I hope they've patented the idea
You wouldn't want anyone to get any ideas now would you?
838 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Jan 2007
It needs some naff plastic trim (slightly wonky), a baked bean tin exhaust, cheap chipped alloys, McDonalds/KFC stained bucket seats, a large plastic "spoiler" and some stickers for surf products in the windows (this only applies to owners who've never seen a surfboard let alone used one).
I loved my HTC Desire for the nine months or so, but in the last 6 months the battery's dying after about 8 hours, the screen's started finding touches that aren't there and it's generally being flakey, all in all not impressed. Mind you it doesn't crash and destroy my data every time I upgrade the OS so it's still better than my iPhone was.
The reason I chose the default Android browser over it was the text shuffling (you know when you resize a page it jiggles the text around so you can still view it all, no idea what it's called), if Dolphin had that (and it may well do now, I've not used it for a while) then I'd go with it.
Would be a far more accurate headline. I'd prefer the article to be more about the fact that the ICO did it's job for once rather than just sitting around watching the world go by ignoring all and sundry whilst they breech the data protection act. Mind you, this case does seem surprisingly simple, maybe it's the only case on their books that they had the mental capacity to bring a successful prosecution for.
is the equivalent of having a Ferrari but using a donkey to pull it from a to b, the 500MB data cap made no difference to me, I can very rarely get anything resembling a decent download speed and I live and work in central London. 5 months and counting until I'm off of their network.
And therefore is obsolete prior to launch? A bit brainless is it not? Especially as Google have been saying not to stick 2.2 on pads because it's designed specifically for phones. I used to like Toshiba as a brand but in the last 10 years they seem to be going a Matsui frankly.
I understand that the reasoning behind the gov costings is thus:
1) Never bring it in house, always use a supplier it's easier to blame them when it goes wrong.
2) Suppliers can never have less more 50% of income per annum from UK.gov.
3) Suppliers total income per year must be more than x million.
Which basically mean that the only people who can work with UK.gov are large companies (Siemens, GE, IBM), who's billing practices are always in the realms of fantasy, I'm surprised a piddling ad agency even got a look in.
Have they ever actually prosecuted anyone? I've dealt with them on 3 separate occasions and let's just say that they're not particularly effective, to the extent that they don't even respond, in fact, I'd have been more than happy for them to be involved in that nice little quango scrappage the Tories pulled the other week. In fact, are the EU still prosecuting us for their utter inaction on Phorm?
I'm more concerned about overfishing, general destruction of the rainforests/seas and mankind's environmental behaviour in general. It's all very well patting yourselves on the back after achieving your 75% recycled target but when all you're doing is shipping your recyclables off to a 3rd world country where they sit in landfill I don't think that constitutes environmental sustainability.