IP address should be no more proof of identification
than a return address on a postcard.
The world's largest P2P legal imbroglio has been downgraded, with 90 per cent of the alleged file sharers caught up in the Hurt Locker downloading case dismissed. The Oscar-winning war film’s producers Voltage Pictures instigated legal action last year against 14,583 netizens for allegedly illegally downloading the movie. The …
Downloading has always been illegal in the UK and the US. It just isn't often pursued as, without distribution, the penalties are low and taking it to court was a waste of the everyone's time.
The new trend, however, is to try to do this in huge numbers, and probably put in some reference to the fact that P2P is not a download-only technology.
In the UK, when it comes to sueing for money, the first question you have to ask is, what have our (the film company sueing) personal loses been...
Well, if someone downloads, for free (illegally) a copy of a DVD, the answer is a difficult one. The defendant could easily argue that becuase its a DVD his friend owns, that he would have just borrowed it anyway, and therefore the loses are £zero. You could also say the the film company has lost the cost of 1 x DVD royalties, which is going to be £5-£10? You then have to add on lawyers fees, etc.
However, if you upload while you download (the standard setting for most p2p/torrent programs) then you've distrobuted the DVD (just parts of it, maybe) to possibley thousands of people. So suddenly the film company has lost thousands of potential DVD sales, directly from your actions, ie 1000s X £5-£10? Then add on the laywers fees etc.
You can, of course, tell your torrent program (i've heard) to not upload any data, and therefore you're not distrobuting any data at all.
Thats as i understand it, anyway.
"22,000 Freetards escape Hurt Lock piracy suit" says your headline, but then you go on to say that "90 per cent of the file sharers caught up in the Hurt Locker downloading case dismissed"
This tends to imply that (certainly in this case) they aren't "Freetards" because they *didn't* actually download something and then try to justify infringing someone else's copyright )or, at least there's no proof that would hold up in court).
Or does using any file sharing service now automatically mean that you're a "Freetard" no matter what you share??
Not impressive, El Reg.
The term "Illegal" is thrown around far too much where software, music and movies are concerned.
First, the ONLY thing protecting any of them is copyright law, if it's in violation of that, then it's illegal, but too often it is not in violation of that.
Second, the so called "License" is false. You must have a license to fly a plane, drive a car, practice medicine, practice law, etc. etc. But those all have licensing boards/agencies and are defined under law. There is no such entity or law regarding Software, moview or music. The only thing that exist is a contract, and a weak one at that. Breaking a contract is not illegal
In many parts of the world, no contract is valid unless it is binding on two or more parties, and many companies put a clause in them so that they can change the contract at any time, so it is not really binding on them is it?
If a company is selling 10 copies of a movie and those 10 copies are on the shelf, and I were to make a copy of it, because I was never going to buy it anyway, and they still sell all 10 copies from the shelf, then what did tey really lose?
... never borrow anything, never listen to the radio, never hear music in the street/cafe/pub, never see trailers, never watch a dvd with anyone else, never look at a photograph that you haven't paid for. Be a good member of capitalist society - pay for everything, regardless of value. Never share - sharing is counter-growth. Pay individually for all you consume - you know it's right.
AC, you're a tosser.
For a movie that tries to be a story about a war, it requires the viewer to suspend all belief in reality in order to watch it. Unfortunately, "the best" war movies are somewhat realistic (see Band of Brothers). The things done by actors in this movie simply aren't done in the field. I'd love to see a solitary bomb disposal person heft and move six 100+ lb artillery shells with a few pairs of 14 gauge wire - like they did in this movie.
I download music because where I live there isn't much shops and even less choice on what to buy or it is very overpriced. In my defence for downloading, I have purchased a retail copy of every music group that I have enjoyed as I prefer to have the original, disc art, sleeve notes etc.
I have given more money to the music industry through downloading, as there is a lot of groups I would never have bought if I hadn't tried their album out first through a download.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019