No thanks. But slap a Power7 CPU on it, and I'll consider tho.
Commodore's Amiga OS was rapidly out-evolved by the Mac OS, and the latest Amiga hardware seems caught behind the Apple curve too. Enter the Commodore Amiga Mini, a squat, compact desktop PC that owes its looks to the Mac Mini - of three years ago. Like 2009's Mac Mini, its footprint is 197 x 197mm square, and it's 75mm tall …
No thanks. But slap a Power7 CPU on it, and I'll consider tho.
You can get their amazing custom linux version from their
Windows/IIS/.NET powered website.
Just out of curiosity, is that observation supported by some form of evidence beyond it serving .aspx pages, which can just as easily be done from a linux distro running the open source mono framework, or is it just an "it's not PHP so it's the devil's work" sort of statement?
Was from the server headers.
I'm indifferent on the tech but they're not using Commodore OS
According to Netcraft it's Windows Server 2008 running IIS 7.5 - so there you go.
Wow the website also has a retro feel to it, just look at the background and the logo's
Sorry i aint buying a piece of metal with Amiga grinded into it.
No, Amiga OS is NOT "OS Vision". Sadly it's not Intel either.
It's small, square and has the word 'mini' in the name. I can hear them spooling up the legal teams as I type...
Rounded corners, man - Apple can't lose! While they're at it, they can sue the makers of my dining table.
"Commodore's Amiga OS was rapidly out-evolved by the Mac OS"
Surely he meant BeOS?
Almost same here. Next time reviewer wants to take stabs at iconic things, at least get freaking facts straight.
The last REAL Amiga is the A4000 circa 1992. Apple hardware of said time would have been a Quadra 900.
As far as OS goes, comparing AOS3x to System 7, sigh, you'd have had to use both to understand how vastly inferior Apples junk was...
As far as HW goes, Amiga did get 060's from 3rd party that made the 040's in Quadras look like snails on valium. That's why many a "Mac lover" back then bought Amigas and jammed Shapeshifter/Fusion on them. That was virtualization beeing done back in the days... Also cheaper to buy a fully kitted Amiga and a "dead Mac to nick ROM from" than to buy Apples overpriced stuff.
So, get your facts straight. The junk you're reviewing is some PC of sorts, whether it's good or bad is of no relevance to the Amiga line. Just slapping the brand on a box makes not said box an Amiga...
I've programmed under AmigaOS and stabbed my eyes out with System 7.
AmigaOS wasn't the one with each program having it's own fixed memory size set with the file preferences. System 7 wouldn't know a DataType if one fell on its head. Guess which OS had co-operative multitasking. Etc etc...
Indeed. Amiga had pre-emptive multitasking and a micro kernel in 1985. It took Mac OS until 2001 to get something similar.
Oh and it was colour, how many years was the Mac only available in mono?
Well, it was actually the 4000T that was probably the last design.
68060 was pretty good, but they did have to remove some features from the silicon that had to be done in software. It wasn't a mass market chip either, no other desktops were using it that I know of. Everyone else was moving on to PPC.
Agreed. The journalist seems deeply ignorant about what happened in the 80s and early 90s. Commodore failed because of poor management and marketing, not because they were eclipsed technically. Indeed, the 1985 Amiga was streets ahead of the 1984 Macintosh - really on a different planet. It was the first true multimedia machine. Sadly the mainstream market wasn't really ready for it. In a world without easily-available content, no cheap digital cameras, poor network connectivity etc, many people struggled to understand what the machine was actually FOR. At that time most people used a computer either for business or for games, and that was pretty much it.
Whilst Apple might have popularized the icon interface, Commodore and Atari were the companies that took that ball and ran with it. The Amiga is arguably the single most influential machine of the 80s. Its architecture - especially its custom chips and its fundamental multitasking and coprocessor approach - are the ancestors of the modern day PC and Macintosh much more than the Macs and PCs of that era are. I would say that the modern Macintosh is the descendant of the Amiga; it just happens to have an Apple logo on it.
More like poor choice of subtitle.
