"arbitrary code execution in backend”
I think I saw that in a video once.
2739 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Jul 2007
1. The energy doesn't run out it just gets spread progressively thinner (at least for light in a vacuum and gravity waves that's were your model falls short).
2. The same analogy applies to light and yet we manage to see distant galaxies.
3. It helps to have a very energetic source and a very sensitive detector.
We hear these stories again and again because in any regulated system a culture develops of doing the the absolute minimum needed to comply with the regulations. No that might be acceptable in the exciting field of, say, stationery (sorry, David Brent) but when it comes to my money I want a proactive regulator that's prepared to continually enforce good and just not just "good enough" (which never is) practices. Of course in the current cultural/political climate I'm dreaming.
Thanks I was trying to find that to cite as a reply to all those blaming Bin Laden for not been allowed in the cockpit anyone. Short summary for those who don't know the story: Captain allows son and daughter to sit in the pilots' seats. Son somehow manages to disable the autopilot. Everybody* dies. One of the more truly horrific aviation stories.
*73 people according to the supposedly unreliable Wikipedia.
The much touted benefits of putting home appliances on the internet are really just edge cases or illusory. Turn the heating cooling on before I get home? Maybe if you work irregular hours and are desperate to save electricity and your memory's good enough. The rest of us will just a timer. Let my fridge reorder for me. Show me a working system that's not a pain to use. Let my washing machine reorder detergent at exorbitant prices. Not bloody likely. Of course maybe that's just me being a control freak but I remain unconvinced that consumer IoT systems make life easier for the user. In which case they stay in their little niche.
the Shuttle was huge. All that mass hoisted to orbit just to bring back seven astronauts. (The contents of the cargo bay were almost invariably on a one way trip.) That was the tragedy of the Space Shuttle system - wonderful tech made horribly inefficient because the USAF thought they might like to snatch satellites from orbit.. Much better to provide a low-g landing system for just the cargo that needs it and dump the rest of the mass.
The parallel with cars doesn't hold up. A self driving car needs to be 100% autonomous. There's simply no time for a driver to take over when another vehicle does something random and unexpected 10 metres ahead. Not that it would do much good - absent Lewis Hamilton at the wheel a human's not going to do better than a computer. Now, the same applies in the air. If the system haWhere a pilot has an advantage is in those situations (Gimli glider etc) where they can draw on experience to pull something original out of the hat. But those situations are by definition rare. And it conceivable that the same thing could be done remotely. Indeed in the Qantas engine fire incident it was the pilot plus a large team on the ground that was responsible for the successful outcome. (Someone above mentioned airlines not wanting to pay for bandwidth which may be true for day to day operations but in an emergency different rules apply.)
It might be a lot easier to get to space if the rocket could stop to buffer every few seconds.
In reality space is an unforgiving mistress and people don't like to die, which is perhaps why the heroes of space today are robots.( Seriously who here ever expected to live in a world where the surface of Pluto is as familiar as the white cliffs of Dover or the Grand Canyon.)
" they have been described as fit, wearing good clothes and many using gadgets like iPhones and other expesive gear."
Reminds me of the old story about the famous Jewish violist who was asked why there were no famous Jewish pianists and replied "because it's hard to flee with a piano". You're no less a refugee just because you flee with a Stradivarius.
Thing is the FTL shuttle is so slow and wormholes always make me queasy. So I got hold of this tardis. (Don't ask me how but the vendor was a very nice young lady.) Trouble is every time I throw the bloody lever I end up in some random part of London. Now the thing's stuck in King's Cross. Oh well, I suppose it's Skegness then.
The usual answer works well enough for politician (they have to be seen to do some good). For a music rep (or anyone in promotions/PR etc) I think the answer would have something to with the presence of a discernible pulse.
Just I don't need to know what a gerund or a phoneme is to be literate I don't need to know what a cpu or a function is to be digitally literate. It's just a matter of the users knowing how to use the (high-level) tools. Sometime we techies just have to accept that it's not about us.