that's what I call
... challenging work conditions.
1175 posts • joined 6 Sep 2007
... challenging work conditions.
"scientists used the power of two supercomputers"
but WHICH power of two? there is huge difference between 2^1 and 2^10 supercomputers!
... which is exactly why HUGE fines, capable of taking the company to brink, are needed. Anything less will not teach idiots in upper layers of mismanagement that actually, they do not have a choice but pay good money for good security, and the only alternative is going bust.
the sooner we see a large PLC company suffer significant losses due to shoddy security practices, the better example it will set for others. Admittedly, it's still far from going bankrupt, I just assume the fines would be big enough.
Plenty of gems on the webpage, generously sprinkled with gobbledygook and buzzwords. Nice!
I'm not a billionaire, or even a millionaire but my daily work depends on Linux servers working well, so I'll be sending some money towards Devuan promptly and on regular basis. Diversity is one of principles of Linux and it would be a shame if all major distributions switched to one, oversized systemd just to make desktops little "better", for some meanings of the word.
Your mistake is in assumption that if a protocol has been designed for non-confidential data, it will never compromise confidential data. Which is obviously wrong, see how often passwords are sent over plain SMTP.
Yes, you would be perfectly right to blame the user. But this won't fix the problem. What will fix it is to use security for any protocol which might be used to gain access to protected data. Which basically means all of them.
Talk about shooting oneself in the foot. Or both feet.
Shame, I was considering getting Oculus Rift for this, some day.
Make server software available for all, so anyone can run their own server if they want to - like Minecraft. I own the machine this is running on, and I decide when to upgrade the software it runs, if I want to upgrade at all. I decide all the tweaks in the game world, who can join it and when it is available.
That is the kind of "always online" experience I could buy.
Otherwise, no thank you, I am note tempted by another WoW.
This means BlackBerry is only going to build BlackBerrys for customers who are likely to buy them.
What a refreshing idea! Hope they stick to it before my 9900 turns from plainly ancient, to ancient wreck. Because I'm seriously considering buying what-they-call Classic.
There is not much radiation in ISS, otherwise people wouldn't be living there. It is much, much worse away from planets, where Philae and Rosetta are at this moment.
Would be nice to have radiation hardened system-on-chip similar to ARM7, but this is not going to happen in a hurry.
talk would be actually useful to anyone, also in UK.
Especially about niche markets, like "lab at home" machines with 2 or more sockets, unusual amount of RAM etc. or simply more robust built quality than "usual". That is market segment where
desktopsworkstations still can do better than puny set top boxes, consoles or tablets.
Now I only need properly written open source CMS for .NET running on Linux.
Yeah , this "£50 victim surcharge" got me thinking - it seems didn't count each victim separately, as this would add up to more sizeable fine.
Whale meat is not sold in Japan for profit, it's actually subsidized (e.g. to schools) to maintain tradition of whaling.
Yes, I know it's silly.
I like to collect watches no one else would, and in my small collection I have two Casio wave ceptors (one steel and another titanium) and a Citizen similar to one above (without titanium body). Casios are lighter, but Citizen is nice too although larger and not quite as readable. They all show accurate to 1s time without need to bother about daylight time changes, batteries etc. - just keep them next to window where radio signal is good and there's enough light to maintain charge.
I also travelled with all of them (at different times) on the other side of pond, and one has to remember to change home city (which is simpler in Citizen) to have accurate time soon after arrival.
Titanium watch is worst for wear after only 1 year of use - it turns out it's actually very soft metal. Unless treated with special coating which my Casio watch does not have.
The other advantage (and arguably, actual primary one) is the lack of explosives. There are no rockets to count and protect, just small nuclear reactor one would need for a modern ship anyway, and a big pile of metal parts.
Any results yet?
This might be just right as cold store for my backups. Two things I particularly like - low price and ZFS. However looking at the website, it does not seem they actually have anything on offer for individuals - the market specifically seem to be for "financial services, government, media, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and data center services". Oh well, perhaps a data center service will pop up as a retail branch ... someday.
In honesty, they also solved another problem - now they are no longer spying on non-DRM books.
