What? Not a "computer" error?
At least they are honest and did not try to blame it on a "computer" error.
52 posts • joined Saturday 14th July 2007 18:47 GMT
"but didn't the US help free China from Japanese imperialism?"
If by help you mean the US support for the Kuomintang then no. While the Communists were busy fighting the Japs the Kuomingtang were busy trying to exterminate the Communists. It took the kidnapping of the Kuomingtang leader Chiang Kai-shek to force them to agree to fight the Japs. And the Kuomingtang were notorious for being soldiers by day and looters by night.
Actually MS does hold themselves responsible for any manufacturing defects in the installation media which they will guarantee for 180 days (or something). That's good to know when you're reinstalling Windows for the *$#^%! time.
From wikipedia:
"As of 2011, fifty-five women have flown in space, out of 525 total space travellers."
so 2 out of 7 is more equal than the world average so far.
At least they are honest and did not try to blame it on a "computer" error.
Don't forget that the average US consumer could buy lots more with their shrinking incomes than they could 20 years ago all because of the millions of Chinese workers toiling away in the factories.
The heads of more than one of South Korea's chaebols have seen the inside of a jail. But they never seem to serve out their sentences and on release they are promptly reinstated.
"What is it with IT guys behaving like utter luddites and not being able to deal with change?"
I wonder if these luddites are the same group as those who rush to be the first to post a comment on any mobile phone review saying "All I want is a phone that can make and receive calls". Bloody annoying sods should go out and buy a phone already.
"unlike the USA, France, uk etc, China is a nuclear powered dictatorship ..."
Authoritarian maybe but not a dictatorship.
"... with a stated territorial claim on a neighbouring democracy."
Are you saying only "democracies" are allowed to have territorial claims on their neighbours - or anywhere for that matter?
The same democracies like the USA who since WWII have started and have been involved in more wars than the rest of the world put together. They have destablised, overthrown and invaded more countries than the rest of the world put together. Their spending on "defence" is close to half of the global total.
The same democracies like the UK and France who violated the UN resolution 1973 on the "no fly" zone over Libya to pursue their agenda of overthrowing the Libyan government. The same France who helped draft the 1973 resolution and voted for it and subsequently went on to violate it by supplying arms to the rebels and bandits. The same UK who helped draft the 1973 resolution and voted for it and subsequently went on to violate it by supplying "boots on the ground" in the form of "military advisors".
"Were Mr Butler alive today, the only thing he would have to do is widen the definition of «war»to encompass «cyberwar»"
No need since the US recently declared that any "cyber" attack on "critical" infrastructure would be seen as a declaration of war.
Maybe facebook could learn from the Chinese government and implement "real name" registration. Of course "James Stavridis" would have to prove that he is the same "Admiral James Stavridis" who is the "Supreme Allied Commander Europe" by providing facebook with his Nato login credentials.
@Majid: "So the EU threatens companies on a 10 percent revenue tax on rules they make up themselves?"
Not much different from the US making up rules imposing penalties against other countries/non-US companies that do business with people the US deems "evil". It has long abused its dominant economic status to bully other countries. And if economic bullying doesn't do the job quick enough they have no qualms about using their dominant military status to speed things up.
Your wallet would most likely contain stuff other than cash which would be a PITA if it got lost. Granted a modern phone would probably contain a lot of sensitive/private stuff and would also be a PITA (of a different kind) if it got lost. However, I for one, would be more likely to forget my wallet than my phone when I go out.
It's actually a mis-transliteration of 'busy corner' in the local dialect. The real transliteration is "Wong Kok" - actually "Wong Gok" would be more accurate - anyway, legend has it the that person responsible for putting up the sign with the road name hung the W upside down hence Mong Kok. In a similar vein there's a road in Hong Kong called "Rednaxela Terrace", which again legend has it that the person responsible for putting up the sign inadvertently reversed the order of the letters.
The chances are that "A LOT..." to mere mortals is petty cash to Google, and soon they will come to realise, what Microsoft have known and practiced for decades, that crime does pay.
Instead of asking others to do their dirty work, they should do it themselves - like the Chinese government does.
"Saudi Arabia wants us involved. And Korea wants us involved. And Tiawan wants us involved. And the UAE wants us involved."
