226 posts • joined 10 Aug 2007
The Good Thing™ about the Internet is: we can always route around the problem.
Keeping this pace in a few years the rest of the world will have route that don't cross the USA. And they will be "isolated", by their own actions.
Even the content industry will get out - it will be too hard to keep track of all the "speed payments".
Dibs on the first row. And a poppcorn, please.
"Really, if I want to jerk it to fat swedish lesbians covering themselves in butter and rolling around in a load of mud, why should anyone object to that?"
Exactly because You want it. Religion derives its power from guilty, simple as this. One incredible force drive is hysterics.
Step 1: Convince a person that $DEITY will torture him/her for all eternity, if some rules aren't followed.
Step 2: Make the rules. Be sure to make them weird, contradictory and (of course!) going against some primal instinct.
Step 3: As expected, everyone is guilty. Sell (one way or another) salvation.
Step 4: Profit.
That's the reason why sex gets so much flack. We all do it (one way or another), we all like it, and we are all born from it. It is the perfect thing to trip someone's guilt.
""only 682MB of free RAM after it boots the Android OS"
So the OS to run a pair of glasses has a 300+MB footprint before it does anything useful. How depressing."
Don't forget the memory to the graphics card. It is shared, and subtracted from the 1GiB.
Same thing with mobiles. They tout the memory - but forget to say it is shared with the graphics card.
"Never did work out what that extra 1 meant, the 100MHz should have implied a DX3 suffix."
IIRC, it was as follows:
"DX" -> With math coprocessor. The "SX" series didn't have one.
"4" -> Indicates a 4x multiplier. More on that later.
"100" -> The internal clock of the CPU.
SX 33 -> Did not have coprocessor, had an internal clock of 33 MHz and a bus speed of 33 MHz.
DX 33 -> Had coprocessor, an internal clock of 33 MHz and a bus speed of 33 MHz.
DX 50 -> Had coprocessor, an internal clock of 50 MHz and a bus speed of 50 MHz.
DX2 50 -> Had coprocessor, an internal clock of 50 MHz and a bus speed of 25 MHz.
DX2 80 -> Had coprocessor, an internal clock of 80 MHz and a bus speed of 40 MHz.
And, the weird one: The DX4 100.
It had a coprocessor and an internal clock speed of 100 MHz. But (IIRC) you could set the multiplier at 2x, 3x or 4x. So, it could work as a DX2 100, DX3 100 or DX4 100.
I believe, although not sure, that the DX4 120 went the same way.
"Apparently "Google Play Store" used 31.52GB in the last month. I don't let apps auto-update. I know I have unlimited traffic, Google, but stop taking the fucking piss."
Mine auto-updates - but only if connected trough wifi. :D
"I've educated my child to respect my belongings and those of other people.
In return, I respect her belongings and don't go moseying through her mail.
We don't need passwords in my family."
It is about containing the damage. A machine with, let's say, 3 users: One admin (with password) and two regulars.
The admin is (should be) safe from the compromise of one of the other two users. But, without passwords on the regulars, one could affect the other.
A big problem, to open your user and find everything encrypted, due to the other visit's to a bogus site...
Yes, my machine is password protected. Yes, my wife knows my password. Why not? I'm not keeping something from her - and it comes in handy, at times.
Re: Here comes the taxman!
"Yeah... but how much money do you owe them exactly ?
Since the value of Bitcoins can fluctuate wildly there has to be a
way to determine this "value" as a certain amount of "regular money"..."
Wouldn't be easier just to tax the bitcoins? You should pay (let's say) 15% of your bitcoins profits. If you profited 400 BTC, then you should pay 400BTC x 15% = 60BTC.
Since BTC is, now, real money in Canada... buying/selling BTC for Canadian Dollars wouldn't count as "profit", would it? It should be counted as changing money. Shouldn't it?
"They had perfectly good backups - the backups didn't fail, someone with the authority to do so deleted them! "
The backups DID fail. An off site backup is not "backup in another machine". An off site backup is "this backup of my data would survive, even if the whole datacenter got burned down in an attack".
This is an off line backup.
They could, for the sake of argument, have used Amazon to run the business - and another cloud provider (just to stay on the cloud) to keep the off line backups. I don't know. Azure? Google? RackSpace? Don't know, don't care - as the point is: it should be in ANOTHER company, not the same. And another location, of course.
