back to article Phone-hack backlash BBC in embarrassing headline gaffes

We at Vulture Central know only too well that it has been an extremely busy week in the world of phone-hacking for reporters across the land, but that's surely no excuse for this worrisome piece of sloppy copy from none other than Auntie this morning. The BBC news magazine has thankfully now corrected its "Phone-hacking: The …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.

Page:

  1. Marky W
    Alert

    More importantly

    WTF is that thing in the bottom right corner of the picture?!

    Body part or sex toy?

  2. Bumpy Cat
    Headmaster

    An artificial trachea ...

    A victim of throat cancer lost his trachea and was near death. The new trachea was grown from his stem cells on some sort of framework, and the transplant/implant was a success.

  3. Oliver Mayes

    Artificial windpipe

    It was the first lab grown organ successfully transplanted into a living human.

  4. Archie The Albatross
    Go

    Yes....

    Yes it is.....all of the above.

  5. Onyx26
    Facepalm

    It's...

    It's a body part. Do you not read the news!? Oh wait...

  6. Drew Scott
    Thumb Up

    Body part

    I believe that was the story published about the synthetic trachea.

    Yep: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-14047670

  7. Marky W

    Oh, I see.

    Thanks for the responses. I've been on hols, missed recent news, etc (btw what's all this to-do with the NotW?)

    Still think it looks more like an artificial lady-pocket that a throat though. Although either could serve the same purpose I guess...aaaaand I'm off home now.

  8. Anonymous Coward
    Pint

    Thailand

    at a guess?

  9. fixit_f
    Thumb Down

    Bloody hell

    That's absolutely shocking

  10. Thomas 4

    Yup

    Real clock up there.

  11. Old Painless
    Mushroom

    I don't want to seem overly harsh...

    ..but anyone who uses the meaningless "COULD OF" instead of the meaningful "could've" should be killed on the spot

    Firm but firm, thats me

  12. Studley

    Oh, sweet irony

    I wholeheartedly agree, but I assume you're less of a stickler for apostrophes?

  13. Anonymous Coward
    Angel

    *amused*

    *cackle*

  14. Oz
    Coat

    Oh sweet irony (part 2)

    ... or full stops?

  15. This post has been deleted by its author

  16. Noons
    Thumb Up

    this is not a title

    Thank's¡

  17. Eponymous Bastard
    Coat

    Split infinitive!

    I wholeheartedly agree

    You wholeheartedly agree

    He / She wholeheartedly agrees . . .

    etcetera.

  18. The Indomitable Gall

    @Eponymous Bastard

    What split infinitive? "I agree" is in the present tense, not the infinitive....

  19. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Split Infinitives

    Split infinitives have occurred in English for ... 800 years? And since English is defined by common usage can we please put this nonsense to bed now?

  20. BenDwire
    Facepalm

    Pot. Kettle. Black.

    That is all.

  21. Gert Selkobi
    Thumb Down

    A common mistake.

    Although not one that is acceptable from such a high and mighty organisation as the BBC, this is a very common mistake. Last night I was reading through some technical articles on OpenBSD network security, written by an obviously intelligent person, which was littered with the exact same gotcha. If people only read their work back to themselves in a proof reading exercise, this would be easily caught.

    Awaits grammar check report from fellow commentards.

  22. frank ly Silver badge

    Try ...

    ... littered with exactly the same 'gotchas'.

  23. Anonymous Coward
    Happy

    Guten Tag

    Guten Tag Herr Commentard - I'm happy to oblige

    Your statement "which was" should be "which were" as you wouldn't say "the articles was".

    Also "proof reading" should be "proofreading".

    I'm also a little unhappy about the penultimate sentence.

    I now await "You call yourself a grammar nazi?!" replies...

  24. Captain Scarlet Silver badge
    Paris Hilton

    Well

    Everything I write and publish is a work of art and 100% correct until someone points in the first sentence its complete gibberish and their eyes have started bleeding from its hidiousness.

    You need someone else who has not seen the work before to read through it and see what mistakes they find.

    Paris because I probably just wrote a load of gibberish.

  25. Bumpy Cat
    Happy

    Muphry's Law

    If you post a reply pointing out a grammar or spelling error, you will make a grammar or spelling error yourself.

    (checks post very carefully)

  26. Fred Flintstone Gold badge

    I would just like to comment..

    .. that it is compulsory for any grammar correcting post to MISspell the word Intelligent. This is commonly done by omitting one "l" (that is "L" for those who use a sans-serif font).

    Kind regards, your average troll. And have a nice weekend too. :-)

  27. nyelvmark
    Boffin

    No, that's Skitt's law.

    Murphy's law runs (in one variation): Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong.

    Muphry's law is unknown to me, oddly.

