Dust Gathering
As a general principle, I am strongly opposed to hosting sites being careless with user data.
However, in this case, as it took a year for anyone to even notice, I'd have to admit they made the correct business decision.
2460 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Sep 2007
I'm concerned the fact that he livestreamed the mass murders didn't lead to them being interrupted in progress posthaste.
As to the rest - since I don't have to pay YouTube $20 to put a video on their site, of course they can't afford to pay a human being to review each and every video posted. They may make millions in ad revenue, but it's pennies off each video.
I'm quite surprised the police could just go in and arrest a city's mayor. Surely they would have to wait for the aldermen to impeach him first? Maybe this time, the mayor really was involved in criminal activity, but next time, the police could just arrest a mayor on false charges because they didn't like his politics. The police have to be kept strictly subordinate to the elected representatives of the people.
"As employees, technologists wield enormous power." Not when any one technologist can break the strike, and many technologists happen to be living in poor countries like India. For that matter, mainland China, a totalitarian dictatorship, has many people who are trained in technical specialties related to computers. So here, I'm afraid, Bruce Schneier is being very unrealistic, and is proposing a solution which won't happen in the real world - which distracts us from what we need to do instead.
Given that Saturn has moons, I fail to see how it could even be possible that "The resulting motion of the probe suggested Saturn’s gravitational field was much higher than expected," except for some value of "much higher" within the limits of accuracy of observations of the orbits of those moons.
If there is a real chance that Oracle may be accused of wrongdoing that it did not commit, then indeed any attempt by the prosecution to seek to win without due regard for the law is very bad, because it could lead to a wrongful conviction. And this happens with prosecutors all the time, apparently. I just wasn't aware that this was one of the cases where this particular concern existed.
But then, even those who aren't nice guys sometimes get accused of crimes they did not commit.
Well, the whole idea of this "cell" phone thingy is that the antennas only cover a tiny piece of a city, let alone a country, so that they don't need to have a different frequency for each of a million cell phones. So just one cell tower, even if it were tall enough to cover all Britain, would be inadequate, as only a handful of people could use their phones at once.
Of course, if it were possible to build a tower that tall, that might be the ideal solution to cover all the parts of Britain where nobody ever goes except perhaps once or twice a decade, the existence of which this article solemnly affirms. (I knew Canada had parts like that, but we're bigger and emptier.) How to prevent those frequencies from being snagged by phones that have a closer tower to use, though, is likely a thorny technical problem.
It's quite right that there ought to be 50m high masts in rural areas. But given the lack of incentive to put cell towers in less-populated areas, isn't the obvious solution not to expect the private operators to do it at all? Instead, have British Telecom put up masts in rural areas to cover them to the extent desired by government policy, with the costs recovered by fees to private cell phone firms - which will be obliged to provide service in rural areas through paying BT for mast-sharing? (Or just make it plain, call it a tax on cell phone service.)
If the government has to cover the rural areas, one can expect they would pay close attention to the cost of doing so, and thus remove the limit on 50m masts there quickly. They might even class cell towers as critical to national defence, and thus immune to the normal NIMBY process of community consultation, while they're at it.
I do recognize that regime change in Iran would present practical challenges. But since Iran is not a democracy, I don't see that taking down the country the way the police would take down the home of a suspected hacker poses a moral issue.
The government of Iran has conspired to commit a breach of U.S. law on U.S. soil. Information which should not get into the wrong hands has gotten into the wrong hands. Correcting that would help send a message that might help to prevent it from happening again.
So? The United States and Britain are both nations with free elections, a free press, and the rule of law. Of course they have to have intelligence agencies to defend themselves against tyrannies like Hitler's Germany or Stalin's Russia. It's when tyrants use their spies to commit acts of aggression that it's wrong.
The sensitive data is presumably only in Iran.
So the first step would be to cut all communications links to Iran, so no copies of the data can be sent out of the region.
Then conduct a house-to-house search of the entire country. Of course, that will require inactivating the existing regime. But the United States has adequate tools to carry out that job.
After all, it's not as if we were dealing with Russia or the People's Republic of China.
So I fail to see the problem.
"To imagine that providing a single email address comprises written parental consent is so laughable it is incredible that Facebook ever dared to suggest otherwise." Otherwise than that it does comprise consent, as it would tend to be read initially, or otherwise than that it is laughable, which would be consistent? I hope you see what I'm getting at: people are more used to reading sentences like "That providing a single email address does not comprise written parental consent is so obvious, it is incredible that Facebook ever dared to suggest otherwise." A is so B, it is C that X suggested... A, or not A, but not A is B or not A is B. So also possible is "That providing a single address comprises written parental consent is so laughable it is incredible that Facebook ever dared to suggest such a thing."
And here I thought that if the EU wouldn't agree to a deal that the British people found acceptable, then whatever the current Prime Minister might prefer, Parliament would ensure there would simply be no withdrawal of Britain from the EU. If necessary, a referendum to confirm this would be held. So this eventuality of a no-deal Brexit - will never happen.
