as being something that is as big as the entire universe. It has a bit of "electronness" everywhere (the field being the whole universe and not just a football field). Only in some places and in some circumstances is it instantiated into something that you imagine a small point of charge to be.
Then you get onto equivalences. A photon can be a bit of light one moment, and a pair of particles the next. Stand in an accelerating lift and you can't tell whether you're in a strong gravitational field or are simply accelerating.
It's fascinating stuff, but so weird that it hurts my head thinking about it.
With any luck this is the first instance of this joke and we can spend the rest of the day waiting for it to be discovered.
LMAO next week!
A neutrino^H^H^H^H^H^H^H tachyon walks into a bar.
Aaand, while we're at it ...
An atom says to his friend, "Man, I think I've lost an electron." The friend says "Are you sure?" He answers: "I'm positive!"
See, this is possibly the most important bit of news this week, and certainly the most exciting. And none of the 'big' web sites are covering it.
Presumably because it is not about football, or illustrated with a candid nap of an x-factor judge's gusset.
This why I don't rely on El Reg, this story was posted 6 hours before El Reg could cut and paste it
Broaden your horizons. However, you might be the first sighting of a Register Fanboi though.
Am I biting the hand that feeds it? Oh yes!
The Register has been seperating trolls from bridges for years.
AC, with those sorts of charges you're going to be lepton.
I wouldn't call Ars Technica a 'small' site and they had it before El Reg
when it comes to contemporary science, but Richard Chirgwin's reports are, in my humble opinion, not among them. He does a excellent job of reporting scientific developments in popular (i e, non-mathematical) language, at least as good a job as such pop sci sites as Science Daily (http://www.sciencedaily.com/) or Phys Org (http://phys.org/). Moreover, from what I have seen, Mr Chirgwin is ready to correct his articles if and when errors of fact are pointed out to him. There are, alas, other bloggers here on the Reg whose dedication to scientific objectivity is far less evident and who would be much more appropriate subjects for your criticism....
"And none of the 'big' web sites are covering it."
The BBC news website covered it a few hours before the reg.
Is that 'big' enough?
Just when we reckon we know it all, they go and discover new stuff.
Did it stay with the spinon, orbiton or wander off by itself to cry in the corner all alone?
Is this result really that significant? Afaik this wasn't a true splitting of a discrete electron but rather the apparent shift of some of its properties around the electron sea in a semi conductor - whilst it's an exciting result - it's not the revelation that breaking apart a single electron orbiting a hydrogen atom would be.
Having said that it may have theoretical and practical uses analogous to the 'electron holes' concept in semi-conductors.
A good question Gordon. It seems important enough to expect them to go looking for it or at least mention it. I suspect that what has happened is that the X-rays picked out some aspect of the properties of the quantum 'mush' that is smeared around the electron 'sea' of this complex crystalline solid.
I also wonder what temperature the solid was at when they detected this.
It's behind you!
Probably the bar tender asked for cash. The split was the result of the quasi-particles hunting for their wallet and purse.
Splitting electrons is soooo boring. They'll just find another little Russian doll.
I want to see proper, popular research, research that would be published by my journal of choice, namely 'Hello!'. When are we going to get concrete proof of the Pratchettian Kingons, Queeons and Republicons. The theory  has been around since the late 1980s. I, personally, am prepared to undertake the torture of minor royals in order to assist this valuable and necessary research.
I propose that henceforth a population of holons be known as Roy.
Is he wearing black sunglasses? Oh, no, that's Roy Orbison...
Keep mixing up names. Thursday yet?
If you take the spinon out of politics - does that leave the true'on particle behind . . . there might be light at the end of the tunnel or is that mixing theories up?
Yes, but creatively. We might of course find that politics is nothing but spin, and taking spin away leaves nothing but emptiness (or a residue of hot air at most).
Nah. Take away the spin and you'd still have greed, rabid control-freakery and a smattering of pure evil left.
Hmm, I wonder what the fundamental particle of rabid control-freakery is called?
You can take the spin out of politics, but you'll still get screwed by the remaining momentum... And the charge is always too high.
"Hmm, I wonder what the fundamental particle of rabid control-freakery is called?"
I prefer the Politicion. It comes in three quantum "flavours": Labour, Conservative, and Libdem. When observed before an election, the three flavours are distinctly observable. After an election Conservative and Labour turn out to be identical in terms of greed, incompetence, and all other observable quantum properties, and Libdem vanishes.
when you split the Politicion and take out the spin, the orbit will become an inward spiral that will cause orbit particle to eventually disappear up its own arse, as usual the charge will be passed to the maninthestreetion.
Only recently shed ourselves of 13 years of the real rabid control freaks. The UK hadn't yet reached the 'glories' of North Korea and Stalinist USSR, but was well on the way.
The Tories are doing a fine job of undoing the control mess left behind, but it is so great that socialist sect followers have difficulty distinguishing what is inherited control-freakiness from reality.
I think the Libdem particle is a good example of the uncertainty principle, you're never quite sure if it's there. The only thing you know for sure is that it has zero impact on anything else..
"hadn't yet reached the 'glories' of North Korea and Stalinist USSR, but was well on the way"
"have difficulty distinguishing [...] reality"
Do you actually know what the Stalinist USSR was like?
Cranks don't 'do' reality, so I think your biting will be in vain.
The 'rabid control' was indeed inherited - a continuation of policy from the 1980s onwards. I don't see much sign of it slowing down, let alone being 'undone'. Renaming the 'Interception Modernisation Programme' as the 'Communications Capabilities Development Programme' is not exactly bringing down the Berlin Wall, is it?
I thought they renamed that the Berlin Transverse Aerial Navigation Aid.
> Do you actually know what the Stalinist USSR was like?
You never knew if you, your friends, or your family members might suddenly disappear in the night.
Plus lines to get toilet paper.
And you really, really don't want to know about Marxist-Leninist toilet paper.
The mandelson, surely?
An idea on a future approach on how to get rid of the pesky spacetime and unify QM and Gravity:
Some of the Anons here may be interested.
Some kind of particle with unknown attributes, used to convey embarrasing or controversial information? this is probably what makes up dark matter. Can I have my Nobel prize now?
a memetic particle created by the Lulz-Haet Collider
"Spin here, orbit there..."
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017