Re: Word perfect article
I liked the article, especially the bit about Blumlein, but I think that saying every word is true is going a bit too far. I'm rather sure he was exaggerating about Madonna.
1369 posts • joined 18 Sep 2007
I liked the article, especially the bit about Blumlein, but I think that saying every word is true is going a bit too far. I'm rather sure he was exaggerating about Madonna.
Then he should have to reimburse the bank in full before paying money to be used for police and courts.
Insurance just changes who the victim is. That would then mean he should have to pay full restitution to the insurance company.
Of course, full insurance against all crime-related losses should be free of charge. Paid for by the government, which gets the money from criminals, not taxpayers.
Before he should be allowed to pay any money to be used for "policing and the criminal justice system", or, in fact, before he should even be allowed to pay his taxes, every cent taken from his victim should have to be returned to her.
Yes: if you steal money from someone, then when your taxes are deducted, they should go straight to your victim instead of the government, meaning that interest and penalties will just add up until everything you stole was returned. Of course, I know this might not be popular with the government, so voters will have to put pressure on it.
While he seems like the sort of person who would get his secretary to type his E-mails, it seems to me that he didn't do that bad. People can encrypt their hard drives if they're so inclined and still use their computers. Also, he seems to have predicted the existence of what is known as ransomware. This is pretty good guessing for someone who doesn't seem to know that this sort of stuff is going on already.
The fact that no one likes wading through ten levels of menus before getting to "press zero to talk to a human being" does not seem to me to indicate that the use of speech as a form of communication is heading for obsolescence, so I thought you were being rather unfair.
There should be criminal charges in U.S. courts under U.S. law, because they were engaging in the unauthorized misuse of people's computers. This should be treated just like other methods of exploiting vulnerabilities in browsers and operating systems.
When people actually go to jail over something, then the behavior stops - at least among respectable businessmen.
The suspects in this case should never have been charged, as they weren't engaged in any criminal activity - as soon as they discovered there actually was a problem, they ceased from their unauthorized access, and notified the authorities.
This explains the case of the programmer prosecuted for double-checking whether the charitable site he donated to was legitimate that I read about in the Register some years back.
Having broad and severe laws against computer misuse is entirely reasonable. Enforcing them without a shred of common sense and discretion, however, is not.
As the Schrodinger equation is a wave equation, it is not too remarkable that some of its behaviors can be replicated in other things that involve waves. If, however, you ever try to do the Bell's inequality experiment with your droplets, I rather think that some differences will come out - indeed, I suspect that they will manifest themselves earlier, such as when you try to "observe" those droplets, thus forcing wave packets into eigenstates.
The wave-particle duality is key to much of the strangeness of quantum mechanics. Yes, you can simulate the wave part, but the particle part, that leads to "quantization", is not so easy to match with a classical model.
"You do not know with 100% certainty who was flying those planes or who put them there !!!"
No, but I know nutcases when I see them, and the "911 Truth" style movements definitely qualify. In the real world, sometimes we have to live with 99.9999% certainty.
"Saudi Arabian laws are not dictated by the USA, therefore the Saudi Arabian government are not commiting an act of agression against an innocent according to SA law. US laws apply only to the US..."
I didn't say anything about Sa'udi Arabia breaking some other country's laws. Aggression against innocent people is an objective matter, and has nothing to do with any particular country's laws. Thus, Negro slavery and the Holocaust were both "legal" according to the laws of the countries that countenanced them, but that mattered not a whit. Right and wrong and justice are absolutes that exist for all times and places, and are not subject to change by human whim, or alterable to benefit vested interests.
Exactly when did radical atheists or secularists fly an airplane into a building in Sa'udi Arabia, killing thousands of innocent people? The U.S. is responding to an act of aggression against innocents, and the Sa'udi government is committing an act of aggression against an innocent. That should be clear to everyone.
It's time to bring about regime change in Sa'udi Arabia, and ensure that the new regime is firmly committed to universal standards of religious liberty and the separation of church and state, so that things like this will never happen again. From one end of the Islamic world to the other, non-Muslims must have full equality, under constitions which firmly prohibit making Islam, or any other faith, an established church - that is, favored in any way by the government, in violation of the basic eternal democratic principle of a wall fo separation protecting religious faith from government interference,
Of course, that wall of separation doesn't exist in the other direction, and so the faithful Muslim population can continue to vote for legitimate laws that reflect their moral beliefs which are informed by their faith. So beverage alcohol, abortion, pornography, and maybe even teaching evolution in public schools might still be illegal in Sa'udi Arabia, but such laws are admissible, being in line with precedent in genuinely democratic nations.
