331 posts • joined 1 Aug 2007
Re: We have arrived at the stage
Or you could swap the bell for something that doesn't wind the dog up?
I guess it's because the patent covers an artefact that you actually have to produce yourself, whereas copyright covers the artefact itself.
A counter analogy would be, why should property copyright have limited duration when my home ownership is never ending.
The home I leave to my children doesn't revert to public ownership after 70 years so why should that photo, that I spent a lifetime training and perfecting my craft such that I was able to capture it?
Having been part of the team that sold the business for current share price + 24% I doubt many of the companies owners will complain.
Re: In it for the kill
Maybe, just maybe and call me insane here, the hedge fund are in it for the money.
MS have invested big in Azure to the point where they are a serious competitor in the field. Looking ahead now all those companies (and like it or not there are a few) who haven't made the leap to cloud yet, but are running windows, will be faced with a decision of which cloud provider to choose.
Now imagine a PHB in his office faced with the choice between Azure and AWS. He sees amazon, he thinks "books" he sees Microsoft he thinks "laptop". I know we all like to think we live in a world where the people signing off on contracts are tech savvy, but those companies are not going to be the lucrative contracts they are going to be the ones that monitor tech costs like a hawk.
So to recap, of the bulk of companies that represent the future cloud market, the ones likely to make poor buying decisions will go to Microsoft.
And it's not a direct citation but:
Shows the breakdown of share ownership in the uk, 44.6% of shares are owned by pooled private funds. (Aka hedge funds) I guess to assert that hedge funds break up companies is to assert that almost half of all the companies on FTSE are actively being broken up.
(Note the opinions above are merely opinions and are in no way based on research or prior knowledge)
Nothing beats astronaut.....ever!
Sorry, i know its sad, but when I first saw that ad, it totally cracked me up.
Mines the one that smells like bad deodorant.
I thought that the whole point of raid was that the expectation that a drive would fail and the system could carry on.
Surely the question becomes one of performance improvement over maintenance cost. Given that you are going to be replacing drives more frequently, is the increased maintenance cost less than the increased revenue from having faster drives? If so, use SSDs if not don't. I would hazard to guess that across the industry their are relatively few applications that would provide a net benefit.
Actually, by not paying a dividend when they patently could they are directly affecting the share price and as a result not acting in the best interests of the share holder. Einhorn isn't a philanthropist he is a capitalist, he has provided capital for Apple to operate and now he wants his return.
Re: Why get back in the car?
Re: Why get back in the car?
If he's disabled he might have had no other usable means of transport.
Oh, we'll that makes using a car that he knows to be defective perfectly alright then.
Re: the cause of death is organ failure
I always thought that everyone dies of the same thing...lack of oxygen to the brain.
Why not simply make licensing subject to vat/import duty?
It's this small idea called capitalism.
The reason cars don't have 8 tracks or tape players is because it is no longer commercially viable for the manufacturer to include support for those features. The same applies to software. At some point the company has to make a call as to whether or not a given feature is economically viable to include in future versions.
Or would you rather that the new versions included a legacy feature tax in the price to pay some engineers, analysts, qa, localisation, managers etc to maintain that feature in all future releases?
Down vote away, but the OP did ask for an explanation.
Re: Why are they trying to make this the Ushers problem
Totally agree, ushers are there to...well...usher people to their seats for the performance.
Why do the only people making real money out of movies expect everyone else to police their terms and conditions.
Not Friday yet, but have a cheeky one on me, it's Christmas.
Re: Funny you should mention 'pantheon'
They are all small gods waiting for people to believe in them.
Re: An amicable agreement
It's a wonderful example of the prisoners dilema, if all the companies cooperated then they would all suffer minimal costs and could freely innovate. If one of them sets out to gain the patents then all would suffer substantial costs and innovation would be stifled.
I've always thought that the duration of a patent should be based on returns. Once a patent has returned the research and development costs and given the inventor a healthy return then patent protection no longer applies. This should apply particularly where a patent is considered a component of a bigger system.
Re: Rage on
To be fair to the original poster, I have heard the term big four used a lot when talking about companies but in tech circles or at least dev circles Gang of Four refers to a specific group of individuals and more commonly a specific book.
I guess the corporate GOF would rather appear more like wise gurus than the corporate pirates that they really are.