And if you read DRM ones .... well, you have other problems as well, not just Adobe spying on you.
Mine is the one with paper book in the pocket.
No, XML does not work perfectly with source control, diff etc.
XML as a format suffers from tight internal coupling and low cohesion - because it's universal and low level tool, as compared to domain specific language (say, SQL). Meaning, you make a small change in one place (in whatever domain specific tool you are using) and it's reflected in dozens (if not many more) of places in resulting XML. This is what you will see in source control, diff etc - instead of the one change you actually made at the higher abstraction level. This approach does not lend itself very well to history inspection, merging and other operations you would normally use source control system for. Instead, you have to be extremely careful because merging of the most innocuous changes done concurrently by two developers is most likely not going to be an easy task.
This is also why it is preferable to work with text format of domain specific language (e.g. SQL in case of relational database design) rather than XML. Even though I dropped developing databases many years ago, I'm glad Microsoft has seen the light.
That is, international organization with members from every nation with interest in running of the organization. Yes, it would be very slow to change but how often do we need a new TLD policy? Also, subordination to US government is becoming global security problem.
Add labour cost - you have to pay for assembly. And manager wages. And director's salary. And pension contributions. And there is still this marketing guy who needs his salary.
If Unix has not just survived but also outlived every other operating system out there they might have got something right. And if there is one thing that defines Unix, that would be the "do just one thing, and do it very well" philosophy. Let's not fuck with that, shall we?
sorry, just had to post.
I like the idea of next-gen language too. And Apple would benefit from making it either open-source or standardized (or both). Here is how it might work: if a language is freely available and attractive for wide audience, it will be used. The more it's used, the more developers familiar with it. This last point would directly benefit Apple ecosystem.
Looking at Swift, it seems well designed - and it also has the benefit of supporting shebang script syntax, so it can be used more universally (if made universally available). If it could be also used for scripting of dynamic web pages that would be ideal, I cannot wait for something to replace this abomination called PHP.
Seems like more than "a handful of rules"
... encryption is really strong (and key is kept safe), I don't see (much of) a problem.
For all intent and purposes, losing heavily encrypted data is not different from losing any set of useless binary data. If businesses are not required to notify about the latter, then notification about the former would seem (a bit) superfluous to me.
The difficulty is in determining what constitutes strong encryption and safe key. Perhaps I ought to look at this regulation.
so that you don't wake up one day and find the internet no longer works for you
The problem with protocols which are supposed to work from-day-to-day is that there is no incentive to do anything about deprecated features, and thus "will it work tomorrow" incentive to just keep using what works, gets stretched until things break catastrophically.
I understand NFC link only works on short distances - you might not be able to put your phone to a pocket without erasing it ...
Yeah, was thinking the same : "where are units supporting checksums on filesystem?" and then I realized I need to build my own with FreeNAS or Nas4Free .... because no brand would do that for me!
Honestly, if NAS cannot guarantee integrity of your data, what's the point?
it's diminishing returns, simple. I can spend few hundred on a player, another few on a pair of headphones or speakers, but adding zeros to the bill for gain I cannot hear without moving my home to middle of the desert first is unjustifiable. I'm just happy not to have to hear clipping, sibilance or random artefacts.
@AC bull*it . Nobody is asking you to keep putting CDs in, you can rip them to FLAC if you want to, and only keep physical record in a locked archive. The point being, there is nothing "modern" about streaming and I assume you are either very young or very old and thus memory not serving you well. Anyway, go and lookup "Real Player".
I can keep on microSD a lot of music in a lossless format I ripped form my own CDs myself, and I can play from portable device with proper DAC, amplifier and sound quality a class or two above ipod or a phone (see IHIFI 960, AK100, iBasso DX90 etc.). But of course, I also have proper headphones not some branded crap with "b" on side. Does that mean I do not use streaming? I actually do, to find something new and interesting. And that does not happen very often at all, because "you may like too" algorithms are awfully limited and programmers who wrote them do not understand that someone may enjoy baroque, modern classical, different flavours of rock and few other kinds of music, depending on mood and other factors.
@Peter thanks, exactly my point.
