They cannot be serious
If I am not mistaken that slide uses Comic Sans....
The Higgs boson has been glimpsed by boffins at CERN who are now much closer to pinning down the particle after crunching through hundreds of gigabytes of raw data. Previous work at CERN over the summer had whittled down the mass range in which the Higgs was most likely to be found, with the results presented by Fabiola …
If I am not mistaken that slide uses Comic Sans....
.....and to compound the crime they used the unholy trinity of lime, fuchsia and aqua as background colours.
I would have thought this to be quite obvious.
There's a fine line between genius and insanity. The use of Comic Sans just shows how fine that line can be.
Yeah - but the colours are nice...!
TBH I've been doing the same myself.
Comic Sans on the most important physics discovery this year. As an occasional graphic designer with a real love of type, I can't say how happy this makes me feel. And I'm not being in any way sarcastic.
This slide could have been scrawled in dry-wipe marker on a sheet of acetate, and people would still pay attention.
There's a lesson in there.
And these people have a particle accelerator? Maybe we *should* be worried...
I reckon they're probably better particle physicists than most graphic designers so I'm not too bothered.
It's to preserve the balance of the universe - God Particle, Devil typeface.
Translation from Science to English: "We need a bigger grant".
Interesting news, though.
maybe just "we need another grant - my postdoc who does half of the work is running out of funding, and the graduate students are too busy writing up to do their other half. I'd like to do it but I'm far too busy writing the grant (along with the soon-to-be financially stricken postdoc, that is)".
Oooh, three for one, annoying the fundamentalist religious nutters by probing the secrets of the universe, annoying the 'serious' scientists by calling it the God particle and annoying the design zealots by using Comic Sans. LHC I salute you, worth every penny on so many levels.
Seriously, I wish they stopped using "god particle". It doesn't convey any useful information, it's nonsense and it gives religious people scary ideas about CERN. I propose we use the original provisional designation instead - "the goddamn particle".
It seems we're having a science revival with pop science and the really really lovely Prof Brian Cox riding the crest of a really really big wave and if the price of inspiring a new generation of scientists is having to use a silly name for an elementary particle then I'm all for it.
Would flow so easily from the mouth of Collaterlie Sisters. (Look her up!)
"Let's take a look at the currency cat. Chris."
Actually, I wonder what Peter O'Hanrahahanrahan would make of it?
"Peter, you've lost the news!"
The Day Today - News from telly to belly.
Because Fact Into Doubt Won't Go.
From our friend Wikipedia...
One inverse femtobarn is equal to around 70 million million (70 x 10^12) collisions
The 70x10^12 figure applies only, I think, to the LHC. It depends on the beam size.
It's like measuring precipitation by looking at the window and counting the number of rain-drops that land on it. The longer you watch, the more you will see. The bigger the window, the more you will see. The faster the rain, the more you will see. So you can measure the amount of rain that has fallen by recording rain-drops per square centimetre. Our window might be a square metre, but if we are recording raindrops per square centimetre, then ten thousand drops of rain will have to hit the window before we count one raindrop per square centimetre. -- one inverse square centimetre,
One femtobarn is an area of 10^-43 square metres. To channel Carl Sagan for a moment, that's one, ten million billion, billion, billion, billionth of a square metre. It's quite small. The 70 million million figure tells us that the beam cross-section is 70 million million femtobarns, or 70 millibarn. 7x10^-30 square metres.
So the LHC's window is 7x10^-30 square metres, and there are 11 million rain-drops hitting it every second. It still takes over two months to get one rain-drop per femtobarn.
So how big a banjo to you need to hit one of its doors?
So how can a 126GeV boson impart mass to an electron with a rest mass of 0.51MeV?
Do you need to get lots of electrons together into some sort of timeshare - where they each get 2 weeks of the boson every year (actually, with that provisional energy, it would be more like 2 minutes per year, than 2 weeks).
The Standard Model theorises that spontaneous electro weak symmetry breaking is produced by the Higgs Field, the field it's self cannot be observed or detected but if the theory is corect ten the Higgs boson (or boson's) must exist so observing / detecting the Higgs boson would prove the existence of the Higgs field.
El' Reg, along with much of the rest of the press, continue incorrectly attributing the Higgs boson with the property of 'lending mass' to other particles when this is simply not the case.
Neither is it true that the Higgs boson is referred to as the 'God particle' because of this misunderstood property as this article suggests, but rather Nobel Prize winning Physicist Leon Lederman wanted to call it the 'Goddamn particle' in a book but was forced by his publisher to change this to 'God particle', a term which he himself now abhors.
