back to article NASA rovers to lose comms this week as Mars moves behind Sun

NASA has announced that its surviving Mars rover will be unable to receive commands from Earth for much of the week, as the red planet is about to pass behind the Sun. The plan is for rover Opportunity to spend the blackout period sitting stationary, (gently) blasting a rock with a cobalt-powered radiation beam. The Santa …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. Anonymous Coward
    Thumb Down

    2014?

    Considering the cost of shipping a Humvee to Mars, planning for 2 years fuel seems a little short-sighted. Is there any reason why they didn't plan on, say, 5 years? Or is this just assuming NASA's usual success rate, where the folow-up to something that was astonishingly successful is 10x more complex, and breaks down after a month?

    1. Vulch
      Boffin

      Mass

      It's a trade-off between power and instruments, if you up the "fuel" load you have to leave something else off.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    RIP* Spirit.

    *Rust in Peace.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Headmaster

      Very, very slowly

      Given the lack of airborne water & oxygen, methinks rusting will take a while. That and the fact the rover is probably mostly made of fancier, non-rusting metals.

      But I shared the sentiment...RIP, poor rover.

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Boffin

    Expected in 2014...

    "MMRTG is designed to produce 125 watts of electrical power at the start of the mission and 100 watts after 14 years." [http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/CDReadyMIECEC06_1309/PV2006_4187.pdf]

    So one would assume that although the current mission may only be timetabled for the first two years there will be plenty of power for many years to come.

  4. SteveK

    Mishaps

    "There has to be some chance, barring mishaps or mechanical breakdown, that the veteran Opportunity may yet be going at that point"

    Such as accidentally getting in the path of a lumbering Curiosity...

  5. petur
    FAIL

    CRC anyone?

    "To avoid the chance of a command being corrupted by the sun and harming a spacecraft"

    Since when are they not using CRC or anything better on communications? I even use it on any communication even if it is just a few cm... NASA FAIL?

  6. Mike Bell
    Boffin

    @CRC

    CRCs and crafty encoding techniques have been used in spacecraft communications since the dawn of the space age. It's the only way, for example, to make sense of the data that is sent from any deep space probe. Such data is typically buried deep in the noise of background radiation and has to be picked out using clever mathematics.

  7. Anonymous Coward
    Happy

    Only the Americans...

    ... would want to send a Humvee to Mars.

  8. annodomini2

    hmm..

    Relay the signal via galileo?

  9. Skydreamer
    Thumb Up

    Remembering Spirit

    These articles remind me of this Spirit comic:

    http://xkcd.com/695/

  10. Winkypop Silver badge
    Thumb Up

    Ahhh, the Mars rovers

    Cracking stuff that!

  11. phuzz Silver badge
    Thumb Up

    Longevity

    Over 20 times their planned mission duration - now that's legacy kit!

  12. petur
    FAIL

    @@CRC

    My statement remains valid (even if 4 idiots managed to give it a thumbs down).

    The article specifically states the fear of commands getting corrupted. If they have been using CRC since the dawn of the space age, why fear a corrupt command goes through? Unless your comms protocol stinks....

  13. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Familiar ground

    seven years to cover just 26.7km .............we have a bus service like that round here, too

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like