Dr Dolittle was a cryptologist!
Well I never.
Statistical translation techniques have been successfully applied to decode an 18th century document written using an encryption scheme that has baffled scholars for decades. The Copiale Cipher was found in book housed in an East Berlin Academy after the Cold War. The book’s pages contained about 75,000 neatly hand-written …
Well I never.
A code is not a cipher. Please, please, please, please learn this very basic difference.
tell us what is the difference
...the tools of translation were successful.
As JD implied, other tools would be more appropriate for ciphers.
For pictograms, you need beer.
For example, ASCII is a code but not a cipher.
I believe the traditional distinction is that a code operates at a semantic level (i.e. words and phrases), while a cipher operates at a character level.
" while a cipher operates at a character level."
More Importantly, a cipher scrambles lorries full of informational eggs together into one bowl instead of remapping each Easter egg.*
Most applicably, beer** scrambles useless thought.
* in my **
It's not difficult. A cypher transforms by means of substitution (at its most basic level); a code OTOH transforms by means of a key. Without the key a code is .. ahem.. indecipherable
'AHLIdN' may transform to 'London' by means of a cypher, & this is crackable by brute force &/or mathematcs; however 'AHLIdN' may transform to 'Send the bread rolls on Tuesday' or 'Harden the bomb shelters - we're going to attack in June' depending upon the code key used.. & is therefore uncrackable by the same methods.
Obviously repetitions of similar messages or concepts will give an insight into the coded message (cf enigma et al at Bletchley, although strictly speaking that too was a cypher), but without the key the absolute text remains unclear
I suppose you could call all slang a code of sorts: 'I'm just going up these apples' doesn't have any connotation of what the principal is actually doing, but most Londoners would recognise Cockney Rhyming Slang for what it is & what it describes..
ciphers are one to one character replacements where as codes are dictionaries that provide word for word replacements. I'm not sure what the modern computer encryption technique or re-arranging the positions of the letters in the transmission is called but it is neither code nor cipher. And then you've got the whole steganography (sp?) thing.
"with a strange fascination for eye surgery and ophthalmology."
Must be the Illuminati
"a German secret society, with a strange fascination for eye surgery and ophthalmology"
Or maybe that part of the translation is wrong?
My hovercraft is full of eels.
I thought it was A.A
or was it .A. ?
or perhaps ... ?
I don't know, but it's a secret.
My nipples explode with delight.
A German Secret Society with a penchant for eye-related things.
So it's the Bavarian Illuminati then?
Proposed successor to the Hitler Diaries, but the Berlin Wall fell before they could be unleashed on an unsuspecting world.
The Eyeluminati, surely?
Actually it's iLluminati, and they just got a cease and desist letter from apple.
That's not Apple, that's Welsh...
Never ask for directions in Wales Baldrick, you'll be washing spit out of your hair for weeks
Good luck with that. IIRC, analysis of the symbols in the Voynich Manuscript have shown it to lack the statistical characteristics of language, coded or otherwise. I other words, it's most likely meaningless and probably a hoax. Hardly surprising when the illustrations appear to be of non-existent plants and animals.
The Voynich is more complex than that.
There's the huge problem of how many characters are used - there's almost no agreement about whether some characters are distinct or whether they are actually different characters with ligatures. Estimates vary that Voynichese uses between 20 and 30 characters for the bulk of its text plus a few other rare characters.
Then when you start doing the number crunching odd things begin to appear - there are definitely word-like groups in the text, but the word lengths do not resemble any known language - there are very few short words and very few ones over 10 characters long. Some words are only found in certain parts of the manuscript. Individual words are often repeated either identically or with slight variations - a pattern not usually found in real texts.
The patterns of characters are definitely not random, there are rules about which characters follow others and which do not and whether they appear anywhere in a word or only at the beginning.
When you measure the entropy of the whole text (ie. how predictable the text is), it comes much lower than most European languages, around the same as English or Latin - but neither of those match the previous patterns found in the text.
It most probably is completely meaningless, but a huge amount of work was put into its creation and it would be wonderful to know more about where this thing came from and why it was made.
The best suggestion is that it was an alchemical fake designed to impress the rich and powerful in Central Europe, but there is a frustrating lack of contemporaneous evidence for the book prior to the early 17th Century (we now know from C-14 that the vellum is early 15th Century, but that does not necessarily mean the book itself is that old).
...was that it was better to use a blunt spoon than a dull fork.
Stop laughing! Measured by 18th century surgical standards it was a great leap forward, you know.
I always heard that as "Who controls the British Crown" but I could be wrong - and probably am!
So..wait, what they're saying is that they ran it through Google Translate? :o)
If you can read this.....you are too close!!!
@"making sense of languages that are not currently spoken by humans, including ancient languages and communication between animals."
I'm reminded of a Farside joke about a dog translator... :)
But then it could just as easily be this other Farside joke about dog thinking... ;)
It is a Masonic ritual. The "eye" is the all seeing eye.
Ah, so that's where that vitrectomy procedure originated (Look it up if you dare!!!).
Yeah, I've had that, and also I've seen the business end of a 20 Watt Argon laser, and it is....GREEN!
Fortunately, both were done by a VERY talented ophthalmological surgeon. Thank you Dr. Thompson!
it took 7 before I was having to wear glasses again after my very talented surgeon temporarily sorted mine.
Eye surgery or All Seeing Eye? you know, that nice little symbol at the top of the pyramid!
Sherlock because this is my greatest detective work to date.
Or haven't you been keeping up with your Dr. Helen Magnus?
... the 'eye' might be a Stargate! :)
Where's Richard Dean Anderson when you need him?
RDA mostly blew stuff up.
Translation output: "Should have gone to Specsavers".
"..also prove useful in making sense of languages that are not currently spoken by humans, including ancient languages and communication between animals"
Unlikely; the statistical method only works if you know the language that is encoded/enciphered - in this case German. As no one alive speaks animal or many of the dead languages, how would they know the relevance of symbol or sequence frequency? That is why a Rosetta Stone is so important - it provides a basic glossary in the unknown and a known language.
The code didn't look like ths by any chance?
Surely the Voynich manuscript is already understood:
The code, Mr. Takagi, give me the code!
amanfrommars, your time is up.
It is scratched.
fscked by SHA-1 collision? Not so fast, says Linus Torvalds