"The additional four molecules have incredibly long complex chemical names to spell out here", and yet, if the names existed to spell out here, why didn't I see them? Perhaps you meant "The additional four molecules have incredibly long complex chemical names [too long] to spell out here"?
Can ARM be trusted for deployment on servers, when there aren't even any ARM development platforms around?
That's a good question to ask. That is a gap in the ecosystem.
But if you've got an ARM cpu that's powerful enough to put in a server, then clearly non-rack-mount motherboards can also be developed for it.
Also, while code written in C is at risk of biting you if run on different hardware, code written in FORTRAN or Pascal... not so much.
So I don't see any problems with making the transition gradually. While x86 has a big lead, and some of its competitors have fallen by the wayside - no one is expecting SPARC or PowerPC or Alpha to come and take the world by storm any longer - I think it's too early to say that the x86 lead is forever.
When it comes to real-world Latin alphabet languages, if you're not going with Latin itself, Irish Gaelic is a reasonable choice. Other options include Albanian, Turkish, Basque, and Maltese. But if one really wants a spooky-looking text without going to the effort of inventing a language and its script, nothing can beat Georgian.
Yes, that's true. And from the viewpoint of criminals, having law-abiding honest citizens armed, instead of having to wait for police to show up, is not necessarily a good thing.
But gun laws do reduce things like officers getting shot when responding to domestic violence calls.
And a bit better enforcement of existing gun laws could well have prevented the recent shooting of five workers by a convicted felon, who illegally obtained a gun, and went on a rampage because he knew he was about to be fired.
Gun laws don't deal, though, with use of guns by real criminals, like drug traffickers. So we need a different kind of law for them. How about penalties for involvement in organized crime that make one's head spin, sufficient finally to be an effective deterrent? Plus more sensible regulation of things like wiretaps that protect the privacy of law-abiding citizens, but still allow the police to make it virtually impossible to run an organized crime racket of any kind.
Of course, you can't do it all with sticks instead of carrots. Make sure the economy is working, so almost everyone who is reasonably willing to work can get a decent job at a good living wage. (There will be a few unfortunates unable to obtain a marketable skill, who will need other kinds of assistance, of course.) That is not the case now.
And here I thought this was a building housing Huawei's UK operations.
But even though the GCHQ has intelligence-gathering activities as part of its mandate, evaluating the trustworthiness of products sold in the UK is not "spying" in any sense of the term, it's a perfectly normal and legitimate law-enforcement and consumer-protection activity of government, even if the required expertise had to come from a "spooky" source.
One could still be concerned about the safety of the people working in the building, as they are still targets even if they're not currently engaged in spying, so this is primarily a quibble about wording.
Not running code from untrusted sources. Sounds like good advice.
But when I install a program on Windows, I don't get notified, when that program is a DVD player, say, that the program needs to use the SGX feature, so would I please give it permission to do so.
So how do I install programs that I trust to use the computer conventionally, but which have no need to access this feature?
I'm not sure that this is an issue here. If the FBI submits the DNA of an unidentified body, so as to identify it and contact relatives, it's acting legitimately on behalf of the interests of that person. If it submits DNA from a crime scene, the criminal has forefeited any right to privacy by his act.
The issue is that the people in the database are having their privacy violated, by having their DNA matched under circumstances different from what they expected - by long-lost relatives looking for them. And so the fact that the FBI is getting the same information as a regular customer is relevant even if not decisive.
Given that China is a dictatorship, without a free press, without a civil society - in fact, it is totalitarian, since the only churches allowed to operate are ones run by the government, and any other kind of organization is also under direct government control - being spied on by American and other equipment may be likely, but it's not more likely. China is even more to be distrusted - by an order of magnitude.
"so far there is notably little in the way of hard proof that Chinese network equipment contains actual backdoors or other features intended for espionage or theft of trade secrets."
While this is certainly true, it doesn't seem to be a good guide to action. Instead, it pretty much guarantees that the barn door will only be locked after the horse is gone. Instead, what is needed is hard proof that any network equipment used does not contain backdoors. Including equipment made in China, but with the name of an American company on the box - and, for that matter, any equipment manufactured by any company in any country.
Not only should any sane smartphone user refuse to buy any iPhone, they should also refuse to buy any smartphone with Android that doesn't have removable and replaceable batteries.
Unfortunately, while low-end smartphones still have replaceable batteries, the high-end ones, that cost more, which people would really like to keep for a few years before replacing, almost all have soldered-in batteries these days. So consumers don't have a choice.
One company has a phone with a battery of the non-replaceable type, but allows consumers to buy a battery replacement kit so they can be their own service technician. Nice try, but that is not the solution I had in mind.
I would have thought that the commercial health of the State of Illinois would not be particularly imperilled by companies knowing that, if you want to use fingerprints on a season pass to an amusement park, then you will have to get a parent's or guardian's consent before selling such a pass to a minor. It's not hard to follow the law, and that's what laws are there for. To be obeyed.
That companies ought to be able to plea "Oh, gee, we forgot" in order for a state to be business-friendly is, on the face of it, a preposterous claim that should receive the ridicule it deserves.
