110 posts • joined 15 Feb 2007
As an electronics engineer with a strong background in physics, I should be offended by this. However, I can't really get there. Not because I'm "dead inside"; but because I know this "study" was thought up, performed by, and compiled by Psychologists, not scientists. Ask them what standard deviation is and they'd probably say it means everyone like a little weirdness in the bedroom...
Isn't the Register from the same country where the newspapers have nude women on page two? Why is it OK in the daily paper but not the *internet*?
Something's off here...
Just like Brolin above, I also did a traceroute to the pirate bay. I got the same address (188.8.131.52) and did not get past my ISP's switch. Not just a power outage methinks. It seems like the bay has dropped off the internets...
I can't understand why so much attention is given to the possibility of cell phones / wireless technology causing illness, yet none to all the chemicals and additives in food. Flavours, colouring, preservatives, pesticides and goodness knows what else. If anything is making us sick, it's all that garbage.
I can only imagine that it's related to a vast quantity of people still regarding technolgy as "magic" whereas food has been around for a while now. Sigh.
When I first heard about this from a co-worker, I found it hard to belive that they could have srewed up like this. I've been watching the show for years and just couldn't picture Adam or Jamie messing up so badly. Now I see it was the other ones and it makes more sense. I'll bet that Tony figured heavily in this...
This seems a bit off. What is it they make exactly? A look at their website seems to indicate they build power supplies, but why is that worth all that investment? Are they designing and/or building the semiconductors as well?
MOSFETs made from gallium nitride instead of silicon are already available, if somewhat more expensive, and have similar characteristics to regular CMOS. But if they were used more, the prices would drop.
As an electrical engineer, I've built a number of power supplies over the years, and I know that switching losses in power transistors are a major part of total conversion losses, but reducing those losses mainly comes from better design of the driving circuits and filters.
While I'd love a better transistor, there is absolutely no reason a good engineer can't design their own power supply. They aren't that difficult, (I'd rate them about medium) and you don't need a company for that.
Or they might be a supplier for OEMs. That could be a good idea, but information on their website is thin.
What isn't made in China?
Seriously, I want to know.
Most of the kit in my shop is not made there, but that's because it's higher-end test/development equipment and I'd not touch a "Made in China" oscilloscope/spectrum analyzer/etc.
Unfortunately, I don't know very many tech suppliers who make their stuff elsewhere, and I'll be needing some new computers soon. If I can find something not made in China I'll buy it.
Laser-guided munitions are steered towards their target with a laser beam yes; however, the guiding laser is modulated, usually at a fixed frequency, and of a specific wavelength. The pointers you can pick up at a store or online are the wrong colour, and continuous wave.
They "make" some good stuff
I'm designing for an ARM9 SoC right now. One thing to keep in mind though, is that ARM does not make processors (hence the quotes) and it is up to the actual manufacturer ie. Atmel, Texas Instruments, or whoever; to integrate the core with the peripherals like Ethernet, LCD controller, and so on.
When a design engineer talks about a good ARM part, they're probably thinking of the whole chip.
That said, they are great processors; especially for embedded systems.
My sister is currently studying genetics and molecular biology. While my field is physics and engineering, I do manage to glean some occasional understanding of the processes which make life work. One thing that surprised me however, is how un-organized and messy DNA, cells, and proteins are. From an engineering standpoint, the whole thing is held together with duct tape, baling wire and gum.
From this we get my favorite quote from her: "The best argument against intelligent design is to take a good look at the design".
Another issue here
My real concern is that this ruling appears to circumvent one of the primary motivations of the constitution; which is namely, to protect the Minority from the Majority.
"In the end, (the girl) would have us declare by judicial fiat that the public display of fully-uncovered female breasts is no different than the public display of male breasts, when the citizens of Indiana, speaking through their elected representatives, say otherwise."
It shouldn't matter who they elect or what they want. You can't vote out Free Speech or Equal rights. Protection from "the tyranny of the majority" was envisioned early on for the constitution, as argued in the Federalist papers.
They used a transmitter?
Why not get a laser listener instead? Bounce it off the window and you'll pick up everything without needing access to the room itself. It's how I did^H^H^H would do it.
