Re: WHY DO YOU ALWAYS HAVE TO MAKE IT ABOUT POLITICS!?
"Donald, is that you?"
Absolutely not! It's publicist John Baron, who is totally NOT anyone named Donald!!
1715 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Feb 2007
They charged him with one count (at least) of access fraud (doing it himself) and one (at least) of conspiracy to commit (working with/facilitating others to do it).
With the "conspiracy to commit" conviction in hand, should they manage to catch anyone else in the group, the Feds can lean on him to rat on his co-conspirator, with the carrot of reducing his sentence. That might not have been possible without establishing that he, in fact, HAD conspired with the prospective "X".
It won't take anywhere near that long, since Icahn's strategy has perennially been to lumber the victim with the debt to pay for its own unwanted takeover, strip-mine it of anything salable to pay dividends to the stockholders, and leave the husk to declare bankruptcy and screw the employees, retirees, and other unsecured debts. It'll all be over in a year or two.
Well, he "was apparently given a (now removed) tracking number for his faithful friend," which implies to me that only the one for which he applied was approved, just the same as how one couldn't really claim that some dog picked up off the street was the same animal as one's fully-trained service dog.
"They also call for greater controls over 'the unconstrained marketing, sale and use of spyware' and a 'moratorium on the global sale and transfer of private surveillance technology.'”
I see their point but, honestly, I'd rather have some way of seeing, in clear, some vague approximation of what the current state of the art is in surveillance tech, rather than let ALL advances in it be done in government agency black projects without any reasonable chance of oversight.
...or am I being naive?
Exactly! I'm pretty tolerant of neologisms and generally easy to get along with (despite what everyone who knows mw says!), but one MUST draw the line somewhere and, for me, "productize" not only CROSSES that line, but leaves it sitting in the dust a mile back, shaking its head and saying "What the hell just happened...?"!
Not being familiar with UKIP's internal organization (We've got our own problems on THIS side of the pond!), my first thought was that "Braine" seemed wholly inappropriate for a member of that party. Having just looked him up online and confirmed that he really IS a Dick Braine, I now withdraw my original objection.
"...all those involved have promised that their current kit will continue to work..."
So, does this mean that all of those currently-existing devices with hard-wired credentials -- or no inbuilt security at all -- will still be available as potential access points into the new consolidated network? Well, THAT'S a relief!
The son-in-law is running his first D&D campaign as a DM and several of their friends, my daughter, and I (Yes; we're a family of geeks!) are playing, to give him a relatively safe and supportive first group. In our first fight, our half-orc finishes the last of the goblins attacking our party with one swing of his great axe.
DM: "Your axe cleaves the goblin's body in two. Blood and guts just spray everywhere."
Me: "Urrgh...! I hate axe body spray!"
Easiest EP I ever earned!
Well, automobile batteries run 30 - 50% sul[ f | ph ]uric in water, so you're that far along, anyway. ISTR the US Special Forces Improvised Munitions Handbook giving instructions for using battery acid for that purpose. (It also rather strongly recommended that you DON'T do this unless you really, REALLY need to -- but that warning pretty much holds true for ANY home-brewed explosives.)
Yes; definitely the chalk.
One small classroom in our Jr. High had the desks set two side-by-side, then an aisle, etc. One teacher, out of the corner of her eye caught two students seated together conversing while she was writing at the blackboard, stepped back and, with no wind-up, did this sort of elbow-and-wrist-snap bullet with the chalk that caromed off of one kid's head and into the other's. It was a thing of beauty.
This is the teacher who (in the same class, though not the same day) stepped backwards, caught her high heel on an uneven board in the floor (1920s-vintage school building), fell backwards and landed in the wastebasket, and nobody laughed.
She scared us.
"An American confirmed in this afternoon's press conference that the Russian authorities had co-operated with a mutual legal assistance treaty request..."
We can infer from this that the duo are: A) - not officially-sanctioned / protected by the right people, but; B) - limiting their exploits to outside of the Rodina, so we'll fulfill our treaty obligations but (elaborate shrug) it's not really our problem.
"While this might sound cynical, over the last several decades as an activist I have made billions and billions of dollars not only for Icahn Enterprise but for all shareholders by standing up to managements and boards that have refused to do anything that would change the status quo, which might mean threatening their huge incomes."
The cognitive dissonance is strong in this one.
The law should require the FCC to announce annually how many of the fines assessed had actually been collected -- both in terms of number of penalties assigned and dollar values.
Having to explicitly state how little they are doing / how ineffective they've been MIGHT have had a salutary effect on the FCC's activity levels; without that, I'm not expecting much change.