Evgeny Morozov's point is obvious, having read his Guardian column. While digital tech may help somewhat in creating more equality, this is being over-hyped, and it's not going to solve the serious existing problems of inequality we face any time soon. So it won't "make those old debates irrelevant".
Poll taxes are evil, and TV license fees are evil. If the BBC needs government funding, let it come from progressive income taxes like anything else worth doing that costs a great deal of money. It has been a terrible tragedy that lower-income people in Britain have had to suffer under the burden of BBC license fees as a condition of getting access to entertainment. This also meant that in the 8-bit computer era, people had to buy expensive monitors for their computers, because using cheap old disused TV sets, as North Americans did, would have meant they would have had to pay extra license fees - and so Britain fell behind in the early microcomputer era.
Driving at excessive speeds places human lives at risk, and so harsh penalties for attempting to reduce the efficiency of legitimate law enforcement measures to ensure that every motorist, every second of the time he or she is on the road, drives at or below the posted speed limit, are entirely appropriate.
After all, if someone were to die in a car accident, not all the tax revenues of the French government could bring that person back. So it must never be allowed to happen in the first place.
Seeing the headline, I wondered how on Earth the government not paying sales tax to the government could cost the government, or even the taxpayer, any money. But reading the article cleared this up - individual government departments, claiming tax refunds not allowed by the rules, were enabling themselves to spend more of your tax dollars than they were really given in their budgets.
I wonder how you could have made a non-confusing headline for this type of story. Civil servants use tax fraud to inflate their budgets?
There's a foundry in Red China capable of making 28 nm chips? Oh noes, we're all DOOMED!
But I'm surprised that ARM isn't in more trouble already. Never mind Intel using the x86 chip as an Android alternative. Since most Android programs use bytecode rather than native code, other chips more similar to ARM, and thus presumably more suitable to smartphone chips, could be used. Thus, why isn't MIPS entering this market?
Or, more to the point, some RISC chip vendors are licensing their architectures on generous terms, because they would really like to see them more widely adopted. So why not SPARC smartphones, or PowerPC smartphones?
I'm quite surprised the article did not give prominence to the most obvious benefit to this technology; it would be able to bring sight to the blind.
If one is going to mention "Ever Onward, IBM" and the like, what about Farey Aviation and the Black Dyke Band?
Robert Zubrin has used this as an argument against being overly concerned about back contamination from Mars. However, he overlooked one point. Of course we don't have to worry about Martian malaria contaminating the Earth. Martian mold or Martian mildew, however, could see us just as a big pile of sugars with no relevant immune defenses - and turn Earth's biota into green goo in a matter of weeks.
Plus, on Earth, mold and mildew are relatively complicated organisms - symbiotic clusters of eukaryotic cells, I think. So they're not the ones that would have already made it to Earth on meteorites, putting paid to another one of his arguments.
It's clear that the fellow from Belarus was expressing a concern for the conference providing an opportunity for FEMEN to express its message, as opposed to concern for modesty or for the delegates' dry cleaning bills.
While it's true we should be converting to nuclear energy - a way to reduce our carbon footprint without making huge sacrifices in our energy use - even that isn't happening soon enough.
Giving a loaded gun to a child, if that's what the child needs to survive, is not always a bad thing; it may be the least bad alternative left.
In the United States, at one time all it took was one sixty-fourth part of black ancestry to be classified as officially black.
Just hiring on skills and merit instead of color sounds like it should be enough. But practical experience in the United States shows that it is not. Black people are somewhat less likely than white people to have the right pieces of paper when they are capable of doing a job. Furthermore, they're quite a bit less likely to have the right training to make them qualified for a job even when they have the same level of innate talent and ability for the job as a white person.
Is affirmative action really the right tool, though? Should employers, rather than the government, be expected to make up for prior discrimination black people have suffered in educational opportunities? That is a legitimate question, but even so, in any case the question is still more complicated than presented here.
The instant a firm's solvency is called into question, it is entirely reasonable for it to be expected henceforth to pay in advance for any and all goods and services it receives from outside suppliers. For that matter, we need laws to protect the employees of firms that run into difficulty: their wages should be immediately paid into escrow as they are earned.