Re: "This has nothing to do with the cloud..."
"It does in the sense that an actual old-school IT server room would likely have some actual backup tapes or portable HDDs locked up in a cupboard, or trucked away to a physical (not virtual) off-site backup. When EVERYTHING is in the cloud, then it is susceptible to hackers in the cloud."
But it doesn't. Because EVERY business should have off site backups. It doesn't matter if you use the cloud, a datacenter, a colocation or your basement. Ate least ONE copy of the backups should be kept off site - and not accessible by the systems being backed up (ie: the backup can access the systems, to do a restore or a backup - but the systems can't access the backups).
Yes, the single sign on system that Amazon uses made it easier. No doubt about it. But the absence of off site backups... that was just neglect, not a cloud problem.
"Why do the fools leave the Xbox turned on? Or doesn't it have that marvelous invention made famous by the Assyrians - an On-Off switch?"
I turn of my TV with the remote - but the pretty red LED stays on. It is in "standby", not "off". I could get up, and turn it REALLY off - with the mechanical button on its front.
But I'm lazy, and this way I don't have to remember to turn it on before use. Truth be told, my TV doesn't have mics or cameras - so it is not a concern.
Most people do the same with the Xbox - don't they?
Re: This: ... catch some proper crims
"Anything to keep them out of unmarked cars with speed guns is a plus if you ask me..."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but...
Wouldn't be better, simpler and safer, to just... obey the speed limit? No amount of speed gun will get someone bellow the speed limit.
And, if it is set too low, the traffic problems would send a clear signal that something should be changed.
Ok, ok. I'm going, no need to get the pitchfork.
Re: Can we apply this to printed bollocks as well as electronic bollocks?
"So the ICO can give a good kick in the profit margins to a company sending out 350k electronic spam messages, how come OFCOM (or somebody else) can't do the same to BT / Virgin / Sky etc for posting about the same amount of unwanted marketing material through my front door."
The reasoning, I believe, is that electronic SPAM is almost free - as in beer. When a company sends paper, there is a far greater cost - so, they tend to keep it at a minimum.
It is annoying, sure. But You don't get 500 brochures every day, selling pills to grow your... nevermind.
OTOH, I remember one convicted spammer - who got his address leaked. He received, I believe, more than a metric ton* of complains from his "customers". That was fun. :D
* To use an official standard: 238.0952 Jubs
Well, I live in Brazil - Niterói. I don't remember the last time I had problems with the payment system. Be it debit card (do you call it this way?) or credit card.
No system is perfect, and I am sorry to hear about your problems, but I can't say the plastic card system have being failing me.
Re: "the irreplaceable orbital station"
I'm more worried with the ISS5 seceding, backed by a bad tempered aliens.
OTOH, it will be the year we will make contact! :)
Because some people trade this stuff. It is quite common to mine one coin and trade it for another.
There are programs that do just like the stock market: thousands of small transactions, playing the few satoshis of difference between two exchanges.
And there are the clueless, that use the exchange as a wallet.
Re: first 10 days is when most fail
The difference is: The S5 are beeing replaced, aren't they? No one told the customers they pressed the camera button in a wrong way...
And it is, probably, a bad batch of cameras. A fuckup, no doubt, but hardly a fundamental flaw of the project.
And I don't even like Samsung...
"It increases battery life for those applications that do not use the surge of power functionality ... those that do use a surge of power will of course drain the battery quicker ..."
Yes, but that's not the point. The more we demand from a battery, the more it heats itself.
Think about someone opening a site from the mobile. There will be bursts of power, when the browser process all that HTML and CSS. And there will be quieter periods, when the browser is waiting for data or the user is reading the page.
The busier periods will generate more heat in the battery, as it will deliver more energy per second. With an ultracapacitor the draw is smoothed out, with the battery providing less energy for second, in a longer time frame. This will make the battery usage more efficient, since the heat does not increases linearly with the power draw.
No, it will not help someone playing games. But will help normal usage: spikes for loading a browser, surges from scanning wireless networks and whatnot.
"Clearly context is important as well. Someone wearing swim wear (men and women) at the swimming pool probably have an expectation to not be ogled at. However, at the beach, perhaps the situation is different. How does one tell if a man or woman is actively looking for attention or just wants to be left alone?"