I wonder if by "average citizen" he means, the subset of all Athenians that are not slaves and not the sum of all people that live and work in Athens. I believe this to be an important distinction because it is essentially like saying the average person at Cambridge University is genetically disposed to high intelligence (not counting all those people who clean the floors, cook food etc etc)
I was a rabid GTA fan boy but IV put pay to that. It's not that the game was bad but it wasn't true to the GTA lineage of bigger badder and more ridiculous. Bailing a jeep out of the back of a cargo jet however, is pure GTA! Soon as I have confirmation that the annoying, friends phoning you up to whine mechanic is gone, I will put in my preorder.
Of course, I might be willing to put up with incessant friend nagging if the combine harvester mission gets included again.
Re: Email the Judge in the Samsung case.....
Portable display device, yeah good luck defending that one. I got a digital picture frame that shape for Christmas in 2003.
Re: We live in a world where there is choice
Your argument is only slightly flawed, Starbucks themselves are the very antithesis of your argument. They charge a premium for a product that is exactly the same as everyone else's. and yet, people pay the higher Starbucks price, why?
How high would a tax have to be before Starbucks stopped seeing a profit big enough to warrant having outlets in the UK? This is the point at which Starbucks would leave. Whilst there is a profit, there will be a company there to exploit it.
Re: Self-employed Milkmen, eh?
I'll take a stab at it,
Hmrc introduced IR35 which is supposed to apply the test of "on the balance of probabilities is the contractor actually a disguised employee". (The sheep in wolves clothing test)
They could by the same definition introduce a "on the balance of probabilities is the company just making that foreign payment in order to avoid tax". What I like to call the bunch of robbing bastards test. If they pass the test then the payment be treated as profit and not an expense.
Mines the one with the PCG membership in the pocket.
You my friend make a very salient point. An import on ip is exactly what is needed. Corps have found a way to put a value on something that is tax free. IP is exactly what this is, for a company to take money out if the system (country) it has to be assigned as an expense of the company. Normally this would be assigned to something that had been imported but as you quite rightly point out all that has been imported is the IP. If import duty was assigned to the value of the IP that was extracted then everything would balance. The company can show as big a loss as it likes because it will have paid some form of tax on all of its expenditure.
Re: The punishment is way too light
Up voted by me, I used to be an avid cinema goer, but have given this up nowadays in favour of on demand services. The biggest turn off to the cinema is not the people who love the sound of their own voice so much that they can't shut up for 2 hours, not the overpriced "refreshments", not the mortgage sized face value of tickets. It is the simple fact that on the balance of probabilities any film that a cinema is showing is nothing more than an overhyped over dramatic pile of special effect sequences shown in no particular order and generally for no particular reason.
Here's an idea, when the producers sit around deciding what film to make and how to go about it, rather than getting the worlds best marketing people and advertising executives in a room with a group of special effects technicians, maybe (and I know I am out on a limb here) you should start with a writer, and a plot, and maybe a script. The cinema "experience" is still one of the best forms of entertainment available it is just a shame that the actual content has sunk to a level akin to watching a porn film starring Jo Brand.
Mines the one with the frog pills in the pocket.
Re: I disagree
You can waste a courts time with rounded corners patent cases, you can bitch about the verdict to the press, he'll you can even call the judge names outside his own court if you like. But Judges get real funny when they issue an order and it doesn't get followed. People that don't do as they are told by a judge generally go to prison.
My guess is that they would go with the language of Europe, Esperanto.
I am curious, is this sort of thing a self generating Media frenzy or do the picture companies drip feed you ideas for stories to promote their films?
Your buddy accepted a sales call from some random stranger and got suckered.
To be fair to him, he offered no opinion on whether or not sucking anything proffered by lee would be good or bad, only that he didn't want to. Which kind of makes his point.
Not a hoarder so much
I do regularly clear out old kit so my collection these days only runs to a couple of boxes.
Although in my defence I do seem to cling to exotic items:
1 x Fujitsu Siemens stylistic st5031 tablet pc
1 x mpeg4 daughter board for long obsolete graphics cards.
1 x Commodore 64 with 1541 disk drive and 1501 printer
And my personal favourite
1 x Action Replay Cartridge mkiv for said Commodore 64
Re: Dark fibre?
IMHO we are reaching a sort of saturation point with tech. Most people get by with a tablet these days, whilst they certainly aren't a 640k 8bit machine they are also much much lower spec than a top of the range PC. My point is that the difference between what you could get and what you would actually use is getting wider and wider, I had virgins 40meg product about 4 years ago it was extortionate but I felt that As a heavy user I needed that bandwidth. Then I realised that in actuality I would rarely go over 10 meg in terms of what I actually used so I dropped my service down to that, no noticeable difference in service I merely stopped flattering myself that I needed that much bandwidth and accepted the fact that at 10 meg I could probably receive a file quicker than the source can pump it out.