Then again, they were obviously unfamiliar with the rules of covert intelligence gathering. Especially the covert part.
Lies, Damn Lies and Marketing
Apple _will_ admit its mistake. It will do so publicly and without condition.
Just wait for the next iPhone; the white version of the 4 I believe. Five internets says the antenna design is different and no longer susceptible to the death grip.
Then ask: If it wasn't a mistake, why did they change it?
Two containers, one higher than the other, one filled with water and the other with just a little water. Say a few centimeters. Fill a hose with water and place one end in the higher container, the other in the lower UNDER the water already present.
The atmospheric pressure will be equal on each end of the hose yet water will flow. Gravity does the work. The professor is correct and the dictionary was wrong. It happens...
Not odd at all
It's not at all strange that NASA still performed this test. After all, the thing was already built, and there was still a great deal of data to gather about how it performs.
In any event, they still learned how to build these safety systems (always good) and maybe now have some new ideas.
It would have been odd *not* to test it.
Why does everyone assume that the aliens would be studying or experimenting on us? Or invading or spying?
Could be they're just here to hang out; like a vacation spot. No subspace cell phones or whatnot. Like how some humans will travel to the middle of nowhere to relax.
Reminds me of an old joke...
A woman goes to the pastor of her church and gives him a note to read after the service.
"John Smith, having gone to sea, his wife requests the congregation's prayers for his safety".
However, being a little hurried, the pastor neglects to read the commas properly.
"John Smith, having gone to see his wife, requests the congregation's prayers for his safety".
I'd say given the size of the weapons in question, they're looking at recruitment. Given their size a mousetrap would do the job. Perhaps baited with a small knicknack...
Who else here would love to have the story image (the dead bird) as an icon? Love it. Make it represent the general failure of all that Web2.0 nonsense...
Right after it realizes the deviation of its position puts it in two places at once. Within its margin of error of course...
Canada has a tax imposed on the sale of blank media, supposedly to offset the money "lost" by media companies due to piracy.
When those companies lobbied to push privacy invading legislation, our government told them to sod off, saying that their "losses" were offset by the tax that they themselves pushed for.
While piracy is not technically legal here, no one is going to bother a home user for downloading anything.
Besides, I can't find the music I like in stores, and I'm sure as hell not giving my money to Amazon. (They give most of their "charitable" donations to the Republican party)
Check out the wikileaks site...
Notice how most of the people with the dumbest passwords are also the people with the longest subscriptions?
Just a small observation, make of it what you will...
are after all in the business of making money. It's generally in their interest to make things out in such a way that more people will watch it.
I would not be surprised in the least if it turned out that Paris was, if not actually intelligent, then at least average.
Certainly not the bumbling, stupid, ditzy barbie doll that the press made her out to be.
...can only be done with duct tape. That will keep out the evil nicely.
Re: The Answer
"is to not turn on the LHC. Until we do both Hawking AND Higgs are both right. And my cat is both alive and dead."
Yes, but they are also both wrong...
By the way, I nominate the word "Deiton" to become the official term for it if they do find this so called "lynch-pin" of existence.
the BOFH? Did no one here write in a vote for him? I must confess that I forgot about him, but think about all the politicians (bosses) that could be made to disappear.
I don't know what happened to other peoples Palm stuff, but I bought a Treo 600 about four years ago and haven't turned it off or had to reset it once. Ever.
I was prepared to get a Folio, but when that didn't turn out I got an Eee instead.
Palm really does make great stuff, and I hope that they can get their act together and keep competing, as there's nothing like quality competition to keep everyone else on their toes.
This reminds me of an old quote from alt.sysadmin.recovery...
"I still think 'Hello Kitty, Destroyer of Worlds' would be an appropriate name for a cruise missile."
Re Gaol vs. Jail
If "Gaol" is good enough for Oscar Wilde's poems it's fine by me. Mind you whilst I don't see it very often in everyday use, it is nice to see that some people stubbornly cling to proper usage of a language that, in my personal opinion, does not receive the respect it deserves.
Paris, because she didn't spend enough time in there.
To quote a great writer...
"Only Two possibilities exist: Either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying."
