What happens to WebOS which, by many accounts, was actually pretty damn good software.
Why is HP killing its webOS tablet and hoping to spin-off its PC business? Apple. During HP's quarterly earnings call with reporters and analysts on Thursday afternoon, company CEO Leo Apotheker explained the company's unexpected about-face with an admission that may seem paradoxical on the surface, but ultimately makes …
HP Should've opened WebOS like MeeGo.
Interestingly, tt is reported that HP to lower down their prices significantly. I do not see it in BestBuy.
Moreover, there are two HP tabs differing in $100 - $399 and $499 ,resp. One would ask what is different in the hardware? I can only see 16Gb vs. 32Gb drive . That is why no one wants an HP tab!
"There’s a clear secular movement in the consumer PC space" - I really don't understand what that means.
Has it been (badly) translated from another language, am I just too ignorant to be worth HP communicating with, or does it make Leo Apotheker a bit of a pseud?
I think in non-bullshit it means that people don't particularly care which brand of PC they buy - they've "lost faith" in any one particular brand and aren't swayed by "big names" like HP any more.
"Brand-agnostic" would probably be closer to what I think he meant. Religion and religious metaphors seem to permeate US culture for some reason...
Apple is often lazily referred to as a religion, and Apple is the only tech company that I've seen references to in Apotheker's quotes about this part of HPs business so far. So assuming it *has* been translated correctly, perhaps he's admitting that the shift he refers to is taking place not because of blind religious zeal for Apple - which variously gets explained away as "better marketing" - but because Apple actually are producing better products...?
I think he's using "secular" in the sense it's used by astronomers: a slow, underlying trend. For example, the earth's orbit can be decomposed into assorted cyclical components and a secular trend.
And I've seen economists use it in much the same way.
So I guess he's saying the same about the PC market: there is an underlying trend away laptops and desktops towards iPads.
> ... a slow, underlying trend ...
> And I've seen economists use it in much the same way.
I think you nailed it:
5. Continuing over a long period of time, long-term.
The long-term growth in population and income accounts for most secular trends in economic phenomena.
on a secular basis
Secular means, amongst other things, an event that lasts a long time or that happens, or is celebrated, once within a century (or other long period).
What Apothekar means is that, within the consumer PC space, there is a movement that is at once long-term, highly notable and has nothing to do with relig- wait...
Aren't we surprised....
Half of el Reg readership pointed out how to get this done. All that HP needed to do was to ship WebOS as an optional visual shell on every PC it shipped.
As far as spinning off the PC biz, not like HP has a PC biz. Its board design has been done by Asus for ages. Ditto for a lot of he manufacturing. When you voluntarily surrender the part of your business which actually _CAN_ make a difference to someone and try to differentiate only on shop-ship spreadsheet juggling prowess you should not complain about the consequences.
I used to think Apple had crappy marketing ideas but they are all-stars compared to HP or Palm before them. It's pretty sad when the CEO is too clueless to figure out that failure is due to an inability to execute. The PC side would be pretty tough to differentiate but having BestBuy throw the tablet in a weekend ad flyer and dusting yourself off is the epitome of lax. Having a web site isn't enough, you can't just sit back and wait for the money to roll in even if you're on youtube.
I hate almost everything about Apple - from the way it does business to the way that they treat their company as a religion or cult (and the fact that almost everyone I know who has an Apple is a stupendiously annoying fanboi that just repeats the Apple mantra of "must be the other things fault, Apples work out of the box, they never break, they are perfect" anytime they or someone else have problems) - but I'm amazed to find anybody who says they can't do marketing.
Surely the *only* thing they can do is marketing!
I can't say what would have worked but they could have tried. Here's a hint, when I drive to work in the morning there are 2-3 iPhone ads in the 35 minute ride and there is another 1 or 2 in the 45 minutes on the way back, every day. Guess how many HP or Palm ads? I haven't heard one yet and the same goes for TV, granted I'm in a fairly small market, it's called Los Angeles. I won't go into the hardware or syncing problems or small screens but yeah touchstone was nice, pity only 37 people knew about it.
Seriously, their entire youtube channel has about 1 million views and they could have gotten double that audience in the middle of a single 2 & 1/2 men episode. But... they didn't try.
Yeah, well, you announce the unique phone and then don't get around to selling it for half a year. Instead you try to peddle the me-too product that nobody really cares about. Of course you fail, and you deserve to. Who does not deserve this is the people invested in webOS.
HP, you have just decided to fuck your customers, existing and potential. Prepare for them to give you the finger.
Have you ever tried to buy an HP? They have a billion different model names/umbers and figuring out which one is best suited to you is a nightmare. Check out their website, it's a disaster. I don't know if this is a sale technique kind of like Intel were they try to confuse you into being upsold. Apple doesn't have this problem, they have a small number of models so it's easy to choose.
Back when William Hewlett & David Packard were prominent in the company it had products and a company to look up to. But then both Hewlett & Packard were both engineers, so they knew good engineering when they saw it. But HP are now run by suits more interested in share prices and company acquisitions to artificially boost their perceived company value in the eyes of shareholders.
Its sickening that their core focus on building products is being given up because they are not run by engineers. Its hard to believe HP are giving up on technology to go over to more of less only software. So I guess they want to become another Oracle Corporation by the sounds of it?. Service industry, not engineering? How many Oracles can the fleecing service industry support?!