I like your choice of countries. Saudi Arabia is a hardly a model of democracy and freedom, when women there have less rights than those of Iran's. Saudi Arabian women aren't allowed to drive or even work and hence are forced to buy their undies from salesMEN. Meanwhile in Iran, a country derided in the western media as a repressive country, women have the right to vote and be voted for. South Korea and Taiwan were run by sometimes brutal military dictatorships (propped by the US of course) until their people had enough and demanded democracy, which they both got, peacefully, thankfully, despite the US influence. UAE is a slightly less repressed version of Saudi Arabia.
But this is besides the point. There is no need for you to justify why the US is involved, it will involve itself when it thinks it has something to gain (or something to lose if it doesn't get involved) regardless of domestic law, international law, morals, ethics, the views of the host country's people or ruling clique, or world opinion.
On their current trajectory, Nokia would most likely be gone before they finish spending that $100m.
Of course they do. Just take a look at the case of Viktor Bout. None of his alleged crimes were committed, or to be carried out, on US soil. But still:
"He was convicted in November 2011 of conspiracy to kill Americans and US officials, delivering anti-aircraft missiles, and aiding a terrorist organisation.
His trial heard that Bout had been told the weapons would be used to kill US pilots working with Colombian officials."
Furthermore the US case rests on the results of a sting and entrapment operation.
Read the first post. An app could crash. Hopefully the server sending the text messages wouldn't. Or if it does, someone would reboot it. In any case this is for dumbphones, not "smartphones" so no installable app.
"Once our platform is installed we know everything that happens on that phone," - no thanks.
The attacks were on their websites not their payment gateways infrastructure.
Despite jokes about the jesus phone etc, the Reg are devout iphone worshippers and will mention it at any opportunity possible.
The competing OS's of yesteryear were basically incompatible with each other so when one OS reached a critical mass it will dominate because everybody wants to be "compatible".
The OS in today's mobiles provides:
a) the ability to call and talk with other phones and send/receive SMS
b) the ability to go online and do your email/surfing/etc
No matter what OS your phone has you can still call and talk to other phones.
No matter what OS your phone has you can still do internetty stuff.
Because of this interoperability (real one not MS's version) the likelyhood of any one OS completely dominating the market is slim.
"With the cost of SSL certs cheap, no website should unencrypted."
Certs may be cheap, but using SSL increases CPU used and leads to global warming.
"I've also stopped visiting sites that don't have a signed certificate."
That means you only visit your own site? since 99.99999999% of the web doesn't use SSL.
@Anonymous Coward
Using Yahoo as an alternative to Google is flawed:
Yahoo's search does not give clear links in its results, you have to go through their de-URL-fier and get them to redirect you to the link you want.
Yahoo's webmail sucks compared to gmail, plus they don't have pop/imap access on /all/ accounts.
Didn't MS used to (or still?) have a "FRAND" policy whereby they charge PC manufacturers for a copy of the OS whether or not a machine shipped with an OS?
Read the actual complaint (conveniently linked to in the article) before commenting. The complainant "is a Washington, DC based Graduate Fellow at the Center for Applied Cybersecurity Research at Indiana University, and a Ph.D. Candidate in the School of Informatics and Computing at Indiana University." and he does mention how to get the major browsers to stop sending the http referrer info (in this case "major browsers" does NOT include IE and Safari).
More interesting is:
"For more than ten years, Google has tracked the links that users click on from the search results page. During the search engine’s first few years, this was done by redirecting all clicks from the search engine results page through a script on Google’s servers, before then redirecting the users’ browser to the server hosting the content they actually wished to view."
That's something that's news to me. I stopped using Yahoo way back when they started obscuring the search results making you click on yahoo links which then redirect you to the target website. Anyway before I started using Firefox and the refcontrol addon I had always copy+paste the cleartext links that Google provide in their results - which is a good thing if the above claim is true.
"It makes one wonder why why HTC is even bothering to make a Win 7 handset"
Probably because they get paid by MS per unit they make?
"I don't think that smartphone OS's have the same sort of "lock in" that desktop OS's have, so Microsoft still has a large window :) of opportunity left."
It is precisely this lack of lock in that prevented MS from fully leveraging their Windows monopoly. MS can never be competitive in a free and open market.
