Since the phone knows your location....
Why doesn't it remember the location of networks and only try and connect when it is in the correct area?
All it would then leak is whether you have been there before.
1239 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Jul 2007
Noscripts also stops plugins, so using this should provide a good level of protection.
Security risks will usually come from java apps running slyly in the background, rather than (reputable) apps you actually want to use.
Limiting its execution to where you know you want it used is a sensible precaution.
But that was an improved interface. (Seemed a lot like RISC OS, but with some of the best bits missing).
It was also appropriate for the systems it was shipped with.
And it was relatively easy to use to old way of doing things. (Which is pretty much what Windows 8 is like when you remove the metro stuff).
I expect Windows 8 to work well with a tablet instead of a keyboard, with a regular screen. However on a regular desktop, it sucks, badly. Why they didn't simply have an off switch for the touch stuff, I really don't understand. Without it, it is quite a lean fast system, exactly what many Windows critics have been crying out for.
> maybe you should try using a Windows 8.1 tablet before you comment at such length!
Why? I made no criticism of the use of W8.x as a tablet. My comment was that my expectation was for it to work well for the reviewed device.
My criticism was the use of this chimera on the desktop. Please could you point out where your second (full) paragraph is at odds with my post? At least the implication is that it is a counter argument, whereas I find it totally consistent.
I haven't actually seen 8.1 yet. There was one machine that someone upgraded at work, but it caused so many problems it was quickly reverted back. But given the lip service they paid to the Start Button. They literally put it back, but not the menu which was what people actually missed, I will take nothing on trust. Is it on a par with de-Metroed Win 8?
(By the same token, I didn't actually accept that out of the box Windows 8 was as bad as everyone said, until I tried it.)
Is there a trial version available, like there was for 7 (I liked that, but not enough to pay what they wanted to avoid reverting to XP, it after it expired) and 8?
The really stupid thing is that Windows 8 after removing metro, is probably about the best version of Windows I have tried. (I wish had had the information to do that when the £30 upgrade was still around).
Using out of the box Windows 8 in a few configurations.
Single screen desktop/laptop config.
Jarring and cumbersome. (Certainly justifies this quote from the BBC website: "Windows 8 is as charming to use as a second-hand toothbrush" ) The jumping from a windowed environment, to a full screen app reminds me of Windows 3 or GEM switching to and from DOS applications (though in that case it was a step forward, not back). The screen being touch enabled doesn't really help, it is slower to move your hand from the keyboard, and I'm sure long term use like this would result in RSI. Not a system I would want to live with.
Dual screen desktop.
Much less jarring, since jumping to full screen only obscures one screen. A big enough improvement to remove the desire to throw the machine against the wall. Still not as good as a single screen machine with all the touch stuff removed though. Could live with though.
I have never used a W8 tablet, but I have no reason to believe it is any worse or better than the established mobile platforms.
However, the behavior does make me believe that the original plan was (as suggested in a reg. comment a while ago) to have a tablet that runs mobile apps as a tablet, and sits in the place of a keyboard for desktop use. (My theory is that whoever though this up, forgot to tell anyone else, and left).
The flaw in the design is that the thing would be horrible to use for desktop apps without the desktop screen. (Easily solved if they logically split the screen, which ought to be do-able in the driver.)
Seem a strange niche to bet the company on. Unless they they were hoping to copy the success of the iPad. (However, that product wasn't being sold at the expense of a huge existing product, it was not a risk for early adopters, because it had a decent ecosystem already, and was probably a success, in part because it allowed people to do 80 or 90% of what they used a computer for without all the bother of a computer, meaning the bother of windows in most non techies' heads .)
Probably far closer to the truth.
As has been pointed out, the idea is good, the implementation isn't.
Were I to make the rules, I would combine NI and income tax. Tax allowance would be scrapped, and something similar to the basic income scheme would replace it, and most benefits and state pension.