You do realise prices start from $345 right?
Commodore, let it die already. Or come out with something as ground breaking as your past machines.
proper AmigaOS is still under development:
And it's owned by a company who have nothing to do with this Commodore USA outfit.
Commodore USA can't exactly be thought of as Commodore to me, it's just someone who has acquired the name and using it to sell what seem like massively overpriced x86 PCs. I have to say, their GUI does look quite funky.
But Amiga OS will be irrelevant till they bring it to the x86 architecture.
And that is a crying shame
they should just skip x86 and go straight to ARM. x86 is irrelevant.
Ill take my fail and give you a thumbs up.
I'm loving my cheap hannspad tablet with ICS on it.
My boss has an ASUS transformer that I'm waiting for him to get bored of.
A Desktop Linux on that and I'll be off.
Hmmm ChampMan 01/02 in Wine on ARM to much to hope for?
If Libreoffice do a good job of the ARM port that thing could be awesome.
I'll always struggle for a projector though, until HDMi becomes standard on them.
Would look good under the TV.
And just to have something again with the Amiga logo, a piece of hardware I adored. Shame that we cant got the good bits of the Amiga OS back into a Linux flavour.
I'll have a look at their version
I agree. It's actually got room for a physical disc player. Throw in some networked tuners (I forget the name but there's a networked tuner-farm box available for not too much cash) and this could be great as an HTPC.
I'd have considered buying and stripping the crapware OS off a Mac Mini for this had they not abandoned physical media but no, they were determined to make the damn thing effectively useless...
The case is a Streacom F1C with extra bits of engraving. A clean one is usually about 70 quid. Add mini-itx mobo, psu etc. to taste.
Brilliant. Thanks, AC.
... even though you aren't paying the M$ tax and are buying a Linux distro with a funky frontend.
Hmmm. Expensive box with an open source OS with a pretty GUI. A bit like Apple's Mac range then.
How clever, witty an insightful. That must have taken ages for you to think up.
But you're so cool managing to slag off apple in a thread that has nothing to do with apple.
I shall bow down to superior wit and intelligence. You troll
yes, a lot cooler than your new iPad
sensible soccer, or cannon fodder on it?
Or Project-X, Xenon 2, Agony, Elf, Legend, Civilisation, Megalomania, B-17 Flying Fortress, Moonstone (complete with bugs)... 'appy dayz
- I've played Xenon 2, Sensible Soccer, and Cannon Fodder with a PC, because all of them were ported way back then to DOS, and Civilization originated from DOS. Sorry to blow your fantasy.
Actually I still play Civ for Windows (from 1993) on my Win7 laptop - natively. Another beautiful example of Microsoft's vision in creating long lasting API's and compatibility.
...is quite a nice take on the "all in the keyboard" theme. Infinitely better than the "all in the monitor" designs that seem to be common elsewhere.
Wtf are they playing at? That looks like a trashy far eastern oem mac-mini clone with some Amiga and commodore labels slapped on it.
If you are going to rip off a mac mini at least make it something better than I could pick up online myself.
I may be wrong but...
When it all went south. Commodore went to Tulip and after some wrangling Amiga ended up with Escom/GW2k. Commodore languished in obscurity while Amiga actually went of for some time.
I'm not sure who Amiga is with now, I suspect its H&P, certainly AmigaOS is and they have been vicious about trademark issues in the past. I'm expecting/hoping this is a licenced product but if not there may be fireworks.
Lot of people forget that Commodore != Amiga for a LONG time.
And to be fair, Amiga was until CBM shagged it up headed for greatness. The 4000 range were closer to the workstations of the day than the personal computers, and the 4000 was half the machine is should have been given Haynie was looking at SMP systems for the machine that was dumbed down to make the 4000. On top of that in some markets they were starting to supplant PCs, Auz being one of them. I'd go so far to say that its an excellent demonstration of what happens when clueless suits are allowed to make technical decisions.
Also think its time to let it die already. Amiga stood for innovation not 'me too' and they need to be looking at other avenues. Given the monay available and the player you are against you'll need to do something really special to even get back to being a niche system.