"I'm surprise you managed to catch even one of them, shows they have more spine than western politicians if they went anywhere near the actual 'theater of war'. Did you ever see Bush or Blair do so?"
Bush and Blair had to make sneaky, unannounced,fugitive visits to Iraq. Meanwhile when Iranian President Ahmadinejad visited, he was given the full "head of state" red carpet treatment and had a motorcade trundle through Baghdad. The irony.
Where is the CTRL-ALT-DEL button?
They don't need to "talk" to their customers. They just need to monitor and take on board on the comments and address all the complaints on their forums. Instead, whenever you post something that has the slightest hint of expressing discontent with Nokia or their phones, the effing moderators jump in to censor your post and slap on their standard warning "This board is monitored by Nokia but the best way to give feedback to us is to contact your local Nokia support..."
> Windows Mobile was a kick arse mobile OS in its day
It sure made me want to kick its arse. If it didn't crash once a day it would crash several times a day.
Seeing as Nokia owns nearly half of Symbian and presumably gets a corresponding share of the profits wouldn't that make it something more like 16 years?
"Methinks the crocodile has lost its teeth"
They still have enough ill-gotten money in the bank to be a destructive force - the ramming of OXML into ISO, the derailing of the OLPC.
MS has won a major victory here. Whether or not OLPC goes on to selling any units from now on is moot. They have managed to decapitate OPLC by forcing the top people to resign and destroyed any credibility that Negroponte may have had. And most importantly they have prevented millions of people from getting acquainted with computers using something other than Windows. If the OPLC does still manages to be a success then MS would have indoctrinated a whole new generation who grows up believing the 3 Rs (restart, reboot, reinstall) are the holy tenets of computing.
"Even Firefox, that has its annoying "download all to Desktop" 'feature' by default, "
Probably to make life easier for dumb lusers, or the people who have to provide support to them.
I provide tech support over the phone to family & friends and often I have to tell to download this and install that. Before they download I specifically tell them to remember WHERE they are saving the file - 9 times out of 10 right after the download they say they can't find the flipping file.
"Just because their gear is cheap and appears capable does not mean it is in our interest to use it. I want to make the argument that strategic equipment (CPU, RAM, display, networking, software) must come from sources we (democratic countries) trust."
You must be living in cloud cuckoo land if you think democratic countries have an agreement not to spy on each other and not to use underhand tactics on each other.
"Joking aside, the single most important organisation in the capitalist world is headquarted in Belgium. It is a place so prestigous that it's employees are banned from ever using the word 'prestige' in internal documentation. That is not NATO, it is SWIFT. It is much more secure than NATO. When you hear of hacking attacks on Belgium, don't think military, think financial. Or beer."
Or they just do what the US did/does, blackmail SWIFT and other corporations to give them whatever info they want:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorist_Finance_Tracking_Program
they get bonuses for having not sold a product that isn't available yet?
"Almost any body hu is anybody in China uses Yahoo. "
It may have been true 5-8 years ago. These days people and companies use homegrown sites like 163.com or sina.com etc.
"Implement an office suite that uses OXML correctly. Wouldn't it be hysterically funny if the first OXML-compliant application was FOSS?"
It won't be funny at all. Not it is possible.
But assuming it was, they'll respond by saying "see it is possible to do 3rd party implementations" and promptly starts charging patents licensing fees.
Then after they get their own implementation out they'll extend it making it incompatible with the "standard" (cf. java). The changes they make will of course take years to filter back to ISO (if ever) - of course MS won't be fast tracking the changes.
"Perhaps you could ask each of China's neighbours - they seem to be in dispute with all of them."
Perhaps you're talking from your rear-end? China has no significant disputes with any of its neighbours.
"China has invaded India (1962), Tibet (1949), Vietnam (1979), East Turkestan (1949), and then of course there's Korea."
Tibet and Xinjiang are both within China's internationally recognised borders. It's funny how China "invaded" India when China had spent years building a road in the disputed area and the first that the Indians knew of it was when they saw the newly built road marked on Chinese published maps.
I'm surprised you have the audacity to mention Korea. The US invaded Korea, China repeatedly warned the US not to cross the 38th parallel, the US with their customary arrogance dismissed those warnings and the rest is history. If you feel there's no justification for China's intervention in the Korean War then try justifying the so called Monroe Doctrine.
