Yet another reason why I love El Reg!
The US has unveiled the design of its new embassy in London - a "carbon neutral" glass cube described as a manifestation of the "core beliefs of our democracy - transparency, openness, and equality". The proposed US London embassy Philadelphia architects KieranTimberlake are at the helm of the £650m project, destined to …
Yet another reason why I love El Reg!
Hehe... I remember where it got them with the embassy building in Moscow. That got bugged down to the physical brick level.
Is it just me or does it look like it has a moat on one side and trenches on the other?
that building is going to cost a couple of mill and the govermen would endanger them using UK contractors by carging them VAT
..so long as the UK govt has a realistic chance of getting the same deal in reverse, I don't have a problem. After all, the idea of an embassy is that the ground space it occupies is the sovereign territory of the country it belongs to. Air Force One is a mobile example of this.. once on board, you're on American soil.
"the required secure boundaries incised into the hillside and out of view".
They're using a ha-ha?
Their democracy is nowadays more like a people's democratic republic's, but hey, at least they're transparently and openly attacking entire countries where people as much as look somewhat like a bunch of people flying planes into buildings. Very symbolic.
And we simply follow them on vapid promises and false pretenses. Fool me once.... While at it, that diplocube somewhat looks like a die. Will they or won't they? They'll be thinking that, of us.
Transparency, openness and equality?
So that's not a moat and drawbridge to keep out the enemy (or car bombs) then - it's a symbol of the ocean that separates us?
...if they don't mind red dots trained on their foreheads while they loll about on the minefi-, er, grass.
is a diplocube - google only lists the occurences in this article
It's not anything to do with the Borg. Definitely. Honest. Trust me.
I believe the diplocube is reference to shape of said building being discussed in the article. I would say that said structure does look like it is designed with symmetry in mind. And of course a definition of symmetry is (not bothering with a dictionary at the moment) both sides equal from a dividing point or line. So hence a cube. And since it houses an embassy which usually houses diplomats, we have a very nice pet name of diplocube.
Will that be sovereign US territory? Could be interesting for bye-laws if people behave antisocially whilst having a picnic. Might actually be safe to take the family there, occasional large bangs notwithstanding.
is a diplocube? Is this some attempt to make a cube sound sexy by building it out of beams and sticking a glass box on the outside? Maybe they have found a source of diplodocus remains and are grinding them up to produce some fantastic new building material?
The solar gain on this thing will be horrendous, thus ensuring that several megawatts of cooling is required and floods the building when the icecap melts. Bet they won't want to pay VAT on their energy bills either.
AAAGGGHHH My eyes! They bleed!
First, the most obvious; those who live in glass houses (embassies)...
Second, slightly less obvious; how can they reconcile the concept of transparency with the camouflaged nature of the security perimeter?
Third; is it just me.. or is this a mott and bailey design?
There's no VAT on new build anyway, only on rebuild / refurbishment. This is why perfectly servicable, well built and attractive old buildings are knocked down and replaced with steel 'n glass pig's ears designed by ego-wanking architects.
The septics are right here, they shouldn't be charged VAT and unless there's a change in the VAT rules between now and 2013, they won't be. Presumably the point they were actually trying to make is that they'd quite like to stay where they are, but refurbishing and extending the existing site *would* attract VAT, so they're moving to a new building to avoid this.
I'd love to be the first to bring this down; why do they need a building so secure and "electronically impenetrable" in a 'friendly' state?
God, how I wish the pond was larger.
Oh, and before any yanks try to tell me how you saved Europe in WW1 and WW2 just think about why you took so long to get involved: talk about waiting to see if the buttered side landed up or down.
Reflecting core values... Surely that means being ostensibly transparent, open and democratic whilst in reality being the exact opposite. Seems this giant reflective blast-proof Borg hypercube fits the bill perfectly.
Resistance is futile.
I preferred Warren Ellis' take.
You guys are getting lazy.
read 'destroying' - it's a Borg Cube!
Half Moat and earthwork embankments, it's a 21st Century castle.