Amiga OS still exists, as does AROS and MorphOS, but again, all also-ran products now.
Tis a nice looking box mind.
Having a look about I spotted: Amiga® trademark used under exclusive worldwide license by Commodore USA, LLC for its line of AIO (All-In-One) keyboard, desktop and HTPC computers, and is the trademark of Amiga Inc., registered in the United States and other countries.
SO nix the first part of my comment.
Agree with the previous poster. The Amiga was making serious inroads in TV production and certain graphics applications. Even Nasa were using them (and I believe still had some running until a few years back). This was at a time where Linux was only used by men with beards and personal hygiene problems and the Mac was only being taken seriously in the DTP environment.
I'm not saying things would have ended up differently but I hope the suits that took Commodore down kick themselves when they look at how much money Apple now has.
I beleive NASA had a number of 2000's that drove the wall displays at Kennedy or somewhere like that.
I kinda maintain a half interest in it and from time to time you'll see a batch of machines pop up, all same spec, same price, same age and its normally something like this. There were a shedload of CD32's and CDTVs a while back from the transport museum. Less and less of them now though, hell 500s are now worth money
"I beleive NASA had a number of 2000's that drove the wall displays at Kennedy or somewhere like that."
More than that. I read an absolutely fascinating article on a website that I now can't locate that interviewed a Nasa engineer who had a whole department kitted out with Amigas that were used for receiving and processing data from certain satellites/shuttle missions.
Just had a Google and can't find the precise article but this is close enough:
Well the main problem was that they refused to implement networking. So it was _very_ hard to get onto the Internet with an Amiga. They did have a multitasking unixoid operating system so it should have been fairly simple, but they just refused to do so. That was probably their downfall. They could have entered into the workstation/graphical market that way.
Although I'm still awaiting publication of the follow-up to Commodore: A Company on the Edge, my feeling was that the Amiga was killed because Commodore decided to market it entirely in the computers-that-connect-to-the-television category so it became known as a high-end games machine and then the consoles became an easier way to play high-end games.
It's not that a properly supported Amiga would inevitably lose to Windows on the desktop so much as that Commodore never let it compete.
As late as 2000, the US Army was still using the Commodore for weapons training (Weaponeer). The kids didn't know what to make of having to put a cartridge in the back...
Yes, if Commodore had survived and continued to develop the Amiga, it might have thrived in the internet era. They were just sadly ahead of their time - creating the world's best multimedia machine at a time where there was no large demand for one.
Looking at the spec for the Bare bones option for $345
You get a case and BD drive. That's it. No motherboard, HDD, memory, cpu.
I considered the BareBones option of the C64x, at least then I could source and spec my own components, and have a nice retro media centre PC.
However the barebones Amiga just reminds me of this - http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150767990772&_trksid=p2992.m753
Considering selling my Mac Mini G4 gathering dust to some Amiga fans to put MorphOS on.
The Amiga was a stunning experience then, long ago, and I don't think I have seen anything since then the same way. Age may have affected me but it's really hard to find anything really new to day.
I vaguely remember Commodore proudly announcing the appointment of the man behind the PCJr to head up their commercial proposition shortly before they destroyed their market by cost cutting all their best new products into uselessness.
He single handedly destroyed IBM in the PC world for years, and then destroyed Commodore completely. I can only assume he interviewed well.
I can't remember his name, but I do remember being rather annoyed at the time, as I was a proper Amiga fanboi - long before these apple fanbois, or fandroids got going. The real war was Amiga/Amstrad or C64/Spectrum before that.
These modern fanbois don't know they're born....
Somewhere I probably still have reams of 'C' containing the entire Amiga OS. Well the GUI part anyway.
And this product (to provide some vague justification for a rambling rant)?
Nah, don't think I'll bother thanks, but good luck to them if they can get some money out of punters.
Does anyone produce mini ITX PPC motherboards? Because sod buying the full unit when you could potentially build your own PPC-powered mini Amiga clone, whack AmigaOS4 on it and have fun.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017