So by the power of your money they should stop working because they have shipped code to a DVD printers?
You're right, those are naive assumptions.
Re: You can lead a viewer to VoD
Same here except if a film is just starting on a channel that carries ads I hit the record button go for a smoke and come back safe in the knowledge I have enough recorded time banked up that I can skip the adverts.
I wouldn't know what to do with all the spare time.
The taxpayer does of course, a bit like the situation we have now but without leaking dividends for shareholders.
Re: I'm happy with that...
I guess we're all happy with that until the term "too big to fail" rears it's head. I am happy for an infrastructure monopoly, just not one that hoses down shareholders with money whilst claiming that they need state aid to do their business.
Re: It's like...
I can't wait to get my custom nissan leaf with black dials and black switches with little black lights that light up black to let you know that you have done something.
I wonder if a sizeable drop in SSDs will hurt new machine sales. I used to buy a laptop every other year but last time I was due for a replacement instead of shelling out over a grand on a new laptop I spent about £500 on replacing my current laptops drives with an SSD and a hybrid. As a result I now have a 3 year old machine that is as (if not not more) responsive than a lot of modern laptops.
Disclosure: I primarily use VS 2010 for work which is very heavy on disk usage.
Am I the only layman that thinks that the LHC sounds like nothing more than a powerful brownian motion generator?
Expect someone to find hundreds of Higgs Bosons by plugging Atlas into a really hot cup of tea and subsequently being murdered for being a smart arse.
Mines the one with the book in the pocket that has the words Don't Panic written on it in large friendly letters.
Re: Microsoft are the bitches of Hollywood
That could be the case, or.........just maybe it is a correlation with the increasing popularity of laptops over desktops and even tablets over laptops that is leading to a market where an ever larger proportion of machines are sold with no media drive at all.
I mean what percentage of a target market needs to have no need of something before that feature is removed. Especially in the case where that feature costs real money in terms of a license?
Whenever I read anything related to MLF I always end up rembering a quote from one of the pratchet books.
"the problem with stupid rich people is that they give them silly jobs for serious money."
Re: What a strange decision.
It may well be the Hotels fault, but the woman was insured. So it is her insurance companies job to recover damages from the hotel or it's insurer.
I guess dropping something on your foot is potentially not as pyschologically damaging as having something fall on you unexpectedly whilst your mind is presumably in a busy and happy place.
Re: Go arounds
That program confused the living poop out of me. I had been in Australia for 3 months, and was watching it about 6 months after I got back. I started watching it about 15 minutes in with no idea what it was about and was genuinely confused until I noticed that some of the dates for serving politicians were in the future.
Re: what I predict ...
Buy 'n' Large?
I think that the case is not based on the dispute that Java is free or not. It is based on the principle that Google have forked the Java source with no intention of returning their changes as a contribution to the ongoing Java effort. Effectively creating two Javas, Sun's and Googles.
Iirc the license allows for the forking of the code for personal use but not for ongoing commercial distribution as competing platform.
Effectively, oracles Own IP is being used as the basis for a competing product which oracle are saying is against the terms of the license under which the source code is made available.
Did you stray here from the BBC comments section?
1) So far as I can tell, the only person guilty in the Wikileaks saga was the person that leaked the information. IIRC, Wikileaks didn't pay for the information so technically have no charges to answer.
2) Yes - though if I were on the Jury there I vote not guilty.
4) Not as such, but the leak should be.
5) Depends on how they come about them.
In almost all these cases there is a possible public interest defence, I guess that when you are faced with the moral dilemma of whether to break the law or not you should ask yourself very carefully, is this really an act that is being taken in the public interest. Or is it just something sensational that the public's insatiable appetite for the salacious would be interested in.
I fear that the Murdoch's empire for tat is more weighted towards the latter.
Considering some of the things that haven't been reported in the Tabloids that really are in the public interest I find myself not giving them the benefit of the doubt.
IMHO the only way that the public interest defence could possibly work is to treat it as exactly that. When the journo brings the evidence obtained illegally, bring the prosecution and test the evidence, the story, the outcome and present your arguments for a public interest defence. If the public (as represented by a jury) disagrees then justice will be seen to be done.
Of course, journalists would probably be a bit more cautious when using this form of defence and that is right and proper.
MPs should make this clear and from this point on that is the process.
If you can't see the dummy in the room, it's you.
There was a second highlander movie?