Actually, moats and earthworks are time honoured defences against a ground attack.
I would presume that the air is protected with stingers as seems to be the usual US tactic.
We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile.
Looks like a Borg Cube.
"You will be assimilated".
"Resistance is futile".
Yep, sounds about right.
Resistance is futile
Is it me or has the Borg cube landed? Your oil will be added to the USA...
Is it inside the congestion charge region! (as currently the US Embassy are somewhat reluctant to pay CC)
It is outside the congestion charge region. That was one of the reasons (non-officially, naturally) why they want to move. Also, the increasingly upset neighbours in Mayfair (because of the way Grosvenor Square now looks and the dangers it represents to buildings around the area should a bomb go off) are also cited as a reason.
It may be treehugging but it's got to be better than their current building. I was there a couple of years back and it's a horrible, dreary, run-down, overcrowded, 50's architecture, concrete craphole. According to Wikipedia, it's just been Grade II listed. God knows why.
When this was first announced it was quite clear that it was because the owner of the Mayfair building had put up the rent and that the US State Dept. was unwilling to pay for it. I don't mean to sound unfair, but the rest is spin.
...and just one final point: would you (USA) please stop making reference to a "special", "cherished" or other "relationship", "partnership", etc., etc. The weirdness since the Obama election vis-a-vis the journalists is a case of tail-wags-dog and is just getting extremely tedious now. So if you wouldn't mind, let's just stop the navel-gazing.
The only people AFAIK who refer to any kind of "special relationship" are the Brits, who imagine that the US gives a tinker's cuss about them if it doesn't align with their foreign policy.
ISTR the previous US ambassador explicitly forbade his staff from using the phrase, as well.
Resistance is futile - you WILL be assimilated. I think we get the message...
Does *any* part of the US Govt in Britain get this treatment?
The Olympic Games won't (one reason they instantly went over budget) What part of the US Govt does not get this?
... We expect you, regardless of common sense and applicable laws and standards, to make exceptions for us. Because we are the US government. Period.
Looks like a Borg cube to me.
Prepare to be assimilated!
I heard the Ambassador talking about this on the radio last night, when he said open spaces and no big security walls etc, I (stupidly) assumed a nice landscaped area. Looks like a combo of a moat and a big feck-off ditch.
Security by old fashioned methods eh??
....a bloody carbuncle if ever I saw one!
Plus I think the designers have been watching FlashForward as one side of the design (the side with the pond/half-moat) the looks a lot like the FBI offices in FF.
Bloody things got a moat around it.
Hope their glass is mortar proof.
but the more pertinent comparison is with the Presbyterian Church in Ireland, which was going to move from it's current gothic-y 'Spires' building and into a new one it was going to build that was nick-named 'the glass house' (it was going to envelope an existing church as well, which would have been _interesting_). Apart from not being able to afford the move, they eventually decided it was just a bad idea.
Diplocube is truly the only word for this. It's not a bad building, but it doesn't seem like an embassy. But 7 years to build? Is that how long it takes to get anything done in London?
We are the borg. If you say something we don't like, our diplocube will destroy you.
They don't build them out of stone these days, but its obviously a castle.
I've got a better use for the tax dollars...
Cause "the brick", as it is referred to in Ottawa, is a sore point in the landscape as seen from Parliament Hill. Some may argue with a hint of humour, the US Embassy in Canada is the archetype of communist-style architecture.
What the... oh wait, I get it. Equality as in All Animals Are Equal But Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others. Sort of like War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength kind of thing. Like calling the police the Ministry of Love and the propaganda department the Ministry of Truth. That's OK, I see it now.
I don't think i'd be accepting a check from good o'le uncle sam. He doesn't seem to have any money in the bank to buy anything.
I do appreciate them outing what they are blowing our money on. The last announcement the IRS made about their needing of a new slew of shotguns reminded me that I also needed a new one.
The IRS wouldn't want me bringing a pistol to a shotgun battle now would they? Gotta have a fair fight!