McCain would've bought an A380
I'm just sayin' is all...
226 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Aug 2007
The 787 is an ambitious project. Not just in terms of the final product (most fuel effecient airliner ever, a whole new class or plane designed to be used in a way that has never been practical before, featuring key technologies that have never been off the testbench) but the many brave predictions Boeing made about its development - I believe it is the shortest project ramp-up, the most complex risk-sharing arrangement, the shortest test program and the fastest (projected) production rate increase they have ever attempted.
The whole thing seems predicated on the idea that "Nothing can possibly go wrong". So far they literally can't even get the nuts and bolts right. The boys in Seattle and Chicago seem to have forgotten that Murphy was an aerospace engineer.
Now listen, I hate the Daily Mail as much as the next man but I think Cluley is correct - it is the responsibility of ad providers to ensure they are not serving malware to their clients. And, as he pointed out, it is the responsibility of the of webmasters not to do business with ad suppliers who can't manage this. This has nothing to do with the Daily Mail and their competence or otherwise in the IT field, it's a universal aspect of Internet security.
The enshired right of first sale means that once you've bought something you own it and it's yours to do with whatever you want. Stick it up your nose, set it on fire, install it on a PC, whatever.
In the specific case of software it's a bit trickier because software is "licensed for use" via a contract agreement, not sold. However the legality of unsigned, shrinkwrapped buy-before-read EULAs is still something of a grey area by my understanding - it hasn't been proven decisively proven in court yet whether these have the same weight as a traditional contract or not.
There was a case a few years ago where Microsoft tried to sue someone for selling unwanted "OEM" copies of Windows on eBay, but I think they ended up dropping it due to bad publicity.
Not all Windows exploits rely on Internet access. An unpatched Windows box can be a security risk even if it has no network connectivity at all. And in this case the box obviously had some kind of networking setup so the users could access it via thin clients.
The real WTF here is why they weren't using WSUS or any one of the other available patch management products to keep this machine up to date, rather than the much riskier method of allowing access to the Internet from an inmate-used system purely for Windows Update. Hell, they could have used sneakernet to patch it in a pinch.
OK I'll bite, how does one destroy and/or defeat an enemy using Cyberwarfare? Assuming the enemy isn't a web server.
About the best I can think of is a large-scale psyop to send fake orders through the enemy's C3 network telling everyone they lost and need to surrender. But that's not particularly likely to strike a decisive blow.
Why set a top limit at all on memory at all? Let the chipset and RAM guys worry about how much memory you can cram into two DIMM slots.
P-ATA seems like a waste of money too - if you've only got two drive bays you might as well fit them both with SATA devices. P-ATA may be an option for optical drives but it's seriously old hat.
I for one think Micro-ITX is a great form factor, but it almost seems as if VIA doesn't take it as seriously as the "big rigs" like ATX.
Better criminalize cars then AC, since they're involved in 100% of fatal car crashes. And horse riding too, because that's involved in 100% of fatal horse riding accidents.
Better criminalize electricity because it's involved in 100% of electrocutions.
Better criminalize immersion in water because it's involved in 100% of drownings.
With all due respect, you're a loony.
"I take it this was tongue-in-cheek? 29,000 units in use - somehow I don't think we're too afraid of sex. :)"
Depends if by "we" you mean "me and my mates" or "the government".
This line is my favourite:
"Education for parents and teachers as well as children is a priority."
The Government now needs to spend money educating adults as to why ISP-level censorship is good for them.
Yes you can. And yes, presumably you will need to approve these updates in WSUS as well.
I reckon when XP SP2 was released there was a moderate-sized kerfuffle because it turned out some places don't actually use WSUS (or equivalent) and set all their PCs to individually download (and automatically install) all updates from windowsupdate.microsoft.com. This is Microsoft's way of pandering to those freaks.
Also if you have a single WSUS realm I guess you could use this tool to selectively deploy the Service Packs after they have been approved.
Hi Wade, I'm confused by your last statement, can you clarify it please?
Are you describing the Warner execs who haven't made plans to put these titles out in both formats as "fanboys"? Or are you saying that the logic behind not to putting these titles out in both formats (assuming they are leaning towards Blu-ray) is not apparent to the public?
Thanks
- Adam