These innocent victims, who are at arm's-length from troubled companies, who don't have the opportunity to review their books and keep an eye on their total operations, ought not to be consigned to the limbo of being "unsecured creditors" who may get nothing. Banks do have the opportunity to monitor the fiscal health of the firms to which they supply credit; of course, though, since their collateral is what is backing part of the money supply, in much the same way as gold bullion in the vaults of central banks, so I admit that a balance has to be struck.
Actually, there is some truth to the claim, incredible though it may sound.
The BlackBerry phones owed part of their security to communicating with BlackBerry's own servers. And the downfall of the company started when corporate users perceived BlackBerry phones as unreliable when it was victimized by a major DDoS attack.
The problem with their comeback was that individual cell phone users want a major apps platform like Android or the iPhone for their money - and, again, their maverick software is an element in their enhanced security.
So, while the encryption itself was a plus, not a minus, features of their phones that made it possible did contribute to their problems. Note, of course, that Apple and Google have no such problems, though, however much they upgrade their security.
I'm just glad that Sweden avoided sparking a conflict with Switzerland by declaring Helvetica the Swedish National Font!
If addiction is a disease of loneliness, then the cure is presumably worse than the disease.
Now that women have equal rights, they can take paying jobs and support themselves; not like ancient times, where every woman had to be married so her parents wouldn't have to be the ones to feed her.
Looking up the case, I found that Mark Duggan was in possession of an unauthorized firearm, and that he was believed to be a member of an organized crime gang. Given that, why would his death be politically sensitive, or, indeed, a concern to anyone except perhaps his immediate relatives? Isn't the whole country at war with drug dealers and the like?
Obviously, the charges should be billed to the dishonest party who posted the improper advertisement.
If law enforcement in, say, Belarus, or somewhere like that is not fully cooperative in this, the answer is simply to deny the country involved access to the Internet and, indeed, to long-distance telephone service. It's high time for the treaties that let 900 number dialer virus writers get away with their crimes to be reviewed.
Under current law, I don't think the people responsible for this ransomware, if they were ever brought to justice, could be charged with murder. That should be changed. People who drive others to suicide through harassment and similar actions should pay the just price for what they have done.
Companies are responsible to their stockholders; governments are responsible to the society as a whole. So asking for a "sense of responsibility" from corporations is a waste of air. But it may well be difficult to draft appropriate legislation that won't prevent foreign companies, operating in the UK, from taking their profits home without an extra burden of taxation - which is basically the point of investing in the UK, isn't it?
Of course, perhaps the onus should be on the home nation to forego taxation on profits which have already been taxed where they were earned... but that's a radical idea.
Well, there are so many lost books of antiquity the absence of which is lamented, I hope that they will find one or more of those among these scrolls.
Language is a tool of communication; words that have to be looked up in the dictionary - if it even has them - will not perform that function. I've certainly heard of the world "perambulate", but not "obambulate"; I've heard "flapdoodle" and "caterwaul", but not "concinnity". So it's too late for some of those words; they would have had to have been revived while they were still being used to some limited extent.
Around the time of Shakespeare, there was a whole slew of words called "inkhorn" words that were coined which quickly died out; I don't think they're worth reviving.
Of course they had to clone Angry Birds! They wouldn't want it tempting North Koreans into getting bootleg software from outside the country and acquiring subversive ideas along with it! Actually, I'm surprised they didn't clone Flappy Bird as well.
In the case of the Ukraine, that country was invaded as punishment for its people overthrowing a dictator. News stories of his killing of demonstrators and of his private zoo are on the public record. So what's this about the U.S. trying to lead Europe in a wrong direction on that issue?
This makes an amusing counterpart to a news story I read just the other day in Canada.
A Carleton University professor criticized Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper for referring to the Charlie Hebdo attacks as "barbaric", because that word might tend to reinforce negative stereotypes of Islam, and to stigmatize other cultures.
This shows that there is apparently something wrong with the culture in that part of the world, unless the flogging is entirely the government's idea without popular support.
One can improve sound quality by shipping bits to a DAC at strictly regular time intervals. Slight variations in the time in which a DAC is given new data can indeed affect the output signal, even if no bits are changed. This is why certain external USB DACs, which have internal buffer storage, can improve sound quality over the sound card in a computer which simply takes the bits it is given when it is told to, which may vary while the computer is doing other things like running the operating system.
Maybe this is what they were talking about, in a garbled way.