Don't know. Didn't hear anything that sounded like broken crockery when I picked it up. I took the box downstairs unopened, knocked and handed it over with an explanation of where I found it, and went back upstairs.
Just pointing out that the guy shooting hoops on my porch apparently had a far greater faith in people's packing abilities and the structural integrity of cardboard boxes than I do.
Years ago, the downstairs neighbors were expecting a package -- some fancy ceramic serving dish thingy that a relative had ordered online as a Christmas gift, as I recall. It was actually recorded as delivered, although the neighbors never received it. They asked if we had signed for it, which we had not. both apartments' front doors were accessible from an unlocked vestibule, so it was possible that someone had seen the delivery placed inside and had sneaked in and grabbed it. The delivery company eventually ate the cost and the seller sent a new dish as a replacement.
Flash forward about four months. After a long, miserable winter, the spring thaw had finally arrived and I unlocked the door to my apartment's porch, which was over the main entrance, to get some fresh air in... And found, sitting nestled into the last remaining mound of melting snow, a largish cardboard box, looking somewhat the worse for wear. Rather than leave the parcel on the porch or in the unlocked vestibule, the delivery person had TOSSED the box containing a CERAMIC DISH onto the SECOND-FLOOR PORCH, and hadn't noted that minor detail anywhere!!
They may not ALL be idiots but -- my ghod -- the ones who ARE skew the average all to hell!!
For years, children's letters to Santa were dropped in a special mailbox at the post office in the small town where we lived and, at home in the evenings, my mother and her co-workers would answer them, put them in envelopes addressed to the child and put them in the appropriate mailbox (or give them to the route carriers) when sorting the mail out in the morning. Being that it WAS a small town, there was a good likelihood that they knew the child, or at least the family, and could personalize the letters in a way that enhanced Santa's omniscience.
Damn. Where'd that mist come from, all of a sudden...?
"Insects "breathe" through their exoskeleton via gas exchange (...)"
Actually, I believe they breathe via spiracles -- openings in the exoskeleton which connect to the trachea, not permeation through the exoskeleton, and it's the size of the spiracles that limits their size.
In any case, however, the lower oxygen content in the Martian atmosphere clearly explains why the insects there today are so much smaller than the ones who attempted colonizing the Earth from there 5 million years ago/.
And, of course, it has to be remembered that it's being supported by Carl Icahn whose lifelong strategy involves getting control of ailing companies, loading them up with debt to pay for the buyout, strip-mining every salable asset, and leaving everyone but the preferred-level stockholders both broke AND holding the bag for the debt. So, from a stockholder's POV, the deal makes perfect sense.
From everyone else's, not so much.
"But it's exactly the sort of thing that some people will be willing to believe, or pretend to believe, and retweet."
A commonly-spread story in Massachusetts is that Boston's famously corrupt mayor (He served part of one term while in Federal prison on mail fraud charges!) James Michael Curley was the originator of the phrase "Vote early and often!"
A friend of mine had an uncle who had been politically connected to Curley and the Boston Machine who once chided him for attributing the quote to Curley: "Never happened...! Hizzoner was WAY too smart a politician to EVER say something like that... in front of anyone who would be likely to quote him on it!"
"Every - EVERY - Apple laptop keyboard I've ever used has offered about the same tactile reward as typing in cat excrement."
Morbid curiosity ALMOST tempts me to ask how you would possibly know to make this particular comparison, but "discretion being the better part...", etc., etc.
I can't speak to Sprint's namesake service but, as a customer of Sprint's PAYG "Boost Mobile"-branded service, FWIW, I have to say that I've been quite satisfied with the service, the coverage, and the price.
It would be lovely to think that that will all remain once T-M gets their hooks in, but I'm having difficulty believing it.
"The problem is not in private APIs or not. The problem is the rule said do not use them, developers used them and got away with it for a while, building their base and reputation, and now boom, no more private APIs."
I'm not a developer and have no idea how long it can take to recode an app, so this is genuine curiosity: How long SHOULD a company wait after saying "Coding Thing X is prohibited and all apps which use it will be removed from our repository"? Because, honestly, I've seen Apple get ripped by commentards here if they say something is prohibited and ban it and remove affected apps immediately, and here they are getting it because they didn't enforce the rule "soon enough".
So, is there a time-frame between banning a thing and actively enforcing that ban that is acceptable to the general community (ignoring the knee-jerk "AppleSux!" brigade who will always fault them)?
Well, appearances would seem to indicate that his boss doesn't like to hire people who might give the appearance of being smarter than him -- and any time he does (when blinded by his adoration for "strong" military generals, frex), they don't last long.
So-o-o-o-o-o-o... Yeah... Giuliani as cybersecurity czar makes total sense.