201 posts • joined Friday 10th August 2007 16:25 GMT
At least two
Agility 3 - 60 GiB.
Working like a charm. I must be the lucky one... Or the earlier series were bad.
Some of them mine too!
See this link. It's a datacenter BUILT to mine bitcoins. Built by AsicMiner - who make and sell mining hardware.
Re: Electricity is free is you steal it
I am not quite sure about it. The difficulty is so great that specialized hardware is used. The smaller of them does 5 Gh (giga hashes)/s. Is uses about 10W, and is a small cube. And people use this (and its big brothers, going up to 500 Gh/s miner - the size of a big tower home PC. It is against this that a bot network would go against.
To add a little perspective: a Core i7 3930k is quoted as going as high as 66.6 Mh (mega hashes)/s. A dedicated machine, fine tuned to do mining, and doing nothing else.
Sure, 10k slave machines would do some good. But what are the odds of the infection going unnoticed, when it is gobbling 100% of the CPU power, turning the computer in a home heater?
It is not that isn't feasible. It's just that I believe is more profitable to send spam and another nasties.
Re: Is it really that hard to ID a phone?
"... (or of the blacklists have to be synchronised, otherwise a stolen mobile could still slip on to the network)..."
Sure it is not so hard? There is no need to be real time sync: once a day would be good enough.
Every 3 hours shouldn't be hard: how many mobiles are stolen per hour - wolrdwide? 10k? 30k? Even 100k entries would be easy to syn once a day. Hell, Usenet lift a very heavier load in terms of messages/second - and has been doing it for years.
Remember: There is only need to sync the IMEI, the operator's code, the country and the time of block. What all this would amount to? 512 bytes/mobile?
It's obvious, isn't it?
"One way or another, the days when an iPhone doesn't know which way is up are probably drawing to a close."
It's up yours!
Re: why not try
"As for putting the phone in aeroplane mode, why not just disable the beeps for tweets, linked-ins and emails. Admittedly that doesn't save you from being woken by text, but then I don't tend to get early morning texts."
Sony mobiles have an app, called "Smart Connect", that allows You to choose actions to be performed when something happens.
Mine goes to silent mode, if a charger is plugged, between 23:00 and 7:00.
I believe Samsung has something on this lines too...
The DNLA software on my Viera is pretty much flawless.
(Plays everything from anything if there is a problem it is never the TV)."
Mine has its quirks - some settings not supported - but works fairly well. I'm used to stream FullHD, and works without a glitch.
"Actually I would say the extra size and weight would be the biggest con for most people. "
My 42" plasma has a depth of about 3 centimeters. I believe the LCD are in the range of 2, aren't they? Hardly important, as a few years back people were buying LCD to hang on the walls due to its thinness - 4 or 5 centimeters at the time.
"However, this isn't really news as Panasonic announced a while back it was getting out of plasma and has recently been heavily involved in the move to printing OLED screens."
I do hope they sort the OLED in time for my next TV. In about... 10 years? My Viera is new, and rock solid. Will change when it dies.
Re: Tough as old boots
Count me in. In my second Viera plasma TV. I'd buy a third without blinking.
Beautiful colors, great blacks, and excellent image all around. Sad to see, again, another case of a VHS trumping a betamax.
Re: Noise pollution
"I far prefer to be in a quieter environment and with fewer people talking at once so that I can actually make out what is being said."
I know what You say. There are times I want to walk around the pub - clubbing people into silence. :P
Re: I think you'll find...
"So called because dogs keep licking them, so they must be good."
Upvoted just for the explanation. I have always wondered why the "dog' s bollocks" would be a good thing... :D
They do port them allright. I play on Linux, and the games work flawlessly. Even Left 4 Dead 2 - still beta - is running very well.
Natural Selection is, as far as I know, perfect. As Team Fortress 2 and many others.
"Locking the users out when the system is infected seems counter-productive, since they'll have to get it fixed. If the process just sat in the background taking maybe 10% of CPU, it could run for years unnoticed. 100,000 PCs all dedicating 10% of their capacity to mining bitcoins could contribute a lot of cycles..."
Yes, the same question occurred me. But wouldn' t be better to use 100% of CPU?GPU, and drop the priority all the way down? This way the malware would stand a much better chance of getting by unnoticed.
At least on desktops - where there is no battery to run flat in about... five minutes?
Re: Its kind of pointless really
"The typical false negative rate is around 5% for these devices, where you are comparing a scan against a single specific finger print (the best case scenario), so on a typical day, they will have 15 people unable to sign in anyway..."
We use fingerprint based clock where I work. Yes, sometimes it doesn't recognize my print. Then, I put my finger AGAIN against the sensor. Costs me about 5 seconds more. boo hoo, the shame...