The amount would be based on the number of years paying into the tax system. (years in secondary school would count too). 5 years needed for the minimum amount, after 10 years it raises to standard amount, and after 50 it raises to a pension rate. For disabled and sick people this rate would be adjusted upwards, to reflect extra expenses and reduced earning capability.
The amount would not be enough for most able bodied people to live comfortably on, and so job centres would provide guaranteed paid casual work and training.
Obviously there would still need to be some benefits, for those who don't fit into the above system, and during the transition.
(This is a slightly bluer version of the Green Party's basic income scheme.)
> nowadays there isn't really anything but high-end.
I don't know what facilities they have in Russia, but even if they have few, and are blocked from importing the facilities, due to the Ukraine situation, I'm sure they have enough resources to produce something considerably more powerful than the strongarm relatively quickly, which with a decent OS would allow them to replace a fair chunk of their x86 kit. The high end stuff would follow later.
It is a bit odd that they haven't already mandated a home grown Linux or BSD to replace Windows, though. If they did that right, then changing architecture after would be a lot more simple.
It is worth pointing out the Arm chips were designed not to need high end chip making facilities.
When the design was produced by a company with high end facilities, the Strong Arm was produced, which when dropped into a Risc PC for a while gave one of the most powerful workstations available. (Despite the bottlenecks caused by the internal buses being designed for a machine 10% as fast).
Intel soon caught up and then acquired the strong arm and let it stagnate for a few years, while their own designs overtook it.
It is also worth pointing out that the Russians have a lot of money.
Don't forget, a Raspberry Pi with an efficient operating system would be enough to replace the majority of PCs.
And unlike us, the Russians appear to believe it is a good idea to educate their people, so I doubt they would have a serious problem.
If Putin thinks it is a good idea, then it is highly likely to happen.
It has some very annoying omissions compared to the 9700 it replaced. Had I known about them beforehand, it may have lost BB a sale. (Because I wouldn't have know how good the rest of the system was.)
However it has some really nice features, too. Music sounds excellent, for example.
However, I don't think it will win over BB7 users that well because it doesn't use the same BB infrastructure, so if you are a corporate, you have to upgrade it and it doesn't run the same apps.
They should make all new high end phones dual boot.
Since a few days after Android support arrived.
Just a case of a search, download, allow it and it works.
Of course it does mean that there is something subject to the Patriot act on the phone. (But then simply having Skype or an American mail service or chat installed would do the NSA almost as well).
It would be nice for it to be official, and presumably Amazon would be allowed as a second trusted source, without opening up the phone completely.
It would be even nicer if Amazon had a service to auto convert apps to BlackBerry format, so they would work on the Playbook, but that's probably far too much to hope for.
> having to wipe the phone if you change the SIM.
I have swapped mine around a few times. Never had this issue. (BB 4, 5, 6 and 10). I know some phones offer this as an optional security feature. (I haven't *noticed* it in the BB options, though.)
> the SIM being linked to Blackberry rather than your telco so data capacity paid for can't simply be transferred to another phone.
Do you mean the requirement for BlackBerry services rather than standard internet? That is just a service the telco provides. True, it can't be used by a normal phone, but it also can't be used by a BB10 device, which needs standard internet. It used to be an advantage for domestic use, because it was cheaper, now there is no difference (t-mobile in the UK) There was a disadvantage in that the phone became almost useless on wifi abroad, (which sent me back to Nokia, reversed later by Microsoft.)
> I dislike the (to me unnecessary) corporate level security stuff which just hampers normal use
I'm totally at a loss to understand this, unless your phone is a company one.
All they need to do is make the high end devices either dual boot, or easy to swap system. Perhaps the OS on an extra microSD, (it would be nice if there was a software interface on board, similar to how a BIOS worked in DOS, etc.)
They could sell the device with a full android ROM (as in paying Royalties to MS, Google etc.) and a free Tizen ROM. Cheaper devices could come with a Tizen ROM and perhaps an Android lite ROM (without the bits that cost).
If Tizen is any good, it would catch on, if not, it wouldn't.
I think what everyone else hates are the things you refer to as niggles.
