Do you think this will be covered on the BBC?
2850 posts • joined 16 Jul 2007
Do you think this will be covered on the BBC?
Aliens will just think we have a twin moon, natch ;o)
But I'd put a fiver on a deep-space quantum-entangled probe relaying data almost instantaneously.
Who the fuck ever thought they'd hear a phrase like that spoken seriously in their lifetime, too?
Don't let the facts stop you foaming at the mouth for some free publicity
Given the price tablet makers bend customers over for on flash memory I'd think he had a reasonable expectation for 80% of that storage to be usable at least. Losing half of it does seem unduly excessive.
Nobody 'gave' him 32GB memory though, did they. He paid for it in the price of the device.
I think even you would be pissed off if you paid for a 1TiB hard disk and found you could only use 512GiB of it.
You confused, innumerate prick.
If it's his IP it's his right to do wtf he fancies with it, surely?
But not anyone else's right.
After all when you have to pay for a Gold account to access your already-paid-for SKY/Lovefilm/Netflix/etc accounts how is it going to be any other way.
The XBOX actually got turned on over the weekend after about a year... because Halo4 isn't available on PS3
When they have the R35 ??
Can Sammy now put that on stuff? Can imagine a certain irked fruitmonger if they could
'Buddy Jesus' perhaps as in 'That's karma for ya' ?
For stuff like MAFIAA activities, censorship, etc...
Perhaps the old Monopoly face-behind-bars jail image or a taped-over mouth, etc
For, well, when various states/organisations are riding into people's metaphorical towns shootin' their sixguns in the air...
My first thought.
Greenwashing your information for you.
UK business owners are writing to Ed Quilty to seek guarantees of indemnification against any actions brought against them should this make its way into law.
If not, perhaps they should be.
That's Karma for ya.
Unsubstantiated but someone in the office today was saying apple had been told to fork out for sammy's legal costs in the appleogy-gate proceeding because of their overly childish approach to it all...
Anyone else heard this?
Which cannot now be trusted to be 'impartial', presumably.
Agreed. Remember though, a clip round the ear is assault and that'll get you thrown in chokey.
Which is why we have Chavs...
Perhaps if the kid were a soldier it'd be OK...
Just like it's OK for Omid Djalili to make jokes about Iranians but not for me.
Hopefully his lawyer will tell him to claim it was an act of protest against war and the CPS will have to sod off and find some real criminals to prosecute.
Or just as likely, Apple realised they'd have to pay something to HTC for something HTC owned which was being used without permission so decided to settle instead of lose publicly in court.
Is because the climate change Chihuahua's would be shown to be correct.
Which would make people who use phrases like 'Climate Change Debier Attack Dogs' seems a bit, well, like Apple fanbois or Creationists.
Oh, and it'd embarrass the Government immensely which is more likely the reason for the judgement.
It's also about time a distinction was drawn between Climate-sceptics and Anthro-sceptics. The former being folk who deny the bleeding obvious and the latter being folk rightly suspicious of the lobbying from a darn lucrative industry.
But there's still room in their wallets and time for skiing trips or Mohitos in Tuscany
Since the Roman Empire, at least... Caesar crypts (perhaps wrong name) would be like a substitution cipher for which you'd need the original scrambled alphabet 'key' just to transpose letters to recreate the original message.
And called it 'distressed'
Profit, presumably. They don't give a stuff what you do with them after they have your money.
But.. She looks like Pete Burns....
'Made in the UK'
A tax break based upon the amount of product creation you do in the UK. If, say, a product is 75% created in the UK then allow a tax break or other incentive.
Helps ensure a certain amount of work stays within the country which at least means jobs and PAYE stay within the country to some extent, too.
No, I haven't thought about this for longer than five minutes but it would seem to have merit on the surface. (This is where someone points out this already exists and doesn't work)
When a Starbucks closes down it might get replaced by a coffee shop... bonus!
It's legalised piss-taking, essentially.
I recognise that however much it's needed, change is not going to come as the ones who can effect change are the main beneficiaries of the status quo.
Hence I do what I can to play the game from the inside using its own rules, instead. Less than ideal but at least gains a little altitude on the greasy pole.
Is widely demo their app running on their dev iDevices and ramp up the desire to a frenzied level giving apple another perfect opportunity to shoot themselves in the foot with a childish response to their customers' desires.
Of triple damages for willful infringement back dated to forever.
Ian Gillan wrote a song about htat...
Mutually Assured Destruction
A Haiku maybe ?
With a Samsung logo, right at the top of the page
To apologise with extreme hubris
The fact that they're offering anything implies they know they're infringing and should pay so surely that itself is evidence of willful infringement in the past - triple damages.
So how many phones might they owe upon that have already been produced, I wonder?
Apple vs World
Then fine them for contempt. LOTS.
Pay Sammy £5m/day during non-compliance and a ban on all products until compliance is achieved and £100M contempt fine.
Boof... site changed in 15 minutes with perfect copy...
But no-one reads my gumpy-old-man comments anyway...
Meanwhile Samsung prepare a comedy-sized quotation per display panel just in case...
Always happy to see someone sticking to the
May I be the first to wish him a fluffy cat, swivelly chair and an oak-panelled map of the world with flashing lights thereon!
The email servers are underwater due to the hurricane?
So, he's stating he's confused by a device he's never laid hands on.
Presumably he's VERY easily confused, then. Or perhaps just confused in general in a sort of senile dribbly way.
God knows WTF he means by 'compromised', perhaps he thinks it's populated internally by David Icke's lizard people or communists or Samsung employees.
What a twat.
Another Patently Pathetic Legal Embuggerance
God bless Terry Pratchett
Because Apple knew they could manipulate the juror selection process in their favour, otherwise if you believed a judge would rule in your favour you'd do that instead.
Seeing as the display manufacturers obviously allow multitouch by design I don't see how any patent can be derived from it. It's even likely the manufacturers ship demo dev code with the units to show customers how to achieve it with their panels.