You don't have to. Respect is the key. Say you see a beautiful woman at the beach. She is wearing a very small (and provocative) swim wear. Does she want attention? I don't know - but one thing is true:
You can go talk to her. She may go along, or she may not. As long as you are respectful, she will not (or shouldn't) mind.
Now, getting close, taking out the camera and flashing her butt at point blank... that's a no-no. It's all about common sense and respect.
This is EXACTLY what bothers me. A vessel of this kind would barely follow the waves. This is great with waves of less than... 10 meters? Above this, and the wave will hit the wind turbines.
Well, we can say they are not so critical. How about a 25 meters wave? The thing is 18 meters high - and due to the hull format, will not rise with the wave. Could she stand beeing at 7 meters depth?
And, yes. 25 meters waves ARE far more common than we imagine:
Re: Haha, why not Robocop?
"Cops shouldn't be comparing themselves to Terminator, who was, himself, a criminal."
Wouldn't it be a combatant? Else, a machine - and machines cannot be condemned.
"So while ASICs are now being created for LTC, graphics cards will stay relevant for other altcoins. "
Not quite. The others altcoins (well, most of them) use Scrypt, just like Litecoin. The specialized Litecoin hardware would be quite happy to mine others Scrypt based coins.
In fact, they are MORE profitable than Litecoin. They may be unstable, they will probably die on the long run. But it doesn't matter, as we mine and sell them at once.
The site called "coinwarz" has a comparative between various altcoins, with profitability included.
Re: All that effort
"Instead of mining, crack the passwords that protect coins already mined."
There are none. Well, not in the blockchain. The blockchain is made of transaction after transaction, in such a way that the later validates the previous. One could try to break this - but he would need MORE hashpower than the rest of the network combined.
At he moment the hashrate of the Litecoin network is =~ 68,9 gigahashes. To put it in perspective: a Radeon 7970 has about 750 kilohashes of processing power. To succeed at a 51% atack, one would have to get 51% of the processing power of the ENTIRE network. That means his own machines count too.
68,9 gigahashes are about 91258 Radeons 7970. Add enough boards that this one person would have 51% of ALL. It is feasible, but hardly lucrative. Especially since the heist wouldn't go unnoticed, and either the coin would crash or the problem solved.
42 is the magic number
-> I ain't Spartacus
I would upvote you - but the counter is at 42! I can't bring myself to mess with this! :D
Re: I don't give a **** about the TVs
Tell me about it. I could live with 1920, but 1080 is quite small. 1200 would be a world better.
Of course, 2560 on my monitor is better, even so 4k.
Re: let me be the first to say ...
Cthulhu, single handed, got you an up vote. All hail Cthulhu! :D
At least two
Agility 3 - 60 GiB.
Working like a charm. I must be the lucky one... Or the earlier series were bad.
Some of them mine too!
See this link. It's a datacenter BUILT to mine bitcoins. Built by AsicMiner - who make and sell mining hardware.
Re: Electricity is free is you steal it
I am not quite sure about it. The difficulty is so great that specialized hardware is used. The smaller of them does 5 Gh (giga hashes)/s. Is uses about 10W, and is a small cube. And people use this (and its big brothers, going up to 500 Gh/s miner - the size of a big tower home PC. It is against this that a bot network would go against.
To add a little perspective: a Core i7 3930k is quoted as going as high as 66.6 Mh (mega hashes)/s. A dedicated machine, fine tuned to do mining, and doing nothing else.
Sure, 10k slave machines would do some good. But what are the odds of the infection going unnoticed, when it is gobbling 100% of the CPU power, turning the computer in a home heater?
It is not that isn't feasible. It's just that I believe is more profitable to send spam and another nasties.
Re: Is it really that hard to ID a phone?
"... (or of the blacklists have to be synchronised, otherwise a stolen mobile could still slip on to the network)..."
Sure it is not so hard? There is no need to be real time sync: once a day would be good enough.
Every 3 hours shouldn't be hard: how many mobiles are stolen per hour - wolrdwide? 10k? 30k? Even 100k entries would be easy to syn once a day. Hell, Usenet lift a very heavier load in terms of messages/second - and has been doing it for years.
Remember: There is only need to sync the IMEI, the operator's code, the country and the time of block. What all this would amount to? 512 bytes/mobile?
It's obvious, isn't it?
"One way or another, the days when an iPhone doesn't know which way is up are probably drawing to a close."
It's up yours!