You just got a dud one. FWIW my eeepc can consistently pick up more APs than my Thinkpad Z61. At home the eeepc on average sees about 20 APs whereas the Thinkpad only manages around 10.
It makes me sneer to hear people mention Windows' useability (lack of). Features that I take for granted such as auto-focus (on the window under the mouse) and multiple virtual desktops, and which I have been enjoying since my Amiga days, are still missing from Windows. Major time saving conveniences such as having your session saved when you log off and having it restored it when you next log in (which even the old OS/2 had) are obviously non-existent in Windows - it is all the more strange considering that a Windows user would benefit from that feature much more so than a Linux user, since the former would encounter BSODs (or whatever MS disguises it as these days) so many times a day.
Little things like text highlighted with the mouse being automatically copied to the clipboard (and can be pasted using the middle mouse button) are major time savers - and I don't need to worry about accidentally overwriting the clipboard because klipper allows me to keep a clipboard history.
"That's the front thickness - HP didn't say how much bigger the 2133 gets at the back"
WTF would one want to know the thickness of the thinnest edge? I want to know the thickness of the thickest edge TYVM. Bloody tw@ts.
"In that case, all you need to do is take one shot, and immediately duck behind a wall. By the time the gun has slewed to your position, you're not visible anymore!"
No, in that case the jerks will fall back to SOP and call in airstrike(s) to level the wall/building that you're hiding behind/in, and maybe the surrounding ones too for good measure.
"where is the US / UK government?"
Too busy having fun with Echelon.
"I expect they've simply removed the restore partition that takes up quite a bit of the flash on the 4GB version (it's not really needed anyway, as you can restore the OS from a USB key or external DVD drive anyway)."
It does not have a separate restore partition. The base system which doubles up as the restore partition is mounted read-only, and is merged with the partition holding the user generated files using the magic of UnionFS. Why is it that MS with its self-proclaimed "innovative" prowess haven't come up with something as useful as UnionFS?
@Surely a better solution ..... would be a new international treaty which outlawed robotic weapons altogether?
Why would a country which had the technological edge agree to such a ban? It's only when you have technological parity, when the other guy can hurt you as much as you can hurt them, will there be any moves towards such a ban (whether it be ICBM's, nuclear warheads, space based weapons, or even white phosphorous).
@Just imagine what we could have done if all that money had been spent on clean water and sanitation instead of thinking of new ways to blow people up.
If the hundreds of billions that the US spent in their war of terror had been invested in productive research we could have cures for cancer, aids, malaria, and maybe even the common cold by now. Instead the money has been squandered in nurturing a new generation of disaffected youth in the Middle East and Central Asia who grows up knowing that it was the Americans who killed their brother/sister/father/mother/uncle/dog.
@US Govt do what they like with foreigner's code? Don't theink WTO etc would stand up to that. So that isn't a threat to OSS.
That assumes that the present US Govt gives a toss about the WTO and its rulings.
"Is the fact that China is doing so many, many deals buying up Countries oil production for many decades into the future ... We, the West, need to get much more pro active."
So you're saying that it's bad for China to be *buying* oil and instead they should follow the proper procedures like invade oil-rich countries under the pre-text of WMDs, and when none are found change the mission objectives to (1) making said oil-rich country into a "beacon of democracy"?
@Don't be so dismissive
"I know from a relative who works in the government, and has to deal with this stuff on a daily basis, that China is indeed waging cyber-warfare against us"
And are you too naive to realise that the US is also "waging cyber warfare" against every other country of significance? I don't see other countries making a song and dance about it.
'I find it ironic and funny that these companies that rolled over, er I mean "cooperated" with the Chinese authorities are rewarded with their sites being blocked.'
They had to comply with the laws of the land in which they were doing business in. How is that different from:
1) the US forcing non-US banks to hand over financial details of their customers (who are not even US nationals FFS)
2) the US forcing airlines to hand over passenger details
under the pretense of Bush's War of Terror.
"I guess USPO knows that if third parties were allowed to dispute patents, 99% of us patents would be proved invalid."
The USPTO is self-funded by the application fees. Hence it would be in their interests to grant as many patents as possible. Who cares if they're invalidated later.