935 posts • joined Sunday 29th July 2007 17:14 GMT
You love Britain so much
yet you can't spell its name or even be bothered to capitalise it properly.
That aside, this is fundamental research where the limiting factor tends to be the researchers not the equipment so if you really want to keep the research in Britain you can't just throw money at it. (How many tunneling electron microscopes can one team use?) And yes this research is going to be exploited by all the world - that's how fundamental research works. If Edison made more money out of electricity than Faraday it wasn't because Faraday was under-appreciated. (It was probably because Edison was a thieving bastard.)
Just what we want you to think
Regards - the Rutan Host.
just fit them with peril-sensitive filters.
different court, different country. Both sensible judgments, though.
That puzzled me too
(And supernovae may be quick but they belong in a funeral home. The process of recycling their material into new stars takes a little bit longer.)
Easy, it ends in
I agree about the corn
I don't advocate the use of food crops for biofuel. But that's for economic/politcal reasons.(Sugarcane is exception - it's high yield and if you're living on sugar you're doing it wrong.) A ratio of 1.5 for energy in to energy out may look bad (and is bad compared to 8 for sugarcane) but apart from pollution/land use concerns it really doesn't matter since you're producing energy. You might as well complain that you're "only" getting 50% return on you're investments!
But again, I'm not advocating the use of food crops for biofuels. I am advocating serious research into non-food sources such as switchgrass and algae. If they can be made to give the yield of sugarcane without it's environmental impact (cane farming tends to be fertiliser intensive and produce nasty runoff) we will have a viable alternative to oil.
" The fuel required to transport biomass to a processing plant, covert it to fuel and transport the fuel to an airport is about equal to the fuel created from biomass."
I see this claim again and again. Yet we manage to transport crude oil half-way around the globe for a net energy profit. Is the energy density of biofuels so much less or is this an economic argument in disguise?
Now I can't find precise figures but according to the Wikipedia "oil tanker" article "the average cost of oil transport by tanker amounts to only two or three United States cents per 1 US gallon". (Yes there's a citation for that.) With crude oil at 1$100 per barrel (42 gallons) three US cents buys something like one hundredth of a gallon. That's a ratio of 100 to one even assuming no other costs.
OK, if you transport the raw biomass rather than processing it on site the ratio would decrease significantly but why would you do that? You harvest the material, process (or refine) it and ship it out in a concentrated form.
Sorry, but these efficiency arguments are just a red herring. There is no theoretical constraint. At the moment oil is cheaper because it's cheaper (an economic constraint). But it's not getting cheaper and never will while biofuels certainly will.
I love how
they translate even the names into Latin. Nialus Armstrong FTW.
I applied for that one
All I got was killed in a cheap negative effect.
Turn off the internet - that's crazy talk
The internet is just a black box with a flashing red light on the top. There is no off button.
"I think well known brands tend to pay more for R&D"
the "affectionately" bit.
Put that simply
the idea is tautologous nonsense. But, of course, you've put it too simply. Put simply, but not too simply, the idea is something like: "the survival of organisms with inheritable traits that allow individuals to survive long enough to have sufficient offspring to ensure those traits survive. That may be beyond your ability to understand but it isn't nonsense.
Now, can we get back to talking about how crap Facebook is.
Okay, there's some damn fine religious music but from my brief exposure it's not to found on Song of Praise.
Lesbians lesbians lesbians
lesbians I lesbians
don't lesbians lesbians
lesbians think lesbians lesbians my lesbians
version lesbians lesbians lesbians is lesbians lesbians lesbians
lesbians lesbians lesbians working lesbians lesbians lesbians lesbians lesbians lesbians
lesbians lesbians lesbians lesbians lesbians lesbians at lesbians lesbians lesbians
all lesbians lesbians lesbians lesbians lesbians lesbians lesbians lesbians lesbians lesbians
Since 100km is pretty generally regarded as the edge of space I doubt the accuracy of the statement about the fuel burning up in "the dense atmosphere of the Earth at an altitude of approximately 100km".
Oh God, you made me remember
the flying shark.
I'm not a Bill Hicks wannabee
I'm a Douglas Adams wannabee.
And anyway I wouldn't have existed if not for Hitler but that doesn't stop me being 21236468th on the list of people who get to have a crack at killing him should time travel ever be invented..
If Einstein where around today he'd have a dozen sets of black t-shirt and jeans.
Boffin chair blasting
Great fun for the boffin.
Less fun for the Trazabentigarnos whose stay this used to be.
Mine's the one with the collected works of Arthur C. Clarke in the pocket.
for adding some perspective (the first thing that seems to get lost when people talk about Wikipedia).
Yin and yang
It's to preserve the balance of the universe - God Particle, Devil typeface.
This reply is a figment of your imagination
brought to you by a Pre running WebOS 2 . (Thanks to a 'community'.)
The "museum or educational centre"
should contain a permanent display of a lead balloon.
supply and demand. If the supply's there and demand is low prices go down thus pushing up demand. That's not happening here.
What does BAE know about
about oak and hemp?
Don't be so hard on him
I think he just had a bad experience with Deepak Chopra.
are a joke. Capacitive touchscreens are inherently inaccurate and no stylus can change that.
- On the matter of shooting down Amazon delivery drones with shotguns
- Review Bring Your Own Disks: The Synology DS214 network storage box
- OHM MY GOD! Move over graphene, here comes '100% PERFECT' stanene
- IT MELTDOWN ruins Cyber Monday for RBS, Natwest customers
- Google's new cloud CRUSHES Amazon in RAM battle