Re: why not try
"As for putting the phone in aeroplane mode, why not just disable the beeps for tweets, linked-ins and emails. Admittedly that doesn't save you from being woken by text, but then I don't tend to get early morning texts."
Sony mobiles have an app, called "Smart Connect", that allows You to choose actions to be performed when something happens.
Mine goes to silent mode, if a charger is plugged, between 23:00 and 7:00.
I believe Samsung has something on this lines too...
The DNLA software on my Viera is pretty much flawless.
(Plays everything from anything if there is a problem it is never the TV)."
Mine has its quirks - some settings not supported - but works fairly well. I'm used to stream FullHD, and works without a glitch.
"Actually I would say the extra size and weight would be the biggest con for most people. "
My 42" plasma has a depth of about 3 centimeters. I believe the LCD are in the range of 2, aren't they? Hardly important, as a few years back people were buying LCD to hang on the walls due to its thinness - 4 or 5 centimeters at the time.
"However, this isn't really news as Panasonic announced a while back it was getting out of plasma and has recently been heavily involved in the move to printing OLED screens."
I do hope they sort the OLED in time for my next TV. In about... 10 years? My Viera is new, and rock solid. Will change when it dies.
Re: Tough as old boots
Count me in. In my second Viera plasma TV. I'd buy a third without blinking.
Beautiful colors, great blacks, and excellent image all around. Sad to see, again, another case of a VHS trumping a betamax.
Re: Noise pollution
"I far prefer to be in a quieter environment and with fewer people talking at once so that I can actually make out what is being said."
I know what You say. There are times I want to walk around the pub - clubbing people into silence. :P
Re: I think you'll find...
"So called because dogs keep licking them, so they must be good."
Upvoted just for the explanation. I have always wondered why the "dog' s bollocks" would be a good thing... :D
They do port them allright. I play on Linux, and the games work flawlessly. Even Left 4 Dead 2 - still beta - is running very well.
Natural Selection is, as far as I know, perfect. As Team Fortress 2 and many others.
"Locking the users out when the system is infected seems counter-productive, since they'll have to get it fixed. If the process just sat in the background taking maybe 10% of CPU, it could run for years unnoticed. 100,000 PCs all dedicating 10% of their capacity to mining bitcoins could contribute a lot of cycles..."
Yes, the same question occurred me. But wouldn' t be better to use 100% of CPU?GPU, and drop the priority all the way down? This way the malware would stand a much better chance of getting by unnoticed.
At least on desktops - where there is no battery to run flat in about... five minutes?
Re: Its kind of pointless really
"The typical false negative rate is around 5% for these devices, where you are comparing a scan against a single specific finger print (the best case scenario), so on a typical day, they will have 15 people unable to sign in anyway..."
We use fingerprint based clock where I work. Yes, sometimes it doesn't recognize my print. Then, I put my finger AGAIN against the sensor. Costs me about 5 seconds more. boo hoo, the shame...
Re: Truth or consequences
"Mine is, "It you're bullied, hit them back and hit them hard"."
Hard, and where it hurts.
Re: 4K TVs need 4K content
"You may not want to junk your current set, but if you're in the market to buy a new tv... You will want to future proof it."
No doubt about it - but there is a pesky thing called ROI. Think about it: Today a 4k TV costs... 5 thousand? How much a Full HD TV costs today? I'm brazilian, so I don't know the price for You. But, for the sake of argument, let's say 1 thousand.
Question: When my FullHD get obsolete, will the 4k of the time be more than 1 thousand cheaper than the 4k of today? If the answer is "yes" or "it will cost exactly one thousand less", then it is better ROI to buy a FullHD today, and buy another one when the time comes.
"But the pleasure will be spoiled when part way through the interesting stuff, every flaming light flashes on, and the whole house starts bleeping, groaning and wheezing."
I could give a fuck for beeps and... Oh, wait.
Re: ssh person@kitchen
sudo make me a sandwich
error: could not find "ham_lib.so.2". Missing dependency.
Re: SSD are not reliable enough yet!
"One moment they're AOK, the next monent they're done for. They wear out and die - the more that is written to them, the faster they wear."
Well, bad luck DOES exist. Apart that, You will find that SSDs inform You about the wear of the cells. Consider this SMART output (from an OCZ Agility 3, 120 GB). Only the relevant part is showed.