Unfortunately, whatever Illinois does, it looks like instead most other states are taking the complaints of some corporations about this very seriously indeed.
While such hiring practices are obviously a temptation to the entire industry, I would have thought most companies pay a bit more attention to potential legal consequences.
Of course, outsourcing as much software development as possible to India, on the other hand, is perfectly legal. That's an area where free-market decision making would still rule. But if one wishes to do elements of software development in-house, for better control and security, one does have to pay the price of doing it legally.
Although the floating-point unit was shared between two Bulldozer cores, it was a vector floating-point unit.
Both cores could be simultaneously doing something with a single floating-point number just fine, each one using half of the shared core. It was only when they were using the specialized vector instructions for full-width vectors (the earlier half-width vector instructions would also not conflict) that a conflict would arise.
And, of course, historically, most computers that had hardware floating-point just had instructions that worked on one number at a time. Even MMX only allowed vectors of integers when it first came out, not vectors of floating-point numbers.
I did a search. Apparently one rogue employee at Cellcom had hired him. During the time when this was happening, Cellcom got bought out by a reputable European company, Orange.
Whether this rogue employee faced any consequences yet, though, I haven't found out.
But the rival telecom that was the intended victim has launched a civil suit against Cellcom - and this suit was launched in UK courts, not Liberian ones.
But your article isn't neutral and objective!
Yes, the government shutdown is hampering efforts to get the Wide Field Camera operational again.
But whether that shutdown is the fault of Donald Trump being obstinate, or the House Democrats being obstinate depends on whether the border wall with Mexico is a good idea or not. That is a controversial political question, so taking sides on it surely has no place in a site devoted to technical news.
I vaguely remembered a news item about some high-priced foreign product which was selling well in China to the very rich as a status symbol, but then the government put it out that buying this product was unpatriotic, and sales tanked because nobody wanted to be seen with it.
I don't, however, remember what the product in question was. Apparently it must not have been Apple, since that's not being cited here.
EDIT: Ah. I remembered another detail, which let me look it up. Turns out the company in question was Dolce & Gabbana, and it wasn't just the Chinese government, they had somewhat put their own foot in it as well.
But there is so much else.
The Beatles.
Radar.
The English language.
The law of universal gravitation.
The steam engine (since Scotland is part of Britain too).
Even Doctor Who, which is watched by some people outside of Britain.
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
The Rolling Stones.
Petula Clark.
I think that several of these top Benny Hill!
Many people in France are dubious about the European Union, for the same reason as Britain: policies that require them to accept too many refugees, leading to social problems or the potential for social problems.
Thus, instead of Britain using an exit process that fairly obviously would lead to the situation we now have, because Britain didn't have enough bargaining power to get a good deal, if Britain and France had united to exit the EU together, this could have led to what would have made every nation equal: a return to the days of a European Common Market without a European Union.
There is no serious evidence that Huawei presents a threat?
Huawei is physically located in the People's Republic of China. This country doesn't have an independent free press, free elections, and so on and so forth. Thus, being physically located in the People's Republic of China at the present time is evidence of a threat the same way being physically located in Germany during the 1933-1945 period is evidence of a threat. In both cases, the Government may do pretty much anything it likes, and demand anything it wants, from individuals on its territory.
It's too late to close the barn door after the horse has left. One must eleminate all potential threats of a compromise to vital networks and systems. Of course, cell phones and communications equipment from Chinese-branded companies are not the only threat.
Instead, anything (of a computerized nature) manufactured in mainland China, or containing any components from mainland China, is suspect. Which means every brand of cell phone, just about every consumer desktop or laptop that I've heard of. So from now on, we need to get our computer kit manufactured in places like Malaysia and Indonesia if we want relatively low costs. South Korea or Taiwan would be the next tier. Who knows, they might actually start making things in Japan or the United States again.
That sort of thing costs extra. And there's no good reason why computer systems shouldn't just work, forever, perfectly. Like the Sun keeps shining each morning. After all, the underlying physical circuitry doing the computations is highly reliable. All that's required is that the software be written correctly, once, the first time.
Now, hard drives have moving parts, though, so one does have to allow for them failing. Trouble is that vendors have failed to offer an inexpensive, easy, and convenient method of backup. This is why desktop computers don't routinely come with tape drives for which the tapes have a capacity even close to a terabyte so you could do a complete backup to a handful of them.
Well, this shows that making the operation of software dependent on certificates that can expire is a bad idea, as it creates an additional point of failure.
I suppose, though, that these software certificates are needed for some security purpose, as there is an opportunity to introduce unauthorized software to the systems in question.
I thought you guys in the UK had to import your bacon from Denmark! I remember buying some Danish bacon that was available in Canada, and found it just as good or maybe even slightly better than our own product, so if UK bacon is as good as that, it probably stacks up to American bacon as well.
I can only guess that the Labor Party leadership was simply terrified that a terrorist attack might happen in Australia over the Christmas holidays.
Since there is obviously a minority government, or what the opposition Labor Party liked wouldn't have mattered, perhaps when Parliament comes back into session they could just table a bill to repeal this whole mess if amendments aren't forthcoming.