419 posts • joined 13 Aug 2007
What are the odds the FCA will have any jurisdiction?
A.k.a. IPO to intensionally disregard an act of parliament?
They have a statutory duty to enforce the data protection act but seemingly they won't: are we to assume nobody will prosecute the ICO for what is an intentional breach of an act of parliament (i.e. breaking the law)? Or are we getting to the point that acts (laws) are really just for the newspaper headlines? Is that a valid defence for any breach of an act of parliament then: "well, I didn't think parliament really meant it"?!
It's only a matter of time.
The difficulty in moving email address is the only reason Yahoo! still exists.
How long can it carry on?
Dear Register: I don't run any ad blockers 'cos I realise what your revenue stream is.
That's my side of the deal: your side: NO embedded streaming adverts.
If it happens again, the blocker will be activated.
The Colony in Space
Or The Doomsday Weapon if you'd rather.
A decent enough Master-plan with quite a sad ending as I recall.
Small and juicy
An excerpt from a book of poetry or photographs can easily stand as a complete work in its own right. Its a shoddy affair.
Wiki-PR a "misnomer"
A PR firm that thinks it got their own name wrong?
So either they are very bad at PR or they are lying.
Or both of course.
A sick market needs some medicine
I've always thought that we should slow down the buy/sell system to allow some rationality back in. However, how to do so in our madcap multi-company, multi-financial market world?
My initial stab would be that if you buy a share in stock "X", you can't sell any shares in "X" for a period of time: enough time that you should have truly analysed the stock in question before making such choices.
I'm assuming a simple rule will be gamed almost immediately - and that's one of the main problems: the stock market has become a gamed system through hand through - so much so that large companies make deliberate buy/sell patterns in the hope of triggering automatic algorithms in the competitors to do silly things. What value does that have to the companies who's shares are the exploit tool of such behaviour?
"...it's just not possible to do everything at once..."
You could have planned for it some time in the last decade, but didn't.
You reap what you sow (which includes a failure to sow).
More like "we know about this security hole but don't really care"
Micro USB 3
That's three folks saying they hate it: no reasons as yet.
Care to share?
Can somebody remind me: why do Yahoo! exist again?
Happened on multiple occasions to multiple people? Unsolicited and without justification (not late yet). That's harassment.
Enemies aplenty rather, especially as it seems to consider its own population in that light.
The researcher has a clear POV: are the findings to be ignored then?
Are the points raised are utterly without merit because one doesn't like the POV of those giving them? The ideal would have been to commission a second report at the same time from one of the plethora of right-wing-think-tanks ('charities' apparently!) and then compare and contrast the two.
In "The Age of Austerity", do we really need any toothless (or muzzled) regulators?
What exactly does it do?
As the description in El Reg reads, this is not really a biometric ID, as you will never be able to reproduce that value yourself ever again - it's just a sexed-up really-hot-cup-of-tea to generate a suitably random number that is used from then-on (i.e. "once it has been established").
If only they asked first
For validating (and improving) decent page layout, following user mouse positions (or even just button presses) to determine what paths users actually use and trying to minimise the required mouse-movement for most users is an old technique. But please ask first!
The market gives a clear comment on his abilities
A big ego-knock, but I guess $1 billion makes it a tad less difficult to swallow...
But what to do? Politics is broken and the state is corrupt.
The security state is ever growing. You can't stop it, as there is no vote you can cast in our 'democracy' that actually represents your point of view, certainly no vote that will be count. Now what?
If you are three scope-branches deep or more in a single method, seriously consider refactoring the method to have a few clear-cut early returns at the top, or to call other methods / worker classes instead.
Re: Alphanumeric passwords on a phone?!
And on any website with a password you tend to browse on a phone.
In my case, for such sites I use "random" letters rather than numbers but it is still weak as hell.
Such are the limitations of using a touch screen to enter a password.
Enjoyed this article very much!
If the patents are of fabrication methods, and the methods were applied outwith the patented zone, would there be any infraction?
The anti-web 2.0 pattern
We all know the web 2.0: if you are not paying, then they are selling you.
Alas that's not enough for some: even when you do pay, you are still their property to sell.