177 Wear_Range_Delta 0x0000 000 000 000 Old_age Offline - 3
230 Life_Curve_Status 0x0013 100 100 000 Pre-fail Always - 100
231 SSD_Life_Left 0x0013 075 075 010 Pre-fail Always - 0
241 Lifetime_Writes_GiB 0x0032 000 000 000 Old_age Always - 100712
242 Lifetime_Reads_GiB 0x0032 000 000 000 Old_age Always - 571
As You can see, it reports the life left on the devide (231 SSD_Life_Left).
Yes, it does not help with defects, but is good enough so we can replace a drive BEFORE it goes "read only".
Re: You've got to be doing pretty badly...
"...to get in trouble breaking South American employment laws."
I don't know where You are from, but I'm Brazilian. I can tell You that our employment laws are far from abusive. In fact, there are people that calls them too protective to the employee. I will not discuss if this is accurate or not - but from the top of my head:
1) The standard work journey is of 8 hours, with one break hour in the middle to eat/rest.
2) There are limits to extra hours (2 each day).
3) The week work limit is 44 hours (monday to saturday).
And this is the tip of the iceberg. Mind You, I am not a lawyer.
I can't speak for the rest of Latin America, though.
Re: So why don't men run into as many assholes as women?
" Ask any woman who has just been groped on the Tube, or been propositioned and when the delightful advances have been rebuffed called vile names whether they have heard of men getting the same treatment and we'll say no."
I say "yes". I have been called "fag", "cock sucker", asked if I were impotent and so on. Just because, guess what, I rebuffed female (I'm male) advances online. And the insults were dished out by the female.
I don't know about the proportion, but to say women are saints...
Re: All at once or none at all
"For example, would an automated car be able to react well to a low-to-ground obstacle suddenly falling off the back of a truck? What about a child suddenly running out in front from between two cars (thus practically invisible beforehand)? Can the car detect small but significant patches of black ice? How will it react to an accident suddenly starting in front of them? And so on?"
Well, an autonomous car is not perfect - but so aren't we!
I'm not sure about the hypothetical box hitting the road, but would bet that the car would "see" it. Simple because it must knows where the sidewalk ends - and to that it must "see" things close to ground.
The child would be, at least, treated as another obstacle. The first priority (or one of them) is not hit things. So, the car would break/swerve in order to avoid the child. If it would be successful is another argument. But i'd risk saying the child odds would be better with a computer driving the car. Simple because it doesn't panic.
About the black ice... no idea.
Turn off the shields!
They know about the lasers! Butlers serve unto no one!
Re: Still not fully baked, but interesting.
"I also agree that a UCLASS can certainly outmaneuver a man-driven aircraft given that it can be made both stealthy and extremely agile. You see the problem with stealthy flying wings is that they don't handle high alphas well or rapid directional changes well. If they did then they wouldn't be stealthy. Ever see a B-2 perform an aileron roll, a loop? Remember that Boeing 367 was rolled on an early flight to prove it was good enough, but no one is doing that with one of these stealthy robots . . . yet. Think about such a wing-based aircraft dealing with a dogfight situation with multiple bogies and missiles flying all over the place. Just try programming that!"
I tought that F-22s and F-35s were quite agile. Aren't they? The B-2 is, indeed, more a flying beetle than anything else - but it is outdated technology. Their newer brothers are much better.
About the dogfight... in my opinion they would be MUCH better than humans. Not today, not tomorrow. But give it a few years of research and development...
A computer doesn't get nervous. It doesn't get distracted, and it have no problem prioritizing threats. It can, even, decide that self-sacrifice would be a good idea in a no-winning scenario. All it would have to do is avoid enemy fire long enough to do a kamikaze on target.
Like this: (in pseudo code)
"enemy fire detected. -> 5 missiles incomming. -> 3 enemy fighters and an enemy bomber (my target). -> evasion deemed impossible, no escape solution. -> alternate solution: evade long enough to explode/hit the target. -> EXECUTE."
The bigger problem isn't the capability/feasibility - it is just that people are afraid of let the control go.
- DAYS from end of life as we know it: Boffins tell of solar storm near-miss
- Put down that Oracle database patch: It could cost $23,000 per CPU
- Bose says today IS F*** With Dre Day: Beats sued in patent battle
- The END of the FONDLESLAB KINGS? Apple and Samsung have reason to FEAR
- Review Porsche Panamera S E-Hybrid: The plug-in for plutocrats