Re: Truth or consequences
"Mine is, "It you're bullied, hit them back and hit them hard"."
Hard, and where it hurts.
Re: 4K TVs need 4K content
"You may not want to junk your current set, but if you're in the market to buy a new tv... You will want to future proof it."
No doubt about it - but there is a pesky thing called ROI. Think about it: Today a 4k TV costs... 5 thousand? How much a Full HD TV costs today? I'm brazilian, so I don't know the price for You. But, for the sake of argument, let's say 1 thousand.
Question: When my FullHD get obsolete, will the 4k of the time be more than 1 thousand cheaper than the 4k of today? If the answer is "yes" or "it will cost exactly one thousand less", then it is better ROI to buy a FullHD today, and buy another one when the time comes.
"But the pleasure will be spoiled when part way through the interesting stuff, every flaming light flashes on, and the whole house starts bleeping, groaning and wheezing."
I could give a fuck for beeps and... Oh, wait.
Re: ssh person@kitchen
sudo make me a sandwich
error: could not find "ham_lib.so.2". Missing dependency.
Re: SSD are not reliable enough yet!
"One moment they're AOK, the next monent they're done for. They wear out and die - the more that is written to them, the faster they wear."
Well, bad luck DOES exist. Apart that, You will find that SSDs inform You about the wear of the cells. Consider this SMART output (from an OCZ Agility 3, 120 GB). Only the relevant part is showed.
177 Wear_Range_Delta 0x0000 000 000 000 Old_age Offline - 3
230 Life_Curve_Status 0x0013 100 100 000 Pre-fail Always - 100
231 SSD_Life_Left 0x0013 075 075 010 Pre-fail Always - 0
241 Lifetime_Writes_GiB 0x0032 000 000 000 Old_age Always - 100712
242 Lifetime_Reads_GiB 0x0032 000 000 000 Old_age Always - 571
As You can see, it reports the life left on the devide (231 SSD_Life_Left).
Yes, it does not help with defects, but is good enough so we can replace a drive BEFORE it goes "read only".
Re: You've got to be doing pretty badly...
"...to get in trouble breaking South American employment laws."
I don't know where You are from, but I'm Brazilian. I can tell You that our employment laws are far from abusive. In fact, there are people that calls them too protective to the employee. I will not discuss if this is accurate or not - but from the top of my head:
1) The standard work journey is of 8 hours, with one break hour in the middle to eat/rest.
2) There are limits to extra hours (2 each day).
3) The week work limit is 44 hours (monday to saturday).
And this is the tip of the iceberg. Mind You, I am not a lawyer.
I can't speak for the rest of Latin America, though.
Re: So why don't men run into as many assholes as women?
" Ask any woman who has just been groped on the Tube, or been propositioned and when the delightful advances have been rebuffed called vile names whether they have heard of men getting the same treatment and we'll say no."
I say "yes". I have been called "fag", "cock sucker", asked if I were impotent and so on. Just because, guess what, I rebuffed female (I'm male) advances online. And the insults were dished out by the female.
I don't know about the proportion, but to say women are saints...
Re: All at once or none at all
"For example, would an automated car be able to react well to a low-to-ground obstacle suddenly falling off the back of a truck? What about a child suddenly running out in front from between two cars (thus practically invisible beforehand)? Can the car detect small but significant patches of black ice? How will it react to an accident suddenly starting in front of them? And so on?"
Well, an autonomous car is not perfect - but so aren't we!
I'm not sure about the hypothetical box hitting the road, but would bet that the car would "see" it. Simple because it must knows where the sidewalk ends - and to that it must "see" things close to ground.
The child would be, at least, treated as another obstacle. The first priority (or one of them) is not hit things. So, the car would break/swerve in order to avoid the child. If it would be successful is another argument. But i'd risk saying the child odds would be better with a computer driving the car. Simple because it doesn't panic.
About the black ice... no idea.
Re: Still not fully baked, but interesting.
"I also agree that a UCLASS can certainly outmaneuver a man-driven aircraft given that it can be made both stealthy and extremely agile. You see the problem with stealthy flying wings is that they don't handle high alphas well or rapid directional changes well. If they did then they wouldn't be stealthy. Ever see a B-2 perform an aileron roll, a loop? Remember that Boeing 367 was rolled on an early flight to prove it was good enough, but no one is doing that with one of these stealthy robots . . . yet. Think about such a wing-based aircraft dealing with a dogfight situation with multiple bogies and missiles flying all over the place. Just try programming that!"
I tought that F-22s and F-35s were quite agile. Aren't they? The B-2 is, indeed, more a flying beetle than anything else - but it is outdated technology. Their newer brothers are much better.