The thing I absolutely detested about it, was the jumping to full screen design. I didn't like that behavior in the 90s. It is like using a DOS program under GEM. (Which was a step forward, when it was current).
All the swipey stuff is annoying too, (on anything with separate screen).
I gave the demo a try (with a view to buying it, was it £30?) but it was so bad, I didn't bother.
Had I known that there are simple procedures to remove all the garbage, I probably would have gone for it.
But I'm certainly not paying the price they want for it now. When I need a PC compatible at home, I'm sticking to Mint, and I have a chuck out Vista machine for the occasions windows is needed. (It doesn't seem so bad after Windows 8 ).
The loss of the start menu doesn't bother that much, although the panel they replaced it with is awful. (though the hybrid thing I have seen pictures of looks ok). It is just like going back to windows 3.11 (however it may not be so nice for those not familiar with the command line and shortcuts).
Had they allowed the metro apps to run as desktop widgets or programs in normal windows, made the start menu an option instead of the panel, and chosen different defaults for tablet to laptops and workstations, then the story would have been very different, I think. (It may have helped if they had made the same metro app work across all the systems, rather than needing 5 different versions.)
Doesn't feel horrible and the tabs now match thunderbird. (Snow Leopard) Also feels a bit less glitchy on nasty pages.
But isn't the whole point of windows modern UI to look horrendous? (Or are you still using 'dated and cheesy'?)
I seem to recall that at least one of the major competitors to MS Office was 16 bit.
(Was it Lotus or WPOffice or both?)
16 bit programs generally turned Windows 95 from a nice OS to a hideous pile of cack. (Office 4.3 didn't seem to for some strange reason.) And the program I'm thinking of was no exception.
DOS programs however, generally worked really well under 95. WP 5.1 generally was great on it.
While Android would almost certainly have been a much smaller disaster than Windows Phone, I really don't believe it would have been better than giving the Symbian and Meego teams a boot up the arse to get their act together. (If that was actually seriously needed at that point, as many commentators claim).
The difference between Belle and the older Symbian versions on the E72 for example was huge, the hardware in the phones was great, if they were to have carried on cleaning it up at a similar pace, Symbian Donna(?) phones would have matched any other phones. (The N8 with Belle is a great phone, but with a few horrid gotchas.)
That could refer to the ongoing strategy of dropping operating systems and replacing them with ones incompatible with both hardware and software. Which is why I will never spend more than a throw-away amount of money on a Nokia phone ever again.
(How many is it so far, 4 operating systems killed?)
It will be even better when the remaining important features finally make it over from BB7.
(Cyrillic phonetic keyboard layout for example, no good being able to switch to Russian, if you have no idea where the letters are.)
I really like the system, but it really annoys me, the things that it can't do that even BB OS 4 could.
(Like timed power on/off, and delete original message, in replies.)
It is a really good media player, and web browsing is pretty good. The Q5 was certainly worth the £185 I paid for it unlocked new from Amazon, and I'm very glad I couldn't bring myself to buy an Android.
It really would make sense if BB could replace all the high end BB7 phones with dual boot BB10/BB7 devices.
Since then my total use probably adds up to about the same as a couple of typical days before this braindead move.
I noticed jabber stopped working for me on FB a few days ago, I had assumed it was because I'd disallowed app integration on websites, (a bit odd I thought), but perhaps they just turned it off.
I think my facebook use has been halved.
I expect that the portfolio contains a couple of rock solid patents that would be tricky to work around, a few more that are solid but easy to work around if needed, and several hundred weak patents that wouldn't stand up to any serious scrutiny.
No-one is going to make a fuss about the weak ones when they are in a bundle with the strong ones, that is sold for a reasonable price and to anyone.
What dropping support actually means is that Patch Tuesday (13th?) May 2014, will not support XP, so until that date, (unless there is a hideously bad vulnerability discovered) there is no difference from before.
This is an extra month to play with, (providing you are willing to take the small risk of serious vulnerability.)