If HP are not careful they will throw away what good they have remaining in their company and risk becoming another sinking ship like Nokia. :(
I wonder what William Hewlett & David Packard would have made of all this. :(
HP were one of the old company names I grew up with at work and at home. They have been over the decades like a constant name to me. One of the old names, so its sad to see them in decline like this due to rudderless greedy non-technical managers who wouldn't know engineering if they fell over it. :(
They is why they are doing this, not PC decline. PC's will still be here, but I question HP's survival chances with people like this running the company.
It sad because many of these big companies think too short term. Apple spent years building the software base for their tablets and iphones. Then comes along HP, buys Palm and expect software as good as Apple in 12 months or they give up. They need to give the WebOS division their head to make the best possible software over several iterations. Not give up after 12 months. Pathetic.
Can someone provide an update I lost count on the number of bad business decisions made by HP what number are they up to now, Sure it's getting very close to the three digit mark.
It would be interesting to find out what business streams are propping up HP But I can't be arsed reading for myself. It's HP!
Are only a Speculation vehicle as they don't pay a dividend.
1990 was the time to buy them, not now when they could be near peak. Apple are actually vulnerable to change in "Fashion" and have very narrow range of product.
But I agree it's terrible:
DEC gets bought by Compaq and all the best stuff thrown away.
HP buys Compaq and seems to chuck the best Compaq and HP stuff away in the Product rationalisation.
HP was once a leading Test gear, semiconductor and optical device company. They became very successful at selling PCs and Laptops that frankly always seemed less than best.
Do they make anything in US still or is it all Foxconn or other Chinese anyway?
Obviously they think the best strategy is to copy IBM.
HP never really knew what to do with WebOS, I think their thought process went something like this;
1) Apple is making loads of money in tablets and phones.
2) Android is doing pretty well, but each OEM is making less money. I wonder why this is?
3) Must be because Apple both own hardware and software!
4) Hey if we buy Palm we'll have hardware and software. Then we'll be just like Apple and make loads of cash!
Hopefully they'll sell WebOS to someone else. I'm guessing some of the less-successful Android OEMs will be interested, if there's any truth to the rumour that they're wary of Google now they own Motorola.
A tablet is the ultimate gizmo in the bludger's attire, right ahead of smartphone, people will always brag about the amount of (pretend) work they can now achieve on their tablet. Truth to be told most of computer users achieve sod all.
Apple just "happens" to have some classy visual designs and a very carefully designed pricing policy that makes their products a wee bit expensive but within reach of your already maxed out credit card ... which makes them even more desirable.
I've just returned from the US - there's been quite a bit of marketing and sales to ship the WebOS devices and at one stage I thought the deals on offer were too good to be true. It turns out, had I gone for it, I'd have invested in an obsolete platform... just as those who invested in the latest Nokia phones less than 6 months ago found. HP used to be a superb engineering company - from calculators to some of the best test kit you could buy - the appointment of a new CEO, as Nokia found, can fundamentally change the company.
El Reg and Reg readers are very critical of Apple and their customers. However, Apple must be doing something right - it's not just a few "Fanbois" buying the products. Yes, they can appear to be arrogant (I've read about the new Final Cut X) but overall they seem to be gaining market share and it can't all be about aluminium and nice looking products.
You need to remember that El Reg and the readership are essentially techies first and foremost.
Luckily for Apple, they sell to consumers. The things El Reg reading tech-heads hate about Apple products are things that normal consumers either don't care about (such as how big the spec numbers are, or how much the app developers get for each sale) or actually like (iTunes, the closed environment* etc.)
Apple marketing is amongst the best in the world, the products are intuitive and easy for non-technically-literate people to use and the Apple stores are a much better environment to buy stuff in than the alternatives (PC World through something like Maplin).
Ultimately though, the products look good and do a good job. Hell, why should all your tech kit have to look like it was designed by a 14 year old boy?
*consumers don't actually care that the environment is closed as such, just that they don't have the problems of unverified software bricking their device or serious malware problems and they like that all their purchases are made through a single, consistent interface where all they have to do is click the "buy now" button, wait for a time and then have access to whatever it was they just bought.
Apple makes a good "first smartphone". Honestly, some never need to move beyond that. But a lot of people, after having an iphone for a couple years, find that they feel limited. And rightly so. I can tell you from experience that for those people, after ditching the Apple training wheels, and switching to Android, their general attitude toward the new OS is, "Feck Yeah! This is awesome! Apple can suck it!" I've seen this happen many times. I've also seen others who never want to let go of their iphone, mostly because they hate learning. These people generally have never fully realized what they can do with the iphone anyway, and hence, don't feel limited. To them, its a regular phone with email, music and web browsing. And very little more.
As for HP, they've put out shitty products for years, have horrible support, overcharged repair service, and generally are only good at making printers, which is the only portion of that company that deserves to survive.
They should just completely open source webOS and let people play with it. Perhaps we can succeed where they failed.
There's more to it than that, you can buy marketing expertise but the product has to be good as well.
With Apple the only choice is if you want 3G or not, the storage capacity and colour of the unit.
If you go for a non-Apple tablet there's about 30 or so to choose from and if the price of the better ones is the same as the iPad then why take the risk?
Also, there's masses of applications for the iPad and what good is a computer device without software? there's hardly anything for Android that takes advantage of the tablet's larger screen and resolution. Some Android fans have even been spinning that as a good thing!
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019