About the dogfight... in my opinion they would be MUCH better than humans. Not today, not tomorrow. But give it a few years of research and development...
A computer doesn't get nervous. It doesn't get distracted, and it have no problem prioritizing threats. It can, even, decide that self-sacrifice would be a good idea in a no-winning scenario. All it would have to do is avoid enemy fire long enough to do a kamikaze on target.
Like this: (in pseudo code)
"enemy fire detected. -> 5 missiles incomming. -> 3 enemy fighters and an enemy bomber (my target). -> evasion deemed impossible, no escape solution. -> alternate solution: evade long enough to explode/hit the target. -> EXECUTE."
The bigger problem isn't the capability/feasibility - it is just that people are afraid of let the control go.
Re: re: 'once they look sufficiently human.'
Good old Assimov been there already.
1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2) A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
As for rights... well, they had none.
Re: Good article, but does the punter care?
"People go for the numbers, and don't even know how to appraise the quality!"
Up to a point, yes. No doubt people will buy the TV with most "X" (whatever it is). But they can see the difference alright: I have seen the reactions.
I have a plasma Panasonic, 42". It isn't the best of all (of course), but it is fairly good. And is better than most, here in Brazil. One thing I always hear is "your TV has a much better image than mine!". From people who knows nothing about it - just watching something random.
So, yes. People will buy numbers and marketing - but (sadly) then can see the difference when rubbed on their noses. But, by then, will be too late: they will already have bought into the drivel.
"The last thing I want to do is get off the sofa and fiddle plugging my phone in with a cable! And then I either need a long cable trailing the living room, or have to get up everytime to change the video or volume! And what if I want to use my phone whilst I'm watching TV?"
You don't have to. HDMI provides this functionality, built in the standard. Panasonic calls it "Viera Link". Sony says it is "BRAVIA Link" or "BRAVIA Sync" - and so on. I used it with my Sony mobile and Panasonic TV. I could play/pause and stop. Didn't check much more, but...
"...Smart TVs => dying species."
I'm not sure about it. The reasoning is sound, but...
Wouldn't it means smart TVs with more processor/memory? All in all, smart TVs are more expensive - hence, more profitable.
Re: 'tis an ill wind
I believe he is using another set of nerves to control the movement. So he is like a baby - still learning how to move his arm.
But is extremely cool! To think about all the people that will have a new life out of this tech...
"My HTC phone is on its fourth, maybe fifth, battery. OK, it's three years old. Maybe batteries have improved in that time, but I don't suppose they've become immortal."
What do you do with your batteries? I have a Nokia E66, and its (first) battery is still good. My "old" Xperia Arc is dead (corrosion), but its (18 month and first) battery was just fine. No noticeable drop on capacity whatsoever.
My girlfriend’s Galaxy S2 (about 18 months too, and first battery) works just fine.
Re: Concert spending
No! No! Never! Since is a "rational decision", "freetard" will be, henceforth, known as "freesmart"!
Re: Seems counterproductive...
I remember this. But, at the time, I got the idea they were doing it WITH the consent of the authors - or with books on public domain. Is it not the case?
Re: Seems counterproductive...
Well, they are complaining about Google. Is there another presence of Google than the Internet one?
Where would Google show a book (whole or part of) that wouldn't be the web?
Well, there's Android. But last time i checked it wasn't showing books others than returned by a Google search...
Re: Seems counterproductive...
robots.txt is your friend.
Last time I checked, Google's crawler honored this little bugger.
Don't want your book indexed? Fine, restrict it with robots.txt.
Re: 3x performance
Well, I can't say if his numbers are right - but I agree with the feeling.
You see, it's marketing. You (marketing guy) are paid to make the product look good. How do You do it?
1) Take an average measure of your opponent.
2) Craft a test where Your product excels
3) Compare them.
It's not just Intel that does it. All business are guilty of this kind of thing. If it was reverse - and were a press release from ARM - I would think the same thing. Just reversed.
But there ARE uses for this!
This one isn't pretty - but it's a prototype.
Even ugly as it is now, I can think of one general use to it: using augmented reality to help in some jobs. Think a warehouse, with 2D barcodes on the creates. The glass could overlay significant information to the worker.
Another (more controversial) use would be to sales people. A customer gets in. The glass does a facial recognition, and brings up the client's preferences/order. I know, I know. There are a lot of people who wouldn't want/like/accept this. I'm just showing practical uses to the tech.
If we stop and think a little, there ARE professional activities wich could be enhanced by this.
Re: "It was hoped that the X-51A would break Mach 6"
True, it could have got past MACH6. But if it had, they would advertize it as "greater than MACH6". By the same logic, it could have got faster than MACH 10 (it IS faster than MACH5). But they would say it, don't You think?