My expectation is that when MS don't backtrack, then they will roll it out over the next few months, but they are hoping for a U turn, so they don't have to.
Yes. That is the main thing I dislike about the Q5. Other than that it is a great phone.
Where OS 4 - 6 (never tried 7) are better.
1. Far better autocorrect.
2. Phonetic Russian keyboard.
These two are very strange omissions, because surely they are simply data structures that could be re-used from the old OS.
3. Plain text setting for email accounts.
4. Delete quoted text from reply to email.
5. Timed on/off.
6. Alarm works if phone is off
7. Volume control acts as a cursor (OS 4) or there is a proper cursor.
I have just got a bluetooth adapter for my hifi (digital out, to high end kit) and I am really pleasantly surprised by the quality. I was expecting it to merely be a convenience, however I am now seeing it as a serious source. (flacs playing on a Q5, maybe the qnx core is really makes it low jitter)
Because it was close enough to being a monopoly to make little difference.
Because the replacement was so poor and so incompatible (you couldn't install a vista machine on an AD with lots of policies and expect it to work properly without a lot of changes) that users avoided it.
The replacement for Vista, although a good version of windows, still had the same issues with migration.
And the replacement for that, although probably the soundest core ever for windows, had a UI that was a showstopper.
My opinion is that whenever they fix a bug that dates back to XP, they should fix it for XP too.
If it has a bug then they have sold a faulty product, and should fix it. If they fix it for other versions of windows, then they are pointing out a hole for malware authors to use. This is very close close to blackmail. (Of course many domestic users will just say sod Microsoft and buy an iPad or Nexus)
Have I missed something?
My Q5 loads android apps quite happily, (and some of then even work properly), I've never sideloaded and app like snap.
I just downloaded the amazon store app with the browser and everything was fine.
The android stuff is a bit glitchy and clunky compared to the native stuff, but not unusably so.
I needed a phone below £200 unlocked. (I was given about £160 insurance payout).
Nokia - no chance, ever, I loved my N8 (apart from text input, hence my having a BB too.) To abandon such a good phone before it was properly finished. Grrr. (Didn't even need WP to put me off, which would do the job too.)
I needed either a keyboard, or a huge screen.
All the likely candidates were too expensive, but the Asus Fonepad was in budget, so I seriously considered it (the processor was what put me off), but then I found a Q5 for £185 unlocked on Amazon, so I took a gamble.
I am happy with the phone, it looks great (best looking BB yet, much nicer than the Q10) a decent keyboard, no BIS, (used to be of benefit due to the price, but now with standard access as cheap, the limitations are a show stopper). Works well with Bria for VOIP (and Skype too). Nice media replay facilities (flac for example). I have just installed Amazon App store, which works. (not as smooth as the Native system, but not annoyingly sluggish). It even has a torch function built in to the UI.
There are a few niggles. cursor keys would be nice. The email editor is not as good as on BB6, nor is the keyboard layout support. Hopefully these will be fixed in future versions.
My suggestion would be to try and find a cheap BB10 device (Q10s look a bargain, for those who don't mind lack of keyboards), and give it a try.
(And I got a second hand playbook for £50, which works well with it, had they bothered to put BB10 on them, I think they would have been worth closer to the price they tried to sell them for.).
But surely when you are running fully windows programs, unless you have a keyboard and mouse, they will be horrible to use. (Having tried citrix on a playbook).
(Or possibly a big screen plugged into it, and use the tablet in place of the keyboard).
As a tablet it will be a second rate device. (Bigger heavier, possibly poorer battery life. And as yet a poorer selection of apps.)
I can't see it being a better option than an android/ipad/playbook and keeping the old laptop or desktop for occasional legacy windows program.
I don't think that anyone disagrees that Windows 8 with the metro UI garbage removed and start menu re-instated is a good system.
The problem is that corporates cannot rely on a bit of freeware that might stop working with an update. It needs to be like that with no additional software.
It isn't.
So windows 7 gets rolled out, despite being inferior.