  28. Glenn Booth

    @Bumpy Cat: That's not Murphy's law

    It's Skitt's law. Murphy had nothing to do with it. :-)

  29. Rebajas
    IT Angle

    Slow tech day...?

    Really, El Reg is reporting on grammar errors? Must be a slow day in the office.

  30. Anonymous Coward
    Happy

    Not just grammar

    It's been updated with a spelling error too!

  31. Scott Mckenzie

    Impressive

    Especially considering the usual standards on the Reg are way below that of the BBC!

  32. Swoop
    Headmaster

    Tut-tut, Auntie

    Well, who'd of thought it?

  33. BorkedAgain
    Headmaster

    I think you mean...

    thunk

  34. Richard 102

    Or rather

    I've been thinking, but I ain't thunk!

  35. Michael Dunn

    Like

    Like.

  36. doperative
    Facepalm

    "Phone-hacking: The other news you might 'ave missed, in'it"

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mockney

  37. The Electron
    Headmaster

    Pot - kettle!

    It is not just the BBC (or El Reg) who seem to have trouble with spelling and grammar. Plenty of online and print media make silly mistakes, such using metre instead of meter (and vice-versa) and getting the SI units wrong (MHz, not mhz)!

    The problem stems from the "education" system. Whilst I was studying BTEC National Certificate and Higher National Certificate in Electronic Engineering, I was pleased to see how each year, we re-visited and revised the previous year's work, then added to its complexity. Schools should adopt this approach when teaching maths and English. You could ask me to 'conjugate a verb', but I cannot remember how!

  38. peter_dtm
    Thumb Down

    MHz

    Hz - cycles per second (herz)

    m - millie

    M - mega

    - rule of thumb for most SI multipliers

    upper case = multiplier

    lower case - divisor

    mHz = millie herz

    MH = mega herz

    notable exception k = kilo as in

    km = kilometres (1000 metres) or kHz (1000 Hz)

  39. David 30
    FAIL

    eh?

    Who is this millie?

  40. BorkedAgain
    Thumb Up

    Very good Peter.

    Also, there's a difference (a factor of eight) between Mb and MB.

    b - bit

    B - byte (8 bits)

    Obviously this shouldn't be a shock to anyone on here, but the number of times some numpty gets those confused when trying to sell me internet access drives me potty.

    (Mental image of toilet with steering wheel. Must lie down...)

  41. Anonymous Coward
    Pint

    Again...

    There are some great headlines on the BBC website from time to time. Like the one a couple of months ago: "Live: Osama bin Laden Dead"

  42. Studley

    And again...

    My favourite in recent memory was an article about the launch of Halo: Reach. The first version of the article had an image of John-117 subtitled along the lines of "Master Chef is back for another explosive adventure".

  43. robert Tracey
    WTF?

    thats not as bad as there other headline

    did anyone see this headline as well today? (print screen used as they have fixed it now) http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14373267/bbcfail.JPG

  44. Anonymous Coward
    Headmaster

    thats not as bad as *there* other headline?

    As *their* surely?

  45. Anonymous Coward 101
    Trollface

    What a bunch of...

    ...loosers.

  46. DJV Silver badge
    Joke

    Surely knot?

    But, surely, that should of bin "Shirley knot?"

  47. Noons

    Re: Surely knot?

    Know, it shoed knot.

  48. Christopher W
    Coat

    Shurely shome mishtake

    i frequently find myself reaching for the "Contact the Editors" page to inform them of misspelt words or poor grammatical constructions. It's really very disappointing.

    I had English Comprehension, English Language *AND* grammar lessons at school. I grew to love my engagement with my mother tongue and I feel pretty confident that I can both speak and write to a high, consistent level with minimal errors. I certainly take pride in the fact that I can use their, there and they're appropriately (and the same for its / it's / its' - SERIOUSLY, IT'S NOT THAT HARD). The plague of hyphens slowly infesting written British English is a particular bugbear too... Hyphen-this, intersected-that! Unnecessary and illogical in some cases.

    The old gem I always wheel out in these situations is a crudely handwritten sign outside the village where I grew up: "TRACTOR,S TURNING"

    Mine's the one with the Oxford Super Compact Pico Pocket English Dictionary in it

  49. Fred Flintstone Gold badge

    However..

    .. you too shall eventually succumb to the "teh" problem as your word processor (be it MS Office, OpenOffice or now even the Apple autocorrect in Lion and anything iOS) is busy ramming that into your muscle memory with unrelenting force. You can thank Microsoft for that.

    Eats, shoots, and leaves.

  50. nyelvmark
    WTF?

    I'd be interested to hear about the correct use of

    its'

    Are you sure you aren't missing a T?

Page:

This topic is closed for new posts.

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018