In Canada, there was a high-profile case of a young girl, raped by four young boys who have not yet been charged, who eventually committed suicide after a video of the attack was posted online, accusing her of being guilty of unchastity. As eventually some of those who posted the video online were charged with a child pornography offence, for a time it was unlawful to utter her name, although it had previously been used in stories about the incident.
Given this, there is strong sentiment in Canada for having all the tools possible to deal harshly with this sort of thing before another tragedy happens.
I know that in the U.S. there was a case where a criminal behind bars used a cell phone to arrange the murder of a witness against him. I think that they should move the prisons to locations without any cell towers in range.
Hey, Windows 3.1 ran in 2 megs, while you needed 4 megs to run Yggdrasil Linux, and 16 megs to run fvwm at decent speed in it. Of course, Windows NT needed more memory than Windows 3.1 for much the same reason (multiuser, privilege protecting apps from each other), but if you wanted a GUI on the desktop, Microsoft let you have it with less resources. (But then a Mac pulled it off in 128 K... and it worked even better in 512 K.)
Banks creating money to make loans indeed isn't counterfeiting. It's only check-kiting... and this created money is backed by the collateral on the loan, if not by the gold in Fort Knox. So the system just allows the supply of money to grow to a level commensurate with the real wealth of the nation, rather than allowing a lack of gold-backed money to prevent people from working and producing.
However, the system is still fragile. Things like a collapse of real estate values can cause collateral for a lot of those loans to stop having enough value to actually back the created money corresponding to it. So, while the banking system is indeed not a scam, as people from Social Credit and so on might have you believe, it's not as rock-solid as the gold standard either.
In the United States, for the NSA to spend time hunting criminals - even ones operating outside the U.S. - would be highly controversial. Its job is to support national security and spy on foreign governments that are hostile to free nations - and terrorists by extension. So, aside from the issue of Snowden, the fact that these statements presuppose that the GCHQ chasing criminals is an entirely legitimate part of its mission is... interesting.
Selling narcotics or fake drugs over the Internet is a serious matter. Many Internet users would like Google to be above the law - in the sense that they would like to have a search engine that tells them what is out there, whether governments like it or not. But this isn't achievable.
However, while it's troubling that a corporation can bully elected governments, it's also troubling that a single state government can make law for the whole United States - and, sometimes, the whole world. Thus, while I basically support the article, there are other questions that make this more complicated.
Incidentally, for the United States to have a "51st richest state", it would have to have 51 states, which it doesn't. Alaska and Hawaii brought the total up to 50 from 48, and none have been added since then.
Does Facebook do business in Russia? If they hae people there, they may have no choice.
If they don't, that would be different, then I would unequivocally condemn the cowardice.
Replace Microsoft Windows on your computers. And avoid Macintosh and Linux as well.
Write your own operating system, with no vulnerabilities!
If you can't license OS/2 as a starting point, or OpenVMS, then start from BSD.
If you haven't got accurate statistics, then you have to make do by applying common sense.
History has shown us that there's a war-boom-bust cycle. After World War I, there were the Roaring Twenties, followed by the Depression. Other wars were followed by similar phenomena. And after World War II, there were the boom years of the fifties and sixties, followed by the slump that started in the seventies.
Governments can print money, but they can't print gold, special drawing rights, or the currencies of other nations. So, if nations don't export enough to pay for cheap goods from China and oil from the Middle East, they either go into debt, or constrict their domestic economies so that people can't afford to buy as much from those places.
Because trade agreements prevent them from keeping their domestic economies stimulated and just raising tariffs.
I know I once tried what is called "back bacon", but that just tastes like ordinary pork or ham - perhaps less attractive than either of those. Whereas bacon made from thin slices of pork bellies has a wonderfully appealing flavor, providing the essence of meatiness without MSG.
Because going to the renewable options greens like would make energy supplies more expensive and limited, people are reluctant to acknowledge that global warming is real. While the greens don't like nuclear power, ordinary people to whom jobs and living standards are major concerns would be less likely to have a problem.
I recently read an interesting article about how "solution aversion", making people less likely to accept a problem is real, is operating in the global warming debate. Nuclear power is the option that would make that largely go away.
This article prompted me to do some searching. Apparently this cryptographic primitive belongs to the Goldreich-Goldwasser-Halevi family. Since it uses the Closest Vector Problem, and works by disguising an easy lattice as a hard one, it seems to me that it might have the same basic flaw that torpedoed the knapsac ciphers - the underlying problem is hard, but disguising an 'easy' knapsack as a 'hard' one was the key, the disguises weren't proven hard to see through.