@Nick, I take issue with your "flawlessly". You can never represent analog signal digitally without introducing flaws, especially so when you only have 2 samples per wave.
Haha, this reminds of supposedly lossless, hi-def files from qobuz. One evening sitting by the computer, I found that they have Mozart C-minor Mass directed by Herreweghe, exactly same record I enjoyed earlier the same day from my CD (it was not ripped then). Being lazy (or experimental) sort of person, I decided to stream the music rather than put my CD in. It played nicely, up to solo soprano when it started clipping quite horribly. Compare same part with my CD - no clipping and my poor underpowered mini system played this part rather quietly, but cleanly. Turn down volume on my computer speakers (active Samson studio monitors attached to Epiphany Acoustic DAC) streaming from qobuz, and I hear clipping again. So, I ripped my record to FLAC just to play it on the same equipment and there you go, lovely and clean sound. It turns out that "lossless, hi-def" qobuz files are totally messed up, they probably never checked the final result of whatever conversions they were doing.
I cancelled my qobuz subscription the same day, and from then on I only use FLAC files I ripped from my own CDs, using equipment and processing I trust and know. Or, when I do not care about quality and just want to listen to something different, it's from lossy source such as Spotify. And my "poor underpowered" mini system got an upgrade in the form of better speakers :)
I'm running 8 Crucial C300 (yes, old model) 256GB each on LSI MegaRAID in RAID0 hardware configuration, total 2TB. It's nice and no problems in years since I set it up, but in fairness I do not write this much data to it. Of course, I back it up almost constantly to an HDD and replicate the backups to external HDD, although so far the only use of backups was deleted files or misconfigurations.
It may be a big deal for some, for me this means change of platform. This I'd rather stay with previous generation Xeons E5 v2 running in "old" LGA 2011 socket with 64GB of DDR3 I already have (and do not use - but it was relatively cheap!).
.... but I will remain sceptical until open source implementation appears and is merged into both BSD and Linux (and Windows just for laughs - we all remember NetBEUI and NWLink, right?)
Took me few years to learn to do it properly, but in last 5 years it's been pretty good, with Macap and Dalla Corte. It was expensive to buy, but is cheap to run. Just top it up with freshly roasted coffee beans, remember to check water level and keep it clean.
Icon for how I look before my first coffee (where did I put the filter?)
they wear berets and eat frogs (sort of)
... password replacement policies were based on time needed to brute-force an existing password? Say, you are new employee about to set your network password first time (because the one you received on welcome, comes with "must change" setting). You try "Password1" and since this is "cracked" by validator in real time it is not even accepted, since check for minimum password complexity can be run synchronously, as soon as you press Enter. So you try something a bit more complex and it is accepted, but within few hours or few days you receive an email explaining that you need to change your password again because it has been deemed too weak by automated password complexity assessment (i.e. cracked by security team). This comes with obligatory picture borrowed (legally, of course) from xkcd and a longer explanation about how password complexity works. Sounds like pain?
But here is a good part: if you read the instructions carefully, you will figure out how to set a password that you won't ever have to change (bar emergencies). You simply make it complex enough!
Now, if only one password was needed at work ...
POWER8 has comparable set of instructions.
Now I'm waiting for good professor to produce alternative system. Or at least start productive discussion about design of such a thing. Should I hold my breath?
Actually no, it makes sense. Apple suffered reputational damage as soon as the first class action suit was brought. I'm too lazy to see how this original suit affected the share price but I'd hazard a guess that there was some dip. Now a shareholder are asking for compensation for this dip.
It's fair game, given that (due to lack of dividend) the only way to profit from Apple shares is to sell them, which makes shareholders more sensitive to share price moves.
I think the problem here is the definition (or lack of it) of what is significant enough contribution to work, to make it pass copyright test.
It might be that in the case of actually lost camera, there is no "significant contribution" on the side of camera owner.
It might also be that in case of Mr Slater, the camera was not lost but made ready for simians to use and also that he made significant contribution by first setting up conditions for pictures to be taken and then removing all blurred photos afterwards, selecting good ones and preparing them for publication. To me this seems like nontrivial endeavour.