Re: re: EV fuelling speed - Poor
kWh added: 55.13
How much though? The nearest charger to me that would be £43.55
at 3.6 miles/kWh my weekly mileage would cost £154 in your car.
Ouch.
625 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Aug 2007
Not just that. From the employers side: they want it to not be capex, but running costs.
I've had clients say that to me. They don't want to buy things, as that comes from the capex budget, they are happy to lease services at a much higher cost over time, because it's a different budget...
I was doing some work at a local NHS office which is one of the area disaster centre locations.
I'm not sure what they will do soon, as one of the jobs I did for them was to route a PSTN connection to their main meeting room, for disaster use.
Why? Well, all their phones are VoIP, and step one in their disaster plan for anything is: disable the internet connections and inter-site connections on all sites.
So the first step in their disaster plan was to cut the disaster management offices off from the world.
Hence asking when I was there if I could do something to get this one left over analogue line wired in.
Thankfully, this is SEP.
Client of mine was recently purchased by a larger competitor.
Small company: VoIP phones, Teams for chat type interactions.
Large company: Teams for everything.
Yesterday afternoon the small part lost internal chat functions for 2 hours, but everything else they needed was working.
But when they tried to contact their official tech support, they hit the issue that they couldn't message them (teams), couldn't telephone them (remote end telephones are via teams), etc..
It was interesting to watch from the outside.
We had a sales guy set his email to forward to his personal pipex account.
His next in line staff member went on holiday, and forwarded her email to him.
In comes a virus infected email our system didn't detect, but Pipex did. We had a single channel of ISDN, I got to see the tennis of rejected bounce -> forward -> rejected bounce as the email got slightly larger with the headers each time.
And Pipex's connection and sevrers were going to win regardless ;)
There was a programme years ago covering a cold trip, using arctic trucks and ford mondeo mk1s. The mondeos were only going like, 10% of the trip, and had to be left running over night to keep the engines going. One of them ran out of fuel at like, 3am, and froze. And lighting a fire under the car's engine bay was precisely how they got it going again.
My local FTTC cab shows evidence of someone trying to park in it, by the dent and angle..
The actual wiring green box is on the other side of the road, and has no power to it *nods*
Then there's a friend's FTTC cab, which is at the side of a roundabout. Not that it matters, as twice in the last 2 years, someone has parked a car through it, taking out connectivity for the area!
I close the windows when it gets to 16C...
Funnily, my house was marked down on it's energy report when I had my PV system installed for not having a smart thermostat. Seems having your heating maintain a temp/etc is more energy efficient then having the heating turned off. You'd think not having it on would be the more efficient option...
Also there's different use cases - I don't have my heating on to maintain a temp (infact I don't even have a thermostat on the heating), when it gets too cold I turn it on for a while. I can measure my heating use in a year in a few tens of hours. This is also almost the worse case for a heat pump.
So if I switched to a heat pump, I'd have to change how I use my heating to a model that will use a massively larger amount of energy then I do now.
Had some emails come in recently where I was BCCed in on a hybrid exchange system. I don't know if they screwed it up, or this is default, as we don't use any hybrid setups, we are either on prem, or hosted o365.
But when I looked at the header of the emails, I found the exchange system had put all the BCC addresses in a field, apparently to pass it to the external exchange side, that didn't strip it out.
So every BCC email we have had like this has had the BCC address list 'hidden' in the headers for anyone to see all the people it was sent too!
I used to be friends with someone who worked with some machines called "Deltas". The company was bought out and they were told all IT work had to be done by the new owner's IT department.
So my friend had one of their guys come out and look at the deltas in their racks. Guy looks at one and asks basically "what the fuck is that?"
"That's a delta."
Guy takes out a form and starts to fill in the details... "does it have a serial number?"
"X00001, the X is for eXperimental"
Guy looks at him, and then asks "How many of these are there?"
"5, X00001 to X00005"
"How many were built?"
"5..."
We had a fibre pulled into a building in the City of London. Contractors we being very cautious with it, down to radaring the wall.
We asked why, and were told the last job they did, the main tech (no longer with them) drilled into a wall and though a 44KV feed, taking out 4 buildings in the time it took the drill bit to vapourise, and they weren't making that mistake again.
You are correct, you could use the non-registered version in a business environment, in violation of the winrar licence, you know, the one time RAR labs do take action.
Or you could, as you say, use one of the other free versions... that don't exist. There's only one system that make rar files, and that is from rar labs. The only other programs that "make" rar files need rar.exe from.. rar labs to do it.
"Why would anyone want to make a rar file when you can just tell the other people (who are the ones that require) it that they can just change their work flow to match yours instead".
In the case we had, the supplier's helpdesk system would automatically unpack the .rar files and attach it to the ticket. Using rar.exe. The command line version does not support any format but rar, unlike winrar which does. So sure, you could send them a .zip file, or a .7z file, and they would (and did) close the support request due to not being supplied the diagnostic data .
9 was the furthest from the finger stop? None of your phones had a 0 then?
(also, making it 111 with loop disconnect dialling would mean a slightly broken cable would tap out 1 1 1 and call the emergency call system. A faulty line tapping out 9 9 9 is much less likely)
Client of mine was moved by BT Business from 4 channels of ISDN to VoIP Deskphones. Just one issue. BT can't provide a connection to run said phones, 16/1 adsl2 is the maximum the site can have as they are on the only cabinet not upgraded to FTTC on the exchange, and now that roll out is gone.
They did say they plan to provide FTTP between 2026 and 2028 to the site though...
So the deskphones? Each one has an EE sim in to give it connectivity to use VoIP.
On site dirt: Machines in Lime quarry. replacement policy was to buy a new machine, set it up for someone in the office, their old machine would replace the dead one out on site, to give at least some life span out of them. The Aircon for the computer room needed work every 3 years when the lime dust killed its external unit too.
Coffee company: all the desktop machines had between 3 and 5 cm of coffee grounds they had pulled out of the air in the bottom of the mini tower cases..
Machines that came into the workshop for work: "mouse issue" turned out to be "mouse has made a nest in the amstrad 486 AIO and used the motherboard as it's toilet"