Thanks for the feedback - I'll keep it in mind.
Wow... ugliest slide evar???
They really ought to include PowerPoint training in science degree courses nowadays...
They really ought to discourage PowerPoint usage in science degree courses.
Fixed it for you !
Instead of presenting the data, we need more animations, use of clipart, and all that?
Granted, this is not up (down?) to the level of readability suitable for Daily Mail, Fox and other 'news outlets' -- but to have to follow 'powerpoint training' ?
I'm glad they're not spending their grant money on things such as coming up with a Style guide, with colors that 'soothe, while still inspire' and other whalesong-like statements?
I rather suspect that the author is perfectly aware of the effect that her colour scheme and font choices will have on the "artistically inclined". Consider it a well-deserved slap in the face for telephone sanitation engineers in all dimensions.
I think it is reassuring that we have people that don't care a hoot how good the slide looks when there's enough interesting data in there.
You are mistaken. It's actually Cosmic Sans.
"They really ought to discourage PowerPoint usage"
That's much better.
Call me cynical, but if they do find it they'll just use it to develop more deadly weapons. Micro-nukes or something that can explode the planet into dust.
Your making the same mistake as Thatcher, who praised the good and important work they did at CERN, thinking they made atom bombs. Stupid cow. They didn't, don't and never will. Nuclear physics and bomb-making split in about 1950. The H-bomb uses the most energy-dense stable material in the universe, Hydrogen, in its various isotopic forms. You just need an A-bomb to get it going.
Iron is more stable. (So is helium, which is why you can make a bomb out of hydrogen, but iron is the point at which neither fusion nor fission will yield any more energy.)
As for the OP, presumably they also believe that all chemical and biological research should be banned. There's not much you can say to such people except "Happy trolling".
Your point is correct, but, erm, misguided, Iron and Helium are stable by virtue of their binding energy per nucleon, but this reduces their energy density, in bomb-makers terms, as this binding energy is what is released when Hydrogen fuses into Helium, , or any other nucleide. Therefore Hydrogen is the most energy dense material that is also stable, I am not looking for the most stable material.
"If you were dragged to a betting shop and forced to bet on whether you've discovered the Higgs Boson or not, which way would you bet"
It's so refreshing to see the beeb so finely in tune with the way potential scientific discoveries are evaluated.
Thank 'Gaia' they use such discrimination with regard to all science iespecially their climate change propaganda.
So, basically, we put everything we had into these giant detectors and the particle accelerator and it turns out there it was! in this little cupboard, right at the back, all the time - which had a message scrawled on the door "Do not open until X-mass"
We've just got to check the sell-by-date against the speed of light next.
The Font of Champions
The Font of Chumps.
This article is full of misleading interpretations, statements and inaccuracies; was the author even watching the same webcast?
Although optimistic, the teams at CERN certainly cannot be said to have 'spotted the Higgs', indeed, their presentations and conclusions were (rightly) far more cautious, accepting the real possibility that the Standard Model Higgs doesn't even exist.
And for goodness sake, please STOP stating that the Higgs Boson gives mass to other particles, this is NOT the case, the existence of the Higgs Boson is merely a product and proof of the Standard Model concept of the HIGGS FIELD as the mechanism for spontaneous electro weak symmetry breaking, if this is proven to be the case then it's the Higgs Field which gives mass to all matter, (including Higgs Bosons).
May I politely suggest that if you don't like a news source generalising, and trying to bring science just that little bit closer to the average human being by taking a few small approximations on the linguistic semantics of cutting edge particle physics, then the Register probably isn't the place for you?
Would it really put science *that* much further away from the average human being if the boson had been described as 'linked to the process which gives particles/things/matter/stuff mass'?
That's a pretty big hole to keep searching in!
Directly from: http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/
"For the last decade we have known that the Higgs mass is above 114 GeV (from LEP) and unlikely to be very much higher than that (from precision electroweak results). This summer’s LHC results disfavored masses above about 130 GeV, so for the last few months we’ve known that if the Standard Model Higgs is there, it should be between 114 and about 130 GeV. For a couple weeks news has been circulating widely from ATLAS and CMS that they are both seeing something around 125 GeV."
"One million electron-volts is not cool. You know what's cool? One billion electron-volts."
... to work out what the news was. Seems like the news is that they have now bothered to have a news conference. The story has been as good as public for a little while now
How public does it need to be? - it was in last week's New Scientist, for example.
systemdwith faint praise
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017