- Arthur C. Clarke
The Foleo was what I intended to get when I first received an email about it from Palm. Then I read (on the Reg no less) that the Foleo was scrapped before it even came out.
Then the eeePC came out. Since I still wanted a tiny laptop-like thing for extreme portability, I got myself an eee.
However, while I do love the eee, if it and the Foleo had existed at the same time, I would have chosen the latter, even if it cost an extra $100, as I've always been very impressed with palm stuff. I have a Treo600 that I got about 4 years ago and aside from one little incident involving a coin and the charging slot, it has never been turned off or reset; and it's never let me down.
What's with the Time Machine references? Just for fun?
Also, I think the plural form for the Eloi is just 'Eloi'... At least it was in the copy I have... Oh well.
By the way, Happy Birthday El Reg!
Indeed it is. The whole point of such freedom is to express your opinion on anything, even if it's offensive, misguided, or misinformed. By the same right, I can say what I think, even if it's offensive, etc.
The catch is however, that everyone else has the right to ignore you. I think that people should excercise *that* one a bit more than they do now.
@Joseph Zygnerski - That's a pretty good idea actually. Bogwitch, I think that was an *example*, not a standard document. Identifying objects is going to be MUCH harder for computers to do. As soon as I read that, I envisioned a picture of a pile of forks.
@Herby - Another good idea, but you have to consider the intelligence of the users. It may very well defeat them too... hmmm... That could be a good idea in it's own right :)
How I remember how to quit vi
Esc Escape this
: colon thing,
q Quit and do
Great article by the way.
As regards to this whole Windows vs Linux thing, I have never before spoken on this subject (at least not on the internet). I remember I read a software development book once that said there is really no *better* language than any other. It depends primarily on what you're trying to do and how well you know it.
While I personally have very little liking (or use) for Windows, I realize that Linux is not for everyone, any more than Windows is good for the clued individuals.
Remember, whatever a user can screw up, they will screw up. Time spent making software that aims toward user friendliness, is generally better spent making the user more computer literate.
@ all the people going on about current, voltage etc.
Voltage and Current go *together*. They cannot exist independently. Two points might have a potential difference (voltage) with respect to each other, but without a connection they have no current.
That said, yes 70mA can kill you; primarily by means of ventricular fibrillation. At a point past 110mA, the heart simply stops and restarts. This is what defibrillator does. That piece of equipment usually runs at 3000+ volts. The high voltage is needed because the resistance of the human body, through the skin anyways, is very high. They also use a conductive gel.
The little device employed by the wayward (pfft!) student won't kill anyone. Period. Even *IF* you were to connect it directly across someone's chest (which seems doubtful seeing that anyone smart enough to build one of these for fun is probably not that stupid) it still won't conduct enough to do harm. Remember the high resistance of the body? Resistance causes the voltage to drop across a conductor. With less voltage you get less current.
The skin contact resistance of the human body is about 5k to 10k. At 300 volts (and let's assume a resistance of 10k right hand to left hand) according to Ohm's Law the current flow would be I = V/R or I = 300/10000 = 0.03A or 30 mA.
Speaking personally, I too built a little stunner out of a camera flash and brought it to school. After they got over the initial fear that all stupid people have when they see something they don't understand (is that magic!?!?) they had a great time playing with it. They even asked me to build them some of their own.
It's becoming a very sad world; a place where curiosity and wonder are cruelly stamped out and replaced with indoctrination. This reminds me of that piece entitled "Mentor's Last Words".
"My crime is that of outsmarting you, something you will never forgive me for."
We need to separate school and state. There is a great article about this actually by a fellow named Sheldon Richman. http://jim.com/schools.htm
I can only hope you're kidding. Killing the net? Seriously? While bandwidth is finite in the sense that there is a limited amount of it at any given time, it is still not going to 'run out' and become a "scarce resource".
I think the problem that you refer to is cause by the fact that while the capabilties of home PCs have risen dramatically, particularly in the form of storage, the wires that connect you to the rest of the world are still the same tiny, noisy, unreliable things that Bell put up in the eighties.
The problem here in Canada is that Bell (much like your British Telecom) still owns and operates (barely) the actual pipes that give us the internet here (Nexxia). Even though Bell is not my ISP - a fact for which I am very grateful - my traffic still ends up going through their network.
