To avoid clouds
Swiss adventurer Bertrand Piccard today moved one step closer to fulfilling his ambition to fly a solar-powered aircraft round the world as his Solar Impulse completed its first full-fat test flight. The Solar Impulse The Solar Impulse boasts a wingspan as wide as a Boeing 747, with 12,000 solar cells powering four electric …
To avoid clouds
Don't know what it's cruising altitude will be, but 10,000 feet puts you above most of the thick stuff over low-altitude land, and light high overcast still lets plenty of light through for solar cells (which are happy with diffuse illumination).
10,000 feet is also low enough that one can breathe comfortably without pressurisation.
"Make it so, Number One. Engage!"
(Ballmer icon is the closest thing to Jean-Luc.)
St Jobs of Cupertino.
..just goes to show. Can't really tell any difference between them these days.
Mine's the asbestos-lined one over there.
Or I can jump 7 miles...
Flying around the world is flying around the world, no matter how many stops you make. Are you saying I didn't fly from Florida to Arizona because Delta made a connecting stop in Colorado?
"...five days continual flight per hop..."
I'm presuming it has batteries for night-flights? Or perhaps the moonbeams are particularly strong in certain parts of the world.
Maybe they're planning on flying inside the Arctic circle in the summer. Would that count?
..of some old program with David Bellamy. He took a trip to the North Pole. Stuck his brolly in the floor on the pole, and walked around it. "There, I've just walked around the world!" ...and backward.. "And again!"
Love that guy and his distinctive accent.
Going where no man has gone before.. umm wait wrong Piccard
I'dhave thought anything that brought a charge would be welcome
That's what I say, never mind you cynical bar stewards. I think it's great that people are still trying something different and not just following the herd.
fantastic, even using hops this is one hell of a challenge. Agree with Will, stop whinging, this beats sitting at home watching Discovery.
I don't get the point of it - if it is for a persistent surveillance platform, it will need to be faster to be able to maintain position against winds > 50 mph, which you certainly get at 30K feet.
So it would be unmanned - no problem, but if it can't maintain position, it won't be much use, unless you had a series of them being blown around on the trade winds, and using their power for data transmission.
The point? To fly around the world using solar power only.
I thought that was covered in the article.
The clue is in the article;
The €70m Solar Impulse project is designed "to contribute in the world of exploration and innovation to the cause of renewable energies" and "to place dream and emotion at the heart of scientific adventure".
If we followed this line of thinking the Wright Brothers would never have taken off...
..is probably "to show we can". Think of it as being a more modern Wright Flyer. Totally useless in a practical sense, but demonstrated some very important concepts.
the same as climbing Everest, or flying solo across the Atlantic, or flying a balloon around the world, or...
It looks like the fuselage rests on a dolly for takeoff. How does it touch down without destroying the tail?
There's a wheel at the base of the tail, two very long retractable wheels on the wings and a retractable nose-wheel. The 'dolly' looks to be access steps for the pilot, and probably some maintenance/monitoring stuff.
Looks good fun though. I'd love a go in it :)
Assuming the 44mph figure was a ground speed, and assuming that they stuck to the equator which is 24000 miles (of course it wont be with the equator, they will want to be over land as much as possible so flight distance would be longer)
I make that a little short of an 18 month journey, but the article seems to be saying the journey will be less than a month (5 day legs x 5 legs).
Are they traversing the global just a little south of the north pole and hence covering 360 degrees but only actually flying 500 miles?
44mph x 24hours x 5days x 5hops = 26400miles
Very quick maths check only accounting for ground distance covered around the equator, no stops, constant speed etc.
24,000m/44mph = 545.5 hours non-stop flying time
/24 = 22.7 days or just over three weeks.
So yes, it would be just less than a month if you include a few stops.
Not entirely sure how you came to this figure, missed a multiplication somewhere or something?
The equator's about 25,000 miles..
At 44mph average speed, theyll complete an average of 1,056 miles per day (44 x 24 = 1056)
Theyre planning on upto 5 legs of 5 days each, a total of 25 flying days. 1056 x 25 = 26,400 miles they can potentially cover in this 25 days at an average of 44mph.
24000 miles / 44mph = 545.45~ hours / 24 (hours in a day) = 22.72~ days / 5 ("legs") = 4.54~ days per leg.
Math works out fine for a 5 day leg x 5 legs.
Flying continuously, they'd do it in 23 days. You are thinking they are only going 44 miles per day!
Recent reckonings give us approximately 24 of them hour thingies every day so that's 24 x 44 = 1056miles per day x 5 = 5280miles per leg x 5 = 26,400 miles comfortably making a trip around the world with maximal landfall (sic) I surmise the previous poster was using 44miles per DAY to get 18 months.
er..... there are 24 hours in a DAY -> 44miles*24 = 1056milers per day -> 23ish days of flying
immediately after pushing the submit button for my previous post I realized, I was out by a factor of 24.
no prizes for guessing what I forgot to do in my calculations
...your confusion probably arises from the fact that your days seem 23 hours shorter than the average for this planet.
"mph" after all does not stand for "miles per day" and thus, with your numbers the whole trip would take 22.7 days airborne.
to insist on still air to fly in. Using trade winds would more than halve that.
Not unless it's a flying galleon. If they could get high enough to take a ride on the jetstream however, ~300mph would certainly help. Of course that would mean taking oxygen on board, and I've a feeling every ounce matters on an aeroplane like that.
Pirates because, well..
"up to five days continual flight per hop"
I'm guessing that at the heights they'll be flying the windchill factor of sticking your arse out the window to do your business might be a little extreme.
Goodbye blue skies, indeed.
If only it flew faster (okay, a lot faster), it could simply follow the sun around the globe.
It's a proof-of-concept, you numpty.
I do not want to be the one meeting them at landing time, i have to say!
Challenging to say the least.
If this beast is a sailplane with additional electric power then it could conceivably stay up for a very long time, especially if it got some altitude. Sailplanes can travel quite fast -- at least as fast as a light plane -- and in the right conditions can stay up all day (or until the pilot gets bored) and attain serious altitude (20,000feet+).
The whole purpose to staying up is to end up with an unmanned plane you can send up and tell to loiter for the next month or two. Its cheaper than launching satellites. (As for any human needs -- find out how glider pilots cope.....)
He did 44 miles per day instead of 44mph. It comes to about 1.5 years then.
"Flying around the world is flying around the world, no matter how many stops you make. Are you saying I didn't fly from Florida to Arizona because Delta made a connecting stop in Colorado?"
Correct, you flew from Florida to Colorado, then from Colorado to Arizona, not from Florida to Arizona. It probably doesn't make a big difference when going on vacation, but when you're trying to brag about your awsomeness it does make a difference. What this guy is doing is hard, but I'll be even more impressed by the guy who does it nonstop.
-Bounty "I've gone 10,000 hours without eating" (just not consecutively) Hunter
You are a sanctimonious prick. Why don't YOU build a plane that flies around the world without stopping?
This achievement is about the extreme technical challenges in aero and energy use. A noble effort and one that will surely have spin-off benefits.
Definitely. Replace the human pilot with a robot and a bunch of comms gear, get the endurance up from days to months, and you have a cheap and quasi-stationary replacement for satellites to bring 21st-century communications to rural areas. (They'd need to increase the cruising altitude, but with no human pilot that might not be too hard).
Actually, better than satellites, for which speed-of-light latency is a nuisance or worse.
You might care to ponder how many "essentials" of a modern car were invented and developed for racing or rallying, and might never have been developed at all if motor-sports had not been pushing at the envelope.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017