Is it really this bad? I have been using Seagates on the desktops (about 20 of them, with a service life of 3 years) for the last... six years, I'd say. I believe ONE of them failed me - and was a SMART alert, not a suddenly dead disk.
Maybe I'm lucky... :D
Re: Good news
"You must have missed the last paragraph of the article. Microsoft will take their pound of flesh, whether by 'innovating' or by lawyers."
Up to a point, no? Think about it. If (and only if) the OEMs are going to sell something without Windows installed, is only a matter of time before they start selling something WITHOUT an OS installed! Microsoft is stalling this, saying it is all about piracy - but we know that is not true.
Google OS is Linux. Well, Linux kernel, and (to my argument) all that matters. Why? Because the drivers (sorry, modules) come WITH the kernel! A hardware that runs a Google OS will, probably, run on a standard distro!
A dream coming true... :D
Do not sell: lease it, with a buying option at the end of the contract. Problem solved, and no one would get annoyed.
With the right values, it would cost the same 1500 at the end of the projected beta period.
Re: If you don't know who the sucker is...
Yes, if someone loses the wallet, the bitcoins are gone.
Yes, bitcoins will be more valuable over time, due to the above problem.
I don't know if the value will grow massively, or at a fast speed. But your idea is, basically, correct.
Re: Gold is mined out of the ground.
Not quite. To mining bitcoins the ATI hardware is much better. Much better as to be about 6 times faster than NVidia hardware.
It doesn't mean one is better/more evolved than other. It is, rather, a byproduct of the architecture of the silicon.
NVidia, on the other hand, is faster to folding proteins - or so I've been told.
Re: Obscure, vague and I wonder; more expensive?
You can buy two kinds of "disks" at AWS: a cheaper one - with no guarantees of IOPs - and a more expensive one - with a base level of IOPs.
If they honor the IOPs I can't say, but the concept exists.
Re: FMS routing changes
True. Now, think about this:
1) The autopilot will do the landing. I don't know how common it is, but it's not rare.
2) Send the wrong altitude, off by 2 or 3 meters.
Or I got this wrong, and the system in question is not linked to the autopilot?
Re: I don't get it
I didn't know that! We learn something new every day... :D
Re: Similarities with Ponzi, similarities with property, new stat-ups, tech...
"There is one clear similarity with a Ponzi scheme. Mining for bitcoins gets harder as time goes on, to enforce scarcity. When it first kicked off, you wouldn't have to spend so much money on electricity and hardware to get a higher amount of bitcoin out."
Wrong. For starters:
1) No one said You would receive an "X" value/product. You have the bitcoins You bought/received/mined - and that's it. If there is no delivery promess, there is no Ponzi
2) Mining for bitcoins does not get harder as times goes by. It gets harder/easier based on the number of bitcoins mined on a given period. Really. Check it out. The difficulty is adjusted in order to keep the mining of about "Y" bitcoins/day. If, for some reason, the number of mining machines goes down, the difficulty level follows.
3) There is a finite number of bitcoins to be mined. By design, and since day one. There is, also, a timeframe for this to happen - hence the changes of difficulty. It is weird, but we can have a rough idea of how many bitcoins will be mined each day.
I can't comment on the affirmative of the difficulty of early days. But I can say that it IS feasible to a new player (a new miner) begin today, and make some money. You don't have to be an old player, because You CAN mine for yourself - and the mining isn't affected by the number of bitcoins You already have.
Re: Every so often a market develops around something improbable
True, we can't be sure of this.
OTOH, a site could charge in bitcoins to avoid dealing with (an example) credit cards and its costs. It would receive the bitcoins and ship the product.
As soon as the (bitcoin) transaction is confirmed, it could sell the bitcoins in a local exchange - turning it in "hard" money, and avoiding this problem.
Re: I don't get it
It is a reaction engine: You accelerate something, and the reaction pushes the ship forward.
The thing being accelerated gets up to 30 km/s (if I got it right). So, this is your maximum speed: 30 km/s. I believe that, after 3 days, the spaceship would be at that speed - or close enough to make no difference.
That would be why You turn off the engine after 3 days - would make no difference.
- Xmas Round-up Ghosts of Christmas Past: Ten tech treats from yesteryear
- Analysis Microsoft's licence riddles give Linux and pals a free ride to virtual domination
- Review Hey Linux newbie: If you've never had a taste, try perfect Petra ... mmm, smells like Mint 16
- Special Report How Britain could have invented the iPhone: And how the Quangocracy cocked it up
- Massive! Yahoo! Mail! outage! going! on! FOURTH! straight! day!