And now we've come to the issue of this article, Bell has entered into a contract with a business to supply them with a connection of certain specs, and now Bell has decided to change the service. This is the problem here; since all roads lead to Rome, Bell still has ultimate control over the internet in Canada, no matter who your ISP is, you're still at the mercy of Bell and their "optimisations".
Oh man, this will take some thinking about. I guess I'll ponder it all day (rather than ponder work stuff) and make a selection around beer 'o clock...
Oh come on now, if there's a group sacrificing virgins they're sure as hell not going to waste the good ones...
Re: Glass is half full
I'd have to agree with that. What happened was a perfect "test". Everyone thought it was real (at first anyway) and did what they thought they should do. If it were me, I'd be doing some analysis of how it all worked.
As a business owner who runs some pretty critical software for businesses from cleaning to financial services, I check my UPS and backup systems regularly. It's a bit of a pain sometimes, but well worth it when the power goes off at one site for several hours or something.
A canary trap is a way of identifying *who* leaked a file by putting some unique identifiers in each copy you release. It is not intended to find out who is re-copying it.
Go on and re-read the book.
The Boss never learns...
...because they never last very long. Usually the Boss get fired (because of the Bastard); quits (because of the Bastard); or has a "tragic workplace accident" (again because of the Bastard). I think the Boss turnover rate averages about six weeks, just a little more than Beancounters.
What's the big deal?
I mean, web developers already have to make two web pages anyways. One for IE and one for... everything else.
Just adding a tag to your IE version would be simple!
Securing against stupidity.
I already do this. Everyone who gets me to fix their computer, family, neighbors, friends; gets a nice installation of Slackware. I set it all up, put the newest Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice, and such on and then don't give them the root password. I put them on my domain too, so they get an email address and a folder on the FTP server to stash stuff they might use elsewhere. Theoretically, I can log in and fix anything remotely too but that has yet to happen in three years.
So there you go, that's how I help to make the internet a better place. If someone has a way to stop them from posting stupid and inflammatory things on forums I'd be glad to listen as well.
@ David Wiernicki
50 Seconds to Start! Are you running^H^H^H^H^H crawling Vista? I have Winamp 5 and it loads the program and my 7000+ song playlist in less than 4. Granted though, my shoutcast is looking for DJ Tiesto, so that may be it... : )
I highly agree with this particular A.C. While I do not approve of the death penalty I would not hesitate to *prevent* the murder of an innocent person if the situation allowed for it, up to and including taking the bad guy out myself if need be.
However, executing them after the fact does no on any good. While the thought of conserving the precious oxygen that would otherwise be wasted on criminals like these does seem practical and even 'right', David Wiernicki s correct. The law must apply equally to all; there can be no special exceptions, regardless of the circumstance. In situations like this, when the evidence is (and everyone should agree here) very good; DNA, fingerprints, photo and/or video; a life sentence should mean exactly that. LIFE IMPRISONMENT. This murderer should know that while the state won't kill him, he'll NEVER set foot outside those prison walls again.
I think J.R.R Tolkien said it best in LOTR. Gandalf said that "Many who live deserve death, and many who die deserve life." I think that unless one can give life to those who deserve it, one has no right to give death either.
At least the current "ridiculously silly system of measurement" is based on something constant and universal. Water if memory serves... Certainly much better than how large some guys pedaling extremities were...
Wasn't Mercury the messenger of the gods in ancient mythology? The mission/orbiter name sounds more like a backronym to me...
It's not so bad...
With the "Tax" on media, the government basically told our "Recording Ass. of Canada" that since they're being compensated for their 'losses' they can't go after people for downloading. Hence, filesharing here in the Great White North is perfectly legal! Yay Canada!
- Vid Hubble 'scope snaps 200,000-ton chunky crumble conundrum
- Updated + vids WHOA: Get a load of Asteroid DX110 JUST MISSING planet EARTH
- 10 years of Facebook Inside Facebook's engineering labs: Hardware heaven, HP hell – PICTURES
- Very fabric of space-time RIPPED apart in latest Hubble pic
- Massive new AIRSHIP to enter commercial service at British dirigible base