It's not just pixel size and refresh rate
Don't forget colour resolution while we're at it.
The usual non-USA cost bias.
On amazon; $50 in the USA; £42 in the UK. After taking postal rates into account, I'll still be ordering from the USA.
Nobody's going to spin that there's an overt difference in marketing budgets or support costs in a book,. Or if they do, can somebody please shoot them?
A win from the outliers!
If we remove those who won't accept being Who and the comedians who won't be asked - what do the results look like?
On the first reason, you're spot on: charge what the market will bear. The second is to wall-up "the" market so it has no alternative via anti-free-market laws: i.e. ban grey imports.
So free-market pricing set the price, but requires non-free-market laws to maintain it.
Probably true on the legal writs but...
Wasn't the point of PRISM that they didn't have to ask?
And if they don't have to ask, they most certainly won't.
"As for looking a berk when using it in public, well, as a matter of principle I try not to use my phone when other people are nearby because I prefer not to inflict my conversations on complete strangers so it really wasn’t an issue."
You sir are a Gentleman!
Re: A wide variety of threats
A wide variety of threats
One assumes economic threats too then: i.e. rampant indurial espionage.
My first reaction to this interview was to start peering into the backgrounds!
Higher res PLEASE!
Always thought he would the part splendidly - and isn't doing much at the moment that I'm aware of.
Re: Congress may be more cooperative than you think.
Posted for the second time today....
The definition of an honest politician is "one that stays bought".
I still use my HP 4320 tablet for drawing or "paper-thinking": best tech buy I ever made. That, or my Nokia 6230i. Hmm....
Re: Waste of Space
The definition of an honest politician: "One that stays bought".
Re: Hold on!
Indeed: the suggestion is for graphine to act within a short-pulse laser system, not to be a lasing material itself. The odd thing in such systems is that you only have to make some beam directions/frequencies/phases less easy to traverse the resonating cavity than the rest, and the lasing material (whatever that is) will put most of its energy into the easy routes (via positive feedback of the stuff that gets though most easily).
As pointed out by a few, you can't have a single frquency and be a short pulse at the same time: a short pulse requires a range of phase-locked frequencies. But the definition of a laser can cope with that.
He who pays the piper...
Try Ikea: they're atually a charity. Really. Well, in tax terms (and a tiny charity nod to pretend its true).
Visual and dexterous imparement (e.g. post-stroke) are common in older generations. This proposal may not meet everyone's needs, but it will help a good number, and that's a plus for them. And it is simple, stupid.
Too many phone lines.
Is that a pun?
Not funny even if it qualifies.
"...rules needed to be fixed internationally and business needed to be consulted on those rules..."
Well it would certainly help if they were internationally agrteed: but there's always a weakling / vested interest who'll rock the boat, so if you wait for that, you'll be waiting forever. Establish rules for the magority and trade restrict the rest. Yes it will make all sorts of things harder. But the current system suits only the mega rich and there's no point in sticking with what is extremely broken.
As for business being consulted. Sod that for a lark. That's a governments task. Stop shirking and do your bloomin' job.
Follow the money
If Apple was just a non-profit making intermediary, I'd think the ruling unfair.
But as it stands Apple takes 30%, so time to do something for the money.
The old ones that were good ones.
I've only just retired my old 6230i this year. It was a splendid little phone.
personal vs business shopping
Am I the only one that uses -alibaba in almost all searches when shopping?
What the task says about the asker.
"...She has been tasked to work out how deploying tablet devices could help the management team better cope with the demands of their day..."
An interesting task in that it pre-supposes tablet devices will be given to the management team, even though there is (as yet) no proven business case to do so. Toys for the excs first; IT case second. Same-o same-o.
And who didn't know this?
Not exactly limited just to neuroscience.
- Fee fie Firefox: Mozilla's lawyers probe Dell over browser install charge
- 20 Freescale staff on vanished Malaysia Airlines flight MH370
- Neil Young touts MP3 player that's no Piece of Crap
- Review Distro diaspora: Four flavours of Ubuntu unpacked
- Did Apple's iOS literally make